America at war! (1941–) – Part 3

7645

Stringer: Hitler’s West Wall mass of wreckage

By William J. Stringer

With U.S. forces in Normandy, France (UP) – (June 8, delayed)
Hitler’s supposedly invincible West Wall tonight is a sad spectacle of broken guns and pillboxes and ripped “secret defenses” along the beachfront of at least 15 miles.

When I toured mile after mile of beaches this afternoon, I saw scores of twisted masses of steel which were once powerful German guns and miles of blackened rubble which were flamethrowers and artillery blockhouses. I saw thousands of torn pieces of iron which had been secret underwater obstacles.

Hitler’s West Wall is truly a mass of wreckage. No cyclone could have done as thorough a job as Allied naval guns, artillery and demolitions.

Army and Navy will draw from common pool

…

7646

French patriots near Swiss frontier reported in revolt

Grenoble said to be under siege

London, England (UP) – (June 10)
Multiple indications of an insurrection by Frenchmen outside the tiny Allied beachhead of liberated France were highlighted tonight by reliable reports of full-scale revolt of the local population of two French Departments near the Swiss frontier.

According to advices reaching Free French circles here, much of the population of the Departments of Ain and Saône-et-Loire joined “French Fighting Forces of the Interior” – new name for fighting French patriots – to openly oppose the Germans. Fighting was reported in the towns of Bourg and Mâcon.

Another report reaching London said that the French town of Bellegarde, 18 miles from Geneva, had been cut off by patriots after heavy fighting with the Germans.

Grenoble surrounded

The newspaper La Suisse reported that other French patriots surrounded Grenoble, in southern France, and placed it under siege, but there is no confirmation of this action.

Still other reports of open fighting north of Ain and Saône-et-Loire Departments, in the Vosges Forest, where patriots contacted a German unit of 2,000 men and took 300 prisoners, were received by Free French circles.

Among smaller-scale actions reported was that of a guerrilla attack against a German detachment in Brittany where 20 Germans were killed and war materiel was captured.

Free French London headquarters tonight reported destruction of 50 railway engines in the Saône-et-Loire Department, which contains the Le Creusot Armament Works, and such extensive damage to transformers in the region of Lunéville that factories there will be forced to operate on one-third of their usual electrical power for two months.

Refugees returning

These reports coincided with Berne dispatches indicating that many Frenchmen who sought refuge in Swiss territory had returned to Maquis – the French “bushwhackers” of Upper Savoy Province – and that the original sabotage army had been increased “manifold” because Allied landings encouraged previously timid civilians to join clandestine work called for by Gen. Eisenhower to impede the Germans.

A German report repeated that the Allies are parachuting pigeons to the French so that they can send back valuable information, and a Madrid news dispatch to London said that the Germans are offering a 2,000-franc reward for each Allied pigeon captured.

Transocean reported that 25,000 British Union Jack flags have been discovered in Paris.

Vichy radio said all militiamen in the region had been called to active duty. Radio Paris announced drastic suppression of telegraphic communication in a large region of France, the Germans announced that Frenchmen violating stringent emergency decrees would be shot on the spot and the Laval Cabinet dissolved the French Youth Organization to enroll members in the German Labor Corps.

7647

Finnish leaders denounced as pro-German

…

7648

Allied warships rout Japs without a shot

…

7649

Brooklynite swims 200 yards to land under German fire

A Brooklynite’s grim story of swimming 200 yards to the invasion coast of France in the first wave, under constant heavy fire, was related yesterday in a rebroadcast interview conducted by NBC’s George Hicks in London.

Frances James Agusta, gunner’s mate on a small landing craft, described “heavy casualties” as the personnel in the boat swam to shore with “many being hit while in the water.” Most of the fire was from artillery pieces, he said, with the rest being machine-gun fire.

Agusta declared:

The wounded do not cry or moan. They sit there and try to hold what part of them is wounded. The rest of the landing force continue on the job and leave the casualties for the medical corpsmen.

Asked what the major landing problems were, he stressed minefields which had not been cleared and the heavy tides. His grueling experiences found him in the water three hours.

Agusta concluded:

I’m a little tired, have swallowed some oil and was a bit scared. Otherwise, I’m all right.

7650

americavotes1944

North Carolina Governor decries revolt in South

Governor J. Melville Broughton of North Carolina, whose delegation to the Democratic National Convention is instructed to vote for his nomination for Vice President, told a press conference yesterday that, regardless of “upsurges” occurring in the Southern states, the solid South would stand behind the President for a fourth term and that he would be reelected on the war and peace issue.

He also voiced the judgment that issues which have arisen would be “reconciled” at the national convention without being permitted to reach a point where a split might ensue.

Answering a question whether he believed President Roosevelt would run, he said:

I believe that he will be a candidate and will be reelected, notwithstanding various upsurges and the feeling of resentment which is directed against encroachment upon matters which the South feels should be treated purely at the state level.

I think the decisive issue to be the conduct of the war and the conduct of the peace after the war and that all other issues will be obscured in the minds of the people. I say this although I have heard some people say this with a great deal of reluctance and purely as a realistic appraisal.

Governor Broughton held a press conference at the Hotel Pennsylvania before meeting Governor John W. Bicker of Ohio, an active candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, in a radio discussion of national issues last night.

Asked about the so-called political “revolt” in some of the Southern states, Governor Broughton said he was “not competent to comment on what’s behind it.” He said that from information reaching him it had originated from resentment toward what was considered “interference with state prerogatives.”

“They don’t charge it to the President, but to some parts of the administration’s program,” he said.

His state has no poll tax

His own state has not had a poll tax for many years, but, at the same time, would not, the Governor said, attempt to tell another what stand it should take on the question. He said he did not consider the poll tax issue as one to be handled in the party’s platform. Later, he said, in answering questions, he did not believe the CIO Political Action Committee would insist upon an anti-poll tax plank in the Democratic platform to the point where a clash over the issue might jeopardize the President’s chances of reelection. He admitted the South’s fight for restoration of the two-thirds rule at the convention was “a right strong movement.”

He said:

I don’t know how far it will get, although I doubt this question alone would be sufficient to cause a split.

The Governor said in his judgment the border states of Kentucky, West Virginia and Oklahoma will go Democratic and he also suggested Ohio was more likely to be carried by President Roosevelt than for Kentucky to go Republican.

Governor Broughton, declaring North Carolina has enjoyed a huge industrial boom, said that, in his opinion, all the states were in an excellent financial condition to meet post-war problems “without looking to the federal government.”

7651

Beattie: Showdown battle in France may knock Nazis out of war

Reporter reviews the invasion
By Edward W. Beattie

EDITOR’S NOTE: Edward W. Beattie, in charge of the United Press staff at Allied Supreme Headquarters and a veteran military reporter, has filed the following “balance sheet” on the first five days of fighting in the invasion. He obtained his information from land, sea and air officers who are in close touch with the situation at SHAEF.

London, England (UP) – (June 10)
The Allies are working under a specific plan in their invasion of the Norman coast and that plan has two limits – maximum success and minimum success.

In five days of fighting, they have neither achieved maximum success nor have the Germans been able to confine them to the minimum requirements of the time table. In other words, there have been both triumphs unci disappointments.

Surprise achieved

Military observers here believe that, as of tonight, the following are the outstanding accomplished and potential developments of the battle of Normandy:

  • The Allies achieved a measure of tactical surprise, threw the Germans off balance temporarily on Tuesday morning and secured beachheads before a strong counterattack could be started.

  • The Germans are attempting desperately to cling to their stronghold of Caen and to protect the big port of Cherbourg through which the Allies could funnel reinforcements and heavy equipment.

  • The enemy now has ten divisions deployed tor frontline action with few more held in close reserve.

  • The showdown battle is still to come. When it comes, in the opinion of some military experts, the Allies may be able, by winning decisively, to knock Germany out of the war before any Allied soldier sets foot on the soil of the Reich.

Disappointment to Nazis

It’s safe to say that the five days have been a big disappointment to the German High Command, which counted on the beach defenses to cut the invading force to shreds or – at the very worst – upon quick, heavy counterattacks to obliterate it on chosen battlegrounds behind the beaches.

The Germans failed at both stages and with Allied sea and airpower behind it, the invading army should be able to hold what it has won.

That much I am permitted to tell you after soliciting the assistance of the most authentic sources of information on the progress of the Normandy campaign at Gen. Eisenhower’s headquarters.

The tactics of Marshal Erwin Rommel show that he thinks our initial effort threatens: his dispositions indicate he believes that we threaten firstly the port of Cherbourg, secondly Rouen, on the road to Paris.

Allies prove power

We have already proved our ability to crack the outer defense line. We’re now in process of proving that our forces have the ability to hold their gains in the face of heavy counterattacks. Our advance has been made despite the handicap of bad weather, which delayed supporting operations by sea and in the air. With clearing weather, our advantages in these respects should begin to bear weight.

This will help when we meet the counterattack of Rommel’s ten identified divisions along the road to Paris, probably within the next week.

Rommel and his supreme commander, Marshal von Rundstedt, will be afraid to commit themselves too heavily to this battle because they do not know yet where, when and at what strength the Allies plan other assaults on the continent.

Decisive battle forecast

The final showdown will probably come when both sides are fully deployed – and this deployment will not come until the grand strategy worked by the Allied Combined Chief of Staffs has been unfolded. The initiative is now ours.

When Rundstedt is forced to throw in his strategic reserve, the Allies will have their chance to win the showdown battle. This certainly will be before the end of summer, probably in late July. By that time, the Red Army should be hitting Fortress Europe from the east with the greatest concentration of fighting men ever thrown into action.

The opinion of many observers here that a clear-cut victory on some French battlefield would end the war against Germany before the Rhine had been crossed depends on many factors, such as the progress of the Russians, progress of the drive up Italy, the growing power of air attack and the political state of Hitler’s satellite coalition.

7652

Munro: Shorty’s ‘Honey’ tank invades Kraut camp

By Ross Munro

With the Canadians in France (UP) – (June 9, delayed)
They had practically written off the “Honey” tank, with its crew, when “Shorty” drove it back into camp.

Only one gun was working, there were bullet holes through some of the lighter armor and the turret and the hull had been scorched with grenade and shell blasts.

But trooper J. C. “Shorty” Mackensie of Rouyn-Noranda, Québec, the driver, climbed from the bow turret with his face smoked as black as a minstrel’s, and told me this story of a wild night foray into German lines on the perimeter of the beachhead.

Roar through main street

He said:

We are way out in front, with our Shermans, making reconnaissance. We come to a town, so we button down our turrets and belt right through the main street wide open, with Jerries bouncing grenades off us.

This sturdy little former miner said that with him in the tank were trooper Harry “Happy” Webb of Welland, Ontario; trooper Wilfred “Bing” Miller of Walkerton, Ontario, and a sergeant who doesn’t want to be named but who fought in tanks in Italy for three months and knows his way around.

Shorty continued:

An 88 opens up on us, so I zigzag our Honey around through a field. The fourth shot is so close it rocks us and the fifth nearly gets us. But we breeze off and whoop down a road.

And there we are, breezing right along, see, when we run right into a Jerry camp. There is a barrier over the road, so I swing Honey around and beat it back, with Jerries leaping out of bushes and ditches to heave grenades at us.

Nazis beaten off

They smack us with machine guns and swarm all around us a couple of times. We beat them off with our guns, but these slowly go out of action and it isn’t very long out of action and it isn’t very long before we have only a revolver and one machine gun left. It looks pretty bad.

Mackenzie said that just about then, it got dark:

So we get outta that tight spot and go off into the fields, flat out, until I guess we’re about half a mile or so from the Jerry camp. Then we decide to bed down alongside the tank for the night – a fellow’s got to sleep sometime.

A German patrol found them a short time later, the trooper related, and the sergeant challenged the Jerries.

He explained:

But there weren’t no answer. We didn’t shoot and they didn’t either. The Jerry patrol commander just stands there with his men behind him and looks, then went away. We thought we were going to get it for sure then, but, instead, we get some sleep.

When it gets light, we come back to our outfit, and were our guys surprised to see us show up! That sure was a night.

Gorrell: Grenades smoke out Nazi nest and paratrooper lets ‘em have it

By Henry T. Gorrell

With U.S. airborne troops, somewhere in France (UP) – (June 10)
They shot one of my mates in the leg. I smoked them out of their nest with grenades and let them have it one by one with phosphorus bombs. The speaker was Pvt. Charles E. McGary of Paducah, Kentucky. He had just exchanged his drenched clothing for a German jacket and a French farmer’s pants.

James H. Talley of Texarkana, Texas, said:

I was deep in the swamp and saw a German sniper sloshing down the road shooting. I bumped him off and then three more came up looking for me with rifles. Then one was hit by shrapnel – the other two plunged into the water and came toward me crying “Kamarad!”

For two hours, the little group of paratroops had been fighting through a backcountry swamp dotted with enemy gun positions. They were equipped with nothing heavier than rifles. Their own naval shrapnel as well as German machine-gun bullets buzzed all around. First, they had stormed an 88mm gun post and annihilated its crew. Then they took on one machine gun next after another, systematically cleaning them out with grenades and knives.

Now wet and muddy, they were resting under some apple trees, cleaning their pistols, bayonets and clothes. They were telling me all about it.

Pvt. Arthur Boyung of Milwaukee said:

In some cases, the Germans were so scared they wouldn’t come out even though they could see we were going to blow them up. We didn’t have time to argue, so the Germans went up with their own guns.

Donald McFarland of Alameda, California, told me he and three other paratroopers rushed one machine-gun nest and killed five Germans without receiving a scratch.

Then, Pvt. Francis M. Jirinee of Springfield, Ohio, held out a German canteen:

I took a sip. It wasn’t water; it was the most powerful applejack I have ever tasted.

“There’s plenty more in that barn back there,” Jirinee said, jerking his thumb over his shoulder. He mentioned something about some bodies being there, too.

The little group had started the day as members of several different units. Coming together under the avalanche of shells and shrapnel in the swamp, they had decided to stick it out as buddies the rest of the way.

7653

Editorial: Our operations in France reflect wise leadership

It is not immodest or chauvinistic to say that the part Americans played in the landing on Normandy’s coast reflected the greatness of the nation and the vision, the wisdom and courage of its leadership. That memorable incident cannot be detached from the history of the past and considered as an event of a day. It was the culmination of a great deal of labor, mixed with purpose and vision, of conferences and plans, of determination and of a sustaining faith in the ultimate triumph of a cause and an ideal.

If a number of things had not happened and policies had not been initiated years ago, before Pearl Harbor but while war loomed as a certainty in the eyes of all but those who would not see, Allied troops would not now be on the soil of France and victory and peace would be more distant prospects.

The time of decision is brought closer simply because the obstructive tactics of isolationists were not permitted to prevail and the nation began to prepare for a challenge which from the beginning was inevitable.

Even before Pearl Harbor, the United States, through the operation of Lend-Lease, was sustaining hard-pressed potential allies. The exchange of destroyers for Atlantic bases was an aid to Britain in desperate hours when the U-boat was rampant. The building up of the Army and Navy and the adoption of Selective Service, a politically unpopular move under the existing circumstances, have been factors in placing in the field a great army of millions, perfectly trained and equipped, and capable of holding its own and even mastering the armies of the world’s most traditionally militaristic nation.

The task of placing an army of hundreds of thousands of men on the Normandy shore and supporting it with 4,000 ships and some 11,000 planes, while at the same time carrying on a war in the Pacific and a campaign in Italy, really began nearly five years ago, when German panzer divisions crashed over the frontier of Poland and it became apparent that marauders were again on the loose.

In the face of bitter opposition from some of the less realistic elements of Congress and from other quarters, the preparation went forward, while America-Firsters, political demagogues and some sincere but deluded lovers of peace raised their voices in angry protest. Finally, of course, the tragedy of Pearl Harbor revealed strikingly the justification for every move that had been made. And then, in the course of a short time, a navy that lay at the bottom of Pearl Harbor was dominating the North and South Pacific and making the Atlantic as safe for transports as a ferry trip across the Hudson, and a great army was being whipped into shape and industry was accomplishing miracles of production.

Now, deep in crisis, it is possible to report that everything is proceeding according to plan, a plan vaguely conceived some years ago when Hitler loomed large on the horizon and it became clear that democracy would have to fight in order to survive, a plan refined and perfected in Washington and Casablanca, Québec and Tehran, a plan into whose formulation and fulfilment many elements of greatness have entered.

7654

americavotes1944

Lindley: Campaign in France scanned for effect on home politics

By Ernest Lindley

The Republicans have been relieved of one worry which had begun to plague at least a few of them: that the invasion had been timed to coincide with their national convention. The suggestion that this might occur originated some time ago, probably with a joking newspaper correspondent. But as time passed, and the invasion did not begin, some of the politicians began to take it seriously – even to the point of discussing what to do in such a predicament.

Now an effort is being made to read political significance into the fact that it may be six weeks before the success of the battle now begun can be accurately appraised. This would be just before the Democratic National Convention, whereas when the Republicans meet the issue between the Allied armies and the German forces in France probably will not have been decided.

That forecast may be correct, on both counts, although, since the enemy has something to say about the matter, the best-informed and most expert “insiders” can do no more than conjecture as to whether the main crisis will come in four weeks or 60 days or later. The inference is being drawn, however, that Mr. Roosevelt contrived the timing of the invasion so that the Republicans would have to meet amid uncertainty while he could have the advantage oi knowing whether the invasion was an assured success before deciding on his own course.

Some of this talk may be inspired by the hope that if all has gone well on the Western Front by mid-July, and the defeat of Germany seems likely to come before election, Mr. Roosevelt will decline renomination. In the opinion of many political observers, the surrender of Germany before Election Day would diminish Mr. Roosevelt’s chances of reelection. If that were so, and if Mr. Roosevelt were really eager for another term, and if he were that kind of man, one would assume that he would have seen that the invasion was delayed until there would be no opportunity of compelling the surrender of Germany before mid-November.

It may seem incredible that any sane person could think that the President would juggle war plans to suit partisan or personal political purposes. But it was charged in 1940 that he was overemphasizing the danger to this country in order to get himself reelected. It was charged then and since that he was contriving to get us into the war in order to fasten a permanent “dictatorship” on the country. And it is quite clearly the intention of certain elements in the extreme opposition to resume this line of attack during the campaign of 1944. Indeed, they have already done so. Compared to these charges, the adjustment of an invasion date would be only a misdemeanor.

Some who make these charges and insinuations do not believe them themselves. They simply regard some of their constituents as gullible. Others simply are gauging the President by their own political standards – although some of them, if they had the responsibility, might make these weighty decisions quite as conscientiously as he does. Their affliction may be that the only responsibility they feel, the only task to which they have been rededicated by the great campaign of liberation, is the winning of the 1944 election, no matter by what means.

Mr. Roosevelt would have preferred, I think, that the national nominating conventions be deferred until September. But the Republicans insisted on having theirs at the usual time, and the Democrats decided not to delay beyond July. Obviously, all of these months right up to the election, and probably for some time thereafter, will be months crowded with momentous events. Mr. Roosevelt has a great role to play in these. These events, and his role in them as the responsible head of the nation, will be the principal part of his campaign, assuming that he accepts renomination.

It would be surprising if certain spectacular occurrences did not coincide with political rallies, speeches, or tours, planned by the Republicans or, for that matter, by sundry Democratic candidates, including Mr. Roosevelt. All campaigns are fought at many levels, ranging from the noblest words of the leading candidates to the skullduggery of ward-heelers. In this, the various levels are likely to be especially noticeable. And the outcome may depend on whether the voters are taking their politics as usual or whether the greatest enterprise of our time – winning the war and organizing the peace – does make a difference.

7655

Supreme HQ Allied Expeditionary Force (June 11, 1944)

Communiqué No. 12

Good progress has been made on the right. Our troops are now fighting in the outskirts of MONTEBOURG. To the southwest of the town, we have held enemy counterattacks attempting to stop our advance west of the main CHERBOURG railway.

U.S. troops have liberated LISON and have advanced several miles southward on a broad front. In the vicinity of TILLY-SUR-SEULLES there is heavy fighting. The enemy has strong armored forces in this area and is stubbornly resisting our advance along the river SEULLES. A particularly effective bombardment was carried out in this area by HMS ARGONAUT (Capt. E. W. L. Longley-Cook, CBE RN) and HMS ORION (Capt. J.P. Gornall, RN).

Allied warships also gave support to the armies yesterday by bombarding mobile batteries and enemy concentrations.

This morning, the Allied Air Forces continued their supporting operations in spite of adverse weather. Strong forces of heavy day bombers attacked airfields, bridges, gun positions, and other targets ranging from the battle are to the vicinity of PARIS. Objectives in the PAS DE CALAIS were also bombed. They were escorted by a strong force of fighters which attacked enemy tanks and lines of communication.

Medium bombers, fighter-bombers and fighters attacked many targets behind the battle area including two railway bridges over the river VIRE, military trains, railway sheds and yards, armored cars, and troop concentrations. Fighters maintained patrols over the battle area and shipping into the Channel. There was little enemy opposition in the air, though intense flak was met at some points.

Seaborne supplies are arriving at a satisfactory rate.

Enemy E-boats were active again during the night and a number of brisk gun actions ensued during which one of the enemy was destroyed. Several of the enemy were damaged by gunfire before they evaded the pursuit. Early this morning, our coastal aircraft attacked enemy E-boats off OSTEND and left two of them on fire.

U.S. Navy Department (June 11, 1944)

CINCPAC Communiqué No. 46

A powerful Pacific Fleet Task Force struck enemy positions on Saipan, Tinian, and Guam, in the Mariana Islands, with carrier aircraft on June 10 (West Longitude Date). Further details are not now available.

7656

Völkischer Beobachter (June 12, 1944)

Fahrplan des Gegners in Unordnung –
Weiterer Aderlaß der Invasionsflotte

Verlegenes Verschweigen der schweren Verluste

vb. Berlin, 11. Juni –
Aus den verbissenen Bemühungen der englisch-amerikanischen Invasionstruppen an der Küste der Normandie ergibt sich immer wieder, daß es dem Feinde auf die Gewinnung des großen Hafens Cherbourg in erster Linie ankommt. Sein Besitz würde eine kürzere und leistungsfähigere Nachschubverbindung mit England bedeuten, aber dies ist dem Feinde durch den hartnäckigen deutschen Widerstand verwehrt geblieben. Daher muß der Nachschub der Invasoren weiterhin an die offene Küste des westlichen Teils des Departements Calvados und des südöstlichen Teils der Halbinsel Cotentin gelegt werden, wo es der Gegner bisher nicht fertigbringen konnte, wesentlich über den Feuerbereich der 38-Zentimeter- und 40,6-Zentimeter-Geschütze seiner Schlachtschiffe und Monitoren hinauszugelangen. Umso empfindlicher treffen den Feind die Verluste, die seine Nachschubtruppen auf See erleiden. Diese Verluste wachsen sich, wie der Wehrmachtbericht vom Sonntag zeigt, zu einem dauernden empfindlichen Aderlaß an der feindlichen Invasionsfront aus.

Konnte am Samstag außer den bedeutenden Erfolgen der deutschen Minensperren die Versenkung von 53.000 BRT an größeren feindlichen Schiffen sowie zahlreichen kleinen Landungsfahrzeugen durch Angriffe deutscher See- und Luftstreitkräfte sowie Küstenbatterien in den ersten vier Invasionstagen gemeldet werden, so sind innerhalb von 24 Stunden bereits weitere 33.000 BRT hinzugekommen. Dabei ist von den feindlichen Verlusten an Kriegsschiffen noch abgesehen. Aus den Gefechtsmeldungen ergibt sich, daß es sich bei den Versenkungen feindlicher Nachschubfahrzeuge nicht nur um besonders gebaute Landungsschiffe handelt, die unmittelbar am Strande mit Hilfe von Landeklappen entladen werden können, sondern auch um Transportdampfer aus der Handelsflotte. So befindet sich unter der Beute der deutschen Kampfflugzeuge ein Fahrgastschiff von 9.000 BRT und unter der Schnellbootsbeute ein Fährschiff von 5.000 BRT. Raumgehalt.

Offensichtlich ist der Feind dazu übergegangen, die größeren Transporte, für deren Einsatz der US-General Eisenhower schon die Entladekais der Häfen Cherbourg oder auch Le Havre zu besitzen hoffte, notgedrungen bereits jetzt zum Nachschub an die offene Küste zu benützen, wo sie nur durch die Zwischenschaltung kleinerer Landungsfahrzeuge entladen werden können. Der versenkte Fährdampfer war eines jener Schiffe des Kanaldienstes der Friedenszeit, die inzwischen zur Beförderung zahlreicher kleiner Landungsboote eingerichtet worden sind. Sein Untergang durch Torpedoschüsse deutscher Schnellboote ist deshalb eine besonders fühlbare Einbuße des Schiffsraumes, den der Feind für den ersten Abschnitt der Invasion bereitgestellt hat und Jessen Auffüllung aus dem Tonnagebestand für mögliche weitere Pläne es natürlich vermeiden möchte.

Es war angesichts dieser Sachlage zu erwarten, daß die Kämpfe auf See vor der Invasionsküste an Härte außerordentlich zunehmen würden, wie es jetzt im Wehrmachtbericht hervorgehoben worden ist. Am ersten Tage schrieb die Londoner Presse selbstgefällig, daß der Einsatz feindlicher schwerer Seestreitkräfte, die in den verhältnismäßig flachen Kanalgewässern vor der U-Boot-Gefahr geschützt und außerdem durch einen starken Luftschirm gesichert seien, die deutschen leichten Seestreitkräfte „einfach beiseite fegen“ müßten. Auch in diesem Teil ist der Invasionsfahrplan der Engländer und Amerikaner in Unordnung geraten. Denn die im Feuer jahrelanger Kanalgefechte gehärteten deutschen Seeleute haben sich auch durch das Massenaufgebot großer feindlicher Kriegsschiffe nicht erschüttern lassen. Schon in der ersten Nacht standen deutsche Torpedoboote und Vorpostenboote furchtlos im Feuer schwerster Schiffsgeschütze und führten die ihnen gestellten Aufgaben durch. Seitdem sind deutsche Zerstörer, Torpedoboote, Schnellboote, Räumboote, Vorpostenboote usw. Nacht für Nacht im Kanal am Feind gewesen, der für seine Transporte möglichst den Schutz der Dunkelheit und noch dazu des künstlichen Nebels benutzt. Sie haben ihm in erbitterten Kämpfen schwere Schäden zugefügt.

Wie empfindlich der englische Seebefehlshaber an der Invasionsfront, Admiral Ramsay, auf diese Angriffserfolge deutscher leichter Seestreitkräfte reagiert hat, beweist die erkennbare Verstärkung der feindlichen Nachschubsicherung, besonders durch Zerstörer, Fregatten und Korvetten. Es sind die gleichen schnellen Geleitfahrzeuge, die der Feind auch bei dem Schutz seiner Geleitzüge auf dem Atlantik für Nachschub aus Amerika nicht entbehren kann, übrigens hat, wie der Wehrmachtbericht vom Sonntag meldete, ein deutsches Unterseeboot vor der Westküste der Bretagne, also am Westausgang des Kanals, aus einem feindlichen Sicherungsverband einen Zerstörer herausgeschossen. Zur gleichen Zeit ist die englisch-amerikanische Flotte bestrebt, auch weit links und rechts von der jetzigen Invasionsküste die deutschen leichten Seestreitkräfte in anderen Seegebieten zu fesseln.

Dies erwiesen die See- und Luftgefechte im Norden der Biskaya ebenso wie die Vorstöße feindlicher Schnellboote im Raum vor der belgisch-holländischen Küste, wo bei Ymuiden deutsche Schnellboote angegriffen wurden, und neuerdings auch in der äußeren Deutschen Bucht, wo ein feindliches Schnellboot den Untergang im deutschen Feuer fand.

Mit welcher Erbitterung die Seekämpfe im Kanal geführt werden, geht daraus hervor, daß die deutschen leichten Seestreitkräfte bei ihrer Bekämpfung des feindlichen Nachschubs mitunter bis fast auf Steinwurfweite in Gefechtsberührung mit dem Feinde kommen. Dieser unerhörte Angriffsschneid gegen einen materiell weit überlegenen Feind bleibt, wie der am Samstagabend vom Oberkommando der Wehrmacht mitgeteilte Untergang von einem Zerstörer und drei Vorpostenbooten verdeutlicht, nicht ohne Verluste auf unserer Seite. Aber er verbürgt auch die bedeutenden Versenkungserfolge gegen die Invasionsflotte und ihren Nachschub. Während jedoch die deutsche Kriegsmarine ihre Verluste in den Kanalkämpfen in aller Offenheit behandelt, schweigt die englische Admiralität bezeichnenderweise weiterhin völlig über die immer zahlreicher werdenden Schiffsverluste der Invasionsflotte, die durch deutsche Torpedos, Granaten, Minen und Bomben mit vielen Tausenden von Soldaten und Hunderten von Panzern und anderen schweren Waffen auf den Meeresgrund versenkt worden sind. Diese feindlichen Schiffsverluste, die das Invasionsprogramm sichtlich behindern, werden sich auf die Dauer nicht verheimlichen lassen. Beispielsweise ist bereits in Stockholm aus Kreisen norwegischer Emigranten bekannt geworden, daß in der Nacht der ersten Landung unter anderen ein mit norwegischen Marinesöldnern Englands bemannter Zerstörer untergegangen ist. Er wurde, wie es heißt, von einem Torpedo oder einer Mine mittschiffs getroffen und explodierte sofort.

Die Schiffsverluste der Invasoren durch deutsche Minensperren sind ein Kapitel, das der Feind, weil sie sich natürlich meist außer Sicht deutscher Streitkräfte vollziehen, besonders in Dunkel zu hüllen versucht. Aber in den ersten feindlichen Augenzeugenberichten wurde fast regelmäßig davon erzählt, daß Schiffe der Invasionsflotte durch deutsche Minen in die Luft flogen. Inzwischen hat Eisenhower solche Berichte vollständig verboten. Die Zusammenfassung des deutschen Wehrmachtberichts vom Samstag, wonach mindestens 20 größere und mittlere Einheiten des Feindes und zahlreiche kleine Landungsboote durch deutsche Minensperren gesunken sind, bleibt daher sicherlich hinter der wirklichen Höhe der feindlichen Minenverluste noch erheblich zurück. Der Minenkrieg hatte in den letzten Wochen vor der Invasion im Kanal bereits ein besonderes Ausmaß erreicht. Der Feind mußte nach eigenem Geständnis eine Anzahl von Minensuchfahrzeugen vor der schmalen Invasionsküste einsetzen und, wie das vom Oberkommando der Wehrmacht gemeldete Gefecht schwerer Küstenbatterien mit feindlichen Minensuchverbänden vor der Halbinsel Cherbourg zeigt, ist auch dieses Kapitel des Seekrieges vor der Invasionsküste keineswegs abgeschlossen.

Als erste Kämpfer auf See an der Invasionsfront haben, wie berichtet, Korvettenkapitän Hoffmann, Chef einer Torpedobootflottille, als erprobter Führer bei Torpedoangriffen und Minenunternehmungen gegen den Feind, sowie der Korvettenkapitän der Reserve Rail, Chef einer der zähesten unserer Vorpostenflottillen, vom Führer das Ritterkreuz des Eisernen Kreuzes erhalten. In diesen Flottenchefs sind alle die unbekannten Seekrieger der Kanalfront ausgezeichnet worden, die sich seit 1940 in dauernden Kämpfen mit feindlichen See- und Luftstreitkräften bewährt haben und nun aus den leichten Seestreitkräften vor der Invasionsküste noch größere Leistungen herausholen, um das bitter ernste Ringen der Kameraden an Land gegen die englisch-amerikanische Aggressionsarmee mit allen Kräften zu unterstützen.

ERICH GLODSCHEY

7657

Was Berichterstatter der Gegenseite melden –
In der Hölle der Invasionskämpfe

Stockholm, 11. Juni –
Die anglo-amerikanischen Berichterstatter können nicht umhin, auch weiterhin die außerordentlich schweren Verluste der Invasionstruppen zu betonen. Der mit den ersten britischen Fallschirmjägern abgesprungene Kriegsberichterstatter des Daily Sketch schreibt: „Mörserfeuer, Maschinengewehre und die Kugeln von deutschen Scharfschützen machen meine Nachbarschaft so unsicher, daß ich keinen wohlformulierten Bericht abfassen kann.“ Nach dem Absprung sei er in einem Obstgarten gelandet und habe dort die Überreste des Mannes, der vor ihm den Sprung in die Tiefe wagte, von den Deutschen zerschossen in den Bäumen hängen gesehen.

Der englische Korrespondent schildert dann, wie er selbst nach einigem Bemühen den Anschluß an die Trümmer seiner Abteilung gefunden habe und diese dann gegen Morgen und seitdem ununterbrochen unter schweres deutsches Feuer genommen wurde. Einige Häuser hätten die Briten besetzt gehabt, doch sei es jedesmal ein Wettrennen mit dem Tode gewesen, wenn man zur Nachbarschaft hinüberwechseln mußte. Um die immer enger werdende Stellung herum hätten deutsche Scharfschützen in den Bäumen gesessen und auf jede Bewegung mit gutgezielten Schüssen reagiert. Patrouillen, die die arg beengten Fallschirmjäger ausschickten, um diese Scharfschützen zum Schweigen zu bringen, seien, ohne ihre Aufgabe erfüllt zu haben, zurückgekehrt, denn es war zu schwer, sie ausfindig zu machen und noch schwerer, sie zu töten. Jede umliegende Straße sei unpassierbar gewesen, während das Fallschirmjägerbataillon immer mehr unter den ständigen Gegenangriffen der Deutschen zusammenschrumpfte. Nur dadurch, daß immer neue Absprünge erfolgten, habe man die Stellung zunächst halten können.

News Chronicle stellt fest, daß die Anglo-Amerikaner größte Opfer bringen müßten. Die ersten Angriffstruppen, die den Strand zu stürmen versuchten, seien unter dem fortgesetzten deutschen Kreuzfeuer zusammengebrochen. Neue Truppen habe man in den Kampf werfen müssen, die über die Leichen hinwegstiegen. Die Deutschen hätten eine furchtbare Feuerwalze auf den Strand gelegt, und zwar nicht nur mit Maschinengewehren, sondern auch mit Schnellfeuerkanonen. Sehr schwere Verluste hätten die Amerikaner an einigen Küstenstellen erlitten. Die Deutschen hätten die Landungsfahrzeuge sofort unter Beschuß genommen, ehe sich noch ihre Falltüren öffneten. „Deshalb zweifle ich daran,“ so meint der Korrespondent, „daß die Deutschen von uns überrascht wurden.“

Das ganze Schauspiel, das sich dem Beobachter an der nordfranzösischen Küste bot, sei unglaublich gewesen. Nicht nur viele Tote und Verwundete habe man gesehen, sondern auch Schiffe, die brannten, andere, die sanken, und mit allem möglichen schweren Kriegsgerät voll beladene Landungsfahrzeuge, die auf der stürmischen See herumtrieben. Leichen schwämmen auf dem Wasser und über der ganzen Szene habe eine dichte, schwere Rauchwolke gelegen. In der Hölle könne es nicht schlimmer sein.

Daily Mail bringt einen Bericht aus einem südenglischen Invasionslazarett. Die meisten Insassen seien schwer verwundet gewesen. Bei vielen von ihnen habe man nur Augen und Mund aus den Verbänden hervorschauen sehen. Diejenigen, die noch sprechen konnten, hätten gesagt, es sei ein wahres Wunder, daß sie überhaupt zurückkamen. Einige unter ihnen hätten nicht einmal französischen Boden betreten, geschweige denn irgendetwas Genaues von der Invasion gesehen, als es sie auch schon getroffen hat. Einer bemerkte:

Überall um uns herum schlugen Geschosse und Maschinengewehrgarben ein. Es war die Hölle los. Auch Opfer der Kraftwagenunfälle, die sich in den nervösen Stunden kurz vor Beginn der Invasion noch in England selbst ereigneten, hätten sich in diesem Hospital befunden.

Ein anderer Amerikaner, der mit den US-Luftlandetruppen nach Frankreich kam, erklärte, daß er als Kriegskorrespondent trotz langer Erfahrung niemals etwas Ähnliches erlebt habe. Die auf französischem Boden stattfindenden Kämpfe suchten an Heftigkeit und Blutigkeit ihresgleichen. Ohne Schlaf und ohne Ruhe kämpften die anglo-amerikanischen Soldaten mit dem Mut der Verzweiflung unter Umständen, die den kaltblütigsten Menschen zum Zusammenbruch bringen könnten. Die gelandeten Truppen hätten noch keinen Augenblick Ruhe gehabt. Die deutsche Abwehr sei hart, und wiederholt hätten die amerikanischen Luftlandetruppen nur unter Aufbietung ihrer äußersten Kraft der Vernichtung entgehen können.

7658

Auch im Invasionsraum Idealismus dem Materialismus überlegen –
SS-Panzerdivision ‚Hitler-Jugend‘ bewährt sich

Vom entschlossenen Einsatz der SS-Panzerdivision „Hitler-Jugend“ im Kampf gegen die Aggressoren im Invasionsraum, gibt folgender Bericht eines Kriegsberichterstatters dieser Division ein höchst anschauliches Bild. Der hier waltende Geist unserer jüngsten Kriegsgeneration wird sich stets dem anglo-amerikanischen Materialismus überlegen zeigen und verbürgt zusammen mit dem gleichen Geist, der das gesamtdeutsche soldatische Geschlecht beseelt, mit unerschütterlicher Gewißheit den deutschen Sieg.

Das Ergebnis der ersten Tage des Kampfes gegen die Aggressoren hat deutlich gezeigt, daß die Härte auf unserer Seite ist. Die jungen Kriegsfreiwilligen der SS-Panzerdivision „Hitler-Jugend,“ die sich im rasenden Anlauf auf den Gegner geworfen haben, zeigten schon in den ersten achtundvierzig Stunden zahllose Beispiele einer überlegenen Haltung und Tapferkeit, die mit den schwierigsten Lagen fertig wird. Dreißig junge Soldaten (beispielsweise) mit ebenso vielen Gefangenen, die sie eisern festhielten, verteidigten sich über vierundzwanzig Stunden, und jedesmal, wenn die Munition knapp wurde, schlichen sich zwei wie die Indianer durch die Reihen der Engländer, um ihren Stützpunkt neu mit Munition zu versehen. In später Nachtstunde setzte der Kommandeur einige Panzer in Marsch, um die Zurückkehrenden wieder hereinzuholen. Eine Gruppe von zwölf anderen jungen Soldaten, in Gefangenschaft geraten, nutzte die Verwirrung eines deutschen Artillerieüberfalls aus, ging ihre Bewachung mit den bloßen Fäusten an und kam zurück, zornig allein darüber, daß sie ihre Gewehre drüben lassen mußte.

Ein verwundeter Kommandeur führte Seine Abteilung weiter, und es ist dies dieselbe Haltung, die jenen vor Tagen schon durch Tieffliegerangriff verwundeten Kompaniechef aus dem Lazarett ausbrechen ließ, um seine Panzer wieder zu übernehmen.

Hier zeigt sich eine Gesinnung, der die Anglo-Amerikaner nicht mit ihren Luftgeschwadern beikommen können. Kompanieweise und zu hunderten haben sich die Kanadier schließlich ergeben, willenlos auf ein Schlachtfeld getrieben, das für sie den Tod bedeutet. In langen Kolonnen marschieren sie nun über die französischen Straßen. Sie hatten ihre Löhnung schon in großen Francscheinen in der Tasche, die sie nun auf den Tisch werfen. Einige von ihnen lachen, weil sie das Gefühl haben, den Krieg auf die für sie persönlich beste Weise beendet zu haben.

In nächtlichem Panzervorstoß wurden weitere Dörfer genommen. Im Feuer der brennenden Häuser sieht man die flüchtenden Kanadier. Unerbittlich werden sie gejagt. Der Schrecken der Nacht hat sie befallen, das Entsetzen vor einer Gewalt, die sie unaufhörlich und ohne Gnade treibt. Im erbarmungslosen Straßenkampf, im Handgemenge messen sich die Gegner, die jungen Soldaten, fechten den Kampf ihres Lebens. Sie fühlen ihre Überlegenheit, die Gerechtigkeit ihres inneren Auftrags und genießen ihre ersten Siege. Verzweifelt wehren sich die Kanadier und ergeben sich, unfähig, die erste erbitterte Phase zu überstehen. Gewohnt, nur unter dem Schutze gewaltig überlegener technischer Mittel zu kämpfen, gleichsam als Aufräumer des Schlachtfeldes dann erst in Erscheinung zu treten, halten sie den Kampf Mann gegen Mann nicht aus.

In unseren Gefechtsständen herrscht kühle und gelassene Ruhe. Seit Tagen ohne Schlaf, beugt sich der Kommandeur über die Karte. Er trägt in sich die absolute Ruhe des erfahrenen Ostkämpfers mit der blitzschnellen, überlegenen Führungskunst, die mehr kennt als taktische Grundsätze, die sich auf jenem Kriegsinstinkt verläßt, der, aus zahllosen Erfahrungen zusammengeflossen, zu einer besonderen Begabung wurde. In tödlicher Logik reihen sich die Befehle zu einem lückenlosen Netz, in dem sich die Engländer verfangen müssen. Keinen Blick wirft man zum Himmel, kein Ohr hat man für das Dröhnen der Flugzeuge, keine Nervosität beeinträchtigt die ununterbrochene Arbeit an den Kartenbrettern. Im Anblick der Soldaten, deren Durchschnittsalter Jugend bedeutet, die eine Kriegsgeneration darstellt, in der sich die politische Überzeugung sozusagen in die militärische Form gewandelt hat, im Anblick der Kommandeure, die mit eiskalter Ruhe ihre Anordnungen treffen, gibt es keinen anderen Glauben als den: den neuen Weltkrieg total für Deutschland zu entscheiden.

Bomben auf eigene Fallschirmjäger

An der Kanalküste, 11. Juni –
pk. Der Küstenstrich östlich der Ornemündung ist feindfrei, und auch die Stützpunkte im rückwärtigen Gebiet dieses Abschnitts sind freigekämpft. Der Feind ist nach Westen über die Orne zurückgedrängt. Andere Feindkräfte sind in einem Waldgebiet zwischen den Unterläufen der Orne und des Dives eingeschlossen. Die noch kämpfenden Feindverbände östlich der Orne sind somit ohne Verbindung mit der Versorgungsflotte.

Bei Durchkämmung des Küstenhinterlandes stieß man auf eine Ferme, von der man wußte, daß wenige Stunden vorher in ihrer Umgebung starke Feindkräfte aus der Luft gelandet waren. Zur gleichen Stunde, als die Fallschirmjäger auf die Ferme niedergingen, konnte auch beobachtet werden, wie ein feindlicher Bomberverband auf dieses Bauerngehöft und seine Umgebung einen Bombenteppich legte. Den deutschen Soldaten bot sich ein schauriges Bild.

Die feindlichen Fallschirmjäger mußten zur selben Minute, als die 80 bis 100 Bomben auf engem Raum explodierten, den Boden erreicht haben. Viele von ihnen hingen noch an Ihren Fallschirmen und waren bereits in der Luft durch Bombensplitter getötet worden. Die meisten Fallschirmjäger aber waren in Stücke zerrissen und unkenntlich geworden. An einzelnen Leichen konnte man die gelben Fliegererkennungstücher feststellen. Sie hatten die Briten vor ihren eigenen Bomben nicht schützen können. Die Stunden später abgeworfenen Versorgungsbomben konnten ebenfalls keinem von ihnen mehr helfen.

Kriegsberichter ERWIN SPECK

7659

Supreme HQ Allied Expeditionary Force (June 12, 1944)

Communique No. 13

The U.S. advance east of the VIRE River was continued into the FORÊT DE CERISY.

In the CHERBOURG PENINSULA, enemy mobile batteries have been under a heavy fire from Allied warships, and some further progress has been made west of the inundated valley of the MERDERET River.

Intense fighting against German armor continues in the TILLY-SUR-SEULLES area.

Air operations were curtailed sharply after midday yesterday, when cloud and rain obscured much of the battle area.

After escorting heavy day bombers, our fighters joined fighter bombers and rocket-firing fighters in attacking oil tanks, rail centers, and road and rail traffic, including several hundred railroad cars, tanks and armored vehicles. From these operations, 24 aircraft, including three heavy bombers, are missing.

During the night, heavy bombers struck rail centers at NANTES, ÉVREUX and TOURS, and a railway bridge at MASSY-PALAISEAU south of PARIS.

Allied medium and light bombers and rocket-firing aircraft hammered rolling stock, a ferry terminal and road transport.

Intruder aircraft operated with success over enemy airfields in HOLLAND and FRANCE.

7660

U.S. Navy Department (June 12, 1944)

Communiqué No. 524

Mediterranean.
PC‑558 was sunk as a result of enemy action in the Mediterranean on May 9, 1944.

The next of kin of casualties have been notified.

Communiqué No. 525

Pacific and Far East.
U.S. submarines have reported sinking eighteen vessels as a result of operations against the enemy in these waters, as follows:

  • 1 large tanker
  • 1 medium transport
  • 6 medium cargo transports 6 medium cargo vessels
  • 4 small cargo vessels

These actions have not been reported in any previous Navy De­partment communiqué.

CINCPAC Press Release No. 441, June 12, 1944

For Immediate Release
June 12, 1944

Carrier aircraft again struck Guam, Rota, Tinian, and Saipan on June 11 (West Longitude Date).

Truk Atoll was attacked by Liberators of the 7th Army Air Force at night on June 9 and 10. Airfields at Param, Eten, Dublon and Moen Islands were principal targets. Several fires were started.

Ponape Island was bombed by 7th Army Air Force Liberators on the night of June 9. Ponape Town and gun positions were hit.

Ventura search planes of Fleet Air Wing Two bombed Ocean Island during daylight on June 9, encountering moderate anti-aircraft fire. Two of the planes continued to Nauru Island to strafe small craft there.

On June 10, Mitchells of the 7th Army Air Force bombed Nauru, and started fires visible 20 miles. Heavy anti-aircraft fire downed one Mitchell bomber. A Catalina search plane of Fleet Air Wing Two rescued the crew.

Enemy positions in the Marshalls were bombed and strafed on June 9, during the night of June 9‑10, and on June 10. Corsair fighters and Dauntless dive bombers of the 4th Marine Aircraft Wing, Catalina search planes of Fleet Air Wing Two and Navy Hellcat fighters participated in these attacks. Coastal defense guns and anti-aircraft batteries were hit.

7661

The Brooklyn Eagle (June 12, 1944)

map.061244.up
Drive on Cherbourg: Allied troops moved a step closer to their coastal objective with the capture of Carentan (1). Meanwhile, a U.S. spearhead drove into the approaches to Saint-Lô (2) and British forces took a number of villages east of Caen (3) in a flanking movement. Bayeux has become the base for operations aimed at cutting off the Cherbourg Peninsula.

1,400 U.S. BOMBERS RIP FRENCH TARGETS
Record force hits bridges and airfields

Fortresses, Liberators escorted by huge armada of fighters

London, England (UP) –
More than 1,400 U.S. heavy bombers – the biggest force ever dispatched on a single mission – smashed at 16 German airfields and six bridges in France today to lead thousands of Allied planes supporting the invasion campaign in Normandy.

The record fleet of Flying Fortresses and Liberators was escorted by strong forces of Mustang, Lightning and Thunderbolt fighters comprising an armada of probably more than 2,150 planes.

Seven bombers and 14 fighters were missing, an announcement of the mission said. U.S. fighters shot down at least 17 German planes.

From daybreak until early evening, the skies over northern France were black with raiding fleets taking advantage of clearing weather to bring the full Allied aerial striking power to the support of embattled ground troops.

In the first 18 hours from midnight to 6:00 p.m., the combined air forces had flown some 6,000 sorties and it appeared certain they would top the 10,000 mark by tonight.

Plane pound troop columns

Fighters, fighter-bombers and giant four-engined U.S. bombers swarmed over the enemy wherever they found him. They hit his troop columns with blockbusters, rockets and machine-gun fire and they tore up his road lines and airdromes in one of the most savage tactical assaults of the war.

Almost 1,000 Flying Fortresses and Liberators, accompanied by about 750 U.S. fighters, split up into dozens of task forces to roam over a vast area of northern France, bombing 15 key fighter bases and the Rennes and Amiens railway junctions.

The escorting fighters, meeting only limited enemy fighter opposition, dive-bombed and machine-gunned Nazi airdromes and road lines.

By nightfall, official reports showed that nine Allied planes were lost, excluding U.S. heavies, whose losses were not immediately announced, and at least 21 enemy fighters were shot down.

The German DNB News Agency said violent air battles raged all across the invasion beachheads and asserted that German fighter-bombers attacked Allied tank columns around Caen.

7662

Germans retreat 70 miles past Rome in chaotic rout

Nazi 14th Army no longer a fighting force
By Robert Vermillion

…

7663

U.S. sub chaser sunk by enemy

…

Tokyo warns people U.S. plans massive assault

…

7664

Armed French patriots battle against Germans in south

Half-million reported in uprisings

London, England (UP) –
Unprecedented uprisings were reported throughout France today in Spanish dispatches from the French frontier as German-controlled radio stations warned all patriots they would be shot and said that the big naval base of Toulon, on the southern coast, had been bombarded by Allied naval vessels.

The reputed attack on Toulon and claims of a subsequent naval engagement in which a British warship was set afire were broadcast by the Vichy radio.

Travelers reaching the Spanish border said approximately a half-million French patriots were taking part in the uprisings, particularly in the Tarbes and Toulouse areas in southwestern France, and had engaged German troops and French militiamen in bloody fights.

The patriots were said to be well armed, possibly with supplies and equipment dropped by parachute from the Allies.

Radio information obtained in Algiers from inside France said Grenoble, near the Italian border, had been isolated for the past two days by French resistance forces, and a Zürich dispatch to the London Daily Telegraph said the patriots were trying to storm the town.

Swiss dispatches to newspapers here also reported serious patriot attacks in the area near the Swiss border, where the Germans established martial law in the railroad center of Bellegarde and carried out mass arrests in Lyon after ousting the police force and bringing in another from Loire.

The same dispatches said that big guerrilla engagements were being fought near Saint-Hippolyte and that patriots had occupied Faucille Pass in Jura in a drive toward Pays de Gex.

Berne reports indicated the Germans were suffering heavy losses on the invasion front and had closed 40 theaters and movie houses in Paris for conversion into hospitals.

Berne also reported that all telephone and telegraph communications had been suspended throughout northern France, including the capital, where water and electricity were curtailed 15%.