League of Nations security effort (1946)

The Evening Star (January 7, 1946)

World security effort of League is recalled as UNO meeting nears

By Charles Foltz, Associated Press foreign correspondent

This is the first of a series of stories on the League of Nations effort as it relates to the United Nations attempt to establish collective security.

The Versailles Peace Treaty and the covenant of the League of Nations went into force January 10, 1920. On the same day this year, exactly 26 years later, the United Nations general assembly meets for the first time.

Bad Augury? Those who knew the old League and now work for the new think not. They think it rather a reminder of old pitfalls of the 21-year road to war, a repetition of which they now seek to avoid.

The giants who built that League – Wilson, Lloyd George and Clemenceau – are dead and only a few of the delegates who worked with them work now for the new UNO.

One is South Africa’s Field Marshal Jan Christian Smuts, fighting exponent of world cooperation against aggression. He told the Associated Press that he considered the UNO charter a far better weapon against aggression than the covenant he helped draft in 1919.

Another is China’s Wellington Koo, one of the lesser delegates at the conferences when the League was born. While his countrymen died under Japanese bombs, he pleaded passionately in the League councils and assemblies for help he knew they could not give.

Appeal is recalled

Seven years ago, after one of those appeals, he made a prediction: “China will fight on. Soon the world will be at war. You will win and we will win. Then we will meet here in Geneva again and forge a league with such strength in its arms that no nation will dare to defy it.”

He was the first chairman of the committee in London which this winter turned San Francisco’s world charter into a living organization.

Many other delegates on the new UNO committees remember what happened to the League. Those from Czechoslovakia and Ethiopia remember how futile were their appeals to the old League against aggressors who swallowed them up. Albania and the Spanish Republicans appealed uselessly too. Austria didn’t even have time to appeal.

All that was at Geneva. The great League palace, occupied for the first time in 1937, stands empty on the shores of Lake Leman. It is modem and well equipped, still a fine home for any international organization.

Roosevelt excluded Geneva

Franklin D. Roosevelt just before his death told a friend that he had made a list of 12 possible sites for the League, excluding Geneva.

“I went over them all and found objections to each one. Finally I put down Geneva. Despite the curse of the League, perhaps because of the League curse, we might go back there.”

The UNO will not go back. At least it will not establish its headquarters at Geneva, though the Swiss city might serve as the European regional headquarters.

Chief opponent to Geneva was Russia. One reason was that the Soviet Union has no relations with Switzerland. Another was undoubtedly that one of the last acts of the League was to condemn Russia as an aggressor for her attack on Finland. Russia was the only country ever expelled from the League.

Delegates to the League during its last days did little but go through the motions of condemning aggression. Economic sanctions had proved unworkable against Italy because even the League members did not apply them.

So through the late thirties the delegates played golf by day and gossiped by night, leaving their assistants to attend all but the big meetings. One afternoon in 1938 I sat in a meeting of the Disarmament Conference at which little of the proceedings could be heard; the Swiss Army planes on patrol along the border of belligerent France made too much noise. Next day I left for Munich, where Hitler dictated to Chamberlain and Daladier while Goering, chief of the powerful Luftwaffe, laughed scornfully over his beer.

The Luftwaffe is powerful no longer and its commander sits with Nuernberg’s war criminals.

The memories of Munich, Geneva and many another European international conferences, voluntary or obligatory, were undoubtedly on the minds of the delegates to the preparatory meeting in London this winter who were to choose a home for the UNO.

By a narrow margin they rejected a proposal to establish the headquarters in Europe, decided to make the United States their home. That emphasized one great strength of the new UNO over the old League.

Wilson summoned the first League Assembly to meet in Geneva. Forty-one states sent delegates, but the United States did not.

This time the United States is not only in the new organization but plays a leading part.

The Evening Star (January 8, 1946)

Atom bomb fear gives UNO impetus which old League lacked

By Charles Foltz, Associated Press foreign staff

This is the second in a series of articles comparing the old League of Nations with the prospects for the UNO, which begins its work in London this week.

A great wave of idealism inspired the world to turn with enthusiasm toward the 14th point of Woodrow Wilson’s speech on January 8, 1918, and make it the basis for the League of Nations which was to end all wars.

The United States finally decided to stay out. Idealism turned to bitterness as the world marched toward another war in which the league, too strong in idealism and too weak in fact, was unable to prevent.

Now a great wave of fright has been added to idealism to turn the world toward united security. A bomb fell on Hiroshima and the world realized that there couldn’t be just “another war.”

Perhaps, as Gen. Eisenhower put it, the atomic bomb can “blackmail the world into peace.” To emphasize his point, Maj. Gen. Leslie Groves, who directed the bomb operation, said 40,000,000 Americans could be wiped out at the beginning of a future atomic war.

UNO called only hope

One point is now clear. All that stands between millions of people and death by the bomb is the United Nations Organization which will open its first assembly in London on Thursday.

No such threat hung over Woodrow Wilson’s league in its 26 years of decline and fall before this last global war. The league worried only about poison gas and flamethrowers and such comparatively trivial weapons of war.

Once a Danzig Nazi testifying before the League Council thumbed his nose at that distinguished body. It’s not going to be so easy for the Nazis of tomorrow to thumb their nose at the A-bomb.

Once a chair at the League Council meeting in Geneva was vacant for three days because the representative of a member state literally and honestly forgot the meeting. It’s highly improbable that any delegate to the UNO in this atomic age will let a meeting slip his mind.

The atomic bomb’s existence focuses attention on two important differences between the old league which officially dies this month and the new organization. Both have to do with arms.

The league had no armed force at its command. In each individual case, and by a procedure thoroughly tied with red tape, the League Council could only “recommend” to the governments what military, naval or air force each could contribute for joint action.

UNO to have power

The UNO Security Council will have arms. Article 42 of its charter says, the Council “may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security.”

Since one power on that Council has the bomb, it’s quite likely that the UNO Council’s observations on the activities of any nation preparing for war would be considered rather seriously.

In addition, 51 members of the United Nations have already undertaken “to make available to the Security Council on its call… armed forces, assistance and facilities including rites of passage, necessary for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security.” Special agreements are to be possible” which will determine the “numbers and types of forces, their degree of readiness and general location and the nature of the facilities and assistance to be provided.”

The word “recommend” is not used. This is a grim undertaking for a grim world in which the atom bomb is a grim fact. To make matters quite clear to all, the new Security Council is provided even with a Military Staff Committee. The league had nothing like that.

Reds startled League

One of the league’s most earnest, active and unsuccessful pursuits was its attempt to reduce armaments for the maintenance of peace. The Russians once startled the League by suggesting that everybody agree to destroy all arms of all kinds, but nothing came of it.

The UNO lays no such emphasis on disarmament. It concentrates on provisions designed to make the use of arms a dangerous business.

The bomb may serve the world well by giving the UNO the support of public opinion which the League lacked. Cordell Hull warned that such support was vital to success at the opening of the Dumbarton Oaks Conference.

“The will to peace must spring from the hearts and minds of men everywhere, if this institution is to achieve enduring peace.”

The will to peace inspired by the bomb is colossal.