Simms: Manila victory to alter role of U.S. in war
Fight against Japan becomes moral issue
By William Philip Simms, Scripps-Howard foreign editor
WASHINGTON – The entry into Manila is hailed here as the most important, most significant and most puzzling Pacific development since Pearl Harbor. It alters the whole aspect of our war against Japan.
It is vitally important because our honor and prestige were at stake there. when the Japs hauled down our flag, we were humiliated before every man, woman and child in the Orient.
The loss of Manila will be a corresponding blow to Japan. Half the population of the globe lives in Asia and the Pacific. It was in this area that Japan carved out her new empire – her “co-prosperity sphere.” Here her bandy-legged warriors boasted of their superiority over the Occidentals.
When Gen. Douglas MacArthur enters Manila, the Japs will lose more “face” than they had gained by its capture. Today, their prestige is dragging in the dust from one end of Asia to the other.
Loss of face to be fatal
It is puzzling because nobody knows this better than the Japs. To lose “face” among the hundreds of millions of Orientals whom they have sought to dominate eventually will prove fatal. Why, then, did they not put up a better fight before the Philippine capital? Until recently, they resisted to the last man in defense of every tiny atoll. Why their strange behavior on Luzon?
The answer, some of the experts here believe, may be found in Berlin. The Nazis, like the Japs, at first raced all over the map against less prepared forces only to lose everything largely because they had taken in too much territory. It may be that the Japs know they have lost the war as they originally planned it and are now hoping to avoid complete annihilation by pulling in their lines.
New angle in war
Manila’s fall is significant because from here on out – barring major reverses – the United States can face the war in the Pacific from an altogether new angle. And this is tremendously important.
Territorially, our chief stake in the Far East is the Philippines. Once these are redeemed, our fight with Japan will assume a totally different character, taking its place on the same plane as our fight with Germany. That is to say, our war aim – in the Pacific no less than in the Atlantic – will be to help destroy international outlawry and make the world safe for the peace-loving nations.
As long as the flag of Japan floated above Manila, we were in honor bound to keep plugging away if it took the last drop of American blood and the last American dollar. We had to keep on regardless of whether our Allies helped us a little, a lot, or none at all. It was “our” war.
Moral stake
Once we give the Philippines back to the Filipinos, our stakes in the struggle against Japan are the same as in the struggle against Hittler – no more and no less. As in Europe, our obligation becomes largely moral.
This gives the United States a stupendous advantage at future Allied council tables. Britain, France, Holland, China and Russia will all be more deeply committed in the Pacific than we. Britain must go to bat for Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, her East Indian colonies, Hong Kong, Burma and India. France has Indochina to think of and the Dutch Indies will still bind Holland.
Vladivostok menaced
As for Russia, she must reexamine her entire Far Eastern position. Japan shares frontiers with Siberia. Vladivostok is still directly menaced. Russia’s outlet on the Pacific will remain bottled up as long as Japan remains a first-class power, and Japan aspires to nothing less than the whole of eastern Siberia up to Lake Baikal.
Of course, America’s Pacific war aim will remain unaltered. It is to see Japan destroyed as a great power. But if and when the United States asks her allies for help, compliance will be at least as much to their advantage as ours.