America at war! (1941–) – Part 4

americavotes1944

Aid to labor boomerangs against GOP Congressman

Endorsed by national union leaders, he finds local groups – who vote – oppose him
By Daniel M. Kidney, Scripps-Howard staff writer

Evansville, Indiana – (Oct. 14)
Rep. Charles M. La Follette, who gained national prominence by following “labor” rather than the Republican leadership in Congress, returned here to find he drew a blank.

Although endorsed by national labor leaders and the high command of the Political Action Committee, he learned that local union leaders are more interested in places on the Democratic ticket than Mr. La Follette’s record in Congress.

And it turned out that his Democratic opponent, Charles J. Eichel, as Vanderburgh County chairman, was a boss with sufficient power to give the labor-politicians what they wanted.

Mr. Eichel tells the story quite frankly. It was verified by union leaders themselves. The union leaders asked for all the Vanderburgh County seats in the Indiana Legislature. Mr. Eichel was glad to oblige.

Union men are nominees

Consequently, the Democratic Legislature ticket shapes up like this:

  • STATE SENATOR: Charles F. Lietz (Typographical Union, AFL)
  • STATE REPRESENTATIVES: Walter Hayden and Charles E. Wright (Electrical Workers, CIO) and Leo A. Meagher (Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen).

In return, the local PAC has not endorsed Mr. La Follette for reelection. And Mr. Eichel says with assurance they will not do so.

A visit to their headquarters confirmed this. John Sternaman, head of the Vanderburgh County CIO Council, said the local PAC will not take a stand. He was wearing an Eichel button.

So, Mr. La Follette will have to be content with endorsements from AFL President William Green, CIO President Philip Murray, A. F. Whitney (president of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen) and Indiana State PAC leaders, none of whom vote in this district.

Roosevelt is issue, too

Mr. Eichel explains that Republicans shouldn’t have PAC support (in addition to the local deal) because they are against President Roosevelt.

He declared:

Labor wants to keep President Roosevelt in because they know he will protect them in the courts.

Mr. Eichel calls himself a “labor attorney.” He represents some unions here. When he saw a case-hardened reported wince at such remarks, he added: “You know, appointments and things like that.”

Money problem solved

It takes money to run a campaign – even with union support. Mr. Eichel, an old hand at such matters as fundraising, has solved that problem.

Just two doors away from his spacious Democratic County Headquarters is “The Young Democrats Club.” An electric sign above the door says “Playland.”

An afternoon visit there failed to unearth any “young Democrats.” Instead, one of the biggest bingo games was going on. Middle-age women were packed by the dozens at long tables. A fat fellow sat on a perch calling out the numbers. It’s bingo that brings in the dough.

‘Price’ of votes increases

The police have no interest. The legal explanation is that gambling is OK in “clubs.”

Mr. Eichel contends that Republicans are rich, anyway. He says they have about $100,000 to spend in the Vanderburgh County campaign. He estimates the Democratic kitty at $40,000 and admits they want all they can get. He explains why:

You see we will have to pay more for votes this time. We used to buy them for $2 or $3, but this time it will take at least $5.

americavotes1944

Rep. Luce: Dewey policies like G.I. Joe’s

Roosevelt assailed on foreign program

americavotes1944

Roosevelt-Hillman ‘break’ forecast


Governor Green scores New Deal on labor

Kirkpatrick: Gestapo’s hangouts in Paris reveal Nazis’ medieval barbarism

Tortures used to extract information overshadow atrocities like village burning
By Helen Kirkpatrick

First U.S. general captured by Nazis

americavotes1944

Perkins: Employers still denied right to call election

New ruling unlikely before Nov. 7
By Fred W. Perkins, Pittsburgh Press staff writer

Washington – (Oct. 14)
Another labor controversy not likely to be settled before election” Whether employers are to be given a share of the rights now enjoyed by unions under administration of the Wagner Act by the National Labor Relations Board.

The question has been pending since May 19, when NLRB held a hearing in which spokesmen for practically all branches of organized labor opposed vigorously a suggested change in the Board’s rules to grant employers the right, on expiration of a contract with a labor union, and in the absence of a contest by another union, to petition for a collective bargaining election to determine whether the certified union still has a majority in the plant.

NLRB’s five-month delay in deciding the question, it was learned today, is due partly to its inability to reach an agreement on the general question with the War Labor Board.

Morse urges revision

Wayne L. Morse, former public member of the War Labor Board, now a Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate from Oregon, has attacked exclusion of employers from rights under the Wagner Act as it is now administered. He has declared for legislative revision of this act, but the particular point now long-pending could be handled without any more law – merely by a change in regulations.

Denial to employers of the right to petition for an election (which the National Labor Relations Board would reserve the right to deny) has been charged with bringing on the Montgomery-Ward seizure last spring, although it has been admitted that Sewell L. Avery, head of the company, might have found another line of attack on government policies.

Union delayed election

In this case the company contended the union did not represent a majority of employees in the affected plants, and the union delayed its own petition for an election to determine the question. Finally, the election was ordered, the union won, and the company contended too many units had been included in the election.

Gerard V. Reilly, member of NLRB, proposed the change in the Board’s rules, without reference to the Montgomery-Ward case. In a recent opinion dissenting with the other two NLRB members, he upheld the principles of his proposal.

Agencies in conflict

Correspondence between Mr. Reilly and William H. Davis, chairman of the War Labor Board, shows the conflict between the two agencies. The WLB by a majority vote of its public and labor members is disposed to recognize a union’s certification as continuous during the war period. The NLRB, under the Reilly proposal, would require periodic proofs that a majority of the employees want the union to continue as bargaining agent.

NLRB is a permanent government agency, under the law. WLB is a temporary agency for the war period, under the law, but appears to be the dominant organization in labor-regulatory circles. The present government setup provides no way out of a stalemate when these two agencies are in disagreement – except through presidential action.


Perkins: Labor and its friend, FDR

By Fred W. Perkins, Press Washington correspondent

2,200 heavies rip four Nazi supply points

250 Italy-based raiders rip oil plant

Formosa commands route to Japan’s stolen empire

Island called storehouse of supplies for war-strained enemy in Pacific


MacArthur fliers blast two islands

They cheered Wehrmacht’s march –
Aachen citizens stunned by fate

By Henry T. Gorrell, United Press staff writer

Carlisle: Patton’s army great because of Patton

General inspires men to big achievements
By John M. Carlisle, North American Newspaper Alliance


60,000 Germans hold out on coast

‘Suicide’ garrisons block use of ports

Simms: Pan-American session now vital to new world League

Post-war policies of Latin America, U.S. and Canada must be decided
By William Philip Simms, Scripps-Howard foreign editor

Canadians cross key canal on Adriatic front in Italy

Gain in Rimini–Bologna highway area in drive toward Po Valley
By Eleanor Packard, United Press staff writer

New super-fuel to aid Superfortresses

Range of B-29s due to be increased


Ex-governor cleared of bribery charge

FBI: Enough draft cases handled to form 28 Army divisions

americavotes1944

GALLUP POLL SHOWS NECK-AND-NECK VOTE
Neither has majority of electoral votes; Pennsylvania sentiment listed 50–50

Survey lists only civilian ballots and soldier vote may be of great importance
By Dr. George Gallup, director, American Institute of Public Opinion

americavotes1944

In Pennsylvania –
GOP majority in registration best since 1932

Party has unofficial lead of 801,665

‘College dean’ jailed as fake


Aimee leaves $10 to ‘Ma’ Kennedy

Col. Palmer: Nazi line thin at some points

Foe lacks troops to mass everywhere
By Col. Frederick Palmer, North American Newspaper Alliance

americavotes1944

Editorial: You can’t elect Roosevelt without his company

Novel analyzes women’s ways

Boston Adventure skillfully written
By Harry Hansen


Paulus: Javelins tossed at race question in Halsey book

Heroine gets things off her mind in letters to soldier brother
By John Paulus