10 days before election –
Perkins: AFL demand for decision on pay formula perils WLB
Federation withdraws from board hearings; dispute may cost Roosevelt labor votes
By Fred W. Perkins, Pittsburgh Press staff writer
Washington –
Ten days ahead of election, the National War Labor Board was plunged today into apparently the most serious of its periodic crises, with the possibility that it may get worse and affect some labor votes for President Roosevelt.
The American Federation of Labor members have withdrawn from settlement of wage cases involving the “Little Steel” formula until the Board makes a report or recommendation to the President on the proposal of the Board’s labor members that this yardstick be broken.
The danger of further cleavage in this wartime agency was indicated by a statement of George Meany, secretary-treasurer of the AFL and a board member, that Chairman William H. Davis “invited us to withdraw, period.” The intimation was that the withdrawal might become complete, which would break up this 12-member agency organized on a basis of equal representation for the public, management and labor, and with the labor members divided between the AFL and the CIO.
But Mr. Meany declared:
We have not considered this invitation to withdraw and we are not considering it. We just haven’t done anything about it.
Chairman Davis said, “I certainly did not invite the AFL members to withdraw from the board,” but he added that members, including those representing labor, ought to abide by the majority decisions and accept their share of responsibility for the board’s actions.
Mr. Davis said he could see no similarity between this situation and the one in 1940, when John L. Lewis broke up the National Defense Mediation Board (predecessor of WLB) by withdrawing the CIO members.
CIO eases pressure
The background of the situation:
Both CIO and AFL members of the WLB pressed with full vigor until about a week ago to get the wage question to the White House, in ample time for Mr. Roosevelt to make a decision before election. The CIO members supporting the President for reelection, suddenly took off, the pressure, and then the AFL members, who are not declared supporters of Mr. Roosevelt, began to put it on.
The CIO members were informed, according to statements in labor circles, that their pressure for a presidential wage decision just before election was likely to lose votes for the candidate they are supporting.
Rank and file restive
The AFL members, led by Mr. Meany, seem to be under no such political inhibition, and would like the heat applied to the White House as far as possible in advance of the election.
Rank-and-file union members, in many states and of both CIO and AFL, are reported restive under the maneuvers by which the WLB has delayed a decision on the wage question for many months and now is in position to put it off until after election.
The WLB setup of equal representation from the public, management and labor is being challenged by some labor authorities who contend that labor questions as well as all others should be determined only by representatives of the public.
Labor ‘duped,’ UMW paper says
Washington (UP) –
The United Mine Workers’ Journal in a series of editorials in its last edition before the presidential election charged today that labor had been “duped and dumped by the Roosevelt administration” and “has been given no guarantee” of cabinet representation if Mr. Roosevelt is reelected.
The Journal, official organ of the UMW, also charged that Mr. Roosevelt if reelected may appoint Anna Rosenberg, New York, Secretary of Labor; that Senator Joseph H. Ball (R-MN), “deserted the Republican Party” to support Mr. Roosevelt in a “vote-getting deal at the White House” and that the War Labor Board “sought to perpetuate itself as a compulsory board of arbitration.”
The Journal identified Mrs. Rosenberg as a “personnel director for millionaire department store owners” who was appointed by the President to the CIO-AFL Labor Victory Committee and described her as “the President’s labor advisor.”