Y2K 25th anniversary

Experts’ predictions miss their mark

Economists expect a strong 2000, but 1999 forecasts were far from accurate. Some say consumers will dictate the market’s direction.

NEW YORK (AP) – As the year winds down with the U.S. economy roaring toward the longest expansion ever and the stock market setting new highs, economists say they expect the good times to roll into 2000.

But can they be trusted? Their predictions for 1999 were anything but glowing or accurate.

A consensus of 50 top Wall Street stock pickers was off by 2,000 points in group’s prediction of where the Nasdaq composite index would end the year.

Forecasts for the economy were no more prescient.

Last year at this time, the consensus estimate among economists for annual growth came in at just over 2 percent. But yearend estimates for overall economic growth in 1999 now stand at about 4 percent.

Estimates for 2000, meanwhile, range from 3.1 percent to 3.8 percent.

“It’s very, very difficult to make economic forecasts,” said Victor Zarnowitz, a University of Chicago economist and research fellow at National Bureau of Economic Research.

This year also had an added wrinkle: fears of a looming Year 2000 computer problem.

Market observers also said few professional analysts could have predicted this year’s stock run-up because Wall Street analysts base their forecasts on such traditional benchmarks as earnings and revenues. But many of the technology companies that helped fuel this year’s surge defy those traditional standards.

“In the past, the market set the stock price based on a history of earnings or demonstrated revenues,” said Rao Chalasani, chief investment strategist at First Union Securities in Chicago. “Now it’s gotten to the point where the market is financing ideas.”

Business Week magazine last year asked 50 stock pickers to predict the yearend figures for both the Dow Jones industrial average and the Nasdaq composite index.

The average yearend forecast for the Dow Jones average came to 9,567, more than 16 percent below Thursday’s close of 11,452.86.

For the Nasdaq, the forecasters predicted an average yearend figure of 2081, below where it began the year and nearly half of Thursday’s closing figure of 4,036.87.

Heading into 2000, economists and industry groups are forecasting a slight cooling of the economy. While domestic growth is expected to slow a bit, particularly if the Federal Reserve raises interest rates, U.S. companies should thrive as resurgent Asian and Latin American nations buy American-made consumer goods and technology, the thinking goes.

Chalasani said the market likely will soar even higher in 2000, but he expects a relatively modest gain of 10 percent by year’s end.

Consumers could be the wild card in determining whether the economy continue to roar.

Mark Tebbano, of Albany, N.Y., said he’s optimistic that the new information age will keep the economy and the stock markets moving higher. If there’s any extra money after helping three of his children with college tuition, it’s going into the market, he said.

“I think we can continue,” he said. “I think with new technology companies the world’s opened up. We’re in a good spot in the U.S. because there’s a lot of untapped markets.”

anotherview.dec31

Goodman: Any plans for tonight?

By Ellen Goodman

BOSTON – So at last we come to the ultimate New Year’s Eve, and I don’t mean the advent of the end.

It’s been a thousand years since the chronometer last rolled over three zeros, and back then there weren’t even any chronometers. On December 31, 999, there were no watches, no clocks and the sundials didn’t work very well at midnight, but the Christian world greeted the millennium anxiously contemplating the state of their souls and quivering in the face of the final judgment.

Fast forward to December 31, 1999. We calculate time in nanoseconds, and what are we anxious about? The state of our technology. Instead of worrying about the apocalypse, we’re worrying about computer eclipse. Instead of fessing up sins, we’re backing up disks. Instead of worrying about the devil, we’re talking about the demons of international terrorism.

Lord knows, we owe a good deal to New Year’s Eves past. Where would we be without them? What percentage of our ancestors got married so they’d always have a date on a medieval eve?

Nevertheless, all those who predicted that we’d party like it’s 1999 have discovered that we’re partying like it’s Y2K.

Never mind that in New York plastic surgeons are reporting a rush on last-minute liposuctions and in Los Angeles, baby-sitting services are charging up to $300 for the big night. A Yankelovich poll shows that 75 percent of Americans are going to be at home when the ball drops.

The big bashes are half bash-full. The mega-trippers are staying home. Even the New Republic features a millennium cover of three people asleep on a bench. Every informal survey says that the in-crowd is truly in for the night.

I have, of course, long been ahead of this trend. A born path-blazer, I have spent lo these many New Year’s Eves decked out in festive flannel, cozy in down-home comfort, not to mention down comforter. Through a massive effort, I stay awake until the very first citizen of Reykjavik has blown his horn.

From my vast experience therefore, allow me then to offer six prefabricated fabrications for newcomers to the overworked, overparented population of Americans who are not yet ready to admit the simple truth: We’re too pooped to party. This set of answers to the question “What are you doing for the millennium?” will also aid those whose annual aversion to forced hilarity is multiplied a thousandfold every thousand years.

Excuse 1: “I have to work.” This is particularly handy for single people. It positions you as a very important person, who must sacrifice her own happiness and beat off the requests of endless attractive men in order to save the world or the workplace from a Y2K crash. Never mind that you’re a high-school teacher. Or that your job will be monitoring the hot water in your bathtub.

Excuse 2: “We are planning to be in Galapagos but decided not to fly over the first.” This is the phrase, uttered with the proper panache, that describes you as someone with an IPO, not a credit card limit.

Excuse 3: “We feel we should be home just in case.” This engenders all sorts of images of your state-of-the-art, high-tech trophy house, replete with sophisticated equipment that must be protected. It portrays you as someone who runs an international Web site from your garage. You don’t have to explain that you have to be home just in case your face falls into the soup again at 9:30.

Excuse 4: “We’re actually Islamic, Zoroastrian, or Buddhist.” Choose one. This is the multipurpose, multicultural excuse since 2000 is actually 1421 on the Islamic calendar, 2390 for the Zoroastrians and 4648 in China. Trust me, no one will ask.

Excuse 5: “We’ve decided to welcome the millennium in our own spiritual way.” This is the morally superior answer but it does not mean that you will have to read “Chicken Soup for the Soul” or listen to a CD of waves breaking on the shore of Maui. You can borrow my mantra: ZZZZZZZ.

Excuse 6: “We’re not celebrating, because the millennium is really next year.” This immediately relegates you to the killjoy ranks of those who insist accurately and obnoxiously that this isn’t really the Year 2000 anyway. This has an added advantage. It guarantees that you will never have to offer another excuse, since no one will ever again ask you to celebrate,

In the meantime, I unabashedly announce my own plan to be asleep when the clock strikes midnight. After all, this millennium’s gonna be around for a while.

Ellen Goodman is a syndicated columnist for Washington Post Writers Group.

Commentary: Millennium resolution: Become a better parent

By Shepherd Smith

This year, make some resolutions that pack some real resolve. How about changing the world? It can be done, especially if you are a parent.

What a gift you’ve been given – the opportunity to mold the future, leave a legacy, experience true fulfillment during your time on Earth. But only if you resolve to be a loving, committed and involved parent. There’s simply no better way to start a new year than by taking a moment away from continuous bowl game watching and reflecting upon your commitment to your family and children.

We’ve put together a list of millennium resolutions for parents:

Resolve to strengthen your commitment to your children. Children who feel connected to their parents have better self-esteem and are protected from emotional distress. They are less likely to become involved in unhealthy behaviors such as alcohol, drug and tobacco use, sex, and violence.

Resolve to show your children boundless love. Make sure your children hear you say, “I love you,” at least once a day.

Resolve to be your children’s parent first, not their friend first. Too many parents are afraid to say no when no is exactly what their children need to hear. They seem more interested in always being liked than being respected, more interested in being the good guy than teaching the good lesson. Children need limits. In fact, children whose parents mix discipline and nurturing love are emotionally healthier.

Resolve to keep promises you make to your children. If you promise to be at the ball game, do everything within your power to be there. Same thing for school plays, ballet recitals, trips to the store. To help keep this resolution, limit how many promises you make, making only those you’re pretty sure you can keep.

Resolve to show your spouse you love him or her in front of your children. It’s good modeling and it’s comforting for your children. Sadly, in light of how common divorce is, your children undoubtedly know children whose parents have divorced. It’s good for them to see that their parents are very much in love, If, on the other hand, you and your spouse are having some marital problems, don’t let these play out in front of your children, but resolve to get help from a therapist or member of the clergy.

Resolve, if you are an unmarried parent, to be aware of your child’s feelings about his biological father or mother and to be considerate of his feelings as you build your own adult, intimate relationships. Be sure to remember that your child needs the love and support of his father and mother, even though he’s only living with you. Work hard to make your relationship with the noncustodial parent as amicable and cooperative as possible. And always remember that, as you date and develop intimate relationships of your own, your child is watching closely with lots of mixed feelings. Make sure your child knows he can talk to you about these issues.

Resolve to participate in activities with your child, finding things you like to do together. Research has shown that not only are these activities fun, but they actually help equip your child to choose to avoid unhealthy risk behaviors.

Resolve to set high expectations for your children’s achievement in school. Expecting your children to do well tells them that you know they can do well. Rather than putting undue pressure on kids, it actually bolsters their self-esteem.

Resolve to get to know your children’s friends and their parents. Doing so lets your children know you are interested in their lives. They may protest, claiming they want you less involved, but the truth is they want you to be a big part of their lives. In fact, when we conducted focus groups with more than 400 young teenagers, this was one of the major findings. Getting to know their friends will also help you protect your children from bad influences and bad choices.

Resolve to give moral guidance to your children. The teenagers who took part in our focus groups said they need more, not less, guidance from their parents.

Resolve to eat at least five meals a week as a family. Research shows children who eat five or more meals a week with their families have better emotional health and fewer problems.

Keep these resolutions and you’ll find yourself focusing on the things that really matter: your kids and your family. If you do that, we can practically guarantee a happy new year.

Shepherd Smith is founder and president of the Institute for Youth Development, a nonpartisan, non-profit organization that promotes risk-avoidance.

New Year’s programs to highlight celebrations

By Kevin McDonough, United Features Syndicate

NEW YORK – Whether you plan to greet tomorrow morning with a hangover or a prayer service, this is surely a New Year’s Eve to remember.

Some folks have been making plans for the better part of the decade, booking overpriced hotels, restaurants, even cruise ships. Others have gone into Henny Penny mode, worrying that Y2K will bring certain catastrophe. For the rest of us, there’s always television.

Should any Y2K snafus happen anywhere, ABC News will probably be first with the story. The network has devoted 24 consecutive hours to Y2K coverage, beginning at 4:50 a.m. with the arrival of the year 2000 in the South Pacific.

The network has scattered correspondents all over the globe, with Diane Sawyer in New Zealand, Barbara Walters in Paris, Cynthia McFadden in Havana, and Dean Reynolds in Cairo.

Anchor Peter Jennings will hold down the fort in New York, and preside over the day-long affair. Dick Clark will also cover the arrival of midnight from New York’s Times Square.

Whether New Year’s results in dramatic news stories, or simply a series of corks popping in one time zone after another, Jennings can hardly control his zeal. He has called the round-the-clock coverage “one of the most exciting projects I have had the opportunity to take part in during my 30-plus years at ABC News.”

  • PBS also plans a millennial marathon with “Millennium 2000” with 25 hours of coverage beginning at 4:45 a.m.

    Co-produced by the BBC and WGBH in Boston, and artists and engineers in more than 58 countries, the special will feature scenes of Maori warrior dances in New Zealand; love songs from the Taj Mahal, the grand opening of the Millennium Dome in Greenwich, England, and a celebration of freedom from South Africa’s Robin Island prison, where former President Nelson Mandela spent more than two decades behind bars.

  • Will Smith will serve as host of “America’s Millennium” (10 p.m. CBS) from Washington, D.C. The president and first lady will share their thoughts on the coming century and director Steven Spielberg will present a short film that celebrates the past 100 years. Musical guests are Celine Dion, composer John Williams, Trisha Yearwood, Tom Jones, Luther Vandross and the cast of Stomp.

  • For viewers looking to escape the hoopla, there’s plenty of clever counter-programming on cable including a 25-hour “Twilight Zone” marathon on the Sci-Fi Channel starting at 9:30 a.m. In addition to airing 48 episodes, the network will air rare promotional clips featuring series creator Rod Serling. You have to wonder what Serling (who died in 1975) would have made of our current millennial hysteria.

Turner Classic Movies closes out the year with a 15-hour Elvis movie marathon starting with “The Trouble with Girls” (2 p.m.). Not to be outdone in the distraction department, American Movie Classics rings in the new year with four hours of Three Stooges shorts beginning at midnight.

The New York Times (December 31, 1999)

On this last eve, a glance back, and ahead…

Opinion: Mortality knocks

To the Editor:
For almost everyone alive today, all one’s remembered years have been spent within the 1900’s. My father, born in 1899, had no recollection of the 19th century. My granddaughter, born in 1996, will have only the faintest memories, if any, of the 20th. For her, the transition from 1996 to 2000 will not mean “growing old.”

But for those of us born before mid-century, each passing year – up till now – merely went from 19-this to 19-that: a smooth, almost imperceptible passage of time. For us, 2000 will come as a jolt, a rude reminder that we are indeed getting on in years. Our big worry will not so much be “Will my computer still function past Y2K?” but “Will I still function past Y2K?”

MICHAEL H. STONE, M.D.
New York
December 20, 1999

Opinion: Sleep through it

To the Editor:
Personally, I’d just as soon sleep through New Year’s Eve any year. But the biggest blight on this particular celebration will be all the kill-joys running around shrieking: “This isn’t the millennium! The millennium is next year!”

Still, I don’t begrudge anyone’s fun. If you’re not too hung over, tell me about it the next day. Good night.

KEVIN DAWSON
New York
December 22, 1999

Opinion: The laptop contingent

To the Editor:
Thomas Lynch (“As Memory Itself Runs Out of Time,” Op-Ed, Dec. 26) refers to his mom and dad and others who begat the baby boomers as “fixed in the 20th century.” I just turned 84 and look forward to the new millennium. With my laptop in hand, an open mind and a third of a century of teaching behind me, I think the cyberspace generation may need me and the rest of the over-50 crowd.

To relegate the several generations that made this age possible to the rocking chair and the nursing home is a mistake. Look again: we’re right there with you.

CARMEN CESTA
North Salem, N.Y.
December 26, 1999

Opinion: Symbol for kindness

To the Editor:
I have this idea as a symbol for the new millennium: let your first act in it be some act of kindness. It can be a check to a charity, going out of your way to help someone across the street, calling your parents, giving something to a homeless person, forgiving someone who has wronged you or simply going over to a stranger with your hand extended and wishing him or her a wonderful year ahead.

You might call someone who is ill and express your wish for a speedy recovery, or send flowers. The K in Y2K could stand for kindness instead of representing an element in a troublesome problem that shrouds the century’s end.

AARON DANZIG
New York
December 26, 1999

Opinion: Let us remember

To the Editor:
On the occasion of the new century, I would simply like to thank the more than 600,000 men and women who died serving our country in the wars of the 20th century. Their sacrifice should never be forgotten. May all their dreams for peace come true in the 21st century.

DAVID E. REID
Guilderland, N.Y.
December 28, 1999

Opinion: Wait till next year

To the Editor:
As the next century approaches, we would do well to balance the gains and losses of this century.

We have gained the ability to fly to almost anywhere we please; to travel to the moon and investigate other galaxies; to eradicate diseases; to split the atom; to bring news from around the world into our living rooms, and to do a host of other magnificent things that – in a century filled with marvels – have for the moment escaped my attention.

And yet all these accomplishments are greatly diminished in the face of the two great losses we have suffered: the American people have lost the ability to count, and the American news media have lost the ability to tell the truth, as evidenced by the fact that the next century (and millennium) doesn’t begin until the year 2001.

ALASDAIR DENVIL
Brooklyn
December 28, 1999

Opinion: Enough already

To the Editor:
I am so tired of the millennium, I don’t want to hear about it again for a thousand years.

RICHARD L. PHILLIPS
New York
December 28, 1999

Opinion: New Year’s doctor

To the Editor:
I read with pleasure your Dec. 28 Public Lives column about Dr. Mary Ann Hopkins’s being chosen to press the button dropping the New Year’s ball on Times Square.

In 1996 Dr. Hopkins was the chief surgical resident at New York Hospital when I received a kidney transplant. A few days after the surgery, surrounded by male residents, she visited my room. I asked her if a woman had sewn me up because my scar was so small.

She smiled, looked at the men and said she was glad that I had noticed.

Apparently, she had waited until the surgeon left the room and then sewed me with a needle and thread rather than using the staples that doctors normally use because they take less time. She explained that it was important that a young woman (I was 51) be able to wear a bikini.

Until I read your article, all I knew about her was that she was a wonderful sewer. Now I am dazzled by her commitment and accomplishments.

BARBARA SWARTZ
Brooklyn
December 28, 1999

Opinion: A family moment

To the Editor:
Ten years from now, when my daughter is talking with her friends about what they did to mark the turn of the century, she will not have to say, “My parents left me at home with a sitter while they went out.” She will be able to recall something meaningful that we did as a family to commemorate the historic occasion. It will be, after all, her century.

RICHARD LOCKER
Nashville
December 28, 1999

Opinion: A very early warning

To the Editor:
In view of all the grief caused by the late recognition of the Y2K problem, I would like to alert your readers in good time to the looming Y10K problem. When the clock rolls over to Jan. 1, 10,000, computers that allow four spaces in the date field will be in trouble because they will need five spaces. This early warning will be especially important to people already working on seed and Christmas catalogs.

WILLIAM C. MILLER
Poughkeepsie, N.Y.
December 28, 1999

Opinion: Millencholy’s cousin

To the Editor:
I appreciated R. D. Rosen’s wonderful description of “Millencholy” (Op-Ed, December 29).

Misery loves company. I am suffering from a related syndrome: pre-millennium stress syndrome. Will my computer be O.K.? Will there be water? Will there be a terrorist attack?

All these worries have clouded my usual optimistic outlook. I will be glad to see everything running as usual on Jan. 1, 2000.

ARLYNN GREENBAUM
New York
December 29, 1999

Opinion: Useless predictions

To the Editor:
Why aren’t we prognosticating at the turn of this century as much as our ancestors did at the turn of the last? Because we moderns can all plainly see how little of what was predicted then has come true. I’m sure not going out on a limb, only to be made the subject of a 22nd-century wit in whatever commodity replaces the newspaper by then.

JENNIFER HUGET
East Granby, Conn.
December 29, 1999

Opinion: Unnecessary wars

To the Editor:
The United States is a country founded on the principle of peace, not war. Yet in the last decade we have sent troops to foreign places like Kosovo. These countries were not a security threat to the United States.

The only war that took place in the 20th century that we really needed to get involved in was World War II, in which the Japanese attacked the United States. In most of the other wars that occurred in this century, we acted not in defense but as the police of the world.

If we continue to get involved in other countries’ wars, we could have another split in the population, as we did during the Vietnam War. We need to spend federal money to help our country’s people, not to disturb other countries’ peoples.

MICHAEL RATH
Mount Pleasant, Pa.
December 29, 1999

Opinion: Let fear not rule

To the Editor:
Re “New Year’s Eve Security Issues” (editorial, December 29): Seattle is taking the wrong approach to New Year’s Eve by canceling its planned celebration at the Seattle Center. There are an infinite number of risks in life, and it is impossible to predict with foresight the result of any one decision or action.

Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani’s plan for New York’s Times Square celebration minimizes the risk of a terrorist attack without sacrificing the sanctity and entertainment of the people who attend this once-in-a-lifetime event.

Seattle, on the other hand, threatens the livelihood of all Americans by capitulating to the fear of terrorist actions. Living in fear and choosing to cancel events because of that fear is not living at all.

It is best to follow as many precautions as possible to minimize the risk of low-probability, high-danger acts like terrorism and not to let a small minority that has trouble expressing itself through words ruin the celebration of a majority.

ANDREW READ
Philadelphia
December 29, 1999

Opinion: Honored generations

To the Editor:
In “The Uncertain Blessings of Longevity” (editorial, December 30), you refer to “the honored generation of the Great Depression and World War II, now deep in its 80’s.”

I would like to point out that I was born in September 1927 and remember the Depression with clarity, at least after 1932. I was also in the service when I was 17, during the last year of World War II. There must be many people in their late 60’s who have memories of the last years of the Depression, since it did not really end until the beginning of the war.

MORTON BRYER
Norwalk, Conn.
December 30, 1999