America at war! (1941–) – Part 4

americavotes1944

Women Democrats map vote drive

Democratic women in Pennsylvania are planning the “most intensive drive on registration and getting out the vote since women won suffrage,” Mrs. Emma Guffey Miller, Democratic National Committeewoman, announced today.

Women Democrats opened their campaign today with a regional conference here and in Oil City, the first of six similar feelings.

‘Democratic Women’s Day’

At these conferences plans will be made for “National Democratic Women’s Day,” Sept. 27, when Democratic women’s groups will meet in every precinct in the state.

Mrs. Miller said:

In the hundreds of thousands of homes where a son or sons are in the Armed Forces, the last thought of every woman at night is: “How soon will my boy get home?” And the mothers, wives and sisters of our fighting Pennsylvania boys realize only too well the war will be ended and the boys brought home sooner if President Roosevelt is kept in command, rather than turn the conduct of this great conflict over to the thoroughly inexperienced Governor Dewey.

There is an unprecedented activity on the part of Pennsylvania women in this election and they will have a great deal to do with putting it in the Democratic column. Until Oct. 7 [the last day to register for the Nov. 7 election], an intensive drive to get voters registered will be carried on, reaching through every precinct.

americavotes1944

Communists join registration spat

Communists today joined the Republican-Democratic dispute over the field registration schedules set up by the County Elections Department and the Pittsburgh Registration Commission.

Democrats had accused the Republican Registration Commission of juggling the enrollment sites to Republican advantage. Republicans filed similar charges against the Democratic Elections Department.

Maximum registration

Both allegations, said Max Weiss, president of the Communist Political Association for Western Pennsylvania and West Virginia, are beside the point which concerns the “greatest possible registration.”

He said:

If there are any who object to such a maximum registration and maximum vote, on the ground that it surely will result in the reelection of President Roosevelt, then they admit that President Roosevelt is already the people’s choice.

Offices for every district

Mr. Weiss said Anthony J. Federoff, CIO regional director and a leader of the CIO Political Action Committee, had given a “direct and forceful lead to the development of a nonpartisan approach to voter registration” when he said recently that “the people will vote liberal if they only get out and vote.”

Mr. Weiss advocated opening registration offices “in every single one of the election districts in Allegheny County [there are 1,020 districts].”

Love: Stay in school

By Gilbert Love

Maj. de Seversky: German retreat

By Maj. Alexander P. de Seversky

Here are Americans –
U.S. air evacuation program keeps morale soaring among wounded soldier

By Frederick Woltman, Scripps-Howard staff writer

Screenshot 2022-06-20 213810

Why we lost the peace –
Simms: Allies lacked statesmen to enforce pact they made in World War I

By William Philip Simms, Scripps-Howard foreign editor

Last of two articles.

Washington –
Gen. Pershing did his utmost in 1918 to persuade the Allies to occupy Berlin. But to their bitter regret, later on, he was overruled.

Some – especially in Britain and France – still hold President Wilson largely to blame for ending the war at Compiègne instead of at Berlin. But these are hindsight critics, as “Tiger” Clemenceau, the French Premier, called them. not only did he and Marshal Foch both agree with Wilson that the war should not be prolonged a single day beyond military requirements, but, he wrote, David Lloyd George and Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig led “all others” in opposing harsh measures.

“When he sent us the American Army,” Clemenceau related, “Mr. Wilson had asked if we were prepared to cease fighting on the day the Germans accepted his 14 Points.” And Clemenceau answered yes.

Clemenceau related that Lloyd George once threatened to withdraw from the peace conference “if I did not consent to the occupation of the Rhineland for only two years instead of 15.” Angrily the French Premier replied that if Lloyd George withdrew, he [Clemenceau] would lay his resignation before the Chamber of Deputies and tell the world why he did so, Even them, he added, “without the stalwart support of Mr. Wilson the treaty that day would have been a mangled corpse.”

The chief trouble with the Allies, the “Tiger” never ceased to growl, was not that they failed to make a harsh peace, but that they lacked statesmen with the will to enforce the peace they made.

When the French entered the Ruhr to enforce the peace terms, the outcry in the United States and England was deafening. France, it was said, was “militaristic.” When Poincaré made his famous series of speeches, warning against German perfidy, the same thing happened. The British and French evacuated the Rhineland long before the date fixed by the treaty and Allied opinion forced France to follow suit.

When Hitler denounced the military clauses of the treaty and openly began to rearm, France did not like it but Anglo-American opinion remained indifferent. When the Nazis reoccupied the Rhineland and France wanted to throw them out – even at the price of a “preventive war” – Britain warned France she could not count on Britain being at her side.

The lessons of Clemenceau and of events are clear. Whether or not we occupy Berlin this time, Germany will find a way to stage a third world war unless we remain permanently vigilant. The second World War was due, not to any lack of firmness in the peace of Paris, but to a lack of firmness in ourselves afterwards. We got “soft” and Germany came within an ace of destroying us. Next time – if we get “soft” – she may succeed.

American League normal again: McCarthy’s Yanks are in first place

By Glen Perkins, United Press staff writer

Soldier’s ex-employer gets discharge notice


Batcheller again called to Washington

Will help solve problems of WPB
By Dale McFeatters, Press business editor

Going to New York? Be sure ‘Joe sent me’

Knowing somebody helps a lot
By Si Steinhauser

‘Railroading’ charge denied –
Kennedy tells how spy exposed secret U.S.-British notes

Roosevelt-Churchill messages given to Berlin by code clerk who saw all of them
By Henry J. Taylor, Scripps-Howard staff writer

Völkischer Beobachter (September 6, 1944)

Rosenberg: Gesetze politischer Entwicklungen

Von Alfred Rosenberg

Schwere Abwehr in Nordfrankreich und Belgien

dnb. Berlin, 5. September –
Der Druck des Feindes war am 4. September im nordfranzösisch-belgischen Raum stark. Hier griff er mit erheblichen Kräften in Chouche und Lys nach Norden an. Er verlagerte dann seinen Schwerpunkt nach Osten. Die 2. Britische Armee-schlug bei Tournay eine Bresche und strömte mit starken Kräften in den Raum zwischen Deyle und Schelde, über Brüssel hinaus, ein, wo den ganzen Tag über erbittert gekämpft wurde.

Weiter südlich ergab sich ein ähnliches Bild. Hier drangen nordamerikanische Truppen in breiter Front zwischen den Industrierevieren und Mons und Charleville in nordöstlicher Richtung vor. Starke Teilkräfte sollten über Maubeuge den Anschluss an die weiter nördlich operierende 2. britische Armee gewinnen und durch eine Umfassung unsere Verteidigungslinien zwischen Sambre und Maas ausschalten. Die Angriffe bei Maubeuge wurden nach anfänglichem Bodengewinn blutig abgeschlagen. Unter fortgesetzten weiteren Vorstößen etwa auf der Linie Maubeuge–Dinant verlagerte der Feind seinen Druck immer mehr nach Osten. Als er keine Möglichkeit zum Einbruch fand, trieb er südlich Dinant an mehreren Stellen Panzergruppen über die Maas vor. Aus den Ardennen heraus griffen unsere „Truppen diese Kräfte energisch an. Nördlich Charleville warfen sie den Gegner auf den Fluss zurück, und weiter nördlich pressten sie ihn auf einem schmalen Uferstreifen zusammen oder verhinderten durch zusammengefasstes Feuer seine Übersetzversuche.

In den Argonnen versuchten die Nordamerikaner, unsere Widerstandslinien an der Maas durch Angriffe zwischen Fluss und Lothringer Becken zu überflügeln und einzudrücken. Diese Angriffe blieben unter hohen blutigen Verlusten liegen.

Im Rücken des Feindes kämpfen unsere Truppen in den Küstenstützpunkten der Normandie und Bretagne. Seit zwei Tagen wächst der Druck britischer und kanadischer Kräfte auf Le Havre. Um schwere Verluste, wie vor den bretonischen Küstenplätzen, zu vermeiden, forderte der Feind unsere Besatzung zur Übergabe auf. Selbstverständlich war ein glattes „Nein“ auch hier die einzige Antwort. Um die noch in der Stadt befindlichen etwa 50.000 französischen Zivilisten vor den zu erwartenden schweren Kämpfen zu schützen, bot der Festungskommandant die Evakuierung der Zivilbevölkerung an. Der Gegner lehnte dieses Angebot ab, worauf der Kampf von neuem entbrannte.

Der jetzt bei Le Havre beginnende Kampf ist bei Brest seit Tagen in vollem Gange. Unter den pausenlosen Bombardierungen sind Stadt und Hafen in Trümmer gesunken.

Im Saônetal ist die Lage unserer Truppen günstiger geworden. Sie haben ein Gebiet erreicht, das durch unsere Stützpunkte stärker gesichert ist als das durchschrittene Verhältnismäßig schmale Rhonetal. Von Überflügelungsversuchen in größerem Stil hat der Gegner in diesem Raum bisher abgesehen. Einen besonderen Erfolg errang wieder die im Wehrmachtbericht vom 4. September erwähnte 11 Panzerdivision, die an der Südwestschwelle des Französischen Jura starke feindliche Kräfte zerschlug.

Die anglo-amerikanischen Materiallieferungen –
Das Geheimnis der bolschewistischen Offensive

Von unserer Stockholmer Schriftleitung

Führer HQ (September 6, 1944)

Kommuniqué des Oberkommandos der Wehrmacht

Im Raum von Antwerpen wurden unsere Divisionen auf den Albertkanal zurückgenommen. In der Stadt selbst wird noch erbittert gekämpft. Gegen die Linie Löwen–Namur–Sedan griff der Feind auf breiter Front an, konnte jedoch nur unwesentlichen Geländegewinn erzielen. Feindliche übersetzversuche über die Mosel nördlich Nancy wurden zerschlagen. Die Besatzung von Le Havre wies einen von Panzern unterstützten Vorstoß des Gegners blutig ab.

In das Festungsvorfeld von Brest eingedrungene feindliche Kräfte wurden Im Gegenstoß geworfen, erneute Infanterie- und Panzerbereitstellungen der Nordamerikaner durch zusammengefasstes Artilleriefeuer zerschlagen. Unsere aus Süd- und Südwestfrankreich zurückgenommenen Truppen haben befehlsgemäß den Raum um Dijon und das Plateau von Langres erreicht.

Auf den Passstraßen westlich der französisch-italienischen Grenze schlugen unsere Sicherungen starke feindliche Angriffe blutig ab.

Im adriatischen Küstenabschnitt vereitelten unsere Truppen auch gestern die Durchbruchsversuche des Gegners, der unter stärkstem Materialeinsatz immer wieder gegen unsere Stellungen anrannte. Seit 31. August wurden bei diesen Kämpfen 259 Panzer abgeschossen.

Bei einem Unternehmen gegen Banden in der Ägäis wurden durch Einheiten der Kriegsmarine 88 feindliche Motorsegler vernichtet oder aufgebracht.

Im Südteil von Siebenbürgen warfen ungarische Truppen, unterstützt von deutschen Sturmgeschützen, vordringende rumänische Verbände im Gegenangriff zurück. Hierbei wurden sechs feindliche Batterien und zwei mit Kriegsgerät beladene Eisenbahnzüge erbeutet.

Schlachtflieger vernichteten bei Tiefangriffen im rumänischen Gebiet 60 Lokomotiven und einen voll beladenen Betriebsstoffzug.

In den Ostkarpaten wurden wiederum zahlreiche Angriffe Bolschewisten an den Passstraßen in harten abgewiesen.

Nördlich des Bugs werden die von starken Panzer- und Schlachtfliegerkräften unterstützten Angriffe der Sowjets durch Gegenangriffe am unteren Narew zum Stehen gebracht. In dem erbitterten Ringen vernichteten Truppen des Heeres und Flakartillerie in der Zeit vom 3. bis 5. September 240 feindliche Panzer und Sturmgeschütze.

Von der übrigen Ostfront werden nur aus dem Raum von Dorpat örtliche Kämpfe gemeldet.

In den letzten beiden Tagen verloren die Sowjets an der Ostfront 73 Flugzeuge.

Bei Angriffen feindlicher Bomber auf West- und Südwestdeutschland wurden besonders die Städte Mannheim, Ludwigshafen, Stuttgart und Karlsruhe getroffen.

In der Nacht warfen einzelne britische Flugzeuge Bomben auf Hannover.

Über dem Reichsgebiet und dem Kampfraum im Westen wurden 31 feindliche Flugzeuge abgeschossen.

Supreme HQ Allied Expeditionary Force (September 6, 1944)

Communiqué No. 151

In the BRUSSELS–ANTWERP sector, Allied forces were engaged yesterday in mopping-up operations.

Further west, forward elements of our armor have reached the southern outskirts of GHENT.

Allied troops continued to make good progress north of the SOMME, reaching the line AIRE–SAINT-OMER yesterday evening. Other forces bypassing BOLOGNE have reached the area FORET DE GUINES.

Further south our troops advancing into BELGIUM have freed CHARLEROI and NAMUR. Crossings of the MEUSE River have been made at DINANT and GIVET, where enemy opposition was light.

Mopping-up continues in the area southwest of MONS where more< enemy troops are surrounded.

Fighters and fighter-bombers strafed and dive-bombed enemy airfields, road convoys and railway trains in HOLLAND and Western Germany yesterday. One hundred and forty-three enemy aircraft were destroyed on the ground and 28 were shot down in combat.

Enemy shipping off the Dutch Islands was attacked by rocket-firing fighters. One medium sized vessel was sunk, another left on fire and three smaller craft were damaged.

During the night railway targets in HOLLAND and GERMANY were attacked by light bombers.

Aerial bombardment of the fortified area of BREST was continued during the day by heavy, medium and light bombers.

Troop concentrations at LE HAVRE were attacked by heavy bombers which dropped more than 1,000 tons of high explosives.

U.S. Navy Department (September 6, 1944)

Communiqué No. 540

The submarine USS ROBALO (SS-273) is overdue from patrol and must be presumed to be lost.

The next of kin of personnel in the ROBALO have been so notified.


CINCPAC Press Release No. 545

For Immediate Release
September 6, 1944

The airfield at Iwo Jima in the Volcano Islands was bombed by Liberators of the 7th AAF on September 4 (West Longitude Date). Two enemy fighters were in the air but made no attempt at interception. Anti-aircraft fire was moderate. A single Liberator bombed Iwo Jima during the night of September 3‑4.

Pagan Island was attacked by our aircraft on September 2, 3 and 4. Gun positions were strafed and subjected to rocket fire. Anti-aircraft fire was meager. The airstrip at Rota Island was bombed on September 3.

Marcus Island was attacked by 7th AAF Liberators on September 3 and 4. On September 3, a building apparently used for ammunition storage was hit and destroyed. Anti-aircraft fire was intense.

A Liberator search plane of Group 1, Fleet Air Wing Two, intercepted and shot down an enemy transport plane near Iwo Jima on September 4. A medium bomber escorting the transport managed to escape.

Yap Island was the target of attacks on September 2, 3 and 4 by a single 7th AAF Liberator. Airfield installations and bivouac areas were bombed. Anti-aircraft fire was moderate.

Further neutralization raids against enemy positions in the Marshalls were conducted on September 4 by 7th AAF Liberators and Corsair fighters and Dauntless dive bombers of the 4th Marine Aircraft Wing.

U.S. State Department (September 6, 1944)

Lot 60–D 224, Box 55: DO/PR/14

Memorandum by the Under Secretary of State to the Secretary of State

Washington, September 6, 1944

Subject: PROGRESS REPORT ON DUMBARTON OAKS CONVERSATIONS – FIFTEENTH DAY

Regular meeting of the American Group
The American group held its regular 9:30 a.m. meeting to exchange views and discuss developments in the last twenty-four hours.

Meeting of the Legal Subcommittee
The American, Soviet and British representatives on the Legal Subcommittee agreed, subject to approval by their respective groups, that the statute of the international court of justice should be prepared not later than the remainder of the basic instrument of the international organization. To this end it was suggested that the Governments participating in the conference to consider the international organization should send representatives to the seat of the conference, at least two weeks in advance, for the purpose of preparing a draft of the statute for submission to the conference.

Meeting of the Joint Steering Committee
The meeting of the Joint Steering Committee scheduled at 10:30 a.m. today has been postponed until later in the day because of the continued delay in the receipt by Sir Alexander Cadogan of his final instructions. The Committee is holding itself in readiness to meet this afternoon or tonight if these instructions arrive.

Yesterday’s late afternoon meeting of the Formulation Group on Organization
The Formulation Group on Organization late Tuesday afternoon prepared the following sections of the basic document:

(a) The Secretariat
The group agreed that the secretary-general should be the chief administrative officer and should be appointed by the assembly on the recommendation of the council for such terms and under such conditions as are specified in the charter; should act in that capacity in all meetings of the assembly, the council, and the economic and social council; should make an annual report to the assembly on the work of the organization; and should have the right to bring to the attention of the council any matter which in his opinion may threaten international peace and security. (The Soviet group continued to reserve their position on any reference to the economic and social council.)

(b) Economic and social cooperation
The Soviet representative participated in the discussion of the section on economic and social cooperation but maintained the Soviet reservation on the merits of this entire question. The American and British representatives agreed to use substantially the entire American draft text on this subject. It was agreed, however, to reduce the size of the council from twenty-four to eighteen members, and a new concept of the functions of the economic and social council was added by empowering this council to assist the security council upon its request and by enabling the secretary-general to inform the security council on the work of the economic and social council.

Lot 60–D 224, Box 59: Stettinius Diary

Extracts from the Personal Diary of the Under Secretary of State

Fifteenth Day, Wednesday, September 6, 1944

Meeting with the President and the Secretary.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

I first presented to the President maps and analyses of the climatic conditions and harbor facilities of the Flores in the Azores and Mihau in the Hawaiian group. The President said he still thought the Azores would be the place. I said, “Well, your island of Flores is fine but has no harbor.” He said, “Ed, you don’t know your poetry.” The President said he would take these memos and maps to Quebec and discuss them with the Prime Minister.

I then informed the President that we felt that inasmuch as Vice Admiral Willson would be in Quebec and was completely informed on the proposals and the activity thus far at Dumbarton Oaks that it would be better for him to rely on the Admiral for information if he became involved in discussions on this subject rather than to burden him with memoranda and other documents. He agreed with the proviso that Admiral Willson be supplied with complete papers in case it was necessary for him to refer to them.

I next took up with the President the question of an international air force. We had some little difficulty in explaining this so that the President completely understood it. But after we had stressed that he had already gone on record against an international police force and recommended to him that we stick to our guns on this question, he finally agreed. I confirmed our previous discussion about the possibility of a change in the Prime Minister’s position and he said that he would be ready to discuss this with him at Quebec if we found it was necessary for him to do so. I then asked the President whom we would work through in Quebec, and he said, “I don’t want you to work through anybody; you should call me direct.” I said this was not always practicable; and he said that in such an event to call Admiral Leahy if Hopkins was not going. (He did not go.) I then told him that if the international air force question remained open until after the Churchill arrival in Quebec that this might hold up our proceedings with the Russians until the middle of next week, and I wondered what he thought of recessing our Russian conversations and holding our Chinese conversations in the interim. Both the President and Mr. Hull approved but Mr. Hull thought that we would have difficulty in persuading the Russians to agree, but that if we could do it graciously it would be an excellent plan and would have a fine public reaction.

I then told the President of the possibility of Cadogan being called to Quebec. Mr. Hull thought this would be bad and the President felt so strongly about it that he said that if Churchill spoke of having a diplomat come that he would suggest Eden… During this conversation, Mr. Hull got the incorrect impression that the President was talking about Eden taking Cadogan’s place in Washington while Cadogan was in Quebec and objected violently to such a procedure. We of course straightened this out. I suggested that I be authorized to press for Halifax taking Cadogan’s chair if the latter should be called away. Both gave complete approval to this but wished me to make every effort to persuade Cadogan not to leave the meeting. I told the President that inasmuch as I had some other special matters pertaining to the conversations to discuss that I would leave today’s progress reports with Miss Tully. I then presented the memorandum on bases which had been prepared by Pasvolsky and Dunn. At first I could not get the settled interest of either on this question but when I explained it was a matter of the Council being given authority to demand territory or bases they both had violent objections, feeling this whole performance should be voluntary and that it would be a great mistake at this time to place any compulsion on a small nation to furnish a base or facilities. They felt that the Council should have authority to request but not the authority to demand.

We then reviewed the question of the next step. I said we hoped to finish within two weeks and that we felt the demand in this country from the public for the plan would be so great and the demand from the smaller nations to get it would be so great that it would be most embarrassing not to send out the memorandum to the United Nations just as promptly as possible and that it would be ideal if we could possibly keep the schedule to send it to the other Governments the latter part of September, simultaneously inviting them to attend a United Nations full dress conference in the interior of the United States the latter part of October. I said we had been thinking of French Lick, Indiana. At first the President thought this would be too early but then after he had grasped the idea of having it in the interior, isolationist part of the United States he said it was a magnificent idea. The name of French Lick made his face light up… He agreed on an immediate presentation to the United Nations and to aim for October 25th at French Lick.

We then discussed the idea of presenting the document simultaneously by the four participating Governments in the capitals of the other countries with the invitation to the big conference accompanying it. The President approved this procedure.

Just before the Secretary and I left, I told him that while I was not pressing the matter as it would take some time to get the Russians and the Chinese to agree on a procedure for presentation and approval, etc., I wondered if he would have any objection to my raising, on my own initiative, this question with the representatives of the other Governments. They both approved this immediately and wholeheartedly, asking me to take whatever action I felt necessary and they expressed the hope that I would do so promptly.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

During our discussion of French Lick I told the President that our recent international conferences had been held on the Atlantic Seaboard (Hot Springs, Atlantic City, Bretton Woods, Philadelphia) and that we had not held any in the West. He was quite impressed by that point. The President inquired who owned French Lick and Mr. Hull said that Tom Taggard had owned it and that his son still did. All in all the President was quite pleased with the idea of French Lick and said there was no other place comparable to it.

I then raised the question of the provisions on suspension and expulsion for which the Soviet group has been pressing and reminded them that they had both previously said that that should not be included in the document. I explained that our group agreed with them but as the provisions were relatively minor in nature it might be wise for us to yield on that, especially if we could get something in return. They authorized me to use my own discretion on this, feeling that it would be all right to trade on the matter.

We then discussed the question of voting in the Council and I explained that they had both instructed to take the position that a two-thirds vote was preferable. I reported that the Russians were insisting on a majority and that this was another matter on which we thought it might be wise to yield, particularly for trading purposes. I explained that with a Council of eleven, the difference between the two methods meant only one vote. Mr. Hull backed me up at this point with a convincing argument that it made little difference either way and that it should be settled as we thought best at Dumbarton. I received authorization to proceed along those lines.

I then raised the difficult question of voting on the part of a great power when it was involved in a dispute. Although this had been raised previously with the President on several occasions this time he seemed confused on the issue and both Mr. Hull and I had to explain the matter in some detail before it was clear to him. Mr. Hull said that the Russians would be practically unanimously voted down on this issue at the United Nations conference and that in their own self-interest they should see that point now and agree to the other procedure (Mr. Hull while driving to his apartment, after leaving the White House, advised me to stress this point strongly when talking to Gromyko in the morning). I told the President this question might be the one big point on which we could not reach agreement at Dumbarton. The President then spoke up and said there might be a second – whether that might be the one of the use of force without the approval of our Senate. Mr. Hull and I both replied to this, saying we thought it was pretty well in hand and it was something he could follow through politically on a sound basis. The President indicated clearly that he realized that this question of the immediate use of force is a key point of the whole plan, saying that if we had to go to the Senate in each case as it arose, the plan would not be any good. Mr. Hull in explanation said that of course if the Council used force and if the Senate later disapproved through failure to authorize appropriations, etc., we could always withdraw. This approach was new and apparently of interest to the President.

I then said that Sir Alexander Cadogan had received instructions today that he could settle on a majority vote but that he must stand pat on the larger issue of a great power voting when involved in a dispute. I reported that Cadogan had reported to me that Eden felt the issue was of such prime importance, and that if it could not be settled at Dumbarton, consideration should be given to having it settled at a meeting of Foreign Ministers. The President and Mr. Hull felt that was unthinkable and that having Foreign Ministers devoting the two-, three-, or four-weeks’ time, which would be necessary for that would be widely misunderstood. The President added that he saw no reason why this should not be left open for settlement at the United Nations conference. I explained that it was doubtful the Russians would agree to going into that conference with the point open, and also that as it would look as if we had not reached agreement on such a big point it might arouse suspicions of the Soviet Union on the part of smaller nations and in that way perhaps jeopardize the possibility of success of the big conference, or of some of the smaller nations attending it. That did not impress the President or the Secretary and it was left that if we could not agree we would attempt to find some very general language to hold the matter over for discussion at the later United Nations conference. Practically, this means that I am now instructed by the President and the Secretary to stand firm against the Soviet position.…

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

During our conversation with the President, he said that he hoped we would do everything within our power not to allow the “X” issue to become public and he quizzed me in some detail on how we stood. I reviewed the matter with him, mentioning the cable to S, etc.

The Pittsburgh Press (September 6, 1944)

PATTON MASSES THIRD ARMY FOR SIEGFRIED LINE SMASH
U.S. patrols stab into Germany

Moselle defenses cut by Yanks; Allies close on Channel ports
By Virgil Pinkley, United Press staff writer

Nazis stand and fight

map.090644.up
The first action in the Battle of Germany was reported today along the borders of the Nazi Rhineland. As Canadian troops battled hard to capture the Channel ports (1), U.S. and British troops drove toward Rotterdam (2). Gen. George S. Patton’s U.S. 3rd Army crossed the Moselle River (3), apparently in the Mousson area, and U.S. patrols crossed the German border and then returned, presumably in the region near Metz. Junction of U.S. forces in northern and southern France (4) was reported as Allied troops advanced north in the Saône Valley.

SHAEF, London, England –
U.S. combat troops have invaded German soil for the first time in history at an undisclosed point and have smashed across the Moselle River in a drive toward the Siegfried Line which a staff officer said today the Allies “of course” can break.

U.S. patrols stabbed across the German border into the Nazi homeland and returned to France after a scouting mission a Lt. Gen. George S. Patton massed this 3rd Army for coming blows at the Siegfried Line. Only after the armistice did Americans cross the German borders in the last war.

On the opposite wing of the Western Front, the battle of the Channel ports whirled toward a climax. Canadian troops reached the coast on both sides of Calais, clamping a pincer on the town, swarmed into the outskirts of Boulogne, and struck within 20 miles of Dunkerque.

United Press writer Robert C. Richards reported from the 3rd Army front that German resistance had stiffened as the Americans burst through the Moselle River line, apparently in the Pont-à-Mousson area midway between Metz and Nancy.

Supreme Headquarters cautioned against taking the patrol thrust into Germany to mean that the assault on the Nazi homeland had begun. A headquarters broadcast to foreign workers in Germany, however, said that “the collapse of the German armies in the west means that battles soon will be fought on German soil.”

Coincident with the official assertion that Gen. Patton’s operations were still in the buildup stage and encountering increased resistance, a senior staff officer made the unequivocal statement: “Of course, the Allies can break the Siegfried Line” – the primary defense belt of Germany proper.

Lacking official information, it was believed the American frontier crossing was made somewhere in the area of Thionville, just south of Luxembourg.

Hurdle last barrier

By forcing the Moselle, the Americans hurdled the last river barrier west of the German frontier. Ahead of them was no major obstacle to interfere with a full-dress push into Germany and the Siegfried defense zone.

Far behind the fighting front, the German garrisons of Brest and Le Havre were still holding out despite heavy bombing. Another ultimatum was delivered to the Le Havre garrison today after Royal Air Force heavy bombers saturated the force of some 5,000 diehards with more than 1,200 tons of bombs late yesterday.

About 300 Marauders and Havocs of the U.S. 9th Air Force hit Brest again today, attacking in 16 waves for an hour. The bombers hit gun positions, strongpoints and ammunition dumps in the fifth strike at the base since Sept. 1.

The Canadians reached the outskirts of Boulogne after an advance in the face of artillery fire. An estimated 5,000 Germans were manning the Boulogne defenses.

At the same time, other Canadian elements swung inland around Boulogne and reached the coast on each side of Calais. It was possible that the column east of Calais would continue along the last miles of the coast road to Dunkerque.

Some 50,000 Germans were pocketed along the Channel coast by the Allied thrust into Holland.

Capture 14,000

Headquarters revealed that the mop-up of a big pocket southwest of Mons had yielded 14,000 prisoners and the total might go considerably higher. The cleanup of the pocket was essential to the advance of the U.S. 1st Army since it was too big to leave indefinitely. The 3rd Army was reported to have taken 76,000 prisoners and killed 19,500 Germans.

The Nazis appeared to be trying a major stand in defense of the fatherland along the Moselle River line, which runs into the Reich at the Luxembourg border and curves away to a distance of about 40 miles in the area east of Nancy.

The rout of the German armies in the Low Countries was in full swing, as units of the U.S. 1st and British 2nd Armies linked up beyond Antwerp to drive an armored wedge deep into Holland. Unconfirmed reports said the Allied columns were across the Rhine estuary within sight of Rotterdam after an advance of almost 60 miles from Antwerp.

Flee in disorder

Front reports said the Nazis were fleeing in wild disorder, with thousands surrendering daily as Allied troops cut across their line of retreat.

The breakthrough across the Moselle came after two days of hard fighting, during which the Germans poured a murderous rain of artillery and machine-gun fire down on the Americans from steep heights overlooking the narrow river.

Mr. Richards reported that the Nazis fought desperately for the crossing but the Americans drove across in force, established a firm bridgehead and pressed on to the east.

Lack official backing

Gen. Patton’s scouts were the first Americans officially disclosed to have reached German soil, although unconfirmed reports broadcast by the Paris and Swiss radios said U.S. troops had captured Aachen, just across the southeastern border of the Netherlands, and Saarbrücken, 38 miles east of Metz.

Neither report had official backing, and the seizure of Saarbrücken seemed highly improbably in view of the admittedly-stiff fighting in progress along the Moselle between Metz and Nancy.

The German Transocean News Agency said counterattacking Nazi troops recaptured Audun, 12 miles west of the Moselle and 21 miles northwest of Metz.

Third Army troops broke into Nancy yesterday and were believed to have cleared the last enemy resistance from the city this morning, and the Swiss radio said without confirmation that Gen. Patton’s men effected a juncture in central France with 7th Army troops advancing from the south. Fighting is in progress at the Belfort Gap, 90 miles below Nancy, the Swiss reports said.

Test underway

The first great test of Germany’s frontier defenses was underway in the Larraine Gap beyond the Moselle, however, and dispatches from the front said Gen. Patton was moving tanks, artillery and infantry up to the Moselle in force for a full-scale drive into the Reich.

The broad belt of fortifications in the Siegfried Line was believed to be strongly defended with heavy artillery, tank traps and hidden mortar and machine-gun nests, but headquarters spokesmen expressed confidence that it would be breached in short order.

The Germans, one source said, have suffered such heavy losses in the Battle of France that they no longer have the men to hold fortifications against the weight of infantry, armor and planes the Allies can throw against them.

Fan out in Holland

U.S. and British forces fanned out across the Netherlands against only feeble opposition, and Radio Paris said their vanguards were in sight of Rotterdam, Holland’s largest seaport, presumably after crossing the Rhine Delta beyond Breda.

British 2nd Army troops entered Ghent after a 13½-mile advance northwest of Alost, while headquarters confirmed the capture of Charleroi and Namur by U.S. 1st Army forces in southern Belgium. The 1st Army also crossed the Meuse at Dinant (14 miles south of Namur) and Givet (nine miles below Dinant).


‘Lay down arms,’ radio tells Nazis

By the United Press

An Allied appeal that Germans in the west lay down their arms was broadcast by the British radio today.

The broadcast was in German and was described as “official messages to members of the German Wehrmacht in the west.” One addressed to German officers said:

You know that the defeat of Germany is a military fact. To you the inevitable consequences of party politics are clear – the senseless deaths of thousands of your men and the destruction of German cities. You alone in Germany are now responsible. If these things are not prevented, you alone in Germany have the power and the authority to prevent them. Give orders to the soldiers under your command to cease firing.

The message to the troops said:

Your high-ranking officers know that the war is lost. Those among them who realize their responsibility have given orders to cease fire. Only those who are utterly desperate and the party fanatics insist that you have to sacrifice yourselves.

From today until the time when everything is over, which means the officials general capitulation, many German soldiers will go to their death. Why should you be one of them? The outcome of the war has been decided. You have done your duty as soldiers. Now you have duties at home.

In American or British prison camps, you will receive the decent treatment soldiers deserve. Over 300,000 of you have already surrendered, many of your generals and commanders among them.

Slave workers in Germany get orders to help Allies

Broadcast tells foreigners to prevent destruction of industrial installations by foe