The Syria–Lebanon Campaign (1941)

SIGNED IN ANCIENT CITY

Acre, Palestine, July 13 (AP) –
The armistice ending the hostilities between British and “Free French” forces and the Vichy French government was signed last night in the stucco administration building of the Admiral Sidney Smith Barracks a little north of Acre on the anniversary of the city’s fall to Richard the Lionheart in 1191.

In the 750 years since Richard was here, the city has not changed much. In 1791, there was a clash between the English and French – Napoleon’s siege of the town in 1791 which failed because of the intervention of the British fleet under the admiral for whom the barracks was named.

Three parties were represented at the signing of the armistice: the British, the “Free French” and the Vichy French. The Vichy French did not accept the presence of the “Free French” but the British insisted that they be there and when the Vichy delegates arrived they found the representatives of “Free France” already in the small white-walled lecture room where the signing took place.

It was the first official face-to-face encounter of the representatives of the two Frances.

2 Likes

NOT FINAL, VICHY SAYS

Vichy, July 13 (AP) –
French sources declared tonight that General Henri Dentz or his representatives had only tentatively initialed the armistice of Acre and that Dentz’s powers extended only to military matters – not political or governmental.

Whereas an earlier communiqué said that the armistice had been signed, these sources said it had been only initialed pending “some technical counsel” from Vichy. This “counsel,” they added, would be in no way binding on Dentz because he holds full responsibility.

It is possible, according to these informants, that the British occupation will:

…resemble that of the Germans in the occupied zone of France – a taking over of military authority but leaving civil administration in the same hands.

2 Likes

The Pittsburgh Press (July 14, 1941)

VICHY APPROVES ARMISTICE PACT AS ‘HONORABLE’

Agreement for Syria likely to be signed in Palestine today

Vichy, July 14 –
The Vichy government has approved for ending hostilities in Syria, an official communiqué said today.

The government’s approval was given, a statement by the Vichy was office said, after an earlier “insolent political ultimatum which could not have been signed without dishonor” had been transformed into an “honorable military convention.”

The War Office said the government, after rejecting the earlier “political” demands, had authorized General Henri Dentz, Vichy High Commissioner for Syria, to negotiate with British military authorities on the condition that Free French representatives be excluded.

The War Office said:

Dentz scrupulously respected these instructions.

Vichy troops in Syria are expected under the armistice to receive honors of war. They will not become war prisoners and, together with civil functionaries, will be repatriated, it was said.


Acre, Palestine, July 14 (UP) –
Vichy-British talks were resumed at 11 a.m. today and it was indicated that an armistice formally ending hostilities in Syria would shortly be signed.

Gen. Henry Maitland Wilson, commander-in-chief of British forces in Palestine, presided. Colonel de Verdillac again represented General Henri Dentz, Vichy High Commissioner for Syria, at the conversations.

Hostilities were halted shortly after midnight Friday and have not resumed during the negotiations. The armistice agreement tentatively was initiated yesterday.

3 Likes

U.S. Department of State (July 14, 1941)

740.00119 European War 1939/795: Telegram

The Minister in Egypt to the Secretary of State

Cairo, July 14, 1941 — 6 p.m.
[Received 10:53 p.m.]

949.

I am informed that agreement has been reached on the points in the armistice terms which the British found unacceptable and that formal signature has taken place. The text of the revised terms has not yet been received here but it is expected that it will become available in the course of the day and that it may be possible to make it public tonight.

KIRK

3 Likes

The Pittsburgh Press (July 15, 1941)

VICHY GIVES UP ALL SYRIA TO GREAT BRITAIN

Terms of pact ending war let English have planes, ships

By Ralph Heinzen, United Press staff writer

Vichy, July 15 –
British and Free French troops will occupy all of Syria and Lebanon under terms of the convention ending hostilities of the mandated territory, it was announced today.

The agreement was signed last night in Acre, Palestine, by General Joseph de Verdillac, acting for General Henri Dentz, French High Commissioner, and General Henry Maitland Wilson, British commander.

It provides that all French troops must be concentrated in six zones by noon today. They will remain under French officers until they are repatriated.

Prisoners of both sides will be freed at once.

French civilians and military officials will be given an alternative of joining the Allies’ cause or being repatriated. Officials will remain until they can be replaced.

All ports will be handed over, including arsenals and all ships, including British vessels which had been interned by the French.

The French agreed to surrender their airfields with all airplanes intact and give the British existing supplies of fuel.

An Armistice Control Committee, to comprise three British and two French representatives, will be established in Beirut to supervise execution of the convention.

It was understood the agreement gave Britain full control of the vital French railway system in Syria for the duration of the war and permitted an extension of the “Eden Line” of fortifications northward from Palestine to the Turkish border.

3 Likes

U.S. Department of State (July 15, 1941)

390D.1115/121: Telegram

The Consul General at Beirut to the Secretary of State

Beirut, July 15, 1941 — 9 a.m.
[Received 5:50 p.m.]

299.

Now that the armistice has been signed the Department may wish to inform inquirers that as far as I have been able to ascertain all American citizens in Syria and the Lebanon are well and the properties of American institutions have suffered no damage.

ENGERT

740.00119 European War 1939/797: Telegram

The Ambassador in France to the Secretary of State

Vichy, July 15, 1941 — 6 p.m.
[Received July 15 — 3:20 p.m.]

884.

The information contained in Department’s 561, July 11, 10 p.m., was communicated to Rochat this afternoon, who expressed great appreciation of all the Department’s efforts to communicate the British armistice terms in reply to General Dentz’s request as soon as possible. He said that he would bring the Department’s resume to Admiral Darlan’s personal attention.

He made no comment on the Department’s observation that General Dentz could have at any time sought an armistice under a flag of truce. He likewise could throw no light on the reasons why the Department was unable to establish communication with Beirut during that period.

LEAHY

4 Likes

U.S. Department of State (July 16, 1941)

740.0011 European War 1939/13235: Telegram

The Consul General at Beirut to the Secretary of State

Beirut, July 15, 1941 — 7 p.m.
[Received July 16 — 8:05 p.m.]

300.

First British troops consisting of an Australian battalion entered Beirut about 1:00 p.m. today. At the request of the Colonel I took him to call on Admiral Gouton — see my 286, July 10, 11 a.m. — and assisted him and his political officer in establishing contacts with the heads of certain administrations charged with the maintenance of order, food control, et cetera. The attitude of the French official was correct, courteous and helpful.

General Wilson and General Catroux arrive tomorrow morning.

As previously reported by me, neither Admiral Gouton nor any other French official is permitted by Vichy to have any relations with the Free French authorities who are about to take over in Beirut. This will, of course, complicate the situation enormously and it will require the utmost tact on the part of everybody to avoid an impasse at the very outset.

Repeated to London and Vichy.

ENGERT

4 Likes

U.S. Department of State (July 17, 1941)

740.0011 European War 1939/13243: Telegram

The Ambassador in France to the Secretary of State

Vichy, July 16, 1941 — 6 p.m.
[Received July 17 — 1:10 a.m.]

889.

The termination of hostilities in Syria has unquestionably been received with great relief in all French circles. While the Government’s efforts under German prodding to stir up public indignation over the British and Gaullist “invasion” of Syria fell rather flat, as indicated in previous telegrams, the daily bulletins of the progress of the fighting in that area with indications of casualties and particularly the thought of Frenchmen fighting Frenchmen gave even the more apathetic elements of the public a feeling of uneasiness and futility. Even those who recognized that the French Government’s delivery of Syrian air bases to Germany during the Iraqi affair amply justified British action hoped only for an early termination of hostilities. In fact, the principal complaint heard from our pro-British friends, both in the Ministries and in French military and naval circles, concerned the failure of the British to have undertaken the operation without sufficient force to end it quickly.

The text of the armistice terms published here today will receive general approval and, in spite of the breast-beating of the “collaborationist” press that the Syrian incident has ended in neither a “capitulation” nor even a “military defeat”, the fairness of the British armistice conditions should help somewhat to remove the bitterness engendered by the affair (Rochat incidentally attributes the “reasonableness” of the British around the armistice table to the “influence” of our Government).

Coupled with this sense of relief that the war in Syria is over, there is a natural feeling of pride that the French Army, so quickly and decisively destroyed in May and June 1940, has on a small scale and “outnumbered four to one” proved its worth in Syria. There is also the feeling that the incident has adduced good evidence that France can and will, within the limits of her resources, “defend her empire”, and this aspect of the situation has been helpful in the delicate balance of French relations with Germany in dispelling a certain perhaps not unwarranted Nazi suspicion on this score.

If the British “attack” on Syria did not arouse the bitterness and indignation which might have been expected it was chiefly criticised as ill timed, unnecessary and Gaullist inspired — there is on the other hand no doubt that British military prestige has in no way been enhanced in their eyes by the 4 weeks’ campaign. The firm belief, all too prevalent in France, even among those who most ardently hope for an Allied victory, in British “military incompetence” and talent for “bungling” land operations (as distinct from general admiration in France for the British Navy and the RAF) has but deepened. The forces of the advocates of Franco-German collaboration would as a result have had their ranks greatly swelled by those who believe, however fallaciously, that a German victory is inevitable and that France should, therefore, endeavor to obtain a better place for herself in a German-ruled world by displaying enthusiasm for the New Order from the present moment, were it not for several offsetting factors: The first and foremost of these is the strength and power of resistance which the Russian Army has displayed and the corollary feeling in all quarters in France that German losses both in men and material in the eastern campaign are far heavier than Hitler anticipated. A further offsetting factor is American occupation of Iceland and the significance of its implications. In spite of this, the evidence of British lack of military and strategic efficiency displayed, in French eyes, in the Syrian test has added one more discouragement to our pro-British at Paris to the list which began with the loss of Benghazi.

Repeated to London.

LEAHY

740.0011 European War 1939/13251: Telegram

The Consul General at Beirut to the Secretary of State

Beirut, July 16, 1941 — 7 p.m.
[Received July 17 — 11:10 a.m.]

302.

Generals Wilson and Catroux arrived in Beirut this morning and at the Grand Serail received the head of the Lebanese Government and his Cabinet, high ecclesiastical dignitaries both Christian and Muslim, the Consular Corps and native and foreign notables.

General Dentz left yesterday morning for Tripoli just before the arrival of the first British troops.

I have had a talk with Wilson at my house and with Catroux at his office which I shall report separately. Both said that unless the uncompromising attitude of the Vichy French in Beirut was modified Catroux would have to ask Gouton and Dentz to leave the Levant States immediately. As anticipated, there was an unpleasant little incident this morning when the proceedings were held up for half an hour because Gouton refused to turn anything over to Catroux.

Repeated to Vichy and London.

ENGERT

4 Likes

The Pittsburgh Press (July 17, 1941)

BRITISH TAKE OVER SYRIA WITH LITTLE FANFARE
By Henry T. Gorrell, United Press staff writer

Beirut, Lebanon, July 16 – (delayed)
General Henry Maitland Wilson, British commander for Palestine, and General Georges Catroux, Free French leader, tried to be as ostentatious as possible in taking over the administration of Syria and Lebanon from the Vichy French today.

But local civil functionaries, religious dignitaries and awesome foreign diplomats greeted them almost as conquering heroes.

Two Axis officials, the Japanese and Romanian consuls, attended the reception for Generals Wilson and Catroux in the palace council chamber of General Henri Dentz, the Vichy leader whose forces were defeated by the British and Free French.

The people of Beirut were disappointed by the lack of fanfare in the entry of the main body of British troops.

General Wilson, General Catroux and their military aides drove to Grand Sarail Palace in six camouflaged American autos and quickly reviewed an honor guard in the courtyard.

Admiral Gouton, representing the Vichy government, made a brief speech in turning over the city to the Allied forces.

Red-fezzed civil functionaries went to the palace to witness the ceremony but the Australian military police, unable to understand their rapid-fire French, pushed them back. They got in only after an interpreter told the slouch-hatted Aussies who they were.

Corneliu Van H. Engert, United States consul-general, attended the ceremony in striped trousers and swallowtail coat.


The Pittsburgh Press (July 18, 1941)

INSIDE STORY OF WAR IN SYRIA REVEALS THAT VICHY WARSHIPS FIRED INTO AIR

Reporter explains slowness of British advance; anger against French Beirut commander forced him to shift residence nightly

By Harold Peters, United Press staff writer

Beirut, Lebanon, July 17 – (delayed)
Great Britain and the Free French won a strange war in Syria and Lebanon.

It is possible now to tell the inside story as I saw and heard it here at the general headquarters of the Vichy French during the weeks the British Imperial and Free French troops were moving slowly to victory.

Vichy warships fired their shells into the air instead of at the British fleet. General Henri Dentz, the Vichy commander-in-chief, changed his residence each night because of popular feeling against him all during the war. Free French agents were active in Vichy territory.

dentz
Gen. Henri Dentz. Vichy chief moved often.

Army of only 45,000

Reliable figures, disclosed by Free French agents who remained here during the campaign, were that the Vichy forces totaled about 45,000 men, of whom only half saw action. Of these, 10,000 were Syrians and Lebanese, 15,000 African colonials, 5,000 Foreign Legionnaires and 15,000 real Frenchmen.

Casualties of the Vichy forces are estimated at about 2,000 killed and 2,000 to 3,000 seriously wounded.

It seemed clear that at the start of the campaign, the Germans intended to aid the Vichy forces against their former allies. At least two German planes fought with them and during the first week German artillery officers arrived here by airplane.

One pilot killed

The pilot of one of these German planes parachutes to earth, wounded, 1¼ miles from my house in a mountain village. His co-pilot was killed.

During the first week, I satisfied myself of the arrival of German artillery officers. Four unmistakable German officers were billeted at a hotel at which I then stayed.

After the first week or so, however, German participation in the campaign was confined to a civilian commission which included a half dozen Italians. At one time, the German commission numbered 28. It dwindled to two key agents who remained until two weeks ago. The German infiltration began in February when 20 commissioners were joined by technicians and experts who brought the total number of German agents to about 150.

Carried foreign passports

Most of the Germans were reported to carry Bulgarian and Romanian passports. They were permitted to use military telephones and gasoline, strictly rationed for others, was given to them freely.

The ebb and flow of German and Italian agents was an accurate barometer of front line action. All the Germans and Italians left Beirut for Aleppo, up toward the Turkish frontier, when Damascus fell to the British and Free French. They returned when Vichy resistance tiffened.

Many Vichy officers were disheartened, believing that Germans were in control in Syria, and a captain remarked:

We are fighting for the King of Prussia.

This belief was strengthened by the attempts General Dentz made to strengthen Vichy resistance.

When French non-commissioned officers, leading their men in the fighting, were thinned out, General Dentz tried to replace them. Fifteen airplanes flew in a shuttle service between Tunis, on the French African coast, and Aleppo. The planes flew by way of Athens. It was uncertain whether some German artillery experts were brought in also, but British Imperial officers, who had fought in Greece, told me that at two points there was a sudden improvement in French artillery firing and the technique was similar to that of the Germans.

General Dentz tried to hearten his troops by announcing that the 35,000-ton battleship Jean Bart and the 26,500-ton battleship Dunkerque were on the way from Toulon with reinforcements and ammunition.

Fired into the air

It is asserted that the three destroyers which made up the French “fleet” here fired shells into the air in an attempt to hearten the people. It would be interesting to find out, in fact, whether the British fleet actually encountered any French warships.

The destruction of the transport St. Didier by British warships off the Turkish coast ended attempts to bring reinforcements by sea.

Gen. Dentz’s last attempt at stiffening resistance was when they rejected the British demand that he declare Beirut an open city.

The city became almost depopulated when Free French agents made known his declaration:

I will follow orders even if it means fighting in the streets.

Anti-aircraft batteries were posted near hospitals, including that of the American University.

General Dentz’;s refusal to remove military targets such as munitions, supply dumps and military garages, caused most of the people who had remained to flee too.

Villagers around Beirut were angered when General Dentz placed artillery batteries in or near the villages. One battery was placed next door to the home of the Greek Orthodox Archbishop on Mt. Lebanon. The British declined to fire on it, and the Archbishop’s home was undamaged.

Forbearance by the British in this and other instances undoubtedly slowed their advance. During the last weeks of the campaign, only about 1,000 Vichy troops were able to hold the strong defensive positions south of Beirut.

3 Likes

U.S. Department of State (July 18, 1941)

740.0011 European War 1939/17227

The Chief of the Government of Lebanon to the American Consul General at Beirut

[Translation]

259/C
Beirut, July 18, 1941.

Mr. Consul General:
I am happy to assure you of the gratitude of the Lebanese people for the interest you took in them at the time of the air raids on Beirut and for your effective intervention with the competent authorities.

To these thanks should be added my own pleasure at having established with you personal relations full of cordiality and esteem of which I shall keep the most pleasant memory.

I hope that this happy collaboration in the interest of the public welfare will become still closer in the future.

Please accept [etc.]

A. NACCACHE

3 Likes

Time Magazine (July 21, 1941)

ACRE PACT

Even the date mocked General Henri Fernand Dentz, for it was Bastille Day. As he took up the pen his throat must have worked. Last year he signed Paris away to the conquering Nazis. Now, as Vichy’s High Commissioner to the Levant States, he was about to sign Syria away to the conquering British and, even worse, to the conquering Free French. General Dentz, who rather resembles a provincial druggist in uniform, sighed and signed his full name.

Two days before, the Pact that ended the five-week Syrian War had been merely initialed by Vichy’s Brigadier General Joseph Antoine Sylvain Raoul de Verdilhac, who went to Acre in Palestine for the armistice talks held in the officers’ mess of the Sidney Smith Barracks. When diminutive General de Verdillac uncapped his pen for the initialing, all the lights in the room suddenly fused out. So the war that started in the early morning moonlight of June 8 ended in the light of a dispatch rider’s motorbike headlamp which was brought in from outside.

De Verdilhac went to Acre instead of General Dentz, because he is more pro-British, less anti-De Gaulle than his superior. With Lieut. General Sir Henry Maitland (“Jumbo”) Wilson at the H-shaped conference table was General Georges Catroux, Free French commander of the campaign, condemned to death by Vichy. The sight of him might have caused General Dentz pain. General de Verdilhac, however, lost no time in putting things on a cozy footing. He leaned toward an Australian sentry, winked, made a throat-slitting gesture with one hand and whispered:

Les Baches!

Despite the generosity of the original British terms, the neck-in-noose Government at Vichy bleated of dishonor, made a brief show of refusing them, then dumped the whole mess into General Dentz’s lap. After thanking the Vichy forces who took part in the campaign, Marshal Henri Philippe Pétain declared to Syria’s civilians:

France is going to suffer an eclipse in the Levant as sad for her as for you.

But sadder than Vichy’s eclipse in the Levant might have been the fate of all British Middle East defense had not Syria been taken. Beginning with the Iraq revolt last spring when they used Syrian bases to fly aid to Rashid Ali al-Gailani, the Germans had increasingly filtered into the country. If the Axis had got control of Syria the British Middle East Command might as well have folded its tents and gone home.

That Syria was a rather jumboesque campaign was hardly General Jumbo Wilson’s fault. He had to tread warily lest he inflame Arab sensibilities or drive Vichy further into the arms of the Axis. The Allies’ hope that large-scale deserticras and native uprisings would quickly crack General Dentz’s defense did not materialize. They had not reckoned that his seasoned regulars would fight no matter who gave the orders. On the British and Free French they had inflicted nearly 1,500 casualties.

3 Likes

The Pittsburgh Press (July 20, 1941)

ANZACS REPORT 1,682 SYRIAN CASUALTIES

Sydney, Australia, July 19 –
Army Minister Percy Spender announced today that Australian troops, which reportedly carried the brunt of the Allied attack, suffered only 1,682 casualties in the Syrian campaign.

Mr. Spender said that until July 16, 117 officers and 1,565 men had been reported killed, wounded, missing or taken prisoner. These included 26 officers and 110 men killed in action and 73 officers and 976 men wounded in action.


The Pittsburgh Press (July 21, 1941)

BRITISH SAY SYRIAN OCCUPATION IS EASY

Cairo, July 21 (UP) –
The British and Free French occupation of the northern part of capitulated Syria is continuing “smoothly,” a communiqué of the British Middle East Command said today.


Vichy, July 21 (UP) –
Paris newspapers today published dispatches of German origin from Ankara claiming that a series of demonstrations against the British and Free French had swept across Syria and Lebanon and resulted in declaration of a state of siege accompanied by mass arrests of nationalist agitators.

4 Likes

U.S. Department of State (July 24, 1941)

890D.927/145: Telegram

The Acting Secretary of State to the Consul General at Beirut

Washington, July 24, 1941.

145.

Following from Oriental Institute:

Please ask present Government Syria confirm Fakhariyah concession.

WELLES

U.S. Department of State (July 28, 1941)

740.0011 European War 1939/13488: Telegram

The Consul General at Beirut to the Secretary of State

Beirut, July 25, 1941 — 8 p.m.
[Received July 28 — 1:02 p.m.]

309.

General de Gaulle arrived in Beirut at noon today accompanied by General Catroux. General Wilson also spent the day in Beirut.

De Gaulle received this afternoon the same officials mentioned in paragraph 1 of my 302, July 16, 7 p.m. He expressed to me his appreciation of the sympathy and support the Free French cause was receiving from the United States.

Yesterday the Vichy garrison at As-Suwayda, capital of the Jabal al-Druze, was supplanted by a British cavalry brigade. This was the last French force to disappear from the Syrian scene under the terms of the armistice because it was feared that the Druzes might overpower the French if they became defenseless before the British were ready to take over. I understand that the Jabal al-Druze will be under British not Free French administration.

ENGERT

3 Likes

U.S. Department of State (August 1, 1941)

740.0011 European War 1939/13602: Telegram

The Consul General at Beirut to the Secretary of State

Beirut, July 27, 1941 — 10 a.m.
[Received August 1 — 11:25 a.m.]

313.

General de Gaulle asked me to call on him yesterday afternoon as we had not had an opportunity to talk much at the reception and he was leaving for Damascus today.

He began by saying that the Free French were here to uphold and continue the rights of France in the Levant. This was generally understood and approved not only by the British but also by the Syrians and Lebanese. He had received the necessary assurances from the British Government and quite recently these assurances were renewed and confirmed. However, he had observed that while men like Churchill and Eden seem to understand the situation thoroughly, there was evidence of less comprehension on the part of some of the British military authorities in the Middle East. He regretted this because it rendered the principal task a little more difficult. Few people seemed to realize he had to watch public opinion in France most carefully in order to counteract German propaganda that the Free French movement was merely a tool of the British (I gathered from the tone and manner in which he said this that he wished to convey the thought that occasionally he had to appear less disposed toward the British than he personally felt because everything he said and did had its reaction among the French people). I thanked the General for taking me into his confidence in connection with a matter which was extremely delicate but which all of us had so much at heart. I said I hoped he realized that in the Levant he found himself in an atmosphere of characteristically oriental intrigue and that he would not take too seriously the multifarious accusations, denunciations, innuendos, et cetera, which had doubtless already come to his ears. There were a great many people in Syria and the Lebanon who would like nothing better than to see serious friction develop between the Free French and the British quite apart from a relatively numerous group who were either in Axis pay or had pro-German sympathies and would therefore take advantage of every opportunity to sow discord and suspicion.

It seemed to me, I said, there was one — and perhaps only one — solid tongue which could provide a common starting point for everybody right now, whether French or British, Christian or Muslim or any other nationality or race, and that was the immediate necessity of defense. For the present nothing mattered except the purely physical and strategic position of keeping the Axis out of Syria. And in so far as the situation in Syria was linked up with Britain’s general war effort and could be made to contribute to the overthrow of Hitlerism and any other reason to think of direct interests and concern to the American Government and people.

I therefore ventured to hope that neither his relations with the British nor the admittedly complex and trying relationships of both occupying forces with the natives would be permitted to impede the military effort of the Allies. I did not mean that political problems should not be discussed even now especially as everybody was agreed that Syria and the Lebanon were entitled to independence. But it was futile to allow political schemers to stir up internal dissensions while the present potentially dangerous situation continued, for not only would it be playing into Hitler’s hands but it would jeopardize the very existence and integrity of the territories for whose independence the same politicians profess so much solicitude.

General de Gaulle said he was in entire accord with me but it remained to be seen whether it would prove practicable to postpone indefinitely the implementation of certain political promises which had been made to the natives. I replied the essential thing was that they should temporarily be relegated to the background and that irrevocable commitments should as much as possible be avoided before the successful conclusion of the war.

Repeated to London and Cairo.

ENGERT

3 Likes

U.S. Department of State (August 2, 1941)

740.0011 European War 1939/13608: Telegram

The Consul General at Beirut to the Secretary of State

Beirut, July 30, 1941 — 11 a.m.
[Received August 2 — 2 p.m.]

319.

General de Gaulle made a speech in Damascus yesterday in which he said the time had come to put an end to the mandate and to negotiate with the Syrians regarding the conditions for their:

…full and complete sovereignty and independence and to establish the terms of an alliance which both sides most sincerely desire.

He added that in this war the liberties and even existence of all peoples were at stake. France would prevent Syria from being enslaved in cooperation with her brave British allies:

…who have come here exclusively for strategic reasons. In this connection, I am pleased to refer to the declarations and undertakings of the Government in London by which Great Britain expresses herself completely free from all political aims in Syria and the Lebanon and determined to respect in its entirety the position of France.

Even these unequivocal diplomatic instruments might not stop enemy propaganda or inconsiderate words,

…but I am counting on the complete union of England and France which existed in the past and simultaneous actions of their armies in the Levant states to contribute toward the reassurance of Syria and the Lebanon in the certainty that they will preserve from the Tigris to the Mediterranean and from Transjordan to Turkey their national liberty and integrity.

The General concluded by expressing his firm conviction that the powerful British armies and determination, the mobilized resources of America and the losses inflicted on Germany by Russia were all bound to lead to victory.

ENGERT

3 Likes

U.S. Department of State (August 7, 1941)

740.0011 European War 1939/13750: Telegram

The Consul General at Beirut to the Secretary of State

Beirut, August 5, 1941 — 11 p.m.
[Received August 7 — 11:15 a.m.]

323.

General de Gaulle sent for me again this afternoon and said he had done so because he knew I was a sincere friend of England and France and he authorized me to make use of our conversation as I saw fit.

He said his relations with the British had reached such a critical stage that he was beginning to doubt whether he could go on like this much longer. Despite all promises made to him by the British Government as recently as July 25, by Lyttelton in Cairo, British military seemed determined to thwart and defy him wherever they could. In the first place the armistice terms in themselves were a betrayal of the Free French cause and had been dictated by the British against his own wishes. As far as he was concerned they were, therefore, practically null and void. In the second place, the solemn assurances given him by the British Government and his recent agreements with Lyttelton were being deliberately disregarded by the British military on the spot. And thirdly, British political officers were traveling all over the Jebel Druz, Hauran and Jezideh which gave the natives the impression that the British were the real masters of the country.

General de Gaulle then showed me a letter Lyttelton had sent him July 25 to which were attached two agreements regarding British and French collaboration in Syria and Lebanon. After reading them I remarked that they seemed to me quite fair and logical and if both parties acted in good faith I could not see why there should be trouble. The General replied that he accepted London’s good faith but the good faith of the British military in Syria was more questionable. I said I could not possibly enter into a discussion of this nature and expressed the hope he would tell his British friends quite frankly whenever he thought they were at fault and I knew they would appreciate it. He then startled me by saying he had found it quite useless to talk to them and from now on he would insist on Free French rights “even if this should lead to a rupture of relations with the British.” At first I thought it best to ignore this statement but when a few minutes later he repeated it with emphasis, I said:

I deeply deplore your statement, for if you should make it to an indiscreet person you would be playing into the hands of Hitler which I know is furthest from your thoughts. I personally refuse to believe that the situation is such as to justify a threat of this kind. I am certain that with good will and common sense and a little tact on both sides there is no problem between French and British in Syria which cannot be satisfactorily settled. We in America are naturally interested in the preservation of harmony and effective cooperation between all the Allies, because only so will the Axis be defeated.

We talked for an hour and a quarter but I fear he instinctively distrusts the British and is by nature quite incapable of understanding British character and purpose.

I have informed Generals Wilson and Spears of this conversation but Department may wish to repeat above to London.

ENGERT

3 Likes

890D.01/420a Supplemental

The Secretary of State to the Ambassador in the United Kingdom

No. 433
Washington, August 7, 1941.

Sir:
The Department has been informed that negotiations have been or are about to be initiated by the British authorities in Beirut, looking towards the establishment of independent governments in Syria and the Lebanon. In this connection, there is enclosed herewith a copy of an instruction which was sent to the American Ambassador at Paris on August 4, 1936, when treaty negotiations were in progress between the French Government and representatives of Syria and the Lebanon regarding the independence of those mandated territories. The American Government maintains the attitude set forth at that time concerning the necessity for the adequate safeguarding of existing American treaty rights in any arrangements which may be made for the independence of the areas concerned.

The Department has no reason to believe that the authorities now in control in Syria and Lebanon will fail to respect the full rights which the American Government enjoys with respect to Syria and Lebanon by virtue of the American-French Convention of April 4, 1924. Furthermore, the Department is confident that those authorities will bear in mind the fact that no modification in the terms of the Mandate, including termination thereof of course, will affect existing American treaty rights in the area unless such modification has been assented to by the United States.

You are requested to discuss the matter with the British Foreign Office and to inquire what arrangements the British Government contemplates with respect to consultation with the United States concerning the termination of the Mandate.

A copy of this instruction is being forwarded to the American Consul General at Beirut for his information.

Very truly yours,

For the Secretary of State:
SUMNER WELLES

3 Likes

The Pittsburgh Press (August 10, 1941)

CIVILIZATION: THEN AND NOW

syr3 bren
This picture shows British troops in a Bren gun carrier searching the ruins of the Roman Colonnade in Palmyra, which was built during the days ancient civilization flourished in Syria. The British occupied Palmyra after heavy fighting with the French.

2 Likes

U.S. Department of State (August 15, 1941)

740.0011 European War 1939/14008: Telegram

The Consul General at Beirut to the Secretary of State

Beirut, August 15, 1941 — 11 a.m.
[Received 10:07 p.m.]

332.

Local newspapers published yesterday exchange of letters dated August 7 between General de Gaulle and Oliver Lyttelton signed during Lyttelton’s recent visit to Beirut. The British Government reiterates its disinterestedness in Syria and the Lebanon except to win the war and to recognize their independence. It admits that France should enjoy in these countries a preeminent position compared to any other European power.

General de Gaulle expresses satisfaction that Great Britain recognizes in advance the preeminent and privileged position of France as soon as the Levant States are independent, and in return he gives assurances that Free France is resolved to continue the war at Great Britain’s side until complete victory has been won.

ENGERT

740.0011 European War 1939/14012: Telegram

The Consul General at Beirut to the Secretary of State

Beirut, August 15, 1941 — noon.
[Received 10:05 p.m.]

333.

Exchange of letters mentioned in my telegram 332, August 15, 11 a.m., was the outcome of recent conversations between Lyttelton and de Gaulle in Beirut in order to convince the latter of the good faith of the British Government and if possible to prevent further reckless observations such as he made to me on August 5 and reported in my 323.

It may amuse the Department to learn that General Wilson claims he found de Gaulle much more reasonable and tractable after I had my chat with him but I doubt whether the present extraordinary complexity of the daily contacts between the British and French political and military authorities in the Levant States can in the near future be expected to become less acute.

ENGERT

1 Like

U.S. Department of State (August 21, 1941)

740.0011 European War 1939/14203: Telegram

The Consul General at Beirut to the Secretary of State

Beirut, August 20, 1941 — 6 p.m.
[Received August 21 — 4:03 p.m.]

336.

Following upon the exchange of letters the British turned over to the French such administrative control in Syria and Lebanon, including public security, intelligence service, censorship, et cetera, as they were still exercising. But what is more serious the British have now also given the French complete military control south of a line running roughly east from Latakia though excluding the Syrian desert.

No publicity has been given to these latest concessions but in discussing them with me a senior British officer said he was told in high quarters in Cairo a few days ago that they had been made “in deference to the wishes of the American Government”. I said I felt quite sure my Government had never expressed any wishes in the matter and that it would be interesting to trace the statement to its source.

I consider the question of some importance because the concessions made to the French — especially intelligence service and military control of south Syria — are far wider than anticipated or believed necessary. Considering that a great many Vichy French are still in the country and may remain even in official positions without declaring themselves for Free France, not to mention doubtful or unfriendly native elements, the danger in an emergency becomes a very real one. A report, therefore, that the United States had induced the British Government to surrender rights which the British military believed necessary for their safety would be calculated to cause uneasiness among the British and may perhaps even be the result of local German propaganda which is still quite active.

Repeated to Cairo.

ENGERT

1 Like