Editorial: Our operations in France reflect wise leadership
It is not immodest or chauvinistic to say that the part Americans played in the landing on Normandy’s coast reflected the greatness of the nation and the vision, the wisdom and courage of its leadership. That memorable incident cannot be detached from the history of the past and considered as an event of a day. It was the culmination of a great deal of labor, mixed with purpose and vision, of conferences and plans, of determination and of a sustaining faith in the ultimate triumph of a cause and an ideal.
If a number of things had not happened and policies had not been initiated years ago, before Pearl Harbor but while war loomed as a certainty in the eyes of all but those who would not see, Allied troops would not now be on the soil of France and victory and peace would be more distant prospects.
The time of decision is brought closer simply because the obstructive tactics of isolationists were not permitted to prevail and the nation began to prepare for a challenge which from the beginning was inevitable.
Even before Pearl Harbor, the United States, through the operation of Lend-Lease, was sustaining hard-pressed potential allies. The exchange of destroyers for Atlantic bases was an aid to Britain in desperate hours when the U-boat was rampant. The building up of the Army and Navy and the adoption of Selective Service, a politically unpopular move under the existing circumstances, have been factors in placing in the field a great army of millions, perfectly trained and equipped, and capable of holding its own and even mastering the armies of the world’s most traditionally militaristic nation.
The task of placing an army of hundreds of thousands of men on the Normandy shore and supporting it with 4,000 ships and some 11,000 planes, while at the same time carrying on a war in the Pacific and a campaign in Italy, really began nearly five years ago, when German panzer divisions crashed over the frontier of Poland and it became apparent that marauders were again on the loose.
In the face of bitter opposition from some of the less realistic elements of Congress and from other quarters, the preparation went forward, while America-Firsters, political demagogues and some sincere but deluded lovers of peace raised their voices in angry protest. Finally, of course, the tragedy of Pearl Harbor revealed strikingly the justification for every move that had been made. And then, in the course of a short time, a navy that lay at the bottom of Pearl Harbor was dominating the North and South Pacific and making the Atlantic as safe for transports as a ferry trip across the Hudson, and a great army was being whipped into shape and industry was accomplishing miracles of production.
Now, deep in crisis, it is possible to report that everything is proceeding according to plan, a plan vaguely conceived some years ago when Hitler loomed large on the horizon and it became clear that democracy would have to fight in order to survive, a plan refined and perfected in Washington and Casablanca, Québec and Tehran, a plan into whose formulation and fulfilment many elements of greatness have entered.