Election 1944: Republican National Convention

top.banner.rep.conv

Monday, June 26
Call to order at 10:15 by Harrison E. Spangler, chairman of the National Committee
Address of welcome by Dwight H. Green, Governor of Illinois
Call for convention by Harold W. Mason of Vermont, secretary of the National Committee
Temporary roll call
Election of temporary officers
Selection of committee on credentials, permanent organization, rules and order of business, and resolutions
Recess until 8:15 p.m.
Sessions will resume at 8:15 p.m., with the call to order by Chairman Spangler
Introduction of temporary chairman, Governor Earl Warren of California
Address of temporary chairman
Miscellaneous business and adjournment until 10:15 a.m., Tuesday

Völkischer Beobachter (June 26, 1944)

Nationale Konvention der Republikaner tagt in Chikago –
Auftakt zur Wahlschlacht in den USA

v. m. Lissabon, 25. Juni –
Am 26. Juni, also morgen Montag, tritt in Chikago die Nationale Konvention der Republikanischen Partei zusammen, um ihren PrĂ€sidentschaftskandidaten aufzustellen. Nach dem Verzicht Wendell Willkies und General MacArthurs auf die Kandidatur stehen der Gouverneur von Neuyork, Dewey, der Gouverneur von Ohio, Bricker, und die beiden Senatoren Taft und Stassen in der engeren Wahl. Über 70 Prozent aller Voraussagen glauben, daß Dewey mit einer großen Mehrheit zum Kandidaten gewĂ€hlt werden wird. Der Daily Express lĂ€ĂŸt sich aus Washington berichten, daß er ĂŒber ein Minimum von 700 WahlmĂ€nnerstimmen verfĂŒgt, wĂ€hrend er 530 nur brauchen wĂŒrde, um zu kandidieren.

Roosevelt hat mit allen Mitteln versucht, die Konvention seiner Parteigegner von vornherein zu beeinflussen, damit sie einen Mann aufstellen, der ihm in keiner Weise gefĂ€hrlich werden kann. In Teheran bestand er auf der Vorverlegung der zweiten Front, obwohl Churchill fĂŒr ihre DurchfĂŒhrung im SpĂ€tsommer plĂ€dierte. Die katholische Zeitung America enthĂŒllt nun, daß Roosevelt immer wieder erklĂ€rte habe, man mĂŒsse die Wahlschlacht an der französischen KanalkĂŒste gewinnen. Die republikanische Parteikonvention mĂŒsse im Zeichen amerikanischer Erfolge in Europa zusammentreten, damit die Kritik an seiner Außenpolitik und seiner KriegfĂŒhrung nicht zum Hauptargument des republikanischen Wahlkampfes werden könne.

Dieser Umstand zeigt die Anstrengungen, die der US-General Bradley vor Cherbourg machen lĂ€ĂŸt, im besonderen Licht und lĂ€ĂŸt auch vermuten, weshalb Roosevelt nach dem wenig ĂŒberzeugenden Anfang der Invasion und dem Erscheinen der deutschen Geheimwaffe auf den Gedanken gekommen ist, den Admiral Nimitz zur grotesken Behauptung von der „vollstĂ€ndigen Vernichtung der japanischen Flotte“ zu veranlassen.

Die LĂŒge hatte allerdings so kurze Beine, daß der PrĂ€sident in seiner letzten Pressekonferenz von ihr abgerĂŒckt ist. Er erklĂ€rte den Journalisten, seine Generalstabschefs bedauerten sehr, daß es nicht gelungen sei, die japanische Flotte entscheidend zu schlagen. Auch die heftigen republikanischen VorwĂŒrfe gegen seine Ibero-Amerika-Politik versuchte Roosevelt rechtzeitig durch die Versöhnung mit der revolutionĂ€ren Regierung Boliviens zu entkrĂ€ften. Die jĂŒdischen Finanzkreise hinter der republikanischen Front beruhigte er dabei auf besondere Weise: er stellte bei den Verhandlungen mit Bolivien die Freilassung des gefangen gehaltenen jĂŒdischen Zinnkönigs Moritz Rothschild zur Bedingung und setzte sie durch.

Die Republikaner haben ihrerseits auch alles in Bewegung gesetzt, um die Konvention ihrer Partei zu einer gewaltigen Anti-Roosevelt-Kundgebung werden zu lassen. Die EnthĂŒllungen des englischen Produktionsministers Lyttelton ĂŒber das kriegstreiberische Verhalten der amerikanischen Außenpolitik, das damit verbundene neuerliche AufrĂŒhren des geheimen Briefwechsels zwischen Roosevelt, Churchill und Eden hinter dem RĂŒcken des alten Chamberlains und die in diesem ZusammenhĂ€nge erfolgte Verhaftung des englischen Unterhausabgeordneten Ramsay und des amerikanischen KonsulatssekretĂ€rs, durch dessen Indiskretion diese RĂ€nke bekannt wurden sowie die verzweifelten Entschuldigungsversuche des US-Außenministers Hull, das alles gibt einen allerdings ungewöhnlich guten Start fĂŒr den Angriff auf Roosevelt.

Selbst der Versuch der Roosevelt freundlichen Presse, die Reisen des VizeprĂ€sidenten Wallace nach Tschungking und des HandelskammerprĂ€sidenten Johnston nach Moskau als großen außenpolitischen Erfolg darzustellen, vermochten nicht die StĂ€rke der republikanischen Attacke abzuschwĂ€chen. Die Neuyorker Zeitung PM befĂŒrchtet daher, daß die Republikaner jetzt in Chikago „besonders viel schmutzige WĂ€sche waschen werden.“ Einstweilen richtet sich aber die amerikanische Dreckschleuder gegen Lyttelton, dessen RĂŒcktritt energisch gefordert wird.

The New York Times (June 26, 1944)

top.banner.rep.conv

EDGE LEADS DRIVE TO BROADEN PLANK ON FOREIGN POLICY
Group led by Governor insists Republicans take a stronger stand on post-war unity

Pennsylvania for Dewey; votes of Illinois, Michigan, Tennessee, South Dakota help make his nomination sure
By Turner Catledge

Chicago, Illinois – (June 25)
A demand by outspoken Republican internationalists, headed by Governor Walter E. Edge of New Jersey, that the party stand up and “take it” on the international issue, stood tonight as the chief possibility for important new development at the party’s national convention, which opens in the Chicago Stadium at 10:15 a.m. CT tomorrow.

The prospect that Governor Thomas E. Dewey of New York would become the presidential nominee and that Governor Earl Warren of California would be called upon to take the vice-presidential honor increased hourly.

The dominant party leaders, moreover, were intent upon centering on such policy declarations as would permit the Republicans to launch the 1944 election campaign with the utmost in harmony.

The likelihood of Mr. Dewey’s nomination increased immeasurably with a caucus of the 70-vote delegation of Pennsylvania, which went unanimously for the New York Governor. With this force, plus what he already had amassed in the states of New York, Illinois and California, Mr. Dewey had more than half the number of delegates needed to guarantee his nomination, while the addition of smaller delegations, either in whole or in part, ran his prospective total to well above the required 529.

Other states on bandwagon

Other states that climbed on the Dewey bandwagon during the day were New Jersey with 34 of 35 delegates, Michigan with 41, South Dakota with 11, Tennessee with 19, Connecticut with 16 and Massachusetts with 30 of 35.

After a conference, Governors Leverett Saltonstall of Massachusetts, Raymond E. Baldwin of Connecticut, William H. Wills of Vermont and Robert O. Blood of New Hampshire decided to support Governor Dewey and to notify Governor Bricker of their position.

The one possibility – it decreased from a “probability” to a “possibility” during the night – of a fight over the platform was the most tangible promise to date that the party conclave might rise above a dull meeting on ratification.

Governor Edge at first threatened to take the matter to the floor of the convention itself and there to insist upon a stronger and clearer stand in favor of international post-war collaboration than has yet been seriously proposed. He was uncertain of his course late tonight, however, after some of the convention managers had said that any attempt to tamper with the “official” foreign policy plank might result in a stronger “nationalist” position.

Any possibility of a serious contest over the presidential nomination had vanished well before today’s events. Selection of Governor Dewey as head of the national ticket had become so much a foregone certainty that his managers were considering plans to bring him to Chicago for an acceptance ceremony before the convention adjourns – Wednesday night or Thursday.

Bricker drive keeps on

Backers of John W. Bricker of Ohio were still boosting their candidate, but they conceded candidly that the drift seemed to be away from them. They had never claimed any more than a one-to-three chance for their man. They continued to reject, however, the suggestion that Mr. Bricker should withdraw before the balloting starts, and take the honor of putting Governor Dewey’s name before the convention.

Spokesmen for former Governor Harold E. Stassen had not determined what to do about their candidate, in the light of the evident Dewey bandwagon movement, and so continued for the time being with original plans to have his name presented.

The question of a vice-presidential candidate had not been so definitely settled, due to the persistent reluctance of Governor Warren, who will deliver the “keynote” address at tomorrow night’s session, to take it. Mr. Warren arrived in Chicago today and immediately reiterated his earlier assertions that he is not seeking, and does noy want, any place on the ticket. He said, further, that he had put his own California delegation under obligation not to advance him and not to support him if some other delegation puts him in nomination.

Governor Warren is regarded by most observers as the odds-on choice of the convention delegates for the vice-presidential place and therefore is expected to be induced to take it by the sheer pressure of the demand for him.

With the main candidate contests thus developing into lopsided affairs, the possibility of fireworks had reposed, before today, in the one slight chance that Wendell L. Willkie, the 1940 nominee, might come to Chicago, or send a statement, demanding changes in some of the party declarations. This possibility was waning with each passing hour, however.

Edge talks of the platform

It was under such circumstances that Governor Edge’s demands and warnings immediately captured the interest of the delegates and spectators, who literally swarmed about the hotel lobbies all day and far into the night.

Addressing the New Jersey caucus at the Hotel Blackstone, and after expressing his own hope that the delegation would support Governor Dewey – which it did – Governor Edge swung into his discussion of the platform.

The veteran leader said:

I am worried about the platform. I’m a definite internationalist. Either we take the responsibility to maintain the peace, or we do not, and all this talk of “peace force” is silly. We cannot escape a very leading position in world affairs. It is better to be a party to war with its mass murder, and I believe that the Eastern and coastal states feel that way about it. I’m sorry about the Midwest. But let’s give our nominees a platform that the Eastern and coastal states will be proud of.

Ready for convention fight

I hope the plank [on world affairs] will be satisfactory, but I’m serving notice here and now that I am willing and ready to carry the fight to the convention floor. It must be an out-and-out American plank.

At this point, after applause, a delegate moved that the New Jersey delegation be bound by resolution to support Mr. Edge’s stand. Before the question could be put to a vote – it was carried unanimously a few moments later – Senator Hawkes asked to be excused from voting on it, since he was a member of the Resolutions Committee.

Senator Hawkes added that he had seen Senator Austin, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Subcommittee, only a few minutes before and that Senator Austin had expressed approval of the plank in the form in which it then stood, the form of which Governor Edge disapproved, and that the plank had been unanimously recommended by the subcommittee to the full committee.

In an impromptu press conference a few moments later, Governor Edge said that his principal objection lay in the use of the words “peace force” in the plank, in referring to maintenance of peace by the United States after the present war.

He asked rhetorically:

What the devil is “peace force”? If it is force, it’s force and it’s better to tell the public about it, and not kid them.

Plank authors give warning

Authors of the compromise plank, which was unofficially adopted yesterday by the Resolutions Subcommittee on Foreign Affairs said that some changes might be made in the wording, but insisted that the substance of the plank would not be changed. Senator Arthur H. Vandenberg, who headed a pre-convention group of Republican leaders who evolved the declaration on the model of the so-called Mackinac Charter, warned that tampering with the proposal now might result in a greatly more “nationalistic” declaration.

Senator Vandenberg said:

If Governor Edge carries the fight to the convention floor, he may get the very thing he dislikes the most.

Leaders who have had opportunity during these few days to canvass opinion and feeling among the delegates and who, of course, assume that they represent the sentiments of their home districts, said that there was a strong current of “nationalist” and even “isolationist” in certain quarters of the party.

Governor Edge will likely await the official report of the Resolutions Committee, which was wrestling today with several other planks, before taking any definite action. The contest between national and international approaches to political problems was being waged over the party’s policies on international trade.

A subcommittee headed by former Governor Alf M. Landon of Kansas was trying to compose the views of two groups. One of these, led by Mr. Landon himself, favored a declaration favoring trade reciprocity among nations. The other, said to be sparked by former Senator Joseph R. Grundy of Pennsylvania, was reported as insisting that the party reassert its traditional doctrine of high tariffs in strongest possible language.

Drift to Dewey continues

The drift toward Mr. Dewey was marked throughout today and tonight as state delegations arrived, looked over the lay of the land, and went into caucus.

The Missouri contingent met for an hour, and then announced that it had divided – 19 for Mr. Dewey, four for Mr. Bricker, five not voting and seven absent.

The Illinois group, numbering 59, caucused late last night, and on a count of noses pledged 50 to Mr. Dewey. The nine others were regarded as largely favorable to Mr. Bricker.

The Oklahoma delegates were represented as lined up 22 for Mr. Dewey and one for Mr. Bricker, the one Brickerite being Senator E. H. Moore.

top.banner.rep.conv

Favors rewriting international law

Proposed draft of Republican platform would prohibit robot planes
By C. P. Trussell

Chicago, Illinois –
A rewriting of international law to restore morality in the dealings of nations, to prohibit under extreme penalties such devices as robot planes, such practices as the execution of prisoners and other procedures repugnant to civilized society is proposed in the draft of the foreign policy plank submitted for the Republican platform, it was learned tonight.

In the same draft, it was disclosed authoritatively, the proposals for the establishment of post-war collaboration for maintenance of the peace leave room for the setting up of a Supreme United Nations Council, under which there could operate an assembly for dealing with international political problems and “regional tribunals” for the settlement of questions arising at various parts of the globe, the tribunals to function somewhat in the manner of large-scale circuit courts.

This, in addition to points of the plank disclosed previously, reportedly underwent discussion within the Platform Drafting Committee today as substantial agreement on a 16-point agricultural plank was reached after hours of consultation between the convention Committee on Agriculture and the Mackinac Island advisory group which made the party’s initial declarations last September.

At almost the same time, the Committee on Labor completed its trial draft of a plank which was expected to advocate the amendment of the National Labor Relations Act to “carry out both the spirit and purposes of the act” and specifically deprive the NLRB of authority arbitrarily to determine the kind of collective bargaining agent for workers employed in a plant and confer that authority upon the workers.

It was also expected that recommendation would be made for a reorganization of the Department of Labor “under a Secretary satisfactory to labor.”

Signs also appeared that the Republicans would attempt to get out front with specific plans and programs for the reconversion of industry to peacetime production.

Recommendations for a post-war readjustment of the tax structure to peacetime levels at the earliest practicable date were asserted to form a major phase of a plank submitted to the Platform Drafting Committee on Post-War Business, headed by Senator E. H. Moore of Oklahoma.

In this matter, the Moore Committee took direct issue with Henry Morgenthau Jr., Secretary of the Treasury, who recently contended that too-rapid approach to peacetime tax levels could not be expected.

Despite the spurts of action by plank-drafting committees and a four-day pre-convention start, no assurances were given by leaders tonight that the platform would be completed for presentation to the convention Tuesday as scheduled.

After an all-day session of the Drafting Committee, Senator Robert A. Taft of Ohio, the chairman, announced that it would work far into the night and reconvene again tomorrow morning.

After the formal appointment tomorrow of the Resolutions Committee, and its organization, a public hearing will be held to hear Van A. Bittner, assistant to Philip Murray, CIO president, in the United Steel Workers and a leader of the CIO Political Action Committee, and spokesmen for other national organizations which have not been heard by platform groups.

Not until after these spokesmen had been heard, Mr. Taft indicated, would the Resolutions Committee settle down in executive session to work out the final platform draft.

Program for agriculture

The 16 points upon which the committee and the Mackinac Island advisory body reached substantial agreement late today were, in brief, as follows:

  • Denunciation of “bungling” and “impractical” production programs.

  • Recognition of the role of agriculture in providing wealth and prosperity for the nation and demand that it receive equal encouragement and maintenance with labor and industry.

  • A philosophy of abundance, rather than scarcity.

  • Freedom by agriculture from “regimentation and impractical bureaucracy.”

  • Recommendations for a reorganization of the Department of Agriculture under experienced administration free of politics and regimentation.

  • U.S. markets for American farmers.

  • Protection of the farm economy by fair prices.

  • Opposition to subsidies “as a substitute for fair market prices.”

  • Advocacy of support prices, commodity loans or a combination of both, with specialized means of meeting price situations in specialized fields.

  • Demand for the orderly disposal of surpluses without disruption of production and without benefit to speculative profiteers.

  • Control of future surpluses through the finding of new uses for products, the development of new markets and efficient domestic distribution.

  • Research looking to the discovery of new crops and new uses for existing crops.

  • Approval of farmer-owned and operated farmer cooperatives.

  • Consolidation of farm credit under administration by a non-partisan board.

  • “Adequate and fair” tariff protection to prevent foreign competition with American agricultural products.

  • The making of life more attractive for the family-type farmer, with the development of rural roads, rural home and farm electrification and the elimination of the basic evils of tenancy wherever they are found to exist, and a “serious study and search” for “a sound program of crop insurance with emphasis upon establishment of a self-supporting program.”

On this latter point, the platform framers propose a comprehensive program for soil, forest, water and wildlife conservation and development and of irrigation projects as far as possible at state and local levels.

In discussing the tentative agreement by the agricultural plank drafters, Governor Bourke B. Hickenlooper of Iowa, chairman of the convention committee, explained that it was not certain that all of the points would be included in the draft submitted for party action.

To avoid overlapping

At one or more points, he brought out, the views and recommendations of the committee and its advisors overlapped those of the Foreign Trade Committee, headed by former Governor Alf M. Landon of Kansas, which worked through tonight on a proposed plank that was reported to be weighted heavily with protective tariff declarations. While there was agreement in general view between his committee and that of Mr. Landon, Governor Hickenlooper said, care would be taken to avoid infringements upon jurisdictions.

The Platform Drafting Committee, Senator Taft disclosed today, would be unable to hold the platform to 1,500 to 2,000 words, as had been hoped when the policy committee began its preparatory work. In fact, Mr. Taft observed, it will be “darn long.”

The Drafting Committee continued to pledge its members to secrecy as to what was going on within the west ballroom of the Stevens Hotel, where it was reported to be working through the night on such platform subjects as Negro problems, equal rights for women, social security, post-war organization of the Armed Forces, control of insurance and the coal industry and the St. Lawrence Seaway, besides the planks submitted by special committees.

top.banner.rep.conv

Chicago sidelights stick to tradition

Convention’s ferment produces usual characters and banalities
By Meyer Berger

Chicago, Illinois – (June 25)
The Republican Convention Committee’s Subcommittee on Housing wishes all room-hunters might approach the scramble for quarters as cheerfully as a woman delegate from Connecticut did.

After considerable fuss and fret the subcommittee located a room on the Hotel Stevens’ 22nd floor and sent the delegate – chirrupy middle-aged lady – happily on her way.

She came back in about 20 minutes, still cheerful, but without the room. She told the committee:

Couldn’t take it. When I opened the door, I disturbed a gentleman in shorts who was shaving.

The subcommittee apologized singly and as a body, but the lady explained she wasn’t embarrassed or frustrated. She confided:

When I was assigned to a room at the 1940 convention, I found two men in shorts shaving in it.

The subcommittee has her wait around until they located another room and until they had checked and made sure it contained no men and no shorts.


Some of the elevator girls in Chicago’s hotels don’t seem to have quite caught the hang of stopping the cars in the right places nor of making them go up when they want to go the other way.

An irritable old gentleman tried to “tell off” one operator who took him right up into the Stevens Hotel Tower, beyond the last floor. After the girl had backed the car to the 25th, where he wanted to get off, he said, “Thanks for the ride, Miss One-Way Corrigan.”

The girl didn’t seem to mind a bit of poisonous criticism. She said, “No extra charge, sir, and thank you just the same.” She closed the door on his last comment, which started off explosively and as if it might not have been polite.


You run into some strange paradoxes in a convention city. Through the deviousness of political trumpery, you find the hotel lobbies screaming with all sorts of signs and banners announcing “Dewey Headquarters,” although Dewey workers keep reminding you that Mr. Dewey is not officially an aspirant for the Presidency.

On the other hand, you run into aspirants who have no headquarters, and can’t find any. The Subcommittee on Housing was faced with this problem when a Mr. Bowers of Georgia turned up and announced he was entering the field for the Republican presidential nomination. Last they heard of Mr. Bowers, he was still roaming Chicago for a place to hang his hat and stack his campaign literature.


An animated young lady wriggled her way into the “Bricker for President” room at Mrs. Bricker’s reception there for her husband and made the rounds, being introduced to all the notables. Finally, she reached a dignified, gray-haired gentleman who seemed to be getting a lot of attention, and managed to get an introduction to him to. She wriggled out again. “Who is that man,” she wanted to know.” “I didn’t catch the name?” “That’s Mr. Bricker,” she was told. “Who’s he?” she asked brightly. “I’m so interested in all this politics and everything.”


The first true signs of animation developed in this convention when photographers posed 15 models on the lobby staircase in the Hotel Stevens just after breakfast this morning. The girls wore Dewey sashes and were told off to different posts to hand “Draft Dewey” signs on customers.

An affable gentleman who seemed to be handling this department for the Dewey division assured reporters that “This show is spontaneous.” He said, “These girls are volunteers. They’re high schoolgirls and working girls, who are giving their own time for Mr. Dewey.” He said they just wanted political education.

One of the newspapermen spontaneously took one of the girls aside. “Where do you work, Miss?” he asked her. “I’m one of Vera Jane’s models,” she told him. “We all are.” It seems all the girls were spontaneously hired for the day from the Vera Jane Studio of Fashion Modeling in East Jackson Boulevard. And that their interest in political education was somewhat on the thin side.


The “Stassen for President” workers in the Stevens, all simple, friendly folk, got nowhere trying to tack their signs on one of the downstairs walls this morning. They gave up when they finally caught on that the wall was marble. Ingenious folk, they finally found some scotch tape that worked all right.


“Uncle Joe” Tolbert showed up today as delegate from Ninety-Six, which is the name of a cotton-farming community in South Carolina. “Uncle Joe” has been attending Republican conventions since around 1880, when he used to travel with his daddy, who was a delegate from Ninety-Six, before him. He voted for Benjamin Harrison in 1888, and likes to tell about the time Russell Alger “got beat” for the nomination in Chicago that year. “Uncle Joe” is around 75 or 76 now – he isn’t quite sure of the sum of his years – and he misses faces he used to see around. “Cain’t get used to not seein’ fellers like Elihu Root an’ Chauncey DePew an’ ‘Uncle Joe’ Cannon,” he tells listeners sadly. He’s a Bricker man this year, but seems a little befuddled by the way conventions are run nowadays. “Got a passel of young bucks up here who think they know more’n anybody, and blessed if I think they really do.” “Uncle Joe” wears all black, including a sombrero, favors his cane and makes quite a bit out of the fact that he never wore a necktie. “Never did like to fool with no tie,” he says fiercely.


Wendell Willkie’s ghost seems to haunt this convention. Dozing delegates started right out of their bobby chairs last night when a bellboy passed through shrilly calling “Mr. Will-kie, Mr. Will-kie.” Nobody found out what this was all about, but the general guess was that the call was for Mr. Willkie’s brother who lives out in Wheaton, Illinois. Other delegates were startled this morning by a grim-faced fellow who stood outside the Michigan Boulevard entrance to the Stevens for hours and glared at them as they entered. He wore a pie-plate-size campaign button with the single word – “Willkie.” And down in the bar in late afternoon, when shoulders and spirits seemed sunk pretty low by the heat and by general dullness, another gentleman unsteadily shoved his glass back for a refill: “Willkie and soda,” he ordered.

top.banner.rep.conv

Leaders applaud Dewey’s ‘drafters’

Sprague, Jaeckle, Brownell praised for the way they have handled campaign
By James A. Hagerty

Chicago, Illinois – (June 25)
With Governor Dewey’s nomination for President by the Republican National Convention now assured on the first ballot, the three New Yorkers heading the “Draft Dewey” movement, J. Russel Sprague, national committeeman; Edwin F. Jaeckle, state chairman, and Herbert Brownell Jr., chairman of the law committee of the state committee, have won the admiration of party leaders for the effective way they have conducted their campaign for the New York Governor’s nomination.

The strategy has been simple. It has been based primarily on the argument that Governor Dewey, of all the candidates available, is the most likely to carry New York with its 47 electoral votes and therefore is the most likely candidate to win the election.

This argument has been reinforced by the contention that Mr. Dewey as governor of the most populous state in the Union has demonstrated marked ability as an administrator and can go before the waters with an enhanced reputation which he did not fully possess when he was a presidential candidate four years ago.

At the Philadelphia convention in 1940, Mr. Dewey’s reputation, so far as the country was concerned, was based on his success as a prosecutor in curbing rackets in New York City and exposing alliances between politics and crime. His conviction of James J. Hines, powerful Tammany Assembly district leader, received wide publicity.

Record as Governor emphasized

This year., Mr. Dewey will enter the national convention with the emphasis on his record as Governor. In their talks with delegates and party leaders from other states, Messrs. Sprague, Jaeckle and Brownell have pointed out that in 1942, Mr. Dewey was elected Governor by a plurality of 647,395 over Democratic candidate John J. Bennett Jr. and by a majority of 243,786 over Mr. Bennett and American Labor Party candidate Dean Alfange. They have also pointed out that Mr. Dewey was the first Republican to be elected Governor of New York in more than twenty years and have expressed the belief that if nominated for President, Governor Dewey would carry New York, and that with any other candidate the outcome would be doubtful.

The “Draft Dewey” leaders have contended that Mr. Dewey’s administration has the approval of the people of New York State and cite as evidence the election of Joe R. Hanley as Lieutenant Governor last year over Lt. Gen. William N. Haskell, who was the candidate of the Democratic and Labor parties and whose candidacy had the approval of President Roosevelt.

Mr. Dewey’s position on foreign policy has not been stressed, and the impression has been created that he will approve the plank adopted by the convention. For the most part, delegates calling at the Dewey headquarters have shown more interest in Mr. Dewey’s vote-getting ability than on his stand on issues. The one factor that has brought a majority of the state delegations to the support of Governor Dewey is the belief that he can get more votes than any other candidate who might be named. To foster, maintain and increase this belief has been the main task of Messrs. Sprague, Jaeckle and Brownell.

The fact that about 850 votes out of 1,057 in the convention are now in sight for Mr. Dewey’s nomination is proof that these tactics have been successful. Should a fight on the platform develop in the convention, it will not affect the nomination of Governor Dewey, which is already foreclosed, whatever effect the fight might have on the election in November.

The “Draft Dewey” forces reached Chicago a week ago with a majority for their candidate assured it they could hold what they had, and support from such states as Pennsylvania and Illinois, of which definite assurance had been lacking, not only added more than a hundred votes to the Dewey strength but prevented any possible defections.

The situation at this convention is comparable to that which existed at the 1932 Democratic convention which nominated Franklin D. Roosevelt for the first time. Mr. Dewey, as Mr. Roosevelt was then, is Governor of New York and each had won a gubernatorial election by a large plurality. Mr. Roosevelt, if nominated in 1932, however, seemed certain to win the election. Mr. Dewey at this time is merely the Republican candidate adjudged to have the best chance to win.

Mr. Roosevelt in 1932 faced more formidable opposition for the nomination, and it required a deal with Texas and California and agreement on the nomination of John N. Garner for Vice President to get Mr. Roosevelt the two-thirds vote needed to nominate.

A majority of the delegates to this convention have been obtained for Governor Dewey without commitments. So far as it has been possible to observe, Messrs. Sprague, Jaeckle and Brownell have made no errors in tactics.

Because of his position as a member of the National Committee, Mr. Sprague has been the acknowledged leader of the “Draft Dewey” forces. He would be acceptable to the membership of the committee as national chairman, but it was learned definitely that he would not accept the post, though preeminently qualified.

Mr. Sprague is the Nassau County executive, a position that pays $15,000 a year. As county executive, he operates under a charter containing a provision, which he was instrumental in inserting, requiring the executive to give full time to the duties of that office, which is comparable to mayor of a city.

Sprague declines chairmanship

Nassau is a very wealthy county with a population of half a million, and Mr. Sprague takes great pride in heading its government, the form of which he had a large part in establishing.

Mr. Sprague has informed members of the National Committee and presumably Governor Dewey that it will be impossible for him to take on the full-time duties of national chairman because of the Nassau charter provision, and that he has no intention of resigning as county executive.

In 1940, when Mr. Sprague was the Dewey pre-convention campaign manager, charges were filed with Herbert H. Lehman, then Governor, seeking to oust Mr. Sprague as county executive because of allegations that he had violated the full-time service provision. Mr. Lehman, however, dismissed the charges.

Mr. Sprague believes that acceptance of the national chairmanship would violate the charter. Unless the chairmanship should go to someone outside New York State, either Mr. Brownell, close friend of Governor Dewey, or Mr. Jaeckle will be named national chairman. One difficulty in the selection of Mr. Jaeckle is that he is valuable in his present post, for the national election my turn on the results in New York, and a change in its state chairman may not be desirable.

Governor Dewey on arrival after his nomination will discuss the selection of a national chairman with members of the National Committee and state chairmen and will undoubtedly make a suggestion. It has been the practice of the Republican Party that the suggestion of the presidential nominee for the national chairmanship is followed invariably.

top.banner.rep.conv

Talk of Warren for ticket grows

He says war duties on coast provide major reason for his reluctance to run

Chicago, Illinois – (June 25)
Talk of Governor Earl Warren of California for second place on the Republican ticket gained volume today despite his reiteration that he was not a candidate and had asked his state’s delegation not to put him in nomination.

At a press conference after his arrival, with the California delegation, he was asked if he would accept the nomination if it was proffered. He responded, “I am not going to deal in the realm of hypothesis.”

He said that one of the main reasons he did not wish to run on the national ticket was that he was “wartime” Governor of California and his term did not expire for more than two years.

He added:

My obligations as Governor are great and they will be greater when the fighting shifts completely to the Pacific after the fall of Germany. The arrival of peace will bring with it a variety of extremely difficult problems for California and we must be prepared now to meet them.

His supporters conceded that he was not anxious to obtain a place on the ticket, but declared that he could not very well refuse it if it came. They said they would abide by his request not to place him in nomination, but were confident that his name would be offered by delegates from other states.

Backers of Ohio Governor John W. Bricker were still battling to delegates to support him for the presidential nomination and were inclined to discount talk about the possibility of second place for him, but in other quarters he was considered a close runner-up to Governor Warren for the vice-presidential nomination.

Workers at his headquarters said that they would like to see him on the ticket if he should be defeated for the top nomination and pointed out that he had never said that he would not accept the second-place nomination.

The candidacy of Rep. Everett M. Dirksen (R-IL), who shares with AFL vice president William L. Hutcheson, the distinction of admitting a desire to be nominated for Vice President, seemed to be fading. His supporters, however, were still busy checking the state delegations as they arrive and endeavoring to pick up support for their man.

top.banner.rep.conv

Bricker fights on, with help of Taft

Ohioans ask candidates be invited to address convention, and only he is on hand
By Charles Hurd

Chicago, Illinois – (June 25)
The Ohio delegation to the Republican National Convention emphasized its determined and continuing support for the nomination of Governor John W. Bricker as standard-bearer by adopting today a resolution requesting the convention to invite “all persons whose names are to be presented in nomination” to address the convention.

Such action would be a new departure in convention procedure. There was no immediate indication as to the response the suggestion would receive if made tomorrow, as scheduled, by Ed D. Scharr, chairman of the Ohio delegation.

In actual effect, adoption by the convention of a resolution incorporating the request would benefit principally Governor Bricker among the so-called general candidates, together with a few favorite sons. Other leading candidates, such as Governor Thomas E. Dewey and LtCdr. Harold E. Stassen, are not in Chicago. Governor Dewey probably would not accept such an invitation. Cdr. Stassen did not.

Bricker’s fight unabated

The principal effect of the delegation’s action was to demonstrate the determination with which the Bricker nomination advocates are pressing their fight, despite growing indications of the pre-convention strength of Governor Dewey.

Governor Bricker made no public statement today, but Senator Taft of Ohio firmly contested claims that other candidates, which could mean only Governor Dewey, “control large blocs of delegates.” He questioned this control in a speech before the meeting, preliminary to renewed activity in which the Bricker adherents set out to canvas personally today, and in the next two days, all of the more than 800 among the 1,057 delegates who are not formally pledged elsewhere.

Senator Taft said:

A lot has been said about certain individuals reported to have control of large blocs of delegates. There are no individuals who have such power.

A great majority of the delegates to this convention want John Bricker nominated for President. He can carry New York States just as well as Dewey, and Minnesota just as well as Stassen. The American people want a direct fight on the New Deal and on President Roosevelt. There is no one who will carry that fight so directly and so definitely as John Bricker.

Rep. Bender of Ohio, who is also a delegate from that state, entered the motion fo the delegation to open the platform to aspirants for the nomination.

Demands Bricker be heard

He said:

If John Bricker appears before the convention, his nomination and election will be assured. He has been carrying the fight against the New Deal for months. We should demand that John Bricker be heard. He would make a speech that would sweep the convention. We are tired of pussyfooting around. Let’s get these names and these men before the convention. And we want a man of courage to carry the Republican banner, a man whose views are known.

The meeting of delegates from Ohio attracted a gathering of about 500 persons who call themselves the “Bricker Battalion.” They also heard Rep. Clarence J. Brown of Ohio and Mrs. Katherine K. Brown, Ohio committeewoman, declare emphatically that the nomination for President was still wide open.

Governor Bricker spent today as quietly as was possible for the leading contender on the scene. His only engagement was a brief visit to the Ohio delegation to thank them for their continued work.

Otherwise, he was at his headquarters in the foyer of the Stevens Hotel ballroom or in the lobby of the hotel talking to delegates individually or in small groups.

Regardless of the size of his following in actual votes, he continues to attract the active interest of most of the persons attending this convention.

top.banner.rep.conv

Martin: ‘Sanity’ to return

Convention chairman asserts party means American way – Spangler hits Democrats

Chicago, Illinois – (June 25)
A prediction that “our country is about to get back on the right road to sanity and success” under the leadership of a Republican President was made tonight by Rep. Joseph W. Martin (R-MA), who will preside as permanent chairman at the party’s national convention.

Mr. Martin spoke at a pre-convention coast-to-coast welcome to more than 1,000 delegates staged by MBS. Sharing the program with him were Harrison E. Spangler, party chairman, and Col. Robert R. McCormick, editor and publisher of The Chicago Tribune. Governor Dwight H. Green of Illinois presided as toastmaster.

Rep. Martin said:

The American people will determine in this election whether we are going to have a new kind of America, or remain loyal to our own form of government. Shall we become a one-man government, with rigid bureaucratic control of all our activities, or shall we have personal freedom and individual opportunity in America?

To put it more bluntly, do we want the American way of life, or state socialism?

Describing tomorrow’s convention as “unbossed,” Mr. Spangler leveled this criticism at the Democrats, who will meet in Chicago July 19 to select a presidential ticket:

The [Republican] convention does not meet with orders in advance to select a certain candidate for President. It will not select a candidate already named by the Communist Party. It does not meet with orders from one man to select a certain man for Vice President. It does not meet with a platform prepared in advance by unknown advisers.

Col. McCormick told the delegates:

It is for you to defeat the domestic enemy which would destroy our Republic and make us a dependent nation.

top.banner.rep.conv

Willkie aides seek unity

Urge him to endorse promptly, cordially the Republican nominee and platform
By Arthur Krock

Chicago, Illinois – (June 25)
In the drive for unity which is in progress here by Republican leaders who feel it will be necessary in the campaign to make up for a certain lack of enthusiasm over the prospective presidential candidate, members of the late movement on behalf of the renomination of Wendell L. Willkie are conspicuous.

Among these are men and women who concentrated their energies for months, after Mr. Willkie decided to seek the Presidency once more, in advancing his prospects. They formed what organization they could, arranged for widespread publicity and, in the face of growing apathy toward Mr. Willkie in the national financial and business communities, raised as much as they could of the modest sum which was spent for him before the Wisconsin primaries ended Mr. Willkie’s renomination effort.

With some exceptions, most of these cheerfully accepted what they some time ago conceived to be the inevitable selection of Governor Thomas E. Dewey to head the 1944 Republican ticket and have since urged Mr. Willkie to do the same unless he finds in the platform some major position which he cannot in conscience espouse. They expect to find no such positive bar in the platform as it was outlined to them today.

They have reminded Mr. Willkie of what he said at St. Louis in the speech with which he formally opened his renomination attempt. He said that, even if he had generally agreed with President Roosevelt’s politics and actions, which he emphasized he did not, he would hold that a change of government was vital to the progress of the country and the world. The only way to bring about this change, they have argued, is to elect the nominees of this convention, and therefore they are urging Mr. Willkie to endorse them promptly and cordially after he has had a full opportunity to examine the proceedings.

It is accepted here that Mr. Willkie’s chief anxiety is over the international plank, which has now been drafted in secret by a subcommittee headed by Senator Warren Austin (R-VT) and has the unanimous support of that subcommittee. Mr. Willkie’s friends on the ground here are inclined to think that it will authorize this convention’s presidential candidate to adopt the foreign policies for which Mr. Willkie has long contended.

Mr. Austin has expressed himself as finding it “acceptable” to him, and this has encouraged the workers for Willkie-Dewey unity because the Vermont Senator was in many respects the most outspoken Republican advocate of intervention and has been in favor of the broadest form of post-war cooperation for security by the United States. They reason that if Mr. Austin, “who risked his political neck,” can accept the plank, Mr. Willkie should be able to do the same. The Vermont Senator, it is recalled, candidly accepted Lend-Lease, which he supported, as an act of war and said he favored it despite the clear risks of war involvement, almost a unique Republican attitude at that time.

Efforts today to discover the details of what has passed between these missionaries of unity and the candidate for whom they labored so diligently were unsuccessful. Nor could it be learned whether they have gathered from their former leader whether he is likely to be persuaded by their arguments if he finds in the platform no retrogression toward what is newly called “nationalism.”

It seems certain, however, that if Mr. Willkie withholds his support of the platform and the nominees for any length of time, this group will not wait to announce theirs.

Among those who worked with Mr. Willkie to the end of his renomination campaign, and are now urging unity, it is understood that the following are included: John W. Hanes, his financial chairman and general economic adviser, and John Cowles and Gardner Cowles Jr., his close personal friends, who were also associated in the management of his interests at Philadelphia in 1940.

top.banner.rep.conv

OWI state’s group endorses Dewey

Directs delegation chairman, after tactical delay, so to cast all 93 votes
By Warren Moscow

Chicago, Illinois – (June 25)
New York took officially tonight its long-delayed action in endorsing Governor Dewey for President, instructing the chairman of its delegation to the Republican National Convention to cast its solid bloc of 93 votes for him on the first ballot.

The delay had been only for tactical reasons, and the unanimity was far different from 1940, when Mr. Dewey’s weakness in his home state delegation was a factor in his loss of strength from the time the balloting began in Philadelphia.

Tonight, it was different. With no rollcall and with state chairman Edwin F. Jaeckle standing on a chair in a ballroom recently used for a buffet supper, the vote was unanimous on a resolution presented by Troy Mayor John J. Ahearn.

Text of the resolution

The resolution read as follows:

In 1942, Thomas E. Dewey was nominated for Governor by the duly elected delegates of the Republican Party in New York State and was thereupon elected. He has devoted himself wholeheartedly and exclusively to the responsibilities of that office.

Today, we, the duly elected delegates from New York State to this convention, join with delegates of other states in the draft of Governor Dewey for the service of the nation.

We take this action because we recognize that the interests of the people of New York, like those of all of our people, will best be served by electing Governor Dewey to be President of the United States.

Therefore, be it resolved, that the chairman of the delegation from New York State to the Republican National Convention be and hereby is instructed to cast the votes of the delegates of New York State for Thomas E. Dewey for President.

Organizing is completed

Just before adopting the resolution, the delegation completed, equally informally, its organization for the convention. J. Russel Sprague and Jessica McCullough Weis were reelected national committee members, Mr. Jaeckle was picked as chairman of the delegation, Mrs. Weis became vice chairman, and Harold Turk of Brooklyn, secretary.

William H. Hill, long-time leader of the Southern Tier counties, was named to the committee on permanent organization; Mrs. Harriet Mack of Westchester to the Committee on Rules, and Livingstone Platt of Westchester, to the Committee on Credentials.

Meanwhile, it became known that the problem of providing a Governor for New York during the period that Mr. Dewey will be out of the state to attend the convention here has been solved.

All three statutory successors, Lieutenant Governor Joe R. Hanley. Senator Majority Leader Benjamin F. Feinberg and Speaker Oswald D. Heck of the Assembly are delegates, and one should return to the state before Mr. Dewey leaves it on Wednesday.

It became known tonight that Mr. Feinberg had been selected, and he will leave here about the time Mr. Dewey leaves Albany.

Enthusiasm at headquarters

With the New York delegates’ arrival on a special train this morning, Dewey banners and buttons sprang into sight.

Their first act was to set up Dewey headquarters in a large ballroom on the third floor of the Stevens Hotel, to put on a reception which outdrew the Bricker headquarters, on the same floor, by a wide margin.

Delegates and distinguished guests from other states were greeted throughout the day. In a corner, on the same floor, are separate county headquarters established by New York, Kings and Westchester counties, where open house is held, and tickets are distributed.

The dominant note in the Dewey headquarters is a blue banner about 20 by 10 feet bearing the slogan “Thomas E. Dewey” on one line; “For President” on a center line, and “Vote Republican” on the third line. Close inspection by reporters showed that the words “For President” had been neatly stitched over the previous exhortation, “For Governor.” It was the same banner which was used at the Saratoga convention in 1942, at which Mr. Dewey was nominated for Governor. Pat Gogerty, owner of the banner, explained that its history actually went back eight years, to 1936, and that the upper line, “Thomas E. Dewey,” if peeled off, would reveal the name of William F. Bleakley, who ran for Governor in 1936.

Among the visitors at the Dewey headquarters today were Nebraska Governor Dwight Griswold, U.S. Senator John G. Townsend Jr. (R-DE), former Governor Samuel R. McKelvie of Nebraska, National Committeeman R. B. Creager of Texas, U.S. Senator Chapman Revercomb (R-WV) and U.S. Senator George Wilson (R-IA).

The Dewey headquarters was placarded with signs carrying the picture of the New York Governor and such slogans as “Dewey Will Win,” “The People’s Choice” and “America Wants Dewey.” They appeared to have been brought on from New York by his backers, despite his not having made any formal statement that he is willing to accept the nomination.

top.banner.rep.conv

No speech written, Dewey aides say

Governor returns to Albany from his farm – gives no hint of his plans

Albany, New York – (June 25)
Governor Dewey returned here tonight from a weekend visit to his farm at Pawling avowedly still not a candidate for the Presidency, despite the fact that he is an odds-on favorite to win the Republican nomination on the first ballot.

Members of the Governor’s official family reported that no work had been done on an acceptance speech.

A corps of reporters representing many of the country’s leading newspapers are on hand here, waiting for a “slip” or intimation that the Governor is relinquishing his role as a “non-candidate.”

The reporters are convinced that Mr. Dewey intends to go to Chicago immediately following his nomination to make a speech of acceptance. All are prepared to make the trip, yet the Governor had denied all stories that reservations for such a journey have been made.

Meanwhile, the question still remains unanswered as to who will become Acting Governor in the event Mr. Dewey should go to Chicago. Lieutenant Governor Joe R. Hanley. Benjamin F. Feinberg, President pro tempore of the Senate, and Speaker Oswald D. Heck of the Assembly, who would be in line to take over the office in the absence of the Governor, are in Chicago.

Before his departure last night, Mr. Hanley said he would certainly not return because his 93-year-old mother is gravely ill in Iowa and he intended to visit her. Since it is imperative that an acting Governor be on hand because three men are sentenced to die in the electric chair Thursday for a slaying in New York City, it must then be either Mr. Feinberg or Mr. Heck who must return.

The condemned men are Alex Bellamo, Peter de Lutro and Frank di Maria, who were convicted in the slaying of Francis Servidio on May 18, 1942, in a poolroom. In all executions, the Governor is the person to whom last pleas for clemency are made.

Nothing of political significance occurred during the Governor’s stay on his farm, where his wife and two boys have been living. Rain kept him indoors a good part of Saturday, though he did inspect some farm improvements being made. Today, he shot a round of golf, then returned to entertain two neighbors, Carl T. Hogan and his wife.

top.banner.rep.conv

War overshadows GOP deliberations

Lincoln’s prophetic words on strain of a war election recalled at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois – (June 25)
Chicago has tried hard to whoop up the Republican National Convention, but the race between Governor Thomas E. Dewey and Governor John W. Bricker seems so one-sided and the big guns at Cherbourg make so much noise that it just won’t whoop.

The trappings may be pretty frivolous, the bands are as brassy, the lights as bright, but the war is not somebody else’s this time; there are soldiers and sailors on Michigan Boulevard and anti-aircraft balloons over the lake front, and while delegates are endangered only by their own indulgences, most of them have sons who are in danger, and that takes priority even over politics.

The talk, of course, is little different. The delegates are here to “kick the rascals out,” and most of the speeches and meetings in the Loop are looking to that end, but just as the Republicans are, for the moment, dominating Chicago, the war is dominating the Republicans. Even in the first editions, they cannot get the big headlines over Cherbourg and Vitebsk, and Saipan.

Difference in atmosphere

The atmosphere of the convention is different in more ways than one. The wind is blowing the wrong way from the stockyards and the amount of excitement that can be created over whether Mr. Dewey is nominated on the first or third ballot is not unlimited, but the essential difference is that America is having its first war political convention since the War Between the States, and the delegates are aware of it, even if they say very little about it.

Eighty years ago, near the end of the Civil War, it was the Democrats who held their convention in Chicago, and then, as now, the election was overwhelmed by the war. The great difference then was that the opposition party declared the war a mistake and called in its platform, for a negotiated peace. The opposition this time is not making that mistake.

In the course of that presidential campaign 80 years ago, however, President Lincoln made a statement which foresaw the campaign that starts tomorrow and defined its purpose.

Lincoln statement quoted

As the results of the election of 1864 were coming in, he addressed a group of his supporters who came to see him at the White House.

He said:

It has long been a grave question whether any government, not too strong for the liberties of the people, can be strong enough to maintain its existence in great emergencies. On this point the present war brought our government to a severe test and a presidential election, occurring in regular course during the Rebellion, added not a little to the strain.

The election, along with its incidental and undesirable strife, has done good. It has demonstrated that a people’s government can sustain a national election in the midst of a great civil war.

top.banner.rep.conv

Mrs. Farley ready to bolt her party

Won’t vote for Roosevelt, but shares Chicago suite with Mrs. Mesta, new Democrat
By Kathleen McLaughlin

Chicago, Illinois – (June 25)
Mrs. James A. Farley issued a political declaration of independence today, confirming a report that she will vote Republican unless the Democratic nominee is other than the present occupant of the White House.

Characteristic of the current state of things here, Mrs. Farley is happily sharing a suite with her longtime friend, Mrs. Pearl Mesta, widow of a wealthy Oklahoma oil man, now operating a ranch which she has bought near Prescott, Arizona. Mrs. Mesta, a lifelong Republican, will not only vote Democratic in November but will also be an Arizona delegate to the party’s convention.

Mrs. Mesta’s friends are as stunned at her conversion to the Democratic as Mrs. Farley’s are dumbfounded at her desertion of it. But, since they avoid argument by mutual consent, they are having a gay time of it.

Asked why she was here now if she was a Democrat, Mrs. Mesta smilingly replied, “Oh, I’m just snooping.”

Mrs. Farley said she and her husband had long seen eye to eye politically and that although she had registered as a Democrat, she had voted “independently” for some time.

She went on:

I believe in democracy, and we haven’t got democracy now. I have a couple of children growing up, and if it’s a case of voting for a fourth term, I simply won’t do it. That isn’t democracy.

Her favorite candidate is Governor Warren of California, who, she thinks, should be on the ticket.

She said that her husband, now in Mexico, knew she was here and added that she would be at the Democratic sessions next month.

Mrs. Robert Lincoln Hoyal of Douglas was elected head of the Arizona delegation today, the first woman to hold such a post in the history of the party. She was head of the Women’s Division of the National Committee, 1935-36 and later served as assistant to the national chairman.

Among the “regulars” is Mrs. Alice Roosevelt Longworth, who explains that she attends more out of habit than because of political connection, this being her ninth Republican convention in succession.

Women are in more favorable position in the convention than at any time since 1924, the session that followed their enfranchisement, when they had 121 full delegates and 285 alternates. This year, they had 102 full delegates and 270 alternates.

States which have noticeably increased their feminine groups are Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, Washington and Wyoming.

top.banner.rep.conv

New Jersey delegates 34–1 for Dewey

Only Senator Hawkes opposes New Yorker as Edge champions latter as nominee

Chicago, Illinois – (June 25)
With Senator Albert W. Hawkes of Montclair, New Jersey, the lone dissenter, the New Jersey delegation to the Republican National Convention recorded itself as 34–1 for Governor Dewey for President at a caucus held this noon at the Hotel Blackstone. Senator Hawks voted for Governor Bricker of Ohio.

There was almost another Bricker vote in the New Jersey delegation. On the first rollcall, Thomas A. Mathis of Toms River cast his vote for Governor Edge of New Jersey, who was presiding.

Governor Edge rose and said, “Look, we’ve been through all that and I’m not a candidate.”

“Is Dewey?” asked Mr. Mathis. Then he added, “Make it Bricker for me.”

When the rollcall was completed and no other Bricker votes had appeared, Mr. Mathis again rose and asked permission to make one more change in his vote. He voted for Mr. Dewey, amid applause.

Governor Edge, after organization of the delegation had been completed, made a short speech in which he noted that he was expressing only his own opinion, and that he did not expect anyone to be bound by it, but that he thought the delegation ought to be for Governor Dewey.

Governor Edge said:

I feel, as a result of the preliminary actions thus far, that it is pretty well settled that the distinguished Governor of New York, Thomas Dewey, will be the nominee of this convention. I expect to vote for him on the first ballot. If things develop beyond that, we can then further consider our viewpoint.

It is not a question of getting on the bandwagon. It is a question of showing to the electorate around the country the confidence and the unanimity of the party’s mood. I feel that New Jersey should not straddle, but should take a definite position. It is the best thing to do, and I do it with confidence.

The group voted to send a telegram of good cheer to Mrs. Edna B. Conklin, one of the delegates-at-large, who has been unable to attend the convention because of illness.

New Jersey’s delegation ran into room trouble, with no one apparently getting what had been ordered. Governor Edge had received the suite and an extra room, and tonight only had the extra room. His suite had been appropriated by a woman delegate from a Western state, who refused to move out. Others experienced similar difficulties.

top.banner.rep.conv

Gerald Smith ‘seizes’ ballroom for speech

America First crusader invades Republican quarters

Chicago, Illinois – (June 25)
Gerald L. K. Smith, leader of the America First Crusade, caused a minor diversion today by “seizing” the ballroom of the Stevens Hotel, Republican convention headquarters, and holding a rump meeting in the face of disapproval by the convention management.

Mr. Smith, followed by several hundred of those who favor nationalistic views, took over the ballroom to harangue these persons and numerous others, who were drawn in by curiosity, foe about two hours. His speech was marked by equal denunciation of Harrison M. Spangler, chairman of the Republican National Committee; Governor Dewey of New York, and President Roosevelt.

He led his followers in cheers for Col. Robert R. McCormick, publisher of The Chicago Tribune, and Senator Robert Reynolds (D-SC), who is retiring from the Senate and has intimated an intention to form a new national party.

Mr. Smith issued a typewritten statement in which he said that a group of “Independent Republicans,” had reserved the ballroom for his meeting today, but that “pressure” by the Republican leaders caused the hotel to cancel the reservation. This statement was ignored.

No other meeting was scheduled for the time during which Mr. Smith held the ballroom, as he said, “by force.”

top.banner.rep.conv

Editorial: The Republican opportunity

The Republicans meeting in Chicago today are facing a national situation more critical than that which existed when they met in the same city in 1860 and again when they met at Baltimore in 1864. As on both those historic occasions, they believe they have a chance for victory. If they are right in this belief, they have a great opportunity. If they are wrong, they may still give their party a significance and cohesion it has lost since 1932 and restore the vitality of the two-party system.

This system demand compromise. Each of our major parties is the equivalent of half a dozen or more groups and factions such as have bedeviled many European parliaments in times gone by. If we are to avoid a similar confusion here, the right wing and the left wing must somehow find middle ground. The extreme policy is not practicable and cannot be expected. But this need not mean that the party as a whole cannot stand firmly and unequivocally for a few easily understood principles.

This is the first wartime presidential year since 1864. In that year, the Democrats, as the opposition party, declared that the war to restore the Union had failed and demanded “that immediate efforts be made for a cessation of hostilities.” They paid for that error by 20 years out of office. Today there is no question of Republican support for all-out victory. There is some question as to how fast the party will go in committing the country to all-out participation in a worldwide organization to keep the peace. Just eight years ago, it took its stand against the League of Nations and the World Court. It has certainly learned much since that time, as have the Democratic Party and the voters to whom both must appeal. The old cry of “entangling alliances” cannot successfully be raised again. Our only choice is between limited ties in a precarious balance-of-power system and full membership in a world organization for peace. If the Republicans will accept this necessity, as their wiser leaders urge them to do, they will redeem past errors.

In the domestic field, there are real issues on which the Republicans can seize. Perhaps the most vital of these is the relationship between the federal government and the states and between the federal government and private enterprise. Neither of these issues is likely to be stated now in the terms that would have seemed most appropriate in 1932. But they can be stated. The country has the right to expect a statement that shall e honest and explicit, so that voters this fall may know exactly what they are voting for or against.

Viewed with perfect impartiality, the Republican Party has a great history. It has now reached a turning point. We may hope that this week it will rise to its destiny, suppressing within its own ranks the forces of isolationism and reaction.

top.banner.rep.conv

Harold Stassen

As Republicans convene, they and their country can be proud to have a candidate like this ex-governor – even though they will probably not nominate him
By Robert Coughlan

This week, 1,059 Republican delegates will meet in Chicago to nominate a candidate for the Presidency of the United States. It is generally assumed that they will choose Thomas E. Dewey. Three weeks later, 1,176 Democratic delegates will meet at the same place in the same city for the same purpose; and with even greater unanimity they will choose Franklin D. Roosevelt. Thomas E. Dewey and Franklin D. Roosevelt will then have a campaign, and next November the voters will choose one or the other of them. This act will generate a good deal of excitement around the country. The Dewey partisans will be hot, and the Roosevelt partisans will be hot, and there will be occasional fistfights, broken heads and bad feelings. To a considerable number of voters, however, it will all seem a little tiresome.

These unexcited voters will feel that way because it is not exciting to be forced to choose between two inadequacies. They would prefer not to vote for Roosevelt for reasons too familiar to mention yet, when faced with the alternative of Dewey, they are not inspired. Many of them, in fact, are dispirited. What they finally will decide, nobody knows. What they do decide, however, may swing the election. For these voters are very numerous. They include several million orphaned Willkieites and many others, both Republican and Democratic, who are of a liberal but anti-New Deal disposition. The polls suggest that there may be as many as five million of them. The present writer is one of them, and this article is written and published on their behalf.

There is nothing the Democratic delegates at Chicago can do about these voters, since their convention will be about as free as a Siberian salt mine. The Republican delegates, however, are ostensibly going to have an “open convention” where supposedly anything can happen. Nobody believes this for a moment; but before the almost inevitable happens and the Dewey nomination is sealed, many delegates will be taking a metaphorical last look over their shoulders at the five million or so pivotal voters. These delegates will be asking themselves, “Is this being smart? Is there any other good Republican candidate who could carry the party and the mugwumps?” And they may remember the name, “Harold Stassen.”

Granting that no one man encompasses the humanity of Lincoln, the good sense of McKinley, the vigor of Theodore Roosevelt, the geniality of Taft, the pulchritude of Harding, the economy of Coolidge and the solemnity of Hoover, and in short, that nobody is humanly perfect, it is nevertheless plain to a lot of people that Stassen is the perfect Republican candidate for the election of 1944. His perfection is whole and unassailable, like a billiard ball. He is, for one thing, a lifelong and party-conscious Republican, with only enough urgency in his record to bless him with the honorable tradition of Theodore Roosevelt. Yet there is no trace of doubt about his liberalism. Long before Tom Dewey came out for Cordell Hull, Stassen was speaking and writing in favor of a foreign policy of enlightened self-interest. He wants a world government – “a definite, continuing organization of the United Nations of the World.” However: “This does not mean that the new level of government will take the place of the national level of government. It will not fundamentally disturb domestic sovereignty. Nations will continue to have their own flags, their own constitutions, their own heritage and their own citizens. The new level should be added to carry out relations among nations” – to keep the peace, enforce international law, stimulate trade, promote health and literacy, administer Axis, backward or disputed territories, and supervised international sea- and airways.

Stassen is equally enlightened on domestic policies. He is for minimum wages, unemployment insurance and old-age pensions; for collective bargaining and strong labor unions; for guaranteed minimum crop prices to farmers; for public works during periods of economic slack. Yet he has so many basic objections to the New Deal that they compound quite a different philosophy of government. He would democratize the labor unions, reform their internal practices, and outlaw jurisdictional strikes altogether. He would liberalize securities regulations, lower taxes on business, tighten up Social Security and government relief in general, and revise the monopoly laws to make them really work.

Stassen’s program for the country is implicit in his program for the Republican Party:

The people want a rebirth of forthrightness, and the world needs a forthright America. The Republican Party can prove itself a match for the times only by being forthright, direct and constructive.

To a practical politician, such sentiments are interesting but not wholly relevant. In an election, principles, while fine to have, are often not as important as a candidate’s oomph or political sex appeal. In the case of Franklin D. Roosevelt, this is summed up in the word “charm.” This is very powerful; and yet, as the five million floating voters look across the span of the next four years, they may decide that they want not merely a charming piece and charming post-war world. They have in mind something solid. And as a symbol of solidity, Stassen is practically epochal. He stands 6’3” tall and weighs over 200 pounds, mostly muscle. His face is pleasant and the firm set of his features, capped by thinning sandy red hair, gives him an appearance of competence and maturity despite his age, which is 37. He looks enough like Gen. Eisenhower to be a younger brother. It has been said unkindly of Dewey that his lack of interest in foreign affairs is due to the poor mental picture he has of himself seated between Churchill and Stalin. It has also been suggested that he use Stassen as a stand-in for such occasions. The idea may or may not be funny, but the political implications for the Republicans in November are not funny at all. Stassen’s nomination would take care of that.

He has diversified support

Regarded from any other angle of practical politics, Stassen’s qualifications are almost poetically complete. His personality is warm, but with the quiet restraint that becomes a statesman. He has an engaging family: A pleasant young wife and two photogenic children, Glen, 8, and Kathleen, 2Âœ. He is a churchgoing Baptist whose favorite drink is milk, but who doesn’t feel self-conscious in the presence of a Scotch and soda. He is a good speaker with a firm, calm, baritone voice, lacking any particular accent; and he was practically suckled on a microphone. He appeals to all groups; he was born and raised a farmer, he wooed and won labor in his own state, he looks and talks like a successful businessman; and since he is now in uniform on duty in an active war theater, he has obvious pulling power among servicemen. Perhaps most important of all, he knows politics. After its lamentable experience four years ago, it will be some time before the GOP forgets that courage and energy are not enough in a campaign.

Stassen even has an impeccable history. He was poor but honest. He stayed honest.

No newspaper in Minnesota or anywhere else recorded the fact that on April 13, 1907, Harold Stassen was born. A week after his birth, on April 22, there appeared in the birth-statistics column the calm statement: “Mrs. W. Stasen [sic], boy.” More momentous happenings occupied the papers at the time. The day before his birth, the legislature passed a bill providing a penalty for anyone inducing a mother not to nurse her child. On the day of his birth, the legislature heard a report on automobiles: “Automobiles must not pass teams, animals, or persons on foot at a greater rate of speed than eight miles an hour
 Chauffeurs running over people must stop and give their number.” Also on the same day appeared a timely editorial note in a Minnesota paper: “President Roosevelt hoped that the Southern Democrats may force his renomination for a third term received a jolt yesterday
”

The important event of the day occurred in a modest, unpainted farmhouse in Dakota County, which takes place in West St. Paul, a stockyard and packing district surrounded by farm and dairy country. The citizens of West St. Paul, while not swept away, were pleased to hear the news, for William Stassen was and is a well-liked member of the community. He has been its mayor three times, has served on the school board and for more than 40 years has been treasurer of his growers’ association. He operates a small truck farm whose produce he hauls across the river each morning to St. Paul, where he sells it from his stall in the public market. He is Norwegian, German and Czech, and his wife is German; they blend into the blonde, rugged, solid, ethnographic landscape of Minnesota.

He was an Alger boy

Harold, the third of four sons, was marked at an early age by ambition, resourcefulness, energy, a thirst for learning and other good campaign material. He attended a one-room country school to which he had to walk two miles twice a day, sometimes through waist-high snowdrifts. His brothers and sister did the same, but with less pluck and luck, and ended up, respectively, a milk wagon driver, a sheet-metal worker and proprietor of a small grocery store. The sister, who is married, has been a statehouse stenographer. Since the Stassens were poor, the children worked to help buy their books and clothing. Harold sold newspapers and also raised and sold skunks, a distinction he shares with few men and no other presidential candidate. At an early age, he became a crack shot with a rifle, producing an anecdote of value to campaign biographers. It was the custom in his neighborhood to hold turkey shoots each year just before Thanksgiving. Each contestant put up a dime to enter, and the winner got a turkey. Harold would take orders around the countryside for a dozen or so turkeys, then go to all the shoots, win all the turkeys, kill and clean them and deliver them to his customers. Later on, he became a national champion marksman.

Harold finished high school at 14, meantime operating a rabbit and pigeon business and a roadside vegetable stand. For a year and a half, while his father was ill, he stayed at home to run the farm. Nevertheless, he managed to graduate from the University of Minnesota at 19. While at the university, he worked part-time as a grocery clerk, an adding-machine operator, a pan greaser in a bakery, and finally as a Pullman conductor on the St. Paul-Chicago run. In his spare time, he became an intercollegiate debater, a champion orator, captain of the school’s national rifle team, an honor student, leader of sundry campus causes and all-university class president. He was so involved in campus affairs that he had to hire a fraternity brother as his secretary. At 21, still working every other day for the Pullman Company and still immersed in campus affairs, he graduated from the university’s School of Law. Without losing a stroke, he opened a law office with Elmer J. Ryan, a fellow graduate, in St. Paul.

There have been various fashions in presidential candidates during the course of U.S. history, beginning of the soldier, succeeded by the social philosopher, who was replaced by the practical politician, who gave way to the soldier again, who was replaced by the idealist, and so on, in an erratic but discernible cycle. It may be a commentary on the present state of civilization that the current fashion is for champions of law and order. Among the Republican candidates this year, nearly all got their starts as watchdogs of the law: Dewey, most famously; but also Warren, as a district attorney; Bricker, as an assistant state attorney general; Saltonstall, an assistant district attorney and even such a token candidate as Green of Illinois, who was a gangbuster in Chicago. It is both a good omen and a tribute to his sense of destiny that Stassen entered public life in the same way. Little more than a year after getting his law degree, he filed for and won the Republican nomination for a county attorney of Dakota County. Almost immediately he collapsed and had to go to a hospital. His strenuous life in college had caught up with him; he had tuberculosis. While he lay ill, his friend and partner Elmer Ryan, though a Democrat, carried on his campaign. And by the time Stassen had recovered, minus one lung, he was the new county attorney.

How to handle labor problems

Opportunities for spectacular crime are fairly limited in Dakota County. Hence, Stassen did not become a national hero overnight. What he lacked in glamor, however, he more than made up in physical and political courage and in his handling of important social antagonisms, as compared to the antagonism of one gangster for another. He showed his character, as well as mere skill and vigor, in such incidents as the threatened milk strike of 1932. Milk prices to the farmer then were so low that in neighboring Iowa, only a few weeks before, dairy farmers had gone on strike, not only refusing to send their own milk to market, but waylaying dairy trucks and dumping their contents on the road. An agitator showed up in Dakota County and at a meeting of local farmers, tried to stir up similar violence. “Block the highways! Spill the milk!” he shouted. “If the county attorney gets in your way, run him out!”

Stassen’s voice came from the back of the room, “The county attorney is here.” He took the platform and told the farmers that if there were any sort of disorder, he would prosecute – but that if they would submit the issues to negotiation, he would act as their counsel without fee. They agreed; Stassen did; the price was raised (without any increase to the consumers) and the peace was kept.

Almost as melodramatically, he prevented bloodshed during a strike of packing-house workers in South St. Paul. Both sides were ready to take to the barricades when he persuaded them to get together and talk their difficulties out. With Stassen in the middle, they did, and within five days, the strike was over. When the company refused to rehire members of the strike committee, Stassen served without pay as their counsel before the NRA Compliance Board, and won their reinstatement. In another case, involving a tax suit, he had a chance to show his legal scholarship. The case wound up in the U.S. Supreme Court, where Stassen, though only 26, had the job of presenting the main argument for the state of Minnesota. He was questioned for an hour on points of law by Chief Justice Hughes, who later wrote the decision. It was unanimously in his favor and set a precedent that was cited 16 times in the next five years in federal court decisions involving related issues.

Stassen served two terms as county attorney. By the end of the second one, he, as well as some millions of Minnesotans, had decided that something had to be done about the fantastic regime of Elmer Benson, the Farmer-Labor governor. Stassen was only 31. Although he had achieved a certain fame in the state because of his record in Dakota County, it was considered quite a good joke among Republican leaders when he filed in the primary for the governorship. He won the nomination and then proceeded to drive 55,000 miles around the state to wage a personal, curbstone campaign. He won the election and surprised his seniors again by doing it with a 225,000 plurality over the combined Farmer-Labor and Democratic candidates. It was the biggest landslide in Minnesota history.

The present fashion in Republican presidential candidates inclines not only toward gangbusters but also toward governors. No other campaign within memory has failed to turn out at least a few Senators, Congressmen, Supreme Court Justices or Cabinet members: Everyone seriously in the race this time is a governor. The reason may be that what the party and country yearn for is a Good Executive – a man who has shown that he can run a state government in a sound, efficient, calm, orderly, orthodox way, and who consequently might run the federal government in the same way. By this criterion, Tom Dewey would be a good candidate. So would Bricker, Saltonstall, Warren, Hickenlooper, Griswold, Baldwin, et al. They each have done a sound, efficient, calm, orderly, orthodox job.

Additional criteria might be suggested, however. One would be: What was the condition of the state government when the sound, efficient, etc., man took over? Another would be: How much of his success does he owe to the war, which has suspended nearly all problems of unemployment, relief, labor relations, public works, patronage, finances? Another would be: What did he do to make these chronic problems easier to handle when they reappear, as they will? By these standards, Stassen’s record in Minnesota is something quite distinct from those of most good Republican (or Democratic) governors.

He reformed the state government

Stassen took office in 1938, two years before the United States began to arm. The preceding regime had been one of the weirdest in American history, marked by every offense from payroll padding to political assassination. The labor war was not a figure of speech; it was a real war, with strong overtones of class revolution. The high point came in April 1937 when a mob took over the state capitol (with Governor Benson’s blessing), broke into a committee room, bulldozed legislators, dispossessed the senators from the chamber and spent the night there, picnicking off the desks and having a riotous good time. Nothing much is lacking but Mme. Defarge and the tumbrils.

The difference between Stassen and his predecessor was shown not many months after his inauguration. Again, an organized mob marched on the capitol to demonstrate against relief methods. Stassen invited its leaders into his office, gave them a polite, attentive hearing, and then escorted them out to the statehouse steps. The crowd booed when he appeared. Stassen looked them over and said: “There’s one nice thing about this country. You can boo your officials without getting pushed up against the wall and shot.” Then he talked about relief, explaining the problems, admitting some faults and promising to do his best to remedy them. When he finished, the mob cheered him and dispersed peacefully.

Stassen not only got along with labor, but so identified himself with its just demands that when he ran for reelection, he won the endorsement of the state CIO. When he first took office, the farm bloc in the legislature pushed a punitive anti-labor bill through the Senate. Stassen persuaded the farmers to drop it in favor of his own temperate program. The chief feature of this is the “Count Ten Law,” requiring a 10-day cooling off period between the time a strike is declared and the time it becomes effective. With Stassen himself and his labor conciliator, who had been the head of a typographical union, as mediators, 10 days usually produced a fair and mutually acceptable solution. When a strike or lockout endangered the public interest, the law also provided that the governor could appoint a special arbitration commission and order a further 30-day wait. During Stassen’s first year, he appointed five such commissions, and each time the threatened strike was prevented.

Fairness and sweet reason were Stassen’s tools in dealing with the labor situation; he applied old-fashioned honesty and efficiency to others. The highway department has a $3 million deficit, incurred in the interest of graft and political pork. Stassen packed 10 members of the old regime off to jail, revamped the department and within a year had converted the deficit into a $3 million surplus. The Farmer-Laborites had loaded the state payroll. Stassen axed 7,000 employees and put through a new civil-service law that covered every department and employee and left him only with the power to appoint the department heads. The Farmer-Laborites had built up an oppressive deficit; Stassen put through a bill that tied expenditures to income. Relief had been an administrative burden of the state; Stassen decentralized it and turned it back to county and local control.

By the time he was ready to leave office, Stassen had fewer statutory powers, by his own request, than any recent Minnesota governor. With his fewer powers, he accomplished more than any other Minnesota governor in history. He had cut the state debt by nearly $40 million, cut yearly expenditures by more than $13 million, reduce the payroll from 17,000 to 10,000, reduce strikes by 70% and lowered property taxes by 46%. At the same time, he increased aid to schools by some $1,600,000, increased old-age benefits by $1,850,000 and improved the functions and increased the budgets of the various social institutions of the state. He set up a $2,500,000 fund for disabled veterans and a $15 million fund for post-war problems.

At the end of his second term, Stassen had a difficult choice to make. His record in Minnesota had made him well known around the country. He had twice been chairman of the National Governors’ Conference. As keynoter at the 1940 Republican Convention, he had impressed his party with his eloquence and manifest ability. As floor manager for Willkie during the convention, he had shown himself to be a shrewd political professional. He was an obvious possibility for the Presidency. If he had stayed on in Minnesota and used his time to proper advantage, his chances for it seemed excellent.

He stepped out of presidential campaign

Stassen ran for a third term, but notified the voters that he was doing so only because his program for the state was not complete. He would resign after the first legislative session, he warned, and then intended to go into the Navy. “This war,” he said, “will be fought by young men of my age, and I want to be with them.” From anyone less obviously sincere than Stassen, this might have sounded precious. But he meant it, and in April 1943, he resigned as governor and was sworn in as a reserve officer. After boot training in the East, he was sent out to the Pacific as a lieutenant commander attached to Adm. Halsey’s staff. When Halsey last week gave over his command of the South Pacific, Stassen continued his duties under Halsey’s successor, VAdm. John H. Newton.

If anyone suspected that Stassen was being politically adroit by putting on a uniform, his subsequent behavior has done nothing to confirm it. He has said nothing, done nothing, nor allowed anyone else to say or do anything for him that would relate his Navy job to politics. Pacific correspondents find him clam-like on the campaign. Not long ago, H. V. Kaltenborn had dinner with Adm. Halsey and the staff at NoumĂ©a, and inevitably, talk turned to the 1944 elections. Finally, after an hour of it, Halsey turned to Stassen, banged his fist on the table and said: “Dammit! Stassen, what’s wrong with you? You haven’t said a word all evening.” Stassen smiled amiably and went on saying nothing.

As flag secretary, Stassen is a sort of general office manager at headquarters, handling routine affairs. He manages to blend into the official landscape and, as one admiral says, be “just another lieutenant commander.” He is well-liked among the staff. He has lived with Halsey and the admiral’s chief of staff and planning officer in a big house near NoumĂ©a, about midway between the beach and the made-over warehouse where Halsey had his offices. Sometimes he accompanied Halsey at sea, sometimes not. He has seen some action, particularly doing a “familiarization cruise” he took with a task force under RAdm. Merrill. A good-sized Japanese force jumped the Merrill ships one night off Empress Augusta Bay. In the battle, the Japanese lost a cruiser and five destroyers and were chased back to within 100 miles of Rabaul, where Japanese planes came in for a dive-bombing attack. The only hits were on Merrill’s flagship where Stassen stayed with the admiral on the open bridge throughout the battle. He made a good target but suffered nothing more than some near misses. Stassen’s evident high safety factor so impressed his colleagues that some of them began to rub him for luck. Superstitious Republicans might note this, and also that, like every other presidential candidate during the century, he has a double letter in his name. E.g.: Franklin Roosevelt, Herbert Hoover, Calvin Coolidge, Warren G Harding, Woodrow Wilson, William Howard Taft, Theodore Roosevelt. On the other hand, of course, there was Wendell Willkie.

While Stassen has been tending to his new business in the Pacific, his friends back in Minnesota and Washington have been conducting a campaign for him that makes up in fervor what it lacks in size and finesse. Having very little money, and no political contact with or aid and advice from their candidate, they are obviously working at a disadvantage. They have certain principles to go by, informally laid down by Stassen before he went into the service; don’t try to smear any other Republican candidate; don’t trade on the Navy uniform; emphasize the post-war plan; enter the primaries in the states bordering Minnesota in order to get a nucleus of pledged delegates. They have followed these rules, but only with middling success. Stassen picked up some delegates in Wisconsin and Nebraska; these, with his Minnesota delegation, will assure him of 35 votes at the convention and his supporters expect to pick up another 25 or so among unpledged delegates. For a campaign lacking the presence of the candidate, this wasn’t bad, but might have been better. Stassen has run best where it doesn’t count – in university “mock conventions” such as Northwestern’s, where he wins more often than any other candidate. Whatever happens in the convention and election of 1944, there is encouragement in this for both Stassen’s and the country’s future.

But Stassen’s supporters are not thinking about the future now. They are sure that their man is the best man and the only man who can beat Roosevelt, and they refuse to admit that he had already been counted out. Nor do they entertain for a minute the idea that he should settle for the Vice Presidency, giving liberal window-dressing to a Dewey ticket. They are well advised in this since, as a matter of fact, Stassen would refuse the Vice Presidency, as he would almost as certainly refuse a Cabinet job in a Dewey administration. They want him to be President, now, this year. And in their hallucinations, they have the picture of him, nominated by some freak of political luck, notified at NoumĂ©a by wireless, flying back in a great gray Navy flying boat to Chicago, cheered by an excited convention, making a dramatic and successful campaign, riding in an open car down Pennsylvania Avenue
 But subconsciously they know it can’t be. As one of them said recently in a conversation, “Golly, he would have been a wonderful candidate.”

The Free Lance-Star (June 26, 1944)

top.banner.rep.conv

Dewey ahead at GOP convention

Action of individual states rolls up strong lead

Chicago Stadium, Chicago, Illinois (AP) –
Thomas E. Dewey’s harvest of pledged votes swelled beyond the total needed for a first ballot nomination as the Republicans held their first session of the 23rd national convention in the steaming amphitheater today.

With state after state jumping on a Dewey bandwagon, the New York Governor had a total of 539 pledged votes, when the opening session ended after a one-hour-and-15-minute meeting. In addition, his supporters said 159 others were assured.


By Paul Miller

Chicago Stadium, Chicago, Illinois (AP) –
Governor Thomas E. Dewey took an apparently insurmountable lead for the Republican presidential nomination today as the party’s 1944 convention opened to the main business of the conclave thus all but settled in advance.

Rapid-fire action by individual states raised the New Yorker’s total of pledged and claimed votes to 650 with 529 needed to nominate.

So far had Governor John W. Bricker of Ohio dropped in the pre-convention determination of state votes that speculation of the delegates switched from the Presidency to talk of vice-presidential prospects headed by Governor Earl Warren of California.

Governor Dwight Griswold of Nebraska, it was announced, will place Governor Dewey’s name in nomination Wednesday morning. Previously, Griswold had been mentioned for the Vice Presidency.

His designation to nominate, said unconfirmed reports on the convention floor, was part of a piece of high strategy that was discussed as shaping up like this:

Griswold (a Midwesterner) nominating Dewey (an Easterner) for President – with Warren (a far Westerner) as the possible vice-presidential choice.

The forces of Governor John W. Bricker continued their fight nonetheless. The Bricker supporters said: “It won’t be decided until the roll call actually starts on the floor Wednesday.”

Governor Dwight H. Green of Illinois had the job of officially welcoming delegates to the Windy City in a speech that accused the Roosevelt administration of “political meddling” with the Armed Forces in running the war.

Green declared that Republicans would give the professional fighting men a free hand.

A new flurry of speculation over the possibility of some Republican action towards Senator Harry F. Byrd (D-VA) was started by Senator Owen Brewster (R-ME), who declared in a radio interview that a “responsible leader” of the Republican Party had approached Byrd with the suggestion that he make himself available for the GOP vice-presidential nomination.

The subject was raised in Washington by a group of Republican Congressmen last week, but Byrd said he was not interested.

top.banner.rep.conv

GOP criticizes conduct of war

New Deal is accused of political meddling

Chicago, Illinois (AP) –
Governor Dwight H. Green of Illinois today accused the Roosevelt administration of “political meddling” with Army and Navy heads in the conduct of the war and pledged that the Republicans, if victorious in November, will give the professional fighting men a free hand.

Welcoming the delegates to the Republican National Convention, Governor Green denounced “New Dealers” as seeking to remain in power on a “Win the War” slogan and asserted:

The winning of the war is uppermost in the mind of every American
 There is no “Win the War” Party in America and public opinion has so properly rebuked the attempts of the New Dealers to grab that slogan that they have almost completely abandoned it.

He said a Republican triumph this year would “strike dread into the hearts of the enemy.”

Green said:

They will know that the government of this nation has passed into the hands of men determined to cut all the red tape and bureaucratic inference with the trained leaders of the United States Army and Navy. Those officers will have in the conduct of the war the unstinted support of the Republican administration, free from political meddling of second-string bureaucrats.

He praised the delegates as “unswayed by the weird pretense that an ‘indispensable man’ exists,” and said they were dedicated to work not only for “the heralded objectives of the ‘Four Freedoms,’ but resolved to reestablish here in America the 33 freedoms guaranteed to all citizens under the Constitution.”

top.banner.rep.conv

State delegation likely to split

Virginia Republicans will divide vote in Chicago

Chicago, Illinois (AP) –
Virginia’s position near the bottom of the roll call may have an important psychological bearing on the Old Dominion’s first ballot vote Wednesday at the Republican National Convention.

Some members, Dewey partisans by inclination, said today “as of now” the Virginia’s vote probably will divide about 50-50 between Dewey and Bricker. Bricker advocates claimed substantial Virginia strength.

Officially, Virginia has two votes pledged to Dewey, two to Bricker, 15 remaining unpledged.

Virginia will have “plenty of time to watch the trend,” some members said, and if it appears to be Dewey on the first ballot, the New York Governor will draw at least a substantial vote.

If, however, many small delegations choose to “pass” vote to watch the tide, leaving the issue far from settled, Virginia may itself choose to pass.

The Old Dominion’s delegation had nearly all arrived, but no call had been issued for a formal caucus.

National Committeeman Henry A. Wise said a meeting probably would be called late Monday. Members of an anti-Wise faction, headed by new state chairman Randolph Dovel, also arrived in Chicago today.

Still smarting under the Convention Committee’s rejections of their claim to the state’s four delegates-at-large, the anti-Wise group promised to renew its claim possibly Monday before the convention’s Credentials Committee.