Fireside Chat 18: On the Greer incident (9-11-41)

The Pittsburgh Press (September 7, 1941)

ROOSEVELT SPEAKS TOMORROW; NAZIS CHARGE U.S. SHOT FIRST

White House silent on subject; German charges dismissed by citing the source

By the United Press

With the United States and Germany apparently in a stage of “shooting incidents,” the Presidential secretariat announced Saturday night that President Roosevelt will make a radio address of “major importance” to the nation Monday night at 10 o’clock (ET).

The President’s secretary, who made the announcement from Hyde Park where Mr. Roosevelt is spending the weekend, refused to say if Monday night’s address would have any connection with the encounter between the U.S. destroyer Greer and a German submarine in the North Atlantic Thursday.

But the announcement aroused immediate speculation, especially in view of an official German statement Saturday regarding the Greer incident. German officials admitted a Nazi submarine fired torpedoes at the Greer, which was en route to Iceland with mail for the American soldiers of occupation, but charged that they were launched only after the Greer had fired on the U-boat.

Announcement of the President’s plan to broadcast was made by White House Secretary William D. Hassett. It caught newsmen by surprise for there had been no previous hint of such a development.

Asked whether it was a sudden decision by Mr. Roosevelt, Mr. Hassett replied:

I wouldn’t say so.

He described the address as of “major importance.”

Mr. Roosevelt will speak over the three major radio networks – NBC, CBS and MBS – from 10 p.m. to 10:15 p.m. (ET).

Mr. Hassett emphasized that despite the comparative brevity of Mr. Roosevelt’s speech:

It will be an important one.

William D. Hassett, White House secretary who is with the President at Hyde Park, immediately dismissed the German charges. He said that comment on the charges was unnecessary “considering their source.” This was also the general immediate reaction in Washington.

That the United States and Germany had entered the stage of “shooting incidents” appeared when the Germans formally charged that the Greer deliberately attacked the Nazi submersible under orders from President Roosevelt to provoke incidents which would lead to war between Germany and the United States.

The Nazi statement – offering a sharply different story of the Greer case from that given by Washington and coupled with charges of the gravest nature against Mr. Roosevelt – raised questions as to the future of relations between the United States and Germany.

The statement was issued by the DNB official news agency, a formal branch of the Nazi propaganda arm, and quoted “official German quarters.” This presumably indicated that the Nazi statement reflected the official viewpoint of the highest sources in the Reich, Adolf Hitler and his closest associates.

In Washington and at Hyde Park, the Nazi charges were met with reiteration of previous statements that the Greer incident was provoked by the Nazi submarine’s action in discharging two torpedoes at the Greer.

It was indicated plainly that orders to American warships to hunt out and “eliminate” the Nazi submarine which fired the torpedoes are still in effect. There being no particular manner in which an individual Nazi U-boat could be identified, these orders seemed to make certain that any German submarines in the American searching area can be expected to meet with U.S. attack.

The Greer incident brought repercussions as far distant as Japan where Tokyo seemed to feel that it had hastened the day of formal war between Germany and the United States and where the press urged that the possibility of such incidents in the Pacific be prevented from arising.

Tokyo did not suggest how this might be done but it seemed that a sizeable body of opinion in Japan is swaying away from Axis moorings toward reconciliation, if possible, with the United States.

1 Like

ROOSEVELT’S ADDRESS TO BE OF WORLD IMPORTANCE
By Sandor S. Klein, United Press staff writer

Hyde Park, NY, Sept. 6 –
The temporary White House announced tonight that President Roosevelt will make an address of worldwide importance Monday night.

The announcement climaxed a day of high tension engendered by German charges that the U.S. destroyer Greer precipitated the attack on a Nazi submarine off Iceland.

Although the subject of Mr. Roosevelt’s broadcast was not disclosed, it was considered significant that it should be announced so soon after the German allegations.

Observers believed here that considerable importance will be attached by administration officials to German admission that it was one of their undersea craft which was involved in the engagement with the Greer.

Mr. Roosevelt will speak from the White House and his remarks will be translated into 14 languages and broadcast by shortwave:

…so that the speech will attain world coverage.

Earlier, the temporary White House dismissed the German charges with unmistakable inferences that it regarded the Berlin statement as a mere smokescreen.

Presidential Secretary William D. Hassett told reporters that comment on the Nazi allegation was unnecessary “considering its source.” This was after he had apprised President Roosevelt of the press dispatches from Berlin.

1 Like

The Pittsburgh Press (September 8, 1941)

ROOSEVELT POSTPONES FOREIGN POLICY SPEECH

Because of the death of his mother, President Roosevelt’s foreign policy address has been postponed from tonight until 10 p.m. Thursday.


SPEECH RESET FOR THURSDAY

Roosevelt delays talk because of mother’s death

Hyde Park, NY, Sept. 8 (UP) –
Because of the death of his mother, President Roosevelt’s “important” address to the American public and the world on foreign policy has been postponed until Thursday night.

In announcing the postponement, the temporary White House offices gave no hint of the subject matter, but reiterated it would be of “major importance,” directed not at the United States alone but at the whole world.

Mr. Roosevelt will speak from the White House in Washington at 10 p.m. ET, on the three major networks. His speech will be translated into 14 languages, including German, for rebroadcast to all parts of the world. He is expected to speak for about 15 minutes.

It had been the impression here the address would deal with the attack of a German submarine on the destroyer Greer, but William D. Hassett, a White House secretary, said he did not believe that the sudden disclosure of Mr. Roosevelt’s plan to address the country and the world, which was made Saturday soon after Germany had charged the Greer attacked the submarine, had any connection with the Greer incident.

Because of the importance of the speech, there was speculation as to its contents. This speculation ranged over these possibilities: That Mr. Roosevelt would announce the Navy had been directed to escort convoys taking supplies to the British and to such American outposts as Iceland; that he would reveal his desire for the repeal of the Neutrality Act, thus permitting American vessels to enter belligerent ports; that he would disclose the trend of negotiations initiated by Japan that he would announce a firm naval policy regarding Axis war vessels found within the Navy’s patrol areas; that he would discuss a broadening of aid to the opponents of the Axis in preparation for the introduction of a new Lend-Lease appropriation bill.

1 Like

The Pittsburgh Press (September 10, 1941)

ROOSEVELT’S ADDRESS TO PRECEDE LINDY TALK

Des Moines, Ia., Sept. 10 (UP) –
An American First Committee audience will hear President Roosevelt’s address by radio tomorrow night shortly before it hears Charles A. Lindbergh in person.

Mr. Lindbergh was originally scheduled to speak over the Mutual network at 10 p.m. (ET). Postponement of the President’s address from Monday night forced a change in schedule.

If time cannot be arranged on the radio network immediately after the President speaks, Mr. Lindbergh’s talk will be transcribed and broadcast later.

1 Like

Address tomorrow –
AIDES ON TRAIN WITH PRESIDENT

Broadcast time lengthened to 25 minutes

Aboard the President’s special train, Sept. 10 (UP) –
President Roosevelt arranged today to meet tonight or tomorrow with his three leading cabinet advisers on foreign relations – Secretary of State Cordell Hull, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson and Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox – indicating that an important development in the international situation may be forthcoming shortly.

At the same time, it was announced that the President had extended from 15 to 25 minutes the time to be consumed by the vitally significant address he will deliver to the nation and the world at 10 p.m. tomorrow.

President Roosevelt’s address will be broadcast by stations WCAE, KDKA, WJAS and KQV tomorrow night at 10 o’clock (ET).

White House Secretary William D. Hassett revealed that the President had completed his address which apparently was revised in the light of latest developments in the international situation.

Mr. Roosevelt has also scheduled a meeting tomorrow morning with Congressional leaders.

On way to Washington

Resolutely turning to the increasingly more urgent affairs of state following the death and burial of his mother, Mrs. Sara Delano Roosevelt, the President, accompanied by the First Lady, left Hyde Park today aboard his special train.

When Mr. Roosevelt’s train arrived in New York, it was boarded by Lend-Lease administrator Harry L. Hopkins and his personal adviser, Justice Samuel Rosenman of New York City. Mr. Hopkins will present additional details to the President on the war-aid program, which will shortly be enlarged by another appropriation bill calling for approximately $6 billion. Mr. Rosenman, who recently completed a reorganization plan for the defense administration setup that led to creation of the powerful Supply Priorities and Allocations Board, will present additional information on the subject to Mr. Roosevelt.

Speculation over convoys

There was no hint as to the nature of the conference with his cabinet officers or the legislative leaders. But there was increased speculation over the possibility that a decision may be announced shortly concerning naval convoys or more vigorous naval action to protect Atlantic shipping.

If Mr. Hull, Mr. Stimson and Mr. Knox are all in Washington when the President returns, the conference will be held tonight. If not, it will be held some time tomorrow.

That some new policy of action in the Atlantic was imminent appeared to gain some support from Prime Minister Winston Churchill’s declaration in the British House of Commons that Adolf Hitler might force naval warfare upon the United States. It was recalled that Mr. Roosevelt, in his Labor Day speech, had said that further steps were essential to insure the shipment of American war materials to nations fighting Axis aggression.

The Pittsburgh Press (September 11, 1941)

‘COLD, HARD FACTS’ PLEDGED IN ROOSEVELT TALK TONIGHT


All phases of America’s role in international situation to be covered by President

By John R. Beal, United Press staff writer

Washington, Sept. 11 –
President Roosevelt, in a momentous radio address tonight, will give the American people the cold, hard facts of the international crisis in simple English which will leave no questions unanswered, Secretary Stephen T. Early said today.

Working on the final draft of the message he will deliver at 10 p.m., Mr. Roosevelt conferred this morning with Congressional leaders of both parties.

He talked later with Secretary of State Cordell Hull and Soviet Ambassador Constantine A. Oumansky. That conversation was also expected to include a preview of the address.

Usually trustworthy sources said the President will declare in his address that the United States will take whatever action is necessary to protect shipments to Iceland.

Mr. Roosevelt is also expected to express American resentment over the German submarine attack last week on the U.S. destroyer Greer, which was en route to Iceland, and over the sinking of the U.S. freighter Steel Seafarer in the Red Sea. The Greer, which was unharmed, was carrying mail to U.S. forces in Iceland. The Steel Seafarer was carrying Lend-Lease supplies to the British forces in the Near East.

One person who attended the conference the President held with Congressional leaders said the speech was “not very belligerent.”

Because Mr. Roosevelt believes the speech will leave no immediate questions unanswered and because he feels no important additional news will develop tomorrow morning, he cancelled Friday’s regular semi-weekly press conference.

To mean what he says

While the Congressional conference was in progress, Mr. Early told reporters that Mr. Roosevelt is prepared to give the American people a cold, factual statement on the international situation.

Mr. Early said:

The speech will mean what it says. It will be written in English – English that will not need translation.

And because the speech will be made at 10 o’clock tonight and will be complete up to that hour, there is little likelihood that there will be any news developing between 10 p.m. and 11:30 a.m. tomorrow with the American mission to Russia. Hence there will be no press conference tomorrow.

Mr. Early replied “that is correct” when asked whether cancellation of the press conference reflected Mr. Roosevelt’s belief that the speech will leave no unanswered questions.

To cover all developments

The address, Mr. Early said, will be “complete and all-covering” on all developments up to the hour when Mr. Roosevelt goes on the radio networks.

Mr. Early said that the text of the 3,000-word address had been virtually completed this morning, but pointed out that it was subject to modification as a result of the conference with Congressional leaders.

Mr. Early said:

The conference with the leaders of both parties might produce suggestions, additions, elimination, etc., that will affect the speech.

Mr. Early said that Mr. Roosevelt gave the Congressional group a complete preview on the address.

Participating in that conference were Vice President Henry A. Wallace, Senate Democratic Leader Alben W. Barkley (KY), Senate Republican Leader Charles L. McNary (OR), Chairman Tom Connally (D-TX) of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Acting Speaker of the House Clifton Woodrum (D-VA), Acting House Democratic Leader John Cochran (MO), House Republican Leader Joseph Martin Jr. (MA), and Chairman Sol Bloom (D-NY) of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

There was a tendency to discount earlier speculation that the President would ask modification or repeal of the Neutrality Act.

Mr. Roosevelt’s conference with the legislative leaders lasted about 90 minutes. All were reticent upon leaving the White House.

Mr. Barkley said:

We discussed the President’s address.

…adding that:

It will speak for itself.

He said the legislative group made no suggestions.

The last time leaders of both parties were summoned to the White House was May 27 – a few hours before the President’s last fireside chat during which he proclaimed an unlimited national emergency.

Congressional sources lacked official intimation that the President, as a result of the torpedo attack on the destroyer Greer and the sinking of an American and a Panamanian cargo ship, has decided to ask Congress for Neutrality Act repeal. But several Congressional supporters of the administration’s foreign policy are urging such action.

Senator Gerald P. Nye (R-ND) introduced a resolution today calling upon the Senate Naval Affairs Committee to investigate the action between the United States destroyer Greer and an unidentified submarine last week.

Mr. Nye, a key figure in the Senate isolationist bloc, proposed that the committee question officers and crew of the Greer and examine its orders and its log.

The resolution further proposed that the committee ascertain and report to the Senate all orders issued by naval authorities governing the operation of U.S. warships between the United States and Iceland.

An informal check of the Senate indicated that a presidential request for repeal of the Neutrality Act would probably pass with only 30 or 35 votes against it.

Congressional leaders believe that, if the President asks for repeal, he will have a three-fold objective:

  1. Elimination of the “combat zone” set forth by proclamation under the terms of the existing law so that American merchant ships could carry Lend-Lease goods to ports now forbidden them – for instance, the Arctic ports of Murmansk and Arkhangelsk in Russia.

  2. Arming of merchant vessels now prohibited, so as to protect them against plane and submarine attack such as sank the Sessa, Panama flag vessel operated by the Marine Transport Lines of New York, and the Steel Seafarer, U.S. maritime ship.

  3. Convoying or other protection of American vessels carrying war materials to nations fighting the Axis.

Fast moving events are building up a dramatic setting for the President’s address tonight.

The three ship incidents have been announced since last Thursday night. Mr. Roosevelt has denounced the attack on the Greer as deliberate and ordered the Navy to “eliminate” the submarine if possible.

Late yesterday, Speaker Sam Rayburn (D-TX) summoned the House to return from an informal recess next Monday – a week earlier than has been planned – ostensibly to consider the tax bill which is in conference.

President Roosevelt, returning from Hyde Park, NY, last night, conferred immediately for one hour and 35 minutes with his key cabinet officers – Secretary of State Cordell Hull, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson and Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox. Judge Samuel I. Rosenman, Mr. Roosevelt’s collaborator on most of his important speeches, and Harry L. Hopkins, special assistant to the President on Lend-Lease matters, were also at the White House.

The length of the President’s address was increased from 15 to 25 minutes. It had been planned for last Monday night, but was postponed because of the death of Mr. Roosevelt’s mother.

Elaborate plans have been made for a worldwide broadcast. All national networks will carry it and, simultaneously, it will be broadcast in Spanish and Portuguese by shortwave for South America. Tomorrow, English broadcasts will be repeated by shortwave for Europe, together with translations in German and Italian.

Demands for repeal of the Neutrality Act came from Senator Josh Lee (D-OK), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee who has often forecast administration foreign policy moves. He was joined by Chairman Sol Bloom (D-NY) of the House Foreign Affairs Committee who was the author of the last revision of the act.

‘Repeal and deliver’

Mr. Lee said:

I believe that we should repeal the Neutrality Law in order that we may deliver our Lend-Lease goods in our own ships and guard them with our own Navy.

I feel that the sea lanes must be kept open and the stream of war materials flowing to the countries which are fighting Hitler must be continued. If anything gets in the way of the delivery of these goods, it is just too bad. The American people do not propose to spend their hard-earned money to pay for goods and have them sent to the bottom of the ocean.

This will not necessarily involve a declaration of war. These marauders should be treated as pirates, interfering with the age-old right of freedom of the seas.

ROOSEVELT ON RADIO

President Roosevelt’s address will be broadcast by all local radio stations at 10 o’clock (ET) tonight.

1 Like

FDR-September-11-1941 (1)

My fellow Americans:

The Navy Department of the United States has reported to me that on the morning of September 4, the United States destroyer Greer, proceeding in full daylight toward Iceland, had reached a point southeast of Greenland. She was carrying American mail to Iceland. She was flying the American flag. Her identity as an American ship was unmistakable.

She was then and there attacked by a submarine. Germany admits that it was a German submarine. The submarine deliberately fired a torpedo at the Greer, followed later by another torpedo attack. In spite of what Hitler’s propaganda bureau has invented, and in spite of what any American obstructionist organization may prefer to believe, I tell you the blunt fact that the German submarine fired first upon this American destroyer without warning, and with deliberate design to sink her.

Our destroyer, at the time, was in waters which the Government of the United States had declared to be waters of self-defense – surrounding outposts of American protection in the Atlantic.

In the North of the Atlantic, outposts have been established by us in Iceland, in Greenland, in Labrador and in Newfoundland. Through these waters there pass many ships of many flags. They bear food and other supplies to civilians; and they bear materiel of war, for which the people of the United States are spending billions of dollars, and which, by Congressional action, they have declared to be essential for the defense of our own land.

The United States destroyer, when attacked, was proceeding on a legitimate mission.

If the destroyer was visible to the submarine when the torpedo was fired, then the attack was a deliberate attempt by the Nazis to sing a clearly identified American warship. On the other hand, if the submarine was beneath the surface of the sea and, with the aid of its listening devices, fired in the direction of the sound of the American destroyer without even taking the trouble to learn its identity – as the official German communiqué would indicate – then the attack was even more outrageous. For it indicates a policy of indiscriminate violence against any vessel sailing the seas – belligerent or non-belligerent.

This was piracy – piracy legally and morally. It was not the first nor the last act of piracy which the Nazi Government has committed against the American flag in this war. For attack has followed attack.

A few months ago, an American flag merchant ship, the Robin Moor, was sunk by a Nazi submarine in the middle of the South Atlantic, under circumstances violating long-established international law and violating every principle of humanity. The passengers and the crew were forced into open boats hundreds of miles from land, in direct violation of international agreements signed by nearly all nations including the Government of Germany. No apology, no allegation of mistake, no offer of reparations has come from the Nazi Government.

In July 1941 – nearly two months ago – an American battleship in North American waters was followed by a submarine which for a long time sought to maneuver itself into a position of attack upon the battleship. The periscope of the submarine was clearly seen. No British or American submarines were within hundreds of miles of this spot at the time, so the nationality of the submarine is clear.

Five days ago, a United States Navy ship on patrol picked up three survivors of an American-owned ship operating under the flag of our sister Republic of Panama – the steamship Sessa. On August 17, she had been first torpedoed without warning, and then shelled, near Greenland, while carrying civilian supplies to Iceland. It is feared that the other members of her crew have been drowned. In view of the established presence of German submarines in this vicinity, there can be no reasonable doubt as to the identity of the flag of the attacker.

Five days ago, another United States merchant ship, the Steel Seafarer, was sunk by a German aircraft in the Red Sea 220 miles south of Suez. She was bound for an Egyptian port.

So four of the vessels sunk or attacked flew the American flag and were clearly identifiable. Two of these ships were warships of the American Navy. In the fifth case, the vessel sunk clearly carried the flag of our sister Republic of Panama.

In the face of all this, we Americans are keeping our feet on the ground. Our type of democratic civilization has outgrown the thought of feeling compelled to fight some other nation by reason of any single piratical attack on one of our ships. We are not becoming hysterical or losing our sense of proportion. Therefore, what I am thinking and saying tonight does not relate to any isolated episode.

Instead, we Americans are taking a long-range point of view in regard to certain fundamentals and to a series of events on land and on sea which must be considered as a whole – as a part of a world pattern.

It would be unworthy of a great nation to exaggerate an isolated incident, or to become inflamed by some one act of violence. But it would be inexcusable folly to minimize such incidents in the face of evidence which makes it clear that the incident is not isolated, but is part of a general plan.

The important truth is that these acts of international lawlessness are a manifestation of a design which has been made clear to the American people for a long time. It is the Nazi design to abolish the freedom of the seas, and to acquire absolute control and domination of these seas for themselves.

For with control of the seas in their own hands, the way can obviously become clear for their next step – domination of the United States – domination of the Western Hemisphere by force of arms. Under Nazi control of the seas, no merchant ship of the United States or of any other American Republic would be free to carry on any peaceful commerce, except by the condescending grace of this foreign and tyrannical power. The Atlantic Ocean which has been, and which should always be, a free and friendly highway for us would then become a deadly menace to the commerce of the United States, to the coasts of the United States, and even to the inland cities of the United States.

The Hitler Government, in defiance of the laws of the sea, in defiance of the recognized rights of all other nations, has presumed to declare, on paper, that great areas of the seas – even including a vast expanse lying in the Western Hemisphere – are to be closed, and that no ships may enter them for any purpose, except at peril of being sunk. Actually, they are sinking ships at will and without warning in widely separated areas both within and far outside of these far-flung pretended zones.

This Nazi attempt to seize control of the oceans is but a counterpart of the Nazi plots now being carried on throughout the Western Hemisphere – all designed toward the same end. For Hitler’s advance guards – not only his avowed agents but also his dupes among us – have sought to make ready for him footholds and bridgeheads in the New World, to be used as soon as he has gained control of the oceans.

His intrigues, his plots, his machinations, his sabotage in this New World are all known to the Government of the United States. Conspiracy has followed conspiracy.

For example, last year, a plot to seize the Government of Uruguay was smashed by the prompt action of that country, which was supported in full by her American neighbors. A like plot was then hatching in Argentina, and that Government has carefully and wisely blocked it at every point. More recently, an endeavor was made to subvert the Government of Bolivia. And within the past few weeks, the discovery was made of secret airlanding fields in Colombia, within easy range of the Panama Canal. I could multiply instance upon instance.

To be ultimately successful in world mastery, Hitler knows that he must get control of the seas. He must first destroy the bridge of ships which we are building across the Atlantic and over which we shall continue to roll the implements of war to help destroy him, to destroy all his works in the end. He must wipe out our patrol on sea and in the air if he is to do it. He must silence the British Navy.

I think it must be explained over and over again to people who like to think of the United States Navy as an invincible protection, that this can be true only if the British Navy survives. And that, my friends, is simple arithmetic.

For if the world outside of the Americas falls under Axis domination, the shipbuilding facilities which the Axis powers would then possess in all of Europe, in the British Isles, and in the Far East would be much greater than all the shipbuilding facilities and potentialities of all of the Americas – not only greater, but two or three times greater – enough to win. Even if the United States threw all its resources into such a situation, seeking to double and even redouble the size of our Navy, the Axis powers, in control of the rest of the world, would have the manpower and the physical resources to outbuild us several times over.

It is time for all Americans, Americans of all the Americas to stop being deluded by the romantic notion that the Americas can go on living happily and peacefully in a Nazi-dominated world.

Generation after generation, America has battled for the general policy of the freedom of the seas. And that policy is a very simple one – but a basic, a fundamental one. It means that no nation has the right to make the broad oceans of the world at great distances from the actual theater of land war unsafe for the commerce of others.

That has been our policy, proved time and time again, in all our history.

Our policy has applied from the earliest days of the Republic – and still applies – not merely to the Atlantic but to the Pacific and to all other oceans as well.

Unrestricted submarine warfare in 1941 constitutes a defiance – an act of aggression – against that historic American policy.

It is now clear that Hitler has begun his campaign to control the seas by ruthless force and by wiping out every vestige of international law, every vestige of humanity.

His intention has been made clear. The American people can have no further illusions about it.

No tender whisperings of appeasers that Hitler is not interested in the Western Hemisphere, no soporific lullabies that a wide ocean protects us from him – can long have any effect on the hard-headed, far-sighted, and realistic American people.

Because of these episodes, because of the movements and operations of German warships, and because of the clear, repeated proof that the present Government of Germany has no respect for treaties or for international law, that it has no decent attitude toward neutral nations or human life – we Americans are now face to face not with abstract theories but with cruel, relentless facts.

This attack on the Greer was no localized military operation in the North Atlantic. This was no mere episode in a struggle between two nations. This was one determined step toward creating a permanent world system based on force, on terror, and on murder.

And I am sure that even now the Nazis are waiting to see whether the United States will by silence give them the green light to go ahead on this path of destruction.

The Nazi danger to our Western world has long ceased to be a mere possibility. The danger is here now – not only from a military enemy but from an enemy of all law, all liberty, all morality, all religion.

There has now come a time when you and I must see the cold, inexorable necessity of saying to these inhuman, unrestrained seekers of world conquest and permanent world domination by the sword:

You seek to throw our children and our children’s children into your form of terrorism and slavery. You have now attacked our own safety. You shall go no further.

Normal practices of diplomacy – note writing – are of no possible use in dealing with international outlaws who sink our ships and kill our citizens.

One peaceful nation after another has met disaster because each refused to look the Nazi danger squarely in the eye until it actually had them by the throat.

The United States will not make that fatal mistake.

No act of violence, no act of intimidation will keep us from maintaining intact two bulwarks of American defense: First, our line of supply of material to the enemies of Hitler; and second, the freedom of our shipping on the high seas.

No matter what it takes, no matter what it costs, we will keep open the line of legitimate commerce in these defensive waters of ours.

We have sought no shooting war with Hitler. We do not seek it now. But neither do we want peace so much, that we are willing to pay for it by permitting him to attack our naval and merchant ships while they are on legitimate business.

I assume that the German leaders are not deeply concerned, tonight or any other time, by what we Americans or the American Government say or publish about them. We cannot bring about the downfall of Nazism by the use of long-range invective.

But when you see a rattlesnake poised to strike, you do not wait until he has struck before you crush him.

These Nazi submarines and raiders are the rattlesnakes of the Atlantic. They are a menace to the free pathways of the high seas. They are a challenge to our sovereignty. They hammer at our most precious rights when they attack ships of the American flag – symbols of our independence, our freedom, our very life.

It is clear to all Americans that the time has come when the Americas themselves must now be defended. A continuation of attacks in our own waters, or in waters that could be used for further and greater attacks on us, will inevitably weaken our American ability to repel Hitlerism.

Do not let us be hair-splitters. Let us not ask ourselves whether the Americas should begin to defend themselves after the first attack, or the fifth attack, or the tenth attack, or the twentieth attack.

The time for active defense is now.

Do not let us split hairs. Let us not say:

We will only defend ourselves if the torpedo succeeds in getting home, or if the crew and the passengers are drowned.

This is the time for prevention of attack.

If submarines or raiders attack in distant waters, they can attack equally well within sight of our own shores. Their very presence in any waters which America deems vital to its defense constitutes an attack.

In the waters which we deem necessary for our defense, American naval vessels and American planes will no longer wait until Axis submarines lurking under the water, or Axis raiders on the surface of the sea, strike their deadly blow first.

Upon our naval and air patrol – now operating in large number over a vast expanse of the Atlantic Ocean – falls the duty of maintaining the American policy of freedom of the seas – now. That means, very simply, very clearly, that our patrolling vessels and planes will protect all merchant ships – not only American ships but ships of any flag – engaged in commerce in our defensive waters. They will protect them from submarines; they will protect them from surface raiders.

This situation is not new. The second President of the United States, John Adams, ordered the United States Navy to clean out European privateers and European ships of war which were infesting the Caribbean and South American waters, destroying American commerce.

The third President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson, ordered the United States Navy to end the attacks being made upon American and other ships by the corsairs of the nations of North Africa.

My obligation as President is historic; it is clear. Yes, it is inescapable.

It is no act of war on our part when we decide to protect the seas that are vital to American defense. The aggression is not ours. Ours is solely defense.

But let this warning be clear. From now on, if German or Italian vessels of war enter the waters, the protection of which is necessary for American defense, they do so at their own peril.

The orders which I have given as Commander-in-Chief of the United States Army and Navy are to carry out that policy – at once.

The sole responsibility rests upon Germany. There will be no shooting unless Germany continues to seek it.

That is my obvious duty in this crisis. That is the clear right of this sovereign nation. This is the only step possible, if we would keep tight the wall of defense which we are pledged to maintain around this Western Hemisphere.

I have no illusions about the gravity of this step. I have not taken it hurriedly or lightly. It is the result of months and months of constant thought and anxiety and prayer. In the protection of your Nation and mine it cannot be avoided.

The American people have faced other grave crises in their history – with American courage, and with American resolution. They will do no less today.

They know the actualities of the attacks upon us. They know the necessities of a bold defense against these attacks. They know that the times call for clear heads and fearless hearts.

And with that inner strength that comes to a free people conscious of their duty, and conscious of the righteousness of what they do, they will – with Divine help and guidance – stand their ground against this latest assault upon their democracy, their sovereignty, and their freedom.

Audio of the speech:
https://www.fdrlibrary.org/documents/356632/405112/afdr238.mp3/02efb06c-90d3-4aca-807e-c150df0e401a

The Pittsburgh Press (September 12, 1941)

U.S.-AXIS NAVAL WAR LOOMS
Roosevelt orders fleet to shoot first; Germany says it’s now compelled to act

Hitler gives choice to retreat or risk naval engagements with American warships

By Lyle C. Wilson, United Press staff writer

Washington, Sept. 12 –
Shooting hostilities between United States patrol forces and Germans ior Italian raiders in American “defensive waters” seemed inevitable today unless the Axis hurriedly retreats from those areas.

President Roosevelt announced last night in his radio broadcast that the Army and Navy patrol had been ordered to shoot on sight – shooting first. He said he wanted peace but not at the price of permitting Adolf Hitler to:

…attack our naval and merchant ships while they are on legitimate business.

The shooting order, he explained, means that in our defensive waters American forces will protect not only our ships but merchant ships of any flag. The defensive area extends at least to Iceland which is about two-thirds of the way from American and Canadian ports to British terminals of the Empire lifeline, Mr. Roosevelt promised to keep rolling across the Atlantic bridge of ships the supplies to “help destroy” Hitler and all his works.

Charging that the Axis has begun a campaign of “unrestricted submarine warfare,” Mr. Roosevelt said that henceforth German or Italian warship will enter our defensive waters “at their peril.”

He continued:

I have no illusions about the gravity of this step. I have not taken it hurriedly or lightly. It is the result of months and months of constant thought and anxiety and prayer. In the protection of your Nation and mine it cannot be avoided.

The precise areas of American defensive waters were not defined, and White House Secretary Stephen Early today refused to interpret the phrase, but the major trouble spot is obviously the Atlantic, although a vast but less often raided Pacific area reaching well beyond Hawaii and to the Siberian coast in the Far North apparently would be included. Mr. Roosevelt did not, however, mention Japan in his address.

Secretary of State Cordell Hull explained today that American operations would cover any area in which it might be considered that the safety of this hemisphere was being threatened and that the German activities in the final analysis would determine just how extensive this area might be.

Mr. Hull said attention was being given to establishment of a U.S. defense base in Labrador in connection with hemisphere defense. He declined to say whether any American forces were now in Labrador, but added that the United States would cooperate with Canada in whatever action was taken there.

Mr. Hull agreed with an observation by a reporter that the exact location of “blockade areas” and “defense areas” had not been established by direct communication between the governments of the United States and Germany. The situation has been developed through a series of speeches or proclamations without specific statements of exact areas or boundaries.

Mr. Roosevelt accompanied his shoot-on-sight announcement with an emphatic insistence upon the freedom of the seas in general for commerce, but it did not appear that those worldwide rights were to be enforce at gunpoint. But Mr. Roosevelt said:

No act of violence, no act of intimidation will keep us from maintaining intact two bulwarks of American defense: First, our line of supply of material to the enemies of Hitler; and second, the freedom of our shipping on the high seas.

In the waters which we deem necessary for our defense, American naval vessels and American planes will no longer wait until Axis submarines lurking under the water, or Axis raiders on the surface of the sea, strike their deadly blow first.

Upon our naval and air patrol – now operating in large number over a vast expanse of the Atlantic Ocean – falls the duty of maintaining the American policy of freedom of the seas – now. That means, very simply, very clearly, that our patrolling vessels and planes will protect all merchant ships – not only American ships but ships of any flag – engaged in commerce in our defensive waters. They will protect them from submarines; they will protect them from surface raiders.

There was quick non-interventionists protest on the grounds that such a protection policy “means convoys.”

Mr. Roosevelt cited historical precedent for presidential action to protect commerce – John Adams sent the Navy against European privateers and ships of war in the Caribbean and in South America waters and Thomas Jefferson ordered the Navy to clean out the nest of North African pirates which had preyed on American shipping.

Mr. Roosevelt said:

It is no act of war on our part when we decide to protect the seas that are vital to American defense. The aggression is not ours. Ours is solely defense.

But let this warning be clear. From now on, if German or Italian vessels of war enter the waters, the protection of which is necessary for American defense, they do so at their own peril.

The sole responsibility rests upon Germany. There will be no shooting unless Germany continues to seek it.

The Army and Navy, Mr. Roosevelt said, are putting his orders into effect:

…at once.

Secretary Early said a survey indicated that President Roosevelt spoke to his second largest radio audience last night. He said the survey indicated the President was heard by about 67% of a potential radio audience of 60 million Americans. The 67% rating compared with a 59% rating for Mr. Roosevelt’s fireside chat of last Dec. 29 and the all-time record of 70% for the May 27 speech in which the President declared a state of unlimited emergency.

Mr. Roosevelt’s broadcast was given worldwide distribution by shortwave in many languages and in recorded form is bombarding the world again today.

A nationwide outburst of protest and applause exploded within minutes of the President’s final word.

Chairman Robert E. Wood of the America First Committee:

It is war.

Chairman Tom Connally (D-TX) of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee:

I hope our destroyers shoot hard and straight.

Senate Democratic Leader Alben W. Barkley:

President Roosevelt had no other course.

Wendell L. Willkie:

No man can say whether this will involve the United States in war, but any thoughtful person knows that if the President were less firm, disastrous war would be inevitable. This is the time for all Americans to rally to his support.

Senator Gerald P. Nye (R-ND):

The speech puts us a whole lot nearer a shooting war by presidential proclamation.

Some persons adversely critical of administration policies suggested the speech was a move toward repeal of the Neutrality Act and that repeal would be sought shortly if public reaction to shoot-on-sight orders were favorable.

Mr. Roosevelt had scheduled this speech for Sept. 8 after a German submarine fired torpedoes at the U.S. destroyer Greer en route to Iceland with mail. It was postponed because of the death of his mother. In the interval, the American freighter Steel Seafarer was sunk by a German aerial bomb in the Red Sea and three survivors of the 27-man crew of the American-owned Panamanian ship Sessa were picked up in the North Atlantic. The Sessa was torpedoed, shelled and sunk by a submarine on Aug. 17. One of the 23 men believed lost was an American.

Mr. Roosevelt cited those incidents last night. He recalled that the American freighter Robin Moor was torpedoed and sunk in the South Atlantic last May, her passengers and crew set adrift in small boats hundreds of miles from shore. And the President revealed that last July a submarine had stalked an unnamed American battleship in North American waters seeking attacking position:

…the periscope of the submarine was clearly seen.

In describing these attacks, Mr. Roosevelt said:

Outrageous… indiscriminate violence… direct violation of international agreements… piracy, legally and morally… toward creating a permanent world system based on force, on terror, and on murder.

He said that in our own defensive waters, Axis raiding must stop.

He continued:

No matter what it takes, no matter what it costs, we will keep open the line of legitimate commerce in these defensive waters of ours.

We have sought no shooting war with Hitler. We do not seek it now. But neither do we want peace so much, that we are willing to pay for it by permitting him to attack our naval and merchant ships while they are on legitimate business.

…when you see a rattlesnake poised to strike, you do not wait until he has struck before you crush him. These Nazi submarines and raiders are the rattlesnakes of the Atlantic.

The President coupled his shoot-on-sight order with an emphatic and general insistence upon freedom of the seas – all seas – for commerce, a warning that the Western Hemisphere was under attack right now because Axis raiders were in our waters and a recapitulation of unsuccessful Nazi efforts to seize control of governments or otherwise to establish themselves in Uruguay, Argentina, Bolivia and Colombia.

Attacks on American ships are evidence, he said, of Nazi efforts to seize control of the oceans looking toward ultimate domination of the United States and the Western Hemisphere “by force.”

Hitler’s advance guards – not only his avowed agents but also his dupes among us – have sought to make ready for him footholds and bridgeheads in the New World, to be used as soon as he has gained control of the oceans.

His intrigues, his plots, his machinations, his sabotage in this New World are all known to the Government of the United States. Conspiracy has followed conspiracy.

To be ultimately successful in world mastery, Hitler knows that he must get control of the seas. He must first destroy the bridge of ships which we are building across the Atlantic and over which we shall continue to roll the implements of war to help destroy him, to destroy all his works in the end. He must wipe out our patrol on sea and in the air if he is to do it. He must silence the British Navy.

Mr. Roosevelt said he must explain again to the people that the United States Navy is invincible only so long as the British Navy survives because, if the Axis gained control of all the world outside the Americas, she would have manpower and other facilities to:

…outbuild us many times over.

Scornfully warning against “tender whisperings of appeasers” that Hitler is not interested in the Western Hemisphere and ridiculing the idea that a wide ocean would protect us from him, he told Americans that they were now face to face with:

…cruel relentless facts.

He said:

It is time for all Americans, Americans of all the Americas to stop being deluded by the romantic notion that the Americas can go on living happily and peacefully in a Nazi-dominated world.

Calling Germans “international outlaws who sink our ships and kill our citizens,” the President said note writing and the normal practices of diplomacy were useless under the circumstances. He promised that the United States would not make the mistake of other peaceful nations which fell because each refused to look the Nazi danger squarely in the eye. Instead, he continued, Americans realize the time has come when the Americas must be defended and he would not split hairs whether to begin defense after the 1st, 5th, 10th or 20th attack or whether there should be delay until some crews and passengers are drowned.

The time for active defense is now.

This is the time for prevention of attack. If submarines or raiders attack in distant waters, they can attack equally well within sight of our own shores. Their very presence in any waters which America deems vital to its defense constitutes an attack.

Mr. Roosevelt related the Greer incident in some detail, emphasizing that the Navy Department had reported deliberate attack by a submarine – later acknowledged to be German – although the destroyer’s American nationality was unmistakable. Germany has contended and some Americans, including the America First Committee, have agreed, that the destroyer attacked first. Senator Bennett C. Clark (D-MO) has asked that the Navy Department furnish Congress the log of the Greer.

The President said:

In spite of what Hitler’s propaganda bureau has invented, and in spite of what any American obstructionist organization may prefer to believe, I tell you the blunt fact that the German submarine fired first upon this American destroyer without warning, and with deliberate design to sink her.

PRESIDENT REVEALS U-BOAT INCIDENT

Washington, Sept. 12 –
President Roosevelt disclosed in his radio address last night that an unidentified submarine attempted to attack an American battleship in North American waters and that secret airfields have been found in Colombia within bombing range of the Panama Canal.

Although he did not name Germany in either incident, Mr. Roosevelt revealed the attempted submarine attack in enumerating German acts of “piracy” against American flag ships and referred to the airfields in listing “German conspiracies” to obtain footholds in the Western Hemisphere.

He said the battleship, which he did not identify, was in “North American waters” last July when followed by a submarine:

…which for a long time sought to maneuver itself into a position of attack.

He added:

The periscope of the submarine was clearly seen. No British or American submarines were within hundreds of miles of this spot at the time, so the nationality of the submarine is clear.

Mr. Roosevelt did not specify whether he referred to the same incident as did Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox several weeks ago when he told the Senate Naval Affairs Committee that a depth bomb had been dropped by a destroyer to warn off a submarine it heard in the vicinity.

It was noted, however, that Colonel Knox referred only to a destroyer and the President to a battleship, leading to belief they were different incidents.

Details not disclosed

The Navy Department refused to elaborate on the President’s disclosure and referred all inquiries to the White House.

Mr. Roosevelt mentioned the Colombia airfields in listing Nazi “advance guard” attempts to establish:

…footholds and bridgeheads in the New World to be used as soon as he has gained control of the oceans.

He did not elaborate. Diplomatic experts familiar with Latin American events said they had not heard of the Colombian incident and noted that it had not been revealed previously in the press.

NON-INTERVENTIONISTS BLAST TALK AS DECLARATION OF WAR

But foreign policy supporters give ‘shoot-on-sight’ orders to Navy their unqualified approval

Washington, Sept. 12 (UP) –
Non-interventionist Congressmen charged today that President Roosevelt’s shoot-on-sight speech was tantamount to an unauthorized declaration of war against the Axis, but supporters of his foreign policy gave it unqualified approval.

Senator Guy M. Gillette (D-IA), a member of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee, characterized the speech as:

…a declaration of war insofar as it can be declared without the action of the legislative branch.

He said:

Of course, every American will support the Commander-in-Chief in any course he takes in international relations, however much we may disapprove it. But I would much rather the President, before taking such action, had submitted it in a message to Congress.

Senator Claude Pepper (D-FL), a staunch proponent of the administration’s foreign policy and also a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, said President Roosevelt’s order for on-sight shooting of Axis war vessels in American defense waters:

…is the best way to defend ourselves.

He contended that the newly announced policy does not bring the United States closer to war:

…because we are just protecting a limited objective. We are just saying:

Don’t do any shooting in our front yard. If you want to shoot, go down the road a piece.

Other Congressional comments:

Senator Gerald P. Nye (R-ND):

The new policy is putting us a whole lot nearer to a shooting war by presidential proclamation. It means convoys in spite of our law. He [the President] has been issuing engraved invitations for trouble and when he gets the trouble, he becomes blind to experience and to fact.

Chairman Tom Connally (D-TX) of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee:

Nazi attacks upon our ships and our citizens and upon the ships of other nations trading with us is an arrogant and contemptuous defiance of international law and the rights of our people… If our ships or our citizens are attacked, we shall defend them. I hope our destroyers will shoot hard and straight.

House Republican Leader Joseph W. Martin Jr. (MA):

This means we move closer to the shooting. The President has told the country what his course of action will be in the event Nazi ships appear within certain zones.

Senator Allen J. Ellender (D-LA):

The speech is an unmistakable challenge to the Axis power that our government will no longer tolerate the sinking of our ships and also will give protection to all ships engaged in commerce in our defensive waters. All of which spells a shooting war.

Senator George A. Aiken (R-VT):

The President’s statement that he has ordered the Army, as well as the Navy, to keep American defense waters clear of hostile ships seems to indicate that he might send an expeditionary force abroad without going to Congress for a declaration of war.

Chairman Sol Bloom (D-NY) of the House Foreign Affairs Committee:

The President gives warning that assailants of our rights of freedom of the sea will attack us at their peril.

Chairman David I. Walsh (D-MA) of the Senate Naval Affairs Committee:

The President now without the consent of Congress puts our Navy into merchant convoy service with full acknowledgement that this invites German attack. The people of America who have been praying and hoping for peace will deplore the President’s provocative utterances and his seeming open invitation to a shooting war.

Senator Elbert D. Thomas (D-UT):

In my opinion, the President’s speech was many weeks overdue.

Senator Pat McCarran (D-NV):

It was practically a declaration of war and it exceeded the powers of the President. He is acting unconstitutionally and without authority.

Senate Democratic Leader Alben W. Barkley (KY):

In my opinion, he could pursue no other course and I feel that it will receive the overwhelming approval of the people.

Senate Republican Leader Charles L. McNary (OR):

The President frankly set forth his purposes and policy and did not ask for any legislation. I was very glad of that.

Senator H. H. Schwartz (D-WY):

A very strong speech. He outlined a program which we should follow and which we will follow.

Senator Alexander Wiley (R-WI):

A grave pronouncement on a grave occasion which may result in this nation’s third undeclared war.

Senator Harry S. Truman (D-MO):

I think the policies enunciated by the President are necessary at this time.

Senator Joseph H. Ball (R-MN):

The shooting order brings us very close to a shooting war. But if it is necessary to win the Battle of the Atlantic then it must be done.

Senator Joseph F. Guffey (D-PA):

I agree with the President 100%.

Senator Ernest W. McFarland (D-AZ):

I don’t believe in submarines interfering with our defense so to that extent I agree with him.

Senator Sheridan Downey (D-CA):

It was a vitally important announcement by the President from which serious implications may flow.

Rep. George H. Bender (R-OH):

The United States embarks on stormy seas. We are drawing nearer and nearer to war.

Senator Frederick Van Nuys (D-IN):

I thought it was an alarming and terrifying message. I cannot subscribe to it. We in the Senate were induced to vote for neutrality legislation and the Lend-Lease Bill under assurances from the executive department that they would not lead to a shooting war. There seems to have been a reversal of policy. I can hardly conceive how the Red Sea, which the President mentioned in his remarks, is essential to our Western Hemisphere defense. Nor can I see how Iceland, most of which is not in the Western Hemisphere, is essential. The speech is tantamount to an unofficial declaration of war.

1 Like

PROMINENT CITIZENS COMMENT ON SPEECH
By the United Press

The reaction of organizations and prominent citizens to President Roosevelt’s speech follows:

General Robert E. Wood, chairman of the America First Committee:

The President has initiated an undeclared war in plain violation of the Constitution. In 1917, President Woodrow Wilson sufficiently respected his oath of office and the Constitution to ask Congress to declare war. President Roosevelt now, however, ignores his oath of office and flouts the Constitution… The America First Committee will throw its full weight on the side of the people and their Congress, in order to restore representative government in the United States.

Wendell L. Willkie:

The President spoke as he should have spoken… This is the time for all Americans to rally to his support. I hope Hitler understands that whatever may be the divergent views in the United States on other questions, the people of the United States are united in their support of the President in this crisis.

If Hitler acts on any other assumption because of the voice of an insignificant few in America, he will do so to his sorrow. No man can say whether this will involve the United States in war, but every thoughtful person knows that if the President was less firm, disastrous war would be inevitable.

Alf M. Landon:

I’ve had no illusions for many months. When you go looking for trouble, you always find it.

Herbert Hoover:

Refused to comment but announced that he would present “another aspect” of the foreign situation in an address Tuesday.

Bishop Henry W. Hobson, chairman of Fight for Freedom Committee:

We hope that the President’s speech marks the beginning of unrestricted warfare until the Nazis and their allies are completely annihilated… The next logical step is for the immediate repeal of the Neutrality Act. There can be no neutrality toward rattlesnakes.

Mary W. Hillyer, executive director, Keep America Out of War Congress:

We demand that Congress be asked now whether it approves the President’s action. While the American people through Congress have approved the policy of aid to Britain, they have given no sanction to the President’s newly-announced policy of shooting our way through belligerent waters to get the supplies to Britain since such a policy obviously means war.

Culbert L. Olson, Governor of California:

It was a courageous declaration of the position America must take and it should be supported by a united people.

1 Like

AUSTRALIA FINDS ‘TONIC’ IN TALK

Canberra, Australia, Sept. 12 (UP) –
Prime Minister A. W. Fadden said today that President Roosevelt’s speech:

…comes as a tonic to the people of Britain and a rallying cry for all the peoples of the American continent.

John Curtin, Labor Party leader, said of the speech:

We feel that British, Australian and American sailors, and sailors of the ships of all free nations, can go about their business with the assurance that their lives are less endangered.

1 Like

ITALY WARNS: WE’LL ATTACK SHIPS ON SIGHT

‘Act of unprovoked aggression’ charged to President

By Reynolds Packard, United Press staff writer

Rome, Sept. 12 –
Virginio Gayda, often a spokesman for official Axis opinion, declared today that President Roosevelt has left Axis naval units no alternative:

…but to attack United States naval ships on sight.

Writing in the Giornale d’Italia, Gayda charged that Mr. Roosevelt has committed “an act of aggression” against Germany and Italy.

He said this interpretation of the President’s address made it plain that German and Italian warcraft will be forced to attack American warships.

Gayda wrote:

It is obvious, after the White House warning, that every German and Italian warship knowing itself exposed to aggressive action by American warships must for its own defense attack when it sees it has no chance to escape fro the attackers.

Aggression charged

It is obvious that by his declared aggressive plan Roosevelt is searching for a pretended justification to unleash his armed forces into battle.

No formal declaration of war by Congress could add any new element to this open and direct aggression.

Gayda took the position that an official declaration of war by the American Congress would now be a mere formality.

He wrote:

Every citizen of the civilized word who is sound in mind understands that the President has resorted to arguments of exceptional hypocrisy and immeasurable infantility.

Neutrality mentioned

The Axis Powers do not contest the United States the right to the liberty of the seas, but does expect the United States to comport itself as a neutral nation.

Gayda charged that Mr. Roosevelt was not content with mere freedom of the seas but insists on the unchallenged right to ship arms and war materials to the enemies of the Axis to prolong:

…the war and striking at the very life and well-being of the Axis peoples.

The President, said Gayda, desires to do this:

…with impunity but international law has a precise role which no juggling art by Roosevelt can subvert.

Unofficial quarters said his speech appeared to be the strongest he had yet made against the Axis powers and that he had practically established a counter-counter-blockade against the Axis counter-blockade of Britain’s blockade.

Radio Rome, commenting on the Roosevelt speech, said that:

The President who was re-elected for a third term on a platform to keep the United States out of war has become an advocate of war at any price.

1 Like

BRITISH DOUBTS LIFTED BY TALK
By Helen Kirkpatrick

London, Sept. 12 –
British skepticism vanished with the clear-cut and decisive words of President Roosevelt last night and his announcement that the United States Navy and Army Air Forces had been instructed to clear “American defensive waters” of Axis warships.

The British public had settled itself for yet another disappointment from the United States and awoke today pleasantly surprised, immensely encouraged and convinced that the President’s speech has marked the real turning point of the war.

Lord Halifax, British Ambassador to the United States, in an address this morning to factory workers in London, said that President Roosevelt’s declaration made it plain that the American people will never allow Hitler to achieve world mastery.

The American stand, he said:

…is the latest example and the most practical example of help in a practical form that the United States is prepared to give us.

The hour at which the President broadcast made his British audience small, both because it was not announced that it would be relayed here, as it was, at 3 o’clock this morning and because many had reached the conclusion that the United States intended to ignore every challenge flung down by Germany and wished to spare themselves further disappointment.

The morning newspapers carried the full text of the President’s speech with huge headlines:

UNITED STATES TO SHOOT FIRST

The comment of the man in the street today was:

It means business alright.

The general view in informed quarters was that the speech was directed to the American people and to Germany and that the next move would have to come from Germany. The implications for Britain have not been lost, particularly the fact that the British Royal Navy will be greatly relieved in Atlantic waters.

The London Daily Express editorial says:

Those who doubted at any time the spirit of the American nation to go all-out with us in the fight for the four freedoms must bow their heads. Germany knows her danger… Today is a big day for the democratic cause, a decisive day in the war.

The London News Chronicle sees four-fifths of the Atlantic closed to Axis operations except:

…at direct and invited risk of being shot at by American warships or warplanes.

The choice is presented to Hitler, the News Chronicle thinks, and he will have to decide whether:

…to let American aid reach the Allies relatively unimpeded or to stop it, or try to stop it, at the price of open conflict.

The News Chronicle concludes:

The United States may still be a long way from open war but this morning she is definitely nearer it than yesterday.

Leaves no doubt

The London Evening Standard regards the President’s speech as the clearest, most precise words he has uttered and ones which can leave no doubt in Germany that he disregard of the freedom of the seas and violation of American defensive waters will mean. If Hitler refuses to accept the warning, he must expect open cashes with the United States Navy which can only lead to war; if he heeds the warning, supplies to Britain are assured and his victory is impossible, it declares.

The Standard concludes:

It is a fierce quandary in which Hitler is placed by the President’s most brilliant stroke of statesmanship. Our guess is that he will pursue his immediate aim of destroying Soviet Russia before inciting the United States. If that be his purpose the President has armed us the better to parry it. The President leads his nation with great audacity. Our response must be more audacity.

Vague definition

The vague definition of American defensive waters is remarked on by everyone. Few here attempt to interpret it. It is generally assumed that the sealanes from Americas to Iceland are included and some newspapers suggest that the term covers virtually the entire Atlantic.

But informed circles think that the President has left the term undefined in order to give the United States sufficient leeway to meet any situation or emergency which might arise. The Red Sea is believed to have been included under the freedom of the seas clause, but some suggest that it, like the Pacific, might be regarded as defensive waters.

Speculation seems to agree that the President will probably ask for the repeal of the Neutrality Act and there are some who believe that that is responsible for the recall of Congress.

1 Like

The Pittsburgh Press (September 13, 1941)

MEXICO ENDORSES ROOSEVELT STAND

Mexico City, Sept. 13 (UP) –
Mexico last night officially endorses President Roosevelt’s challenge to the Axis powers and indicated active support of America if shooting war is necessary to defend the Americas.

Foreign Minister Dr. Ezequiel Padilla in a prepared statement said Mr. Roosevelt’s speech was of “transcendental interest for the destiny of the continent” and added:

The Americas have already declared themselves openly in support of the principle of freedom of the seas. The war must be kept away not only from our continental waters but from all maritime regions necessary for the peace and commerce and security of our hemisphere. Whatever other American nations do to prevent acts of aggression merits the support of our country.

1 Like

BERLIN PAPERS BLAST AWAY AT ROOSEVELT

Berlin, Sept. 13 (UP) –
Comment in German newspapers on President Roosevelt’s freedom-of-the-seas speech was epitomized today in headlines such as:

ROOSEVELT CONFIRMS SHOOTING ORDER! ARGUMENTS WITH MASS OF SUPPLEMENTARY LIES

ROOSEVELT GUILTY: WARMONGER SEEKS NEW INCIDENTS ON SEA

ROOSEVELT DEFENDING HIMSELF: WEB OF LIES COVERS SHOOTING ORDER

SEA PIRATE PRONOUNCES JUDGMENT: ROOSEVELT’S SHOOTING ORDER AND HIS FIVE GROUNDS

Völkischer Beobachter, the Nazi Party newspaper, said:

If one considers the immense power which Roosevelt, by his far-reaching destruction of United States democracy, has obtained surreptitiously; if one knows the terrorism which he and his Jewish pack employ, if one observes how piece after piece he destroys the neutrality of his country, then one must wonder that he has not gained more support from Americans.

One important reason for that is his union with Bolshevism, which can no longer be veiled.

Many Americans – too many for Roosevelt – know that his ambassador to Moscow, the Jew Steinhardt, has steadily encouraged Russia to betray its agreement with Germany… the American people, unlike the British, are healthy enough to feel aversion against a President who dared to issue a shooting order and called it the result of months of steady prayer.

Laurence A. Steinhardt is the United States Ambassador to Russia.

1 Like