America at war! (1941–) – Part 5

7876 
740.00119 (Potsdam)/7-3045

Proposal by the U.S. Delegation

[Babelsberg, July 30, 1945]

German External Assets

The United States believes it important that immediate action be taken to exercise control and the power of disposition over German external assets, particularly in neutral countries. This is necessary not only from the standpoint of security but also to preserve such assets for Allied objectives.

It is therefore urged that an appropriate declaration be issued by the United States, the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union, and if possible France, assuming jurisdiction over such assets.

There are attached alternative forms of a declaration, one which would be issued by the Big Three, and the other which would be issued by the Big Three and France.

Following the issuance of such a declaration it is recommended that the Control Council issue a decree vesting German external assets.

[Attachment 1]

Text of Proposed Declaration by the Big Three

The Chiefs of State of the United States, the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union having met at Potsdam, the following Declaration is issued:

The Governments of the United States, the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union declare that German external assets, not already under the control of United Nations which have taken a part in the war with Germany, are subject to the jurisdiction of the Powers occupying Germany and of the Allied Control Council.

All countries in which such assets are located are hereby called upon to place such assets at the disposition of the occupying powers and of the Allied Control Council. The diplomatic representatives of the Powers signatory to this Declaration will act as their representatives in exercising control and the power of disposition over such assets.

[Attachment 2]

Text of Proposed Declaration by the Big Three and France

The Chiefs of State of the United States, the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union having met at Potsdam and having concerted with the Government of France, the following declaration is issued:

The Governments of the United States, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union and France declare that German external assets, not already under the control of United Nations which have taken a part in the war with Germany, are subject to the jurisdiction of the Powers occupying Germany and of the Allied Control Council.

All countries in which such assets are located are hereby called upon to place such assets at the disposition of the occupying powers and of the Allied Control Council. The diplomatic representatives of the Powers signatory to this Declaration will act as their representatives in exercising control and the power of disposition over such assets.

7877 
740.00119 (Potsdam)/7-3045

Proposal by the British Delegation

Potsdam, 30th July, 1945
Secret

Disposal of the German Fleet and Merchant Ships

  1. When this question was discussed at the Third Plenary Meeting on the 19th July, on the basis of the Soviet Delegation’s Memorandum of that date, certain conclusions were reached and it was agreed to leave the matter until the last stage of the Conference.

  2. The British Delegation have given further consideration to the questions raised in the Soviet Memorandum, in the light of the discussion on the 19th July, and submit the following suggestions as a basis for the decisions of the Conference on the subject. These suggestions relate to the numbered paragraphs of the Soviet Memorandum:

    (1) (a) It was agreed on the 19th July that the German surface ships should be shared equally between the Three Powers. The British Delegation suggest that consideration should now be given to allotting a share to France which is an equal party to the terms of surrender for Germany and is a full member of the Control Council for Germany. The allocation of specific vessels is, it is suggested, a matter upon which an expert commission should submit recommendations to the Three Governments, after it had drawn up a list of all available surface ships, including those under construction or already launched, and those under repair which can be quickly completed. Any ships requiring more than three months for completion should be removed from Germany by the country to whom they are allocated. Remaining ships under construction will be destroyed.

    (b) At the same time it was agreed in principle that the German U-boats should be dealt with separately, the greater part being destroyed. A token number would be retained for equal division among the Three Powers for purposes of research. The question of a French share of the retained U-boats should also be considered. Here again, it is suggested that the expert commission should be instructed to make concrete proposals after full investigation of the numbers of U-boats – seaworthy, damaged and under construction or repair – which are in the hands of the Allied authorities. Each of the Three Powers would be responsible for arranging the destruction of U-boats in its control, apart from the token number which it may be agreed to retain.

    In deciding the allocation of German warships, the British Delegation consider that account should be taken of the Rumanian and Bulgarian warships available to the Soviet Union.

    (2) The Soviet request for a proportional share of the German Navy’s reserve of armaments, ammunition and supplies was not discussed at the Plenary Meeting on the 19th July. The Soviet request is acceptable in principle to the British Delegation, who must point out, however, that these stores have been dispersed by the Germans and that the first step must be the preparation of an inventory which should be one of the tasks assigned to the proposed expert commission.

    (3) It was agreed in principle that there should be a division of the surrendered German merchant shipping, but no final conclusion was reached as to the proportions to be allotted to the different Allied States. Mr. Churchill expressed the view that account should be taken of merchant shipping which had passed under the control of the Soviet Government as the result of the armistices with Finland and Rumania. President Truman emphasized the need for German shipping in the war against Japan and for bringing supplies for the rehabilitation of Europe.

    The meeting agreed in principle that without prejudice to the preparation of a scheme for the division of surrendered German merchant ships, all such ships should be available for use in support of the Allied war effort against Japan.

    The British Delegation maintain their point of view that in the division of the surrendered German merchant shipping account should be taken of the shipping taken as reparation by the Soviet Union from the Satellite States. Account should also be taken of the need for providing ships for local German purposes, in accordance with any recommendations which may be made by the Allied Control Council for Germany. Subject to these conditions, the British Delegation renew the suggestion made by Mr. Churchill on the 19th July that a fourth part be made available for division between the other Allied States whose merchant marines have suffered substantial losses at the hands of Germany. The share of the Soviet Union would in that case be one quarter of the total available.

    The shares of the various Allied States would be counted as reparation receipts.

    (4) The British Delegation cannot agree to the timetable proposed by the Soviet Delegation, since, as pointed out above, there is much essential preliminary investigation and listing to be done before the transfer of ships can begin. The British Delegation suggest that the following timetable should be approved in principle by the Conference:

    (a) Warships. Transfers will be carried out as soon as possible after Governments have approved the recommendations of the proposed expert commission.

    (b) Merchant Ships. Proposals for the allocation of specific German merchant ships, in accordance with such decision on allocation as may be agreed by the Conference, should be agreed as soon as possible between the three Governments, in the light of recommendations made by the experts, and particular ships would then be earmarked. The transfer of these ships would take place as soon as they became available after the end of the Japanese War.

    (5) The Plenary Meeting on the 19th July agreed in principle upon the formation of a Three Power Naval Commission, with reciprocal rights for each party to make the investigations required for their work in any territory under the control of the other parties. As mentioned above, the British Delegation propose that there shall be established an expert commission to deal with German warships. Its composition and duties are suggested in paragraphs (1) and (2) above.

    As regards merchant ships the British Delegation suggest that detailed recommendations to give effect to the proposals in paragraphs (3) and (4)(b) should be worked out between suitable expert representatives nominated by the Three Governments to deal with merchant ships, in consultation with representatives of other interested Governments.

  3. There is the possibility that any public announcement that German warships are to be divided amongst the Allies may result in the German crews scuttling ships which might be ordered to sail to Allied ports. It is therefore desirable that no announcement of the division of the German Navy be made, at any rate until the expert commission has completed its investigations, which should include the detailed arrangements for carrying out the transfer of ships. A similar delay is necessary before making any definite announcement about the division of the surrendered German merchant ships.

7878 
740.00119 (Potsdam)/7-3045

U.S. Delegation Memorandum

Potsdam, July 30, 1945, 5:00 p.m.
Top secret

Summary of Meeting of Foreign Ministers July 30, 1945

1. German Reparations
The U.S. Delegation presented the proposals attached hereto (Attachments la, 1b, and 1c) in regard to German reparations, to the Polish Western Frontier and to the admission of certain countries to the United Nations. The British Delegation presented two papers in regard to German reparations which are also attached hereto (Attachments 2 and 3). The Soviet Delegation urged that a specific figure of Soviet reparations from Western Germany be named and suggested 8 hundred million dollars and 2 million tons. They also preferred that the proposal specify reparations from the U.S. and British zones rather than from the Ruhr alone. The question of the specification of a definite figure was referred to the Big Three though the British Foreign Minister stated categorically that he could not agree to such specifications. There was also discussion of who should determine what amounts from Western Germany would be available for reparations and the U.S. presented the suggestion which is attached hereto (Attachment 4).

2. Economic Principles to Govern Treatment of Germany
Decision on this question was put off until the question of German reparations was settled.

3. German External Assets
The U.S. presented a paper on this subject which was referred to the Economic Subcommittee for examination. (Attachment 5).

4. Polish Western Frontier
Mr. Byrnes stated that he could not discuss this question unless agreement could be reached on all three of the proposals which he had presented at the opening of the meeting, i.e., the proposal on German Reparations, proposal on the Polish Western Frontier, and the proposal on Admission to the United Nations.

5. Disposition of the German Fleet and Merchant Marine
Both the British and Soviet papers on this subject, which are attached hereto (Attachments 6 and 7), were referred to the subcommittee which has been set up to deal with this question.

6. Additional Points to Be Included in the Political Principles for Germany
The British paper on this question which is attached hereto (Attachment 8) was considered. The first point was approved. The second point was not approved but was referred for consideration to the Control Council for Germany.

The Soviet Delegation also presented a paper on this question, which is attached hereto (Attachment 9). The British and U.S. Delegations approved the Soviet proposal in principle but took the position that the details should be left to the Control Commission for Germany. The U.S. therefore suggested a modification to the Soviet proposal, which is also attached hereto (Attachment 10). It was agreed that a final decision should be reached on these proposals tomorrow.

7. Southeastern Europe
The British presented a paper on this subject which the Soviets asked for further time to study. The paper is attached hereto (Attachment 11) as well as a Soviet paper presented at the same time on conditions in the Trieste-Istria district (Attachment 12).

8. War Crimes
Both the British and the Soviets presented papers on this subject which are attached hereto (Attachments 13 and 14). There was general agreement that the Conference should make a statement on this subject and the consensus of opinion seemed to be that the statement should not include the names of possible war criminals. It was agreed that Mr. Byrnes would consult Justice Jackson and the Soviets would study the British draft with a view to discussing the question again tomorrow.

9. Fascist Activities in Germany
The Soviets referred to the paper they had circulated in regard to Nazis who are said to be active in the British, French and U.S. zones in Germany and Austria. U.S. and British representatives said that they have asked their commanders for reports on this subject and that they will communicate with the Soviet Government as soon as the reports are received.

10. German Troops in Norway
The Soviets referred to their paper previously circulated on German troops in Norway who are said not to have been disarmed. The British said that they are preparing a reply to this note, which they hope to have tomorrow.

11. Austrian and Italian Reparations
The Soviets presented a new paper on this subject, which is attached hereto (Attachment 15). Mr. Byrnes pointed out that Generalissimo Stalin had already agreed that War reparations would not be asked of Austria. On Mr. Molotov’s motion it was decided once more to refer the question of Italian reparations to the Big Three.

12. The Ruhr Industrial Area
The Soviets presented a paper on this subject, which is attached hereto (Attachment 16). Mr. Bevin stated that he could not discuss this subject without the French but agreed to study the paper.

13. Soviet Citizens from the Baltic, Western Ukraine and White Russia
The Soviets presented a paper on this subject, which is attached hereto (Attachment 17). The British and U.S. Delegations agreed to give the matter consideration.

14. Big Three Agenda
It was agreed that this agenda should be drawn up by informal consultation among the three delegations.

7879 
740.00119 (Potsdam)/7-3045

Memorandum by the Soviet Delegation

[Babelsberg,] July 30, 1945
[Translation]

Soviet Citizens in Allied Territories

According to the information of the Repatriation Soviet Authorities General Thorne, Commander of English troops in Norway, having quoted the British Government’s order refused to deliver to these authorities citizens of the Soviet Baltic Republics, who are at present time in Norway, as well as Soviet citizens-emigrants from the Western Ukraine and Western Byelorussia, several thousand persons altogether.

Similar situation exists in Great Britain from which country 287 Soviet citizens-emigrants from the Soviet Baltic Republics and from the Western Ukraine and Western Byelorussia were not permitted to leave for their native country by the British authorities.

Drawing attention of the Government of Great Britain to these facts the Soviet Government expects that the British Military Authorities will immediately issue instructions about delivering to the Repatriation Soviet Military Authorities of all Soviet citizens-emigrants from the Baltic Republics and the Western Ukraine and Western Byelorussia.

7880 
740.00119 Potsdam/7-3045

Rapporteur’s Report

[Babelsberg,] 31st July, 1945
Secret
P (TERMINAL) 69

  1. Mr. Bevin was in the Chair. The meeting began by conveying to Generalissimo Stalin an expression of the regret with which they had heard of his illness and their hope for a speedy and complete recovery.

  2. The meeting then agreed to the immediate despatch by each of the Three Governments of telegrams to the Governments of France and China inviting their participation in the proposed Council of Foreign Ministers. The telegram to the French Government would also refer to the dissolution of the European Advisory Commission.

  3. The meeting also approved the despatch of telegrams to the French Government communicating to them the text of the statement of political principles to govern the treatment of Germany in the initial control period.

  4. Reparations
    The Foreign Secretaries considered a proposal by the United States Delegation as follows:

    Reparations claims of Russia and Poland to be satisfied from the Russian zone plus:
    (a) 25% of such industrial capital equipment as we determine is not necessary for a peace economy and should be removed from the Ruhr on condition that there would be exchanged an equivalent value in food, coal, potash, zinc, timber, clay products and oil products, to be made available to us by the Soviets.

    (b) An additional 15% of such industrial capital equipment as is determined unnecessary for a peace economy should be transferred from the Ruhr to the Soviet Government without payment or exchange of any kind in return.

  5. The U.S. Delegation made it clear that there were two other questions which must be settled at the same time. The first was the proposal for admission of neutral and ex-enemy states to the United Nations as regards which the U.S. Delegation had circulated a revised note; the second was a proposal concerning the Western frontier of Poland, according to which the U.S. Delegation would agree that the Polish Provisional Government should administer the area claimed by them pending final arrangement of the actual frontier at the Peace Conference. The U.S. Delegation insisted that all three proposals must be the subject of agreement at the same time.

  6. The Foreign Secretaries also considered proposals about reparations and sources of supply for the zones of occupation put forward by the U.K. Delegation.

  7. The discussion showed that there was general agreement with the lines of the American proposal, subject to the following two points:

    (i) The U.S. and U.K. Delegations considered that the figures in the U.S. proposal should be 12½% from all the western zones in exchange for goods, and 7½% from all the western zones without payment. The Soviet Delegation on the other hand maintained that these figures should be 25% from the Ruhr on the basis of exchanges and 15% from each of the Western zones free.

    (ii) The Soviet Delegation wished to see a minimum figure of either weight or value stated in addition to the percentages. The U.S. and U.K. Delegations could not accept this suggestion.

    As there was no agreement on this question, the other two proposals by the U.S. Delegation were not discussed.

  8. Economic Principles
    The British Delegation proposed that the following should be included in the Economic Principles: “Payment for approved imports into Germany shall be a first charge against the proceeds of exports out of current production and out of stocks of goods”.

    The Soviet Delegation asked for the addition of the following sentence: “As regards the rest, priorities should be given to reparations, as compared with the satisfaction of other economic needs”.

    The U.S. and U.K. Delegations were unable to accept the Soviet suggestion.

  9. German Fleet and Merchant Navy
    The U.K. and Soviet Delegations submitted memoranda on the subject. These memoranda were referred to a Sub-Committee composed as follows:

    • U.S. Delegation: Admiral Cooke and Mr. Russell
    • U.K. Delegation: Admiral McCarthy, Mr. Weston and Mr. Ward
    • Soviet Delegation: Admiral Kuznetsov and M. Sobolev

  10. German External Assets
    The U.S. Delegation submitted a memorandum on this subject, which was referred to the Economic Sub-Committee.

  11. Germany – Political Principles
    The U.K. Delegation had proposed two additions to the statement on political principles. The first of these, which was adopted, reads as follows: “So far as is practicable there shall be uniformity of treatment of the German population.”

    The second proposed addition was as follows: “Subject to normal regulations there shall be free circulation of nationals of the Powers represented on the Control Council in all zones by land and air.”

  12. It was agreed that this should be referred for examination by the Control Council for Germany, who should be asked to submit their recommendations about it to the first meeting of the Council of Foreign Ministers in September 1945.

  13. The Soviet Delegation then suggested a third addition to the statement on political principles as follows:

    Assistance will, however, be rendered to the establishment of a central German administration composed of secretaries for respective branches of administration – in the first instance of central administrative institutions for foreign trade, industry, finance, transport and communications. The central German administration shall act under the direction of the Control Council, and it will be their task to coordinate the activities of the Provincial Governments in order to ensure the fulfilment of the decisions of the Control Council and the exercise of functions connected with the solving of problems of an all-German character.

  14. It was agreed to defer this until the Delegations had had an opportunity to study it.

  15. Yugoslavia
    Memoranda on this subject were circulated by the U.K. and Soviet Delegations. It was agreed to consider these memoranda at a subsequent meeting.

  16. War Crimes
    Memoranda on this subject were circulated by the U.K. and Soviet Delegations. It was agreed to consider these memoranda at a subsequent meeting.

  17. Activities of Russian Fascists in Germany and Austria
    The Soviet representative referred to the memorandum circulated by the Soviet Delegation on 27th July. The U.S. and U.K. Delegations said that they had asked for reports from the competent military authorities, which had not yet been received.

  18. German Troops in Norway
    The Soviet representative referred to a memorandum on this subject circulated by the Soviet Delegation on 27th [25th?] July. The U.K. representative said that a reply on this topic had been received and would be sent to M. Molotov as soon as possible.

  19. Administration of the Ruhr Industrial Area
    The Soviet Delegation circulated a memorandum on this subject.

  20. Repatriation of Soviet Citizens from the Baltic, Western Ukraine and White Russia
    The Soviet Delegation circulated a memorandum on this subject.

7881 
740.00119 Potsdam/7-3045

U.S. Delegation Memorandum

Potsdam, July 30, 1945, 5:00 p.m.

Pending Problems Before the Conference, Close of Business, July 30, 1945

I. Problems before the Big Three

{
1. German Reparations
2. Western Frontier of Poland
3. Admission to the United Nations

The U.S. has presented proposals on all three of these questions and has insisted that they be considered as a unit. The British also presented yesterday a new proposal on German Reparations. There seemed to be general agreement on the U.S. proposal concerning reparations, made applicable to the entire British and American Zones rather than to the Ruhr alone, with a corresponding reduction in the percentages. The specific question referred to the Big Three was whether or not a definite figure, in dollars or tons, for the Soviet share of reparations from western Germany should be specified.

  1. Economic Principles for Germany
    It was agreed that decision on this question will depend on the decision on German reparations.

  2. Italian Reparations
    Mr. Molotov’s motion on this question was referred back once more to the Big Three.

II. Problems before the Foreign Ministers

  1. Additional Points for Inclusion in the German Political Principles
    The British proposed two additional points the first of which was accepted and the second referred to the Control Commission for Germany. The Soviets also presented a new point which is still before the Foreign Ministers.

  2. Southeast Europe and Trieste-Istria District
    British and Soviet papers on these subjects are still before the foreign ministers.

  3. War Crimes
    The Soviet and British papers on this subject were presented. It was agreed in principle that a statement on the subject should be issued by the Conference. The question of the exact form of this statement is still before the Foreign Ministers.

  4. Fascist Activities in the U.S., British and French Zones of Germany and Austria
    The U.S. and British Secretaries of State have agreed to reply as soon as possible to a Soviet note on this subject.

  5. German Troops in Norway
    The U.S. and British Secretaries of State have agreed to reply as soon as possible to a Soviet note on this subject.

  6. Disposition of Soviet Citizens from the Baltic, the Ukraine and White Russia now in Allied Territories
    The U.S. and British Secretaries of State have agreed to reply as soon as possible to a Soviet note10 on this subject.

  7. Ruhr Industrial Area
    The Soviet paper on this question is before the Foreign Ministers but the British have stated they could not discuss the subject without the French.

  8. Allied Oil Equipment in Rumania
    The Foreign Ministers have not yet acted on the latest British proposal for dealing with this subject.

III. Problems before subcommittees

  1. German Fleet and Merchant Marine
    British and Soviet papers on this subject are before the subcommittee.

  2. German External Assets
    A U.S. proposal on this subject was referred to the Economic Sub-committee.

  3. Oil for Western Europe
    The Economic Sub-committee has not yet reported on the U.S. proposal on this subject.

  4. Implementation of the Yalta Declaration on Liberated Europe and Satellite States
    The Sub-committee on this subject has not yet reported.

  5. Unrestricted Navigation of International Inland Waterways
    The Sub-committee on this subject has not yet reported.

  6. Transfer of German Populations from Czechoslovakia, Poland and Hungary
    The Sub-committee on this subject has not yet reported.

  7. Directive to the Military Commanders in Germany
    The Sub-committee on this subject is awaiting completion of the work of the Conference in relation to Germany.

  8. Protocol and Communiqué of the Conference
    The Sub-committees are engaged in preparation of these documents.

7882

Lane-Modzelewski conversation, 6 p.m.

Polish Delegation HQ, 10 Domgasse, Babelsberg

Present
United States Poland
Mr. Lane President Bierut
Deputy Prime Minister Mikołajczyk
Mr. Modzelewski 
860c.00/7-3145: Telegram

The Appointed Ambassador to Poland to the Acting Secretary of State

Babelsberg, July 31, 1945
Secret
Victory 444

To Acting Secretary of State from Lane.

Called yesterday on Modzelewski former Polish Ambassador Moscow now Assistant Minister Foreign Affairs, President Bierut and Mikołajczyk also joined group. Following is summary of Modzelewski’s remarks:

  1. Newspaper correspondents should be able to enter Poland before end August. Only present obstacle poor quality telegraphic communications. (As Modzelewski mentioned censorship this may also be reason for short delay.)

  2. Consulates can be established Danzig, Poznan, Lodz and Cracow. (Depending on outcome of western frontier we may suggest Breslau also.)

  3. Rate of exchange for diplomatic corps will have to be arranged. Present rate of eleven zlotys and fraction impossible for us to subsist on.

  4. Policing entirely adequate. Polish Government will furnish sufficient guards. Unnecessary for us bring military detachment. (Shall report further on arrival Warsaw.)

  5. Coal deal being arranged with U.S. here. They want goods in return principally fats, meats and oils.

  6. Requested my personal advice re Oskar Lange as Ambassador to U.S. I replied I thought it might create unfortunate impression because his U.S. Citizenship.

  7. Soviet troops being withdrawn from Poland except for portion west of 1939 west frontier. (Repeated to Moscow and Paris for Lovell.)

  8. Soviet, Czech, Yugoslav, French Ambassadors and Swedish and British chargés now in Warsaw.

7883

Meeting of the Communiqué Subcommittee, evening

Present
United States United Kingdom Soviet Union
Mr. Brown

Brown: “… Met with communiqué committee after Foreign Ministers, British and Soviets seemed to like draft. Foote and I had prepared it. All of it had previously been submitted to British. …”

7884 
761.94/7-2145: Telegram

The Japanese Ambassador in the Soviet Union to the Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs

Moscow, July 30, 1945 — 8 p.m.
[Translation]
Secret
urgent

1480

Re your telegram No. 952

  1. There is no reason to believe that Stalin was not informed beforehand on the Potsdam joint declaration and this must be considered only natural, judging from the present relationship among the three countries – the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union. Also, for the most part, we can surmise that the above-mentioned joint declaration had some connection with our plan to send the special envoy, i.e., our first request to the Soviet Union on the 13th regarding the dispatch of a special envoy. It can be suspected that the subject was casually mentioned to the leaders of the United States and Great Britain at Potsdam. I believe we can conclude that the recent joint declaration was based on this information and that the three countries – the United States, Great Britain, and China – made a proclamation in an effort to make their stand clear and definite. As to whether or not the declaration of the 26th was made after the leaders of the United States and Great Britain were informed of the first request which I made to Lozovsky on the 25th and also regarding the second request (my telegram No. 1449) on sending the special envoy, all this is not actually too important. Also, in reality, we believe that a discussion was held with Chiang Kai-shek prior to our presentation of the request on the 25th. Nevertheless, it is possible that they have already ferreted out signs of our overtures to conclude a negotiated peace at that time. The only ones who knew the circumstances of that period are Stalin and Molotov, and it is a difficult task to find out the truth. As for our side, I believe there is nothing we can do but to reason as indicated above.

  2. In connection with the above problems, one important point is that by issuing the joint declaration, the United States and Great Britain made persistent demands on Japan to surrender unconditionally immediately, and another important point which they made clear is that they have no intention of relaxing the terms as stated in the declaration. If Stalin sees that it is impossible to shake the will of the United States and Great Britain regarding the above points, it would mean that our request to send the special envoy cannot be accepted and will be futile, regardless of how we explain that our desire to terminate the miserable war is in accordance with the will of our gracious Emperor and that Stalin will be called the advocate of world peace, etc. As for the United States and Great Britain, their contention will be that the only way for Japan to avoid the bloodshed of war is to surrender immediately. Stalin will also exert sufficient heavy pressure on the United States, Great Britain, and China regarding Manchuria, China, Korea, etc., in the event that Japan surrenders. He is also believed to have made up his mind to push through his claim and actually holds the power to do so. Therefore I believe that Stalin feels there is absolutely no necessity for making a voluntary agreement with Japan. On this point I see a serious discrepancy between your view and the actual state of affairs.

Also, attention should be paid to Australian Foreign Minister Evatt’s announcement, as reported by the BBC on the 30th, that he was opposed to the attitude of the joint declaration against Japan since it tends to be more lenient toward Japan than the stand taken by the Allied nations against Germany in the past.

I request that you read through my telegram No. 1476 together with this telegram.

7885

Byrnes-Attlee meeting [?]

Present
United States United Kingdom
Secretary Byrnes Prime Minister Attlee
Foreign Secretary Bevin

Byrnes: “As soon as Mr. Attlee and Mr. Bevin returned I visited them and, after several hours discussion, obtained their agreement in principle to our proposal [on reparations from Germany].”

7886

Mosely-Ward and Mosely-Gusev conversations

Present
United States United Kingdom Soviet Union
Mr. Mosely Mr. Ward Mr. Gusev 
740.00119 Control (Germany)/7-2945

Memorandum by the Political Adviser to the Representative on the European Advisory Commission

[Babelsberg, July 30, 1945]

Informed J. G. Ward (UK) and Gousev (USSR) July 30, of U.S. approval and timing arrangement. Telegram to Mr. Winant, July 30.

P[HILIP] E. M[OSELY]

7887 
740.00119 EAC/7-3045: Telegram

The Secretary of State to the Ambassador in the United Kingdom

Babelsberg, July 30, 1945
Top secret
Victory 440

To American Embassy, London, information State Department, Washington, D.C. For Winant.

Re your 65481, July 28, repeated to Department 7606, Comea 345 and re your 65482, July 28, repeated to Department as 7607, Comea 346 and re your 281045, July 28

United States Government has approved three proposed public statements re zones of occupation in Austria, control machinery in Austria and consultation with governments of other United Nations in exercising four-power authority in Austria. US Government approves simultaneous issuance three joint statements in four capitals at a time to be determined in each. Publication of three joint statements should not precede publication of conference communiqué. Each might agree that three joint statements be issued 24 or 48 hours after publication of conference communiqué.

Mosely has informed Gousev of US approval of three statements and of proposal for their issuance immediately after conference communiqué. Gousev has not yet reported re Soviet clearance of three statements and timing of their publication.

BYRNES

7888

The Pittsburgh Press (July 30, 1945)

1500 PLANES BATTER JAPAN
Pre-invasion drive in 21st day

Tokyo region pounded by carriers; warships bombard Hamamatsu

…

7889

Gen. Roosevelt asks release from Army

‘Advised’ to retire, Washington hears

…

7890

Empire State office looted of thousands

Building escapes structural damage

…

7891

Big Three working on communiqué

Military decisions to be kept secret
By Merriman Smith, United Press staff writer

…

7892

Prosecution finishes case against Petain

Roosevelt pledged aid to France, court told

…

7893

He tossed dice and lost –
Two-wife captain worries about honor of WAC bride

Can’t find letter on No. 1’s ‘death’
By Nat A. Barrows

…

7894

Nazis list losses at 3,625,354

Total does not include men wounded

…

7895

U.S. plans drive on tax chiselers

Black markets also to be attacked

…