God why is he so on his idea that "nazi were socialist when it was already debunked a lot of time?
5 Likes
He already made a few videos about it way back in 2018. So, this is just him reaffirming his beliefs. Still disagreeing with him, though.
3 Likes
Does anyone here care to actually watch it and summarize his points? Iām so not spending 5 hours on what I believe to be wrong, but feel somewhat bad about ignoring it outright.
4 Likes
I will be watching it at some point. I already saved it in my list. I also saw fully his two previous videos on the subject back in 2018.
4 Likes
Yeah he did it partially in response to the TG video I think, settle down any potential rifts.
3 Likes
If I recall correctly, he hasnāt mentioned TG at any point, even in his comments response video.
4 Likes
Kinda odd, given how both fanbases intertwine.
4 Likes
Iām one of them. Subbed to both TG and TIK.
4 Likes
Tik has lost his mind, his view is the govt having any involvement = socialism.
Also just looking at the posts he upvotes there is something going on there.
4 Likes
TIK or me? He already made his case way back in 2018. So, this is nothing new.
1 Like
@Sykdom
Itās a real shame, because I really like the Stalingrad series so far.
But I am not one of those who would unsubscribe just because someone says something I disagree with.
And as others have also noted, this isnāt a new thing for him. I will keep disagreeing with him because āgovernment involvement = socialismā just simply isnāt so.
Or rather, itās an amusing way to see it because it would imply any government that sought to implement religious orthodoxy is automatically socialist, and I canāt see many people agreeing with the idea that Russiaās old tsarist was government, or cardinal Richelieuās France.
Whoās gonna tell Trump that TIK thinks heās socialist 
2 Likes
I unfollowed him awhile ago just felt he was actively lying and had an agenda.
I asked him to explain to me how Krupp, IG or Porsche were collectivized and itās just articles of nazism no actual proof.
2 Likes
BTW, ladies and gentlemen, if you have some spare time, please watch the entire video, no matter your disagreements with him.
As TIK said at the beginning of this video:
Even if you do not agree with what Iām about to say, thereās no reason to call me names, slander me, jump to false conclusions, or send me death threats. The point of history is to have a debate. At the very least, by taking this position, I am providing you and others the opportunity to debate with me. If Iām wrong, you should have no trouble addressing all the points Iām about to make. If Iām wrong.
1 Like
my problem with him is that he will never change his point of view on the matter ,even if you put good source on to why they werenāt socialist,heāll still say the were because reason and I think heās contributing spreading bad history with that too
3 Likes
He has his sources as well. So, heās not Alex Jones.
1 Like
I think the ridiculousness of his video is best illustrated by this segment (page 81 of his script): āThis basically presents the idea that denying Hitlerās Socialism, whether you realize it or not, is actually
denying the Holocaust.ā
5 Likes
Yeah, thatās where I disagreed with him the most.
Have you seen the video in its entirety? If so, so have I.
1 Like
His sources:
What Hitler did was use the term socialism as the same thing as collectivism. His version of collectivism was an extreme version called Fascism based on race and class collaboration.
3 Likes
oh god yes this thing,why is denying hitler socialism holocaust denial,the guy got a weird definition of what holocaust denial is tooā¦
3 Likes