Second Battle of Alamein , Preperation , Planning , Training

Destiny in Desert , The Road to Alamein - Jonathan Dimbleby

In marked contrast to the atmosphere at Eighth Army headquarters, Rommel’s mood was bleak in the extreme. In the days following their retreat from Alam el Halfa, the Panzer Army began strenuously to fortify a line, which ran along a forty-mile front between the sea and the Qattara Depression, a mere eight miles to the west of the Eighth Army’s forward positions. On the face of it, the Axis forces had the advantage. As Rommel was to explain, ‘we constructed our defensive system’ to ensure that the Panzer Army could hold out against ‘even the heaviest British attack’. Once the British crossed the no-man’s land between the two armies, they would find themselves entering a minefield, laid with some half a million explosive devices. Beyond the minefield, they would face the artillery, tanks and motorised divisions of the entire Panzer Army, a formidable if not impenetrable barrier.

But fortifications alone would not be enough to stop what Rommel described, for the benefit of both Hitler and Mussolini, as ‘the finest troops of the British Empire’. His confidence sapped by what he called ‘the battle of supplies’ which he now had to wage ‘with new violence’ against both Comando Supremo and OKW, Rommel nonetheless did what he could to alert the Axis leaders to his worsening predicament. The immediate cause of this crisis was the intensity and impunity with which the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force bombarded both the Italian convoys and the North African ports held by the Axis powers. In September , RAF and Royal Navy attacked Axis supply routes from their basses in Malta and Alexandria and had sunk almost one third of the Axis cargo ships bringing vital supplies to Panzer Army struggling in Egypt. In October the Panzer Army had received only 40 per cent of what its commander regarded as their ‘absolute minimum needs’.

Observing this shortfall, logistics officers in the German General Staff concluded that it had become impossible to sustain the African theatre. However their superior officers – with very few exceptions – drew the obvious lesson that at the root of the problem was the strategic failure of OKW and Comando Supremo to recognise, let alone to eliminate, the threat from the British garrison on Malta. In early September Rommel despatched a stark warning both to the Führer’s headquarters and Comando Supremo in Rome, that without ‘the uninterrupted flow of the supplies essential for life and battle … the continued successful maintenance of the African theatre of war will be impossible’. The shortages were so acute, he complained, that the bread ration for the troops had been halved, they were undernourished, and many who had served in the desert for over a year were utterly exhausted. According to Rommel, this aggravated another predicament: the weakening performance of the Italians under his command. They were unable to make quick decisions, their tanks and artillery had limited range, their officers were inexperienced, their men were poorly led, and unless they were supported in the line of defence by German ‘corset stays’ they were incapable of withstanding a bayonet charge by the British.

Rommel’s angry but woebegone litany may well have been affected by a recurrence of his debilitating sickness. He was once again suffering from low blood pressure and near-fainting fits caused by the gastrointestinal problems brought on by excessive physical and psychological stress. By September his ailments were serious enough for his physician to order him home on extended leave. Writing to his wife on 9 September, he affected to be in good spirits, but alerted her to the fact that ‘the doctor is pressing me hard to have a break in Germany and doesn’t want me to postpone it any longer … On the one hand, I’m overjoyed at the prospect of getting away for a while and seeing you, but on the other I fear I shall never be free of anxiety about this place, even though I won’t be able to get to the front myself.’

On the 23rd, with no sign of any improvement in either the flow of supplies or his health, he flew from Derna to Rome ‘with a heavy heart’ for an audience with Mussolini. Despite his stark warning that, unless the fuel, ammunition, weapons, and provisions he required were forthcoming, the Axis would be forced to abandon North Africa altogether, Il Duce still seemed incapable of recognising the gravity of the predicament, a failure Rommel attributed in part to the Panzer Army’s previous successes on the battlefield.

Mussolini’s public utterances continued to be as bombastically fascistic and self-delusional as ever: the Americans posed no threat to the Axis because they were more interested in making money than war; he would in due course preside over a peace settlement as a result of which Italy would soon be able to ‘direct the whole life of Europe’. In private he was far less assured. Comando Supremo had delivered him a pessimistic diagnosis of Axis prospects in North Africa which, for once, even he was unable to ignore.

During the summer, when their staffs warned of an imminent Anglo-American invasion of North Africa – which, coincidentally, they also referred to as ‘a second front’ – both Mussolini and Hitler ridiculed the suggestion. In a letter to Il Duce in early August, the Führer went so far as to write, ‘I consider this second front idea to be totally insane.’ Quite what was in Mussolini’s mind is impossible to discern. By his own account, Il Duce continued to believe – like many in OKW – that ‘a great pincer movement with the Germans storming the Caucasus and Rommel’s German–Italian armies conquering Egypt’ would bring ultimate victory. However, Comando Supremo’s prescient anxiety about a second front in North Africa – which they also advised would almost certainly lead to an invasion of southern Italy – clearly affected him; so much so that, by the autumn, he had already been persuaded of the need to reinforce and, if necessary, impose a formal occupation on Tunisia to repel any possible Anglo-American landings on the African shore of his Mediterranean Lake.

When Rommel’s failure at Alam el Halfa was reported to him, he lapsed into what his Foreign Minister, Ciano, described as a ‘black mood’, during which he said nothing at all about Egypt for three days. When he finally gave vent to his dismay, he not only indulged in ‘one of his periodic attacks on the Army’ with which ‘everything’ was going wrong on all fronts, but also vented his anger specifically at Rommel. ‘As always,’ Ciano noted drily, ‘victory finds a hundred fathers but defeat is an orphan.’

Mussolini’s capricious behaviour was doubtless exacerbated by his persistent ill health. The gastro-enteritis by which he had long been afflicted in times of crisis now flared up so sharply that he was sometimes unable to conceal the pain. He lost a great deal of weight, which made him seem aged and haggard. On his return from his ill-fated visit to North Africa, where he had suffered acutely, he was diagnosed with amoebic dysentery, the prescribed cure for which failed to achieve its purpose. It was noted that he was increasingly stricken by indecision and that his once elephantine memory was deserting him. One of his physicians even feared that his ill health had been so aggravated by the stress of war that his days on earth were numbered. None of this was allowed to be mentioned in public; any suggestion that his health was failing him was forbidden and foreign journalists knew that to refer to it was to court instant expulsion.

On 27 September, after an absence of three weeks, Ciano had a meeting with Mussolini, at which he noted his father-in-law’s loss of weight. Otherwise, he found him calm and clear-minded, though depressingly aware that ‘military events’ – the stouter than expected resistance by the Red Army at Stalingrad (where Italian troops were tied down alongside the Wehrmacht) as well as the humiliation in Albania and the setbacks in North Africa – had ‘cut deeply into the morale of the population’. Ciano himself had just had a meeting with Rommel, who told him that he was about to take a six-week break from the front, prompting Mussolini to observe that the Panzer Army commander would never return to the desert and that he was ‘physically and morally shaken’. As Ciano observed morbidly, ‘We are starting the winter with a state of mind in which, at the worst, we should be at the end of the winter.’

Rommel left Rome for Berlin bearing vague assurances of future supplies and a farewell injunction from Mussolini to the effect that it was imperative to seize the Nile Delta before the arrival of the Americans. In Berlin he discerned that a spirit of optimism still prevailed. In an attempt to prick this bubble of complacency, Rommel did not waste time on the niceties but instead laid out his troubles, reiterating that without greater support and more supplies of every kind it would not be possible even to hold on in North Africa, let alone defeat the Eighth Army. His list of demands included 11,000 reinforcements (to be drawn from the Wehrmacht and the Italian army) in addition to an unspecified number of thousands required to bring every unit of the Panzer Army up to strength and 17,000 replacements for those members of his Afrikakorps who were exhausted by long service in the desert; more bombers and fighters to restore parity with the RAF and to deny Malta to the British; more submarines and motor torpedo boats; and more shipping to carry the many thousands of tons of fuel, ammunition and provisions needed to sustain the line at El Alamein. If these demands made sense in their own terms, Rommel must have known that they would be regarded as quite unrealistic, even ‘preposterous’, when every available Axis soldier, tank and aeroplane was being thrown at the Red Army, which was showing a degree of resistance on all fronts which Hitler had not anticipated.

Berlin appeared to be in denial about the situation at El Alamein. At one point, when Rommel stated that the RAF had ‘shot up my tanks with 40-mm. shells’, Goering retorted ludicrously, ‘That’s completely impossible. The Americans only know how to make razor blades.’ Rommel replied, ‘We could do with some of those razor blades, Herr Reichsmarschall.’ To avoid any further dispute, he produced one of the offending shells which had been fired at a tank from a low-flying RAF bomber, killing almost the entire crew.

Hitler, focussing on gesture rather than strategy, seized the opportunity to present Rommel with the field marshal’s baton which he had bestowed on him after his triumph at Tobruk the previous June. The ceremony took place in the Reich Chancellery, where obsequious courtiers noted that Rommel committed a faux pas by failing to remove his gloves before shaking hands with the Führer. Afterwards, Goebbels, as Propaganda Minister, made sure that Rommel was suitably fêted by the German populace. He was paraded alongside Hitler at the Berlin Sports Palace, where the Nazi Party staged a ‘Winter Help’ rally and where, by his account, he was ‘somewhat alarmed to be greeted by an ecstatic crowd’. There was also a press conference at which – with a bravado that certainly did not fit reality of situation – he found himself declaring, ‘We are now one hundred kilometres from Alexandria and Cairo and have the gateway to Egypt in our hands. We intend to go into action! We did not go all the way there in order sooner or later to be pushed back. You can be certain of one thing: we shall hang on to what we have.’

The ambiguity in this declaration of intent – which promised in one breath to advance, but in the next, not to retreat – was not apparently noted by his fans at the stadium. His speech not only served its rousing purpose but led Goebbels to note in his diary both that Rommel was ‘just the sort of National Socialist general that we need’, and that Hitler had declared his youngest field marshal to be gifted with ‘personal courage and exceptional imagination’ that would make him ‘the future commander-in-chief of the army’.

None of this adulation impressed Rommel (or so he says in his Rommel Papers written in hindsight. Others in the ceramony noted he was quite impressed and deluded about final victory in presence of Hitler and Goebbels ) or solved his predicament. Despite abundant evidence to the contrary, the Führer’s planning staff continued to believe that the Panzer Army’s position on the Alamein Line was secure and – unaccountably – that, in any case, Montgomery would not attack until early in 1943. By this time, they told themselves, Rommel would be strong enough to turn the tables once again and advance on the Delta. This complacency, betrayed in an official memorandum which stated, inter alia, that ‘OKW does not consider the offensive has failed, on the contrary it reckons with its resumption’, was shared by Hitler, who continued to believe that the Eighth Army would be unable to break through Rommel’s defences. So in a way Rommel (or myth around him created by wartime propaganda) was victim of its own success. Thus, garlanded with his new baton and a chestful of false promises, Rommel retreated to the mountain resort of Semmering near Vienna, where, accompanied by his wife, he was supposed to rest and recuperate but where he succeeded only in worrying about ‘the plight’ of his army in Africa, as a result of which, he noted, ‘I was of course incapable of attaining real peace of mind.’

1 Like

Eighth Army’s Greatest Victories - Adrian Turner

The Devil’s Garden’s

Stalingrad did not end the German hopes in Russia, for after the remnants of the forces there had surrendered. Hitler was still able to deliver a series of counter-attacks which made steady progress until the Russians won their finest victory in July–August 1943 at the great tank battle of Kursk. In the same way Alam Halfa had achieved only the first part of Eighth Army’s task. It had certainly deprived Rommel of his last, as well as his best chance of reaching the Suez Canal while Malta remained unsubdued, but Malta’s situation was again becoming desperate – its stocks of both food and petrol would be exhausted by the end of November. If Rommel could hold his ground long enough for the crucial island to be starved into surrender, victory could still be his.

Montgomery, to his credit, was well aware of this danger. In El Alamein to the River Sangro, he specifically stresses the importance of the Martuba airfields ‘whence the Malta convoys could be safely escorted’, while in his Memoirs, he refers to ‘the need to get the Martuba airfields so as to assist by giving air cover to the last possible convoy to Malta, which was short of food and almost out of aviation fuel. The convoy was due to leave Alexandria about the middle of November.’

The trouble was that Montgomery had considerable doubts as to whether Eighth Army was yet ready for a major offensive against a position which could not be outflanked, especially since a considerable percentage of his troops would be inexperienced. The memories of Auchinleck’s five attacks and of Operations BULIMBA and BERESFORD were not encouraging. Furthermore, on 29 September, an attempt by 131st Brigade from 44th Home Countries Division to capture a salient near the Munassib Depression held by the Folgore Parachute Division also proved a failure, at a cost of 392 casualties.

Montgomery therefore set out with ruthless determination to prepare Eighth Army for the task that lay ahead. Inevitably perhaps, in Nigel Hamilton’s words, ‘heads began to roll’ Ramsden, Renton, ‘a host of brigadiers and colonels vanished’. No doubt Montgomery was quite right to remove officers in whom he lacked complete confidence, but to describe his action as cutting out ‘dead wood’ or ‘dry rot’, as it has been in some accounts, is scarcely fair to many of those who suffered.

Take for instance the sad case of Brigadier Noel Martin, the Eighth Army’s senior artillery officer. He had bitterly resented the dispersal of his guns among battle-groups and ‘boxes’, but by a cruel irony now found that he was blamed, in part at least, for their misuse – even though the artillery had performed with great success at Alam Halfa. To make matters worse, Brigadier Maxwell, the senior gunner at GHQ, Cairo, hearing of Montgomery’s doubts, assured him that Martin was a delightful person and an amateur golfing champion. Montgomery’s retort was obvious and immediate, and poor Martin duly ‘vanished’, as indeed did the well-meaning but misguided Maxwell.

Montgomery was equally ruthless in reorganizing the formations of Eighth Army. In other circumstances this might have reduced morale or made the Army Commander extremely unpopular or both. In fact nothing of the kind occurred, for the simple reason that everyone who had fought in it knew that Alam Halfa had been a personal triumph for Montgomery. The units that were transferred – for example Bosvile’s 7th Motor Brigade which left 7th Armoured Division for a re-equipped 1st Armoured Division – may not have been happy about the change, but they accepted that their leader knew what he was doing. Even so, Montgomery’s insistence – designed to increase the loyalty of subsidiary formations to their divisions – that Bosvile’s men replace the famous ‘desert rat’ emblem ‘on their clothing and on their vehicles’ with 1st Armoured Division’s white rhinoceros, was, says Field Marshal Carver, ‘a change that did not come easily to many, and some curious hybrid animals were seen painted on vehicle mudguards for a long time after’.

Changes in personnel and in the construction of divisions were, however, much less important than what the Official History calls ‘a programme of rigorous training’ that would ‘prepare the Army for the offensive which was to drive the enemy from Egypt and Libya’. ‘Montgomery,’ relates Horrocks, ‘was one of the few commanders’ who really did effectively ‘train the people who worked under him’. Nigel Hamilton points out that as early as 31 August, while Alam Halfa was still at a crucial stage, Montgomery had personally issued training instructions for the future which were to be repeated at length by his corps and divisional commanders during September.

In these, Montgomery again emphasized the changes he required in Eighth Army. He declared his objections to ‘splitting up formations and using isolated groups away from the parent formation and scattered over wide areas’. He urged that ‘divisions must be fought as divisions and under their own commander with clear-cut tasks and definite objectives’, that artillery must be ‘centralized’, and most important, that there must be a ‘concentration of effort’ and a ‘co-operation of all arms’. He also dealt with the need to study specific matters such as preventing the enemy establishing ‘strong antitank fronts’, neutralizing ‘enemy anti-tank guns, especially the enemy 88-gun’, and encouraging ‘the employment of anti-tank guns on the flanks of the [British] armour’. And he insisted that such techniques should not only be discussed but should be practised in exercises carried out behind the lines and any problems that arose examined and solved.

These exercises duly commenced almost as soon as Alam Halfa was safely over. They were hard, numerous and took place as nearly as possible under battle conditions. Live mines had to be cleared. Live artillery barrages were fired and on one tragic occasion Major Sir Arthur Wilmot and five soldiers of the Black Watch were killed by ‘friendly’ gunfire. ‘Co-operation between infantry and armour,’ reports Lucas Phillips ‘received special attention.’ The Valentines of 23rd Armoured Brigade, for instance, trained with the infantry of 30th Corps whom they were to support in the battle, while the New Zealanders trained with the newly arrived 9th Armoured Brigade which was to come under Freyberg’s command.

All these matters obviously took time and were further complicated by the arrival of a considerable amount of improved equipment which, although very welcome, meant more delays while the men were trained in its use and its ‘teething troubles’ were sorted out. Montgomery had decided that the battle must start on the eve of the full moon, since he wished his original attack to take place on a night in which there would be clear moonlight, to be followed by a number of other moonlit nights. He concluded that the necessary training, reorganization and re-equipment could not possibly be completed by the September full moon, which meant that the battle would have to commence on the night of 23rd/24th October.

It was not a decision which won the approval of Churchill. The Prime Minister was desperately anxious that Eighth Army should gain a victory quickly, not only so as to capture the Martuba airfields in time to provide cover for the Malta convoy, but to discourage the Vichy French from opposing Operation TORCH, now projected for 8 November. Postponement of the offensive until 23 October would leave very little margin for error. Yet Montgomery, his confidence at a peak after his success at Alam Halfa, ignored all pressure to bring the date of his attack forward, and he was wholeheartedly supported by Alexander.

1 Like

Eighth Army’s Greatest Victories - Adrian Turner

Their desire to ensure that all possible preparations had been made was undoubtedly wise. It is amusing to see how, once the battle was safely won, everyone was quite certain that it could not have been lost. Previously the story had been very different. Grave doubts were felt in London, not only by Churchill but by Brooke. When the latter heard that the offensive had started, he noted in his Diary: ‘It may be the turning point of the war leading to further success combined with the North African attacks, or it may mean nothing. If it fails I don’t quite know how I shall bear it.’ Then, he tells us, he remained for some time sitting at his writing table, ‘staring into space’.

Some of Montgomery’s own chief subordinates were also worried, and their anxieties would be justified by events. Whatever Montgomery may have claimed later, few victorious actions can ever have gone less ‘according to plan’ than did the Battle of El Alamein. Indeed, as Liddell Hart points out, Montgomery’s attitude ‘has tended to obscure and diminish the credit due to him for his adaptability and versatility’. ‘The battle,’ declares the Official History,1 ‘was anything but a walk-over.’ Those who disagree call attention to Eighth Army’s advantages in men and material – but a simple comparison of numbers omits a whole variety of important factors.

Of course Eighth Army had grown very considerably since Alam Halfa, for the old 13th and 30th Corps had been joined by Montgomery’s mobile reserve force, the reformed 10th Corps. 30th Corps, which was now commanded by Lieutenant General Sir Oliver Leese, who like Horrocks had been specially chosen by Montgomery, held the northern part of the Alamein defences. It contained from north to south, 9th Australian Division, 51st Highland Division – which had been moved up to the front line shortly after Alam Halfa – 2nd New Zealand Division,2 1st South African Division and Tuker’s 4th Indian Division which had taken over from 5th Indian Division, bringing with it its 7th Indian Brigade to replace 9th Indian Brigade, but acquiring 5th and 161st Indian Brigades and the divisional artillery from its predecessor. The Valentines of 23rd Armoured Brigade provided close support, while 9th Armoured Brigade under the red-haired, quick-tempered and completely fearless Brigadier John Currie, was, as already stated, directly under the command of the New Zealand Division.

13th Corps under Horrocks held the southern part of the Allied position. As infantry units it contained from north to south 50th and 44th Divisions and Koenig’s Fighting Frenchmen. Supporting them was 7th Armoured Division, now under Harding, another of Montgomery’s personal choices. 22nd Armoured Brigade was back with the division, which also still contained 4th Light Armoured Brigade now led by Brigadier Mark Roddick who had been second-in-command to Roberts in 22nd Armoured during Alam Halfa. The Royal Scots Greys who had done so well in that battle had also left 22nd Armoured to accompany Roddick to his new command.

The main armoured strength was to be found in 10th Corps which was commanded by Lumsden, now a lieutenant general. Under him came Gatehouses’s 10th Armoured Division, its 8th Armoured Brigade having been joined by the newly arrived 24th Armoured Brigade and by 133rd Brigade from 44th Division, its infantrymen hastily provided with lorries and retrained to operate as part of an armoured division. Under Lumsden also came the revived 1st Armoured Division now led by Major General Raymond Briggs – this contained 2nd Armoured Brigade under Brigadier Fisher and Bosvile’s 7th Motor Brigade.

Opposed to these forces in the enemy’s front line were the Italian 21st Corps facing Leese and the Italian 10th Corps facing Horrocks. Or perhaps they should be called German-Italian Corps, for both contained soldiers from each of the Axis countries, deliberately inter-mixed by Rommel in the belief that this would stiffen resistance. The former contained the Italian Trento and Bologna Infantry Divisions and 164th German Light Division. The latter was made up of the Italian Brescia Infantry, Folgore Parachute , newly returned Pavia Infantry Divisions and part of the German Ramcke Parachute Brigade, the remaining German parachutists and the so-called ‘Battlegroup Kiel’, a German unit under Major General Krause equipped with captured Stuart tanks. The main Axis armour – 15th and 21st Panzer, Ariete and Littorio – was held back behind the front line, while 90th Light and Trieste were in reserve to the west of Sidi Abd el Rahman.

In both armies, several of the divisions were well below strength. The New Zealanders still had only two infantry brigades. 69th Brigade, reformed from new arrivals in the Middle East, had rejoined 151st Brigade in 50th Division but Major General Nichols could not muster a third British brigade, receiving instead the newly formed 1st Greek Independent Brigade, made up of exiles from their conquered homeland and led by Colonel Katsotas. 44th Division was even worse off: 132nd Brigade had been returned to it but was much depleted after the mauling it had received at Alam Halfa, 131st Brigade had suffered severely during the abortive attack on 29 September, and 133rd Brigade had left for 10th Armoured Division. Yet the weaknesses of the German and Italian formations, especially the latter, were far greater. So much was this the case that while on paper Eighth Army could find only seven Infantry Divisions to its enemy’s eight and three Armoured divisions to its enemy’s four, its ‘fighting strength’, according to the Official History, was 195,000 compared with 104,000 for Panzerarmee Afrika: 50,000 Germans, 54,000 Italians.

In numbers of tanks, Eighth Army’s advantage was still greater. Those fit for action at the start of the battle totalled 1,029: 252 Shermans, 170 Grants, 249 Crusaders, 119 Stuarts and 194 Valentines. Panzer Army Afrika could muster only 249 German tanks of which only 221 were gun-armed, though they included 88 Mark III Specials and 30 Mark IV Specials, and 278 medium and 20 light Italian tanks – a few reinforcements that arrived during the course of the battle would later be added. Moreover the quality of the British tanks had also improved sharply. Seventy-eight of the Crusaders were later models which carried a 6-pounder gun instead of the type’s usual 2-pounder.

Even more important, the long-awaited Shermans were, as can be seen, reaching Eighth Army in large numbers. These had 50mm of armour on the front of the hull and on the turret – 76mm indeed on the front of the turret – and 38mm on the side-plates, and they carried a 75mm gun in the turret instead of in the side-sponson of the Grant. They were in short better tanks than any that had previously served in Eighth Army – though it may be mentioned that they were still inferior to Rommel’s mercifully few Mark IV Specials.

Eighth Army’s artillery had also grown in strength and quality. There were 908 British field or medium guns as against 200 German and at most 300 Italian; and 1,451 anti-tank guns as against 550 German and 300 Italian. Moreover 849 of Eighth Army’s anti-tank weapons were 6-pounders, superior to the 50mms that formed the bulk of Rommel’s equipment and about equal to his sixty-eight captured Russian 76mms. Once more though, Rommel had the best of all anti-tank guns, his 88mms, of which there were eighty-six available for the battle.

Coningham’s Desert Air Force had increased in size as well, largely because it had received numbers of United States Army Air Force personnel who now flew four squadrons of Mitchells and three of Warhawks. Coningham still had his two Australian Kittyhawk squadrons. There were now nine South African squadrons, two with Boston light bombers, one with Baltimores, two with Kittyhawks, one with Tomahawks and three with Hurricanes: the veteran No. 1 Squadron SAAF in the fighter role, No. 40 Squadron SAAF in the reconnaissance role and No. 7 Squadron SAAF which had converted to antitank Hurricane IIDs. The RAF, as was fitting, manned the largest number of squadrons, three of Baltimores, three of Spitfires, three of Kittyhawks and ten of the extraordinarily versatile Hurricanes, among which may be mentioned No. 208 Squadron with its reconnaissance machines, No. 73 Squadron with its night-fighters, No. 6 Squadron with its ‘tank-busters’ and No. 335 Squadron which had been formed from Greek personnel.

1 Like

Eighth Army’s Greatest Victories - Adrian Turner

In all Coningham controlled some 750 aircraft of which about 530 were serviceable, and as at Alam Halfa, he was supported by two squadrons of Beaufighters, six of Wellingtons and two of Fleet Air Arm Albacores which did not come under his direct command. A further two Hurricane squadrons were to be found defending the rear areas. The Axis air arm contained about 275 German aircraft, mainly 109s and Junkers Ju 87s and Ju 88s, and some 400 Italian aircraft, the great majority of them fighters; but only just over half of the total strength was serviceable. As at Alam Halfa, the enemy too had support from outside, in its case from the bombers based in Crete.

As if these disadvantages were not enough, Rommel was haunted by past mistakes and misfortunes. His decision to advance deep into Egypt while Malta remained unsubdued still bore its bitter fruit as the island’s aircraft and submarines continued their assaults against his lines of communication. During September, over one-third of the supplies sent to Panzer Army Afrika failed to reach it; during October, the figure was over one-half. Petrol was again desperately low, ammunition was also very restricted and even food supplies had been much reduced – a factor which was partly responsible for the large number of Axis soldiers on the ‘sick list’.

And Rommel’s defeat at Alam Halfa had not only dented his men’s confidence but had deprived them – and him – of several trusted senior officers. Von Vaerst remained at the head of 15th Panzer Division, but Major General Heinz von Randow had taken General von Bismarck’s place (who was killed at Battle of Alam el Halfa) in command of 21st Panzer Division and Major General Graf Theodor von Sponeck that of Kleemann in command of 90th German Light Division. Finally, to replace the wounded Nehring as the overall leader of the Afrika Korps came Lieutenant General Wilhelm Ritter von Thoma. A tall, lean man who was, in the words of Paul Carell, ‘the epitome of courage and gallantry’ and whose twenty battle-wounds in two World Wars were worthy of comparison with those of New Zealand general Freyberg opposing him, he made a welcome addition to any force – except that although he had fought with distinction in Spain, Poland, France and Russia, he had had no experience of warfare in the Desert.

At the same time it is only right to remember that much of Eighth Army had had little experience of warfare of any sort. The original 51st Division had been forced to surrender at St Valery during the Battle of France – to Rommel, as had not been forgotten – and its present successor had seen no action. Alam Halfa had been 44th Division’s first battle and its experiences then and thereafter had not been happy ones: 69th Brigade had not seen combat since it had been reformed in mid-September; 9th and 24th Armoured Brigades were totally inexperienced new arrivals; and 8th Armoured Brigade had been in action as a formation only in its unsatisfactory clash with von Vaerst during Alam Halfa.

In addition, the new equipment reaching Eighth Army greatly increased the problems of inexperience – 8th, 9th and 24th Armoured Brigades for instance all received their new Shermans too late to gain any real practice with them before the battle began. They also found that there was a dearth of spare parts and many important items of equipment, such as compasses, were missing altogether. The Shermans later gained a deserved reputation for reliability but in those early days when neither their crews nor the maintenance units were used to them, it is hardly surprising that, in the tactful words of Lucas Phillips, ‘several of them were found to be mechanically shaky’.

In any case, as General Fraser rather unkindly points out, ‘reinforcements, whether of men or material, had in the past been no guarantors of victory’. Eighth Army’s ‘superiority was formidable. It need not, however, have been overwhelming. Battle could still turn on skill in execution.’ General Jackson concurs, noting that ‘numerical and material superiority alone was not necessarily enough to ensure victory, as Gazala had shown’ – and even more so, Auchinleck’s five attacks in July, when his superiority had been vastly greater than that now enjoyed by Montgomery. Furthermore another factor had now come into play. As Paul Carell remarks, ‘El Alamein saw the climax of the war of mines. No such quantities of mines were laid in any theatre in the Second World War as here.’

By late October, Rommel’s front was guarded by half-a-million mines set out in two main belts about two miles apart, between which other mines had been laid to form barriers shaped like the rungs of a ladder so as to ‘box in’ any force which penetrated the first belt. Also in the areas between the main belts were anti-personnel mines and booby traps of every horrible form that human ingenuity could devise. The whole of this sinister barrier, which the Germans called the ‘Devil’s Gardens’, was between two and four miles in depth.

Within the ‘Devil’s Gardens’, Rommel had placed ‘battle outposts’ – forward positions, well concealed and usually containing at least one 50mm anti-tank gun. The main infantry defences, though, were sited behind the second belt of mines, and beyond these again was another line, manned by tanks and anti-tank guns, which ran roughly along the Rahman Track, a desert road stretching southwards from Rommel’s HQ at Sidi Abd el Rahman.

So protected, any defending force was likely to take fearful toll of its attackers. And the defending force this time was Panzer Army Afrika. No wonder then that Rommel, though he would later complain bitterly that it had been ‘a battle without hope’ and that ‘victory was simply impossible under the terms on which we entered the battle’, did at the time hope, almost to the last, that if he could hold out just a little longer, the ‘tenacity and stubbornness of our defence’ would ‘persuade the enemy to call off his attack’ as it had persuaded Auchinleck to do in July. Such resolution ‘might well have succeeded’ reports General Jackson, ‘against a less forceful and less professional British Commander’.

Or against less resolute soldiers or ones whose morale had not been inspired by success at Alam Halfa. Montgomery’s plan envisaged only a subsidiary operation by 13th Corps in the south. Horrocks was to capture Himeimat and maintain pressure so as to keep as much enemy armour as possible away from the main battle-area. If there appeared little chance of progress, the attack was to be broken off so as to preserve 7th Armoured Division for future operations elsewhere. The limited task of 13th Corps was perhaps inevitable, since both 44th and 50th Infantry Divisions were undermanned, while 22nd Armoured Brigade which provided the main strength of 7th Armoured Division, having lost the Royal Scots Greys which had been its ‘mobile reserve’ at Alam Halfa, now found that ‘all our tanks’, as the future Major General Roberts remarks, had ‘the highest mileage in the Army, so no wonder we were given a minor role’. The major role was given to 30th and 10th Corps acting together – a situation that inevitably caused some confusion. The former was to break into the ‘Devil’s Gardens’ on a front of some six miles, using all its divisions except 4th Indian Division, which, having been stripped of its transport for the benefit of others, was ordered to carry out diversionary raids only. The remaining divisions were to advance for some five miles in the north and three in the south to capture the Miteirya Ridge and a series of high points extending north-west of this to the so-called Kidney Ridge – though the kidney-shaped feature from which this took its name was in fact not a ridge at all but a depression with the ridge running north and east of it.

The assaulting infantry would make their advance straight through the minefields, accepting casualties from anti-personnel mines and relying on the fact that a man walking normally did not as a rule set off an anti-tank mine. To bring up vehicles, anti-tank guns and the supporting tanks of 9th and 23rd Armoured Brigades, lanes would have to be cleared through the minefields by the Royal Engineers. A number of old Matildas from 42nd and 44th Royal Tanks were fitted with heavy chains which revolved so as to strike the ground and explode any mine that was encountered. These ‘Scorpions’ as they were known were, however, allocated mainly to 13th Corps and at this early stage of their development they did not in any case prove a great success. In most instances reliance had to be placed on the Polish Mine Detector or on the old, dangerous method of prodding the sand with bayonets. This mine-clearing and marking of lanes was a colossal undertaking, necessitating the provision of 88,775 lamps and 120 miles of marking tape, mostly to 30th Corps.

Once the infantry had secured their bridgehead, the engineers of 10th Corps would clear further gaps through the minefields in two fairly wide areas known as ‘corridors’ which were to be reserved for the use of that Corps alone. Through these would advance Lumsden’s tanks, 1st Armoured Division passing through the northern ‘corridor’, 10th Armoured Division through the southern. The armour would then move forward to sever Rommel’s supply lines, taking up positions on ‘ground of its own choosing’. This was a great improvement on the plan for CRUSADER for instead of seeking the elusive enemy armour, it compelled this to attack in order to regain the vital ground lost. In addition it meant that the British armour could fight on the defensive instead of dashing upon the enemy anti-tank guns. Once more, though, it left a good deal of initiative in the hands of the enemy, and it repeated the old idea that the Axis armour should be destroyed first and the Axis infantry ‘mopped up’ at leisure.

It was thus beneficial that by 6 October, Montgomery had concluded that in any case the armour had not been sufficiently trained for the task envisaged for it. He decided therefore that the tanks would initially continue westward for some two miles beyond the infantry but they would then halt, forming a protective shield for 30th Corps while this Corps engaged the enemy infantry in the battle of attrition – a procedure which Montgomery called ‘crumbling’. He was convinced that the enemy armour could not allow this to happen but would have to intervene to save the Axis infantrymen and then, and later, he proved a shrewd judge of Rommel’s impulsive character, rightly believing that he would attack with his panzers against the British armour in its defensive positions – as had happened at Alam Halfa. As General Jackson points out, this was ‘a radical change of policy’ but one which happily necessitated no ‘major revision of existing plans’.

It was not, however, a change which reassured the armoured commanders, especially Lumsden and Gatehouse. Their fear was that in either case the tanks would suffer fearful losses as they emerged from restricted passageways guarded by enemy anti-tank guns. The lessons of the past made their doubts valid, but the expression of these had the unfortunate result of making the Dominion divisional commanders, with the memories of Auchinleck’s July offensive only too horribly fresh in their minds, question whether the armour had the will or the capacity to carry out its task.

Montgomery remained ruthlessly resolute. The tanks, he declared, ‘must and shall’ break out. If necessary, if the infantry had not cleared paths for them, they were to fight their own way into the open. Montgomery anticipated that the break-in would be followed by a ‘dog-fight’, a ‘killing match’ lasting at least a week. Since the infantry would have to play the major role during this period, he could not afford heavy infantry losses in the earlier phase, particularly in the Dominion divisions which could not expect reinforcements. By contrast he could afford to lose tanks, though not too many of their trained crews. His attitude did much to reassure his infantry commanders, but Lumsden and Gatehouse remained unhappy. For the moment though, it should be said that, to their great credit, both disguised their fears and outwardly showed nothing but enthusiasm for the plan.

‘The Army Commander,’ relates the Official History, ‘now felt free to devote most of his energy directly to his troops. He was out and about, seeing and being seen, sizing up his subordinate leaders, talking to officers and men and arousing their interest and enthusiasm, and generally inspiring confidence and raising the spirits of the whole Army to fighting pitch.’ How well he succeeded is made clear by Horrocks who describes Montgomery’s explanation of his plan to his senior officers – lieutenant colonels and upwards – on 19 and 20 October, as ‘electrifying’, ‘clear and full of confidence’. Lieutenant Colonel Victor Buller Turner, CO of 2nd Battalion, The Rifle Brigade, of whom we shall hear more shortly, would refer to it as ‘absolutely thrilling’. As for the men in the ranks, the plan, says Horrocks, ‘was explained to every soldier taking part in the battle, and there is no doubt that the Eighth Army entered the Battle of Alamein in a state of great enthusiasm, almost exaltation. They had been told by their commander that this was the turning-point of the war, and they believed him.’

It is worth noting that Montgomery made no ‘election promises’. On the contrary, he insisted that Eighth Army, in General Jackson’s words, must ‘face up to the fact that there was no short cut to victory. The Germans had to be fought to the limit of human endurance.’ He emphasized that ‘spectacular results’ could not be expected ‘too soon’; that the ‘whole affair’ would last twelve days. Privately he advised his staff officers that Eighth Army would suffer 13,000 casualties. Even the code name chosen for the offensive had a grimly appropriate implication for a battle among minefields: Operation LIGHTFOOT.

Also being planned at this time was Operation BERTRAM, the deception scheme co-ordinated by the then Lieutenant Colonel Richardson to disguise the time and place of the attack from the enemy. Tanks and guns were concealed by having the shapes of special dummy lorries called ‘sunshades’ fitted over them. Supply dumps being built up in the north were concealed as far as possible, often by being stacked in such a way that from the air they resembled vehicles. By contrast in the south, where Eighth Army’s preparations could easily be observed – as was intended – from the heights of Himeimat, dumps and artillery positions, some of them false ones, were deliberately badly camouflaged, movement of vehicles was encouraged and a bogus water pipeline, complete with pumping stations and water-towers, was laid, moving steadily towards the southern part of the front at a rate of progress that suggested it would be completed early in November.

These carefully considered moves had an undoubted effect. Rommel ‘believed,’ says Field Marshal Carver, ‘that Eighth Army would attack simultaneously at several points and then try to develop the most favourable into a breakthrough’. For this reason and because of his petrol shortages, he split up his armour, as indeed, contrary to legend, he had done so often in the past, placing 15th Panzer and Littorio behind the infantry lines in the north and 21st Panzer and Ariete behind those in the south.

Nor was German Intelligence at all certain of the date of Eighth Army’s offensive. In consequence on 23 September, after making the dispositions previously described, Rommel returned to Germany for a well-deserved, much-needed rest, promising that he would return if the Allies launched a major attack. Rommel’s successor was General Georg Stumme, a highly experienced practitioner of armoured warfare who had commanded a corps in Russia, but again was new to conditions in the Desert. On the evening of 23 October, he gave the final tribute to the success of Operation BERTRAM in a routine report to Hitler: ‘Enemy situation unchanged’.

1 Like

Indeed fantastic work from merdiolu. Interestingly Montgomery kept learning the lessons of the victory in 1918, better planning limited goals and massive use of the always underestimated artillery. Besides air superiority. Tank (Cavalry?) charges in the unknown were off-limits.

He was also good ad building an image which is what the military needed.

3 Likes