Guffey: Butler stooge for magazine
Says Reader’s Digest is making ‘international fool’ of Senator
…
Roosevelt proclaims Jan. 1 day of prayer
…
Repatriated on Gripsholm –
Pittsburgh doctor’s lips sealed on Jap atrocities
U.S. authorities fear reprisals against other internees
…
Soldier-vote issue fought by coalition
Southern Democrats’ lead gains support of GOP
By Thomas L. Stokes, Scripps-Howard staff writer
…
Hoover and Landon seek foreign unity
…
In Washington –
Fight on subsidies is laid to big food manufacturers
Auto union’s Reuther, farm union’s Smith back administration program; Scanlon calls consumers
…
Planes pound Marshalls in 2-way attack
Land and carrier-based aircraft smash at Jap-held islands
By William F. Tyree, United Press staff writer
…
Simms: Time at hand for entry of Turkey into the war
Any delay beyond four months to be too late, diplomats say; decision could shorten conflict, save many lives
By William Philip Simms, Scripps-Howard foreign editor
Washington –
Turkey is expected to be in the war within four months on the side of the Allies. If she isn’t, some of the best-informed diplomats here say, she will have missed the boat.
Now that Marshal Stalin, Prime Minister Churchill and President Roosevelt have fixed the time and place for the final assault against Germany, the moment for Turkey to make up her mind is conceded to have arrived.
The master plan having been made, the details must be filled in at once. If Turkey comes in, the drive from the south will take one direction; if she stays out, it will take another. In any event, Russia, Britain and the United States must be told now in order to fit her into the complicated war machine which will probably start rolling about April.
Turkey’s entry within 120 days would probably be decisive. It might shorten the war by months and save countless lives and treasure.
If her entry is delayed, the chances are that it would do neither her nor the Allies much good. Once the Russians enter Romania and reach the Danube, Turkish intervention would be like Italy’s move against France in 1940. And the same might be said if it came after an Anglo-American invasion of the Balkans via Italy and the Adriatic, or via the Aegean.
Reports that Turkey intends to postpone joining the Allies until it will be “safe” are regarded as slander. According to some, she fears she would be overrun by the Axis.
Nevertheless, she has approximately a million men under arms and her mountainous frontiers looking out on Greece and Bulgaria are comparatively strong. According to military opinion, if she could not hold her own there until help arrives, it would be folly for the British and Americans to attempt landings on the difficult and hostile shores of Yugoslavia and carve out a bridgehead there.
Turkey-in-Europe already forms a powerful bridgehead in the Balkans. Close by, in the Middle East, there are at least 500,000 British, American, Anzac, Polish, French, Indian and other soldiers there begging for a chance. And with the U-boat menace checked in the Atlantic, and the route through the Mediterranean open, the Turkish front would not lack for supplies.
Turkish bases for the Allies without entering the war, or opening up the Dardanelles to Allied shipping, are discounted as beside the mark. To give us bases for use against the Axis would be an act of war in itself. As for the Dardanelles, before we could use them, we would first have to throw the enemy out of the Aegean and, second, dominate the air over Greece as well.
Istanbul, of course, is extremely vulnerable. Turkish cities would probably be bombed. But there is no such a thing as a safe war. But, here again, such talk ignores the national character. The Turks have never wanted in courage. Their soldiers are as gallant as any. And their people have endured the ravages of war for 2,000 years.
Turkey wants a place at the peace table. She sits astride Marmora and the Dardanelles, one of the world’s strategic prizes. She is the crossroads, by land, sea and air, between Europe and Asia. There is every reason why she should have a voice when the future of that part of the world comes to be decided.
But she has obligations as well as rights. Thus, as the Big Three foreign ministers said of Austria after their meeting at Moscow:
In the final settlement, account will inevitably be taken of her contribution to victory.
Background of news –
Behind the scenes at Tehran
By Gault MacGowan, North American Newspaper Alliance
…
Roving Reporter
By Ernie Pyle
Allied HQ, Algiers, Algeria – (by wireless)
The government is scattering a lot of American girls out over the world now to work in government offices.
They are not WACs, but civilians. Their destinations read like an itinerary of Marco Polo. They wear civilian clothes, and everywhere they stop as they fly about the work they create a warmth and a glow among the women-starved men out in the outposts.
We had five girls with us a good part of the way from America to Africa. At all the stops the soldiers, and officers too, would stand and stare, and you could sense them sort of smiling to themselves. Often, they’d wave or whistle, not in a smart-alecky fashion, but just hungry and friendly-like. And the girls would wave back.
A time or two, when we went into Officers’ Clubs at the camps, the girls would be surrounded so quickly and deeply you completely lost sight of them.
Our men on foreign soil miss desperately the companionship of white women. The mere sight of one thrills them. One day in a small South American city I was walking along the crowded sidewalks with two of our female passengers when a couple of soldiers tagged along behind us for blocks and kept saying to me in a friendly fashion:
Congratulations, soldier, you lucky dog. How we envy you.
And at one field, I heard a young officer say to one passenger:
Lady, just stand still a minute and let me stare at you.
Yes, a man without a woman is a sorry spectacle.
Perfect partnership
All the way from America to Algiers I traveled with a young lady from Los Angeles named Mrs. Peggy Pollard. In addition to a pleasant traveling companionship, we both soon saw the advantage of forming ourselves into a sort of team, for we had the perfect combination. I had friends all along the route from previous trips, and Mrs. Pollard was beautiful.
Brother, between the two of us, there wasn’t anything we couldn’t get. If I got invited somewhere, I’d suggest Mrs. Pollard be invited, too. She worked the same principle in reverse. Thus, we traveled over three continents and one ocean like a pair of Oriental potentates. We bask in the rankest sort of special privilege.
We got better quarters than other passengers, we rode special cars instead of buses, we were taken on sightseeing trips and to cocktail parties. People paid us lavish and luxurious attention. I think it’s a great tribute to the tolerance of humankind that the other passengers didn’t get sore at us.
I don’t know what I’m going to do without Mrs. Pollard when I got on from Algiers. If I could only take her to the front with me the soldiers would undoubtedly lay a red carpet through the mud for us. But it’s all over now so goodbye, dear Mrs. Pollard.
Battle of the Hotels
At one big field in Northwest Africa, we fell into the hospitable hands of two very engaging officers – Maj. Charlie Moore of Inglewood, New Jersey, and Capt. David Miller of Lock Haven, Pennsylvania. They room together in a hotel where many officers of the field are billeted and it is probably the finest hotel in Africa.
Living there is pretty close to what living would be like in a very fine resort hotel back home. Both these officers have lived in hotels ever since coming to Africa a year ago. They are both doing important vital work, yet they deride and bemoan themselves for the comfort in which they live although neither asked for it, nor was responsible for it.
They call their war, “The Battle of the Hotels.” Both would much rather be a thousand miles closer to the front, in a barn.
Capt. Miller is an unusual character. He is gray-haired, 52, and has a wife and three teenage children, yet when the war came along, he would up everything and went in – and has never been out of a hotel. In the last war, he was overseas 22 months and never once in a hotel. He said:
I liked the last one better.
Völkischer Beobachter (December 9, 1943)
Amerikanisches Kongreßmitglied stellt fest:
‚Der ehrgeizige Roosevelt will Weltpräsident werden‘
Dafür wird Amerikas Jugend auf die Schlachtfelder getrieben
…
Pearl-Harbour-Kriegsgericht verschoben
tc. Lissabon, 8. Dezember –
Das Kriegsgerichtsverfahren gegen die verantwortlichen USA-Kommandeure von Pearl Harbour, Konteradmiral Husband E. Kimmel und Generalleutnant Walter C. Short, wird auf Grund eines Beschlusses des USA-Senats um weitere sechs Monate hinausgeschoben, besagt eine Meldung aus Washington. Nach dem Senat nahm auch das Repräsentantenhaus den Gesetzentwurf an und leitete ihn dann zur Vollziehung an das Weiße Haus.
Die Frist, binnen derer ein Kriegsgerichtsverfahren gegen die genannten Kommandeure eingeleitet werden konnte, lief jetzt ab, doch wünschte die USA-Regierung begreiflicherweise, daß die Durchführung des Verfahrens erst nach dem Kriege erfolgt.
U.S. Navy Department (December 9, 1943)
CINCPAC Communiqué No. 24
Strong forces of the Pacific Fleet attacked Nauru Island with carrier aircraft and ship bombardment on December 8 (West Longitude Date). Further details are not now available.
Liberators of the 7th Army Air Force, which raided the Taroa Airdrome installations on the morning of December 7, were intercepted over Maloelap by eight enemy fighters. One fighter was shot down. Our planes suffered only slight damage. A Liberator of this force also bombed Mille during the same sortie.
CINCPAC Press Release No. 189
Press Release
December 9, 1943
Navy search planes of Fleet Air Wing Two made the following raids in the southern Marshalls on December 8, 1943 (West Longitude Date). A Ventura bomber strafed installations at Mille in the face of heavy automatic weapon fire without damage to our plane. Three Zeros attacked one of our Liberators near Mille, with no damage; another Liberator raided and strafed base facilities at Jaluit, sinking a patrol boat and probably sinking a medium freighter and two small vessels.
Joint Statement
The following joint Anglo‑American statement on submarine and anti-submarine operations is issued under the authority of the President and the Prime Minister:
Anti U‑boat operations in November have been notable, for the enemy has achieved little for the great effort he has exerted. The number of merchant vessels sunk by U‑boats in November is less than in any other month since May 1940.
By means of aircraft operating from Azores we have been able to improve protection to our convoys and to diminish area in which enemy U‑boats were free from attack by our forces.
The enemy has used long range aircraft to assist in concentrating U‑boats on our convoy routes but in spite of this our escort and counterattack has been effective.
The caution of the enemy U‑boats has lessened the number of opportunities presented to our forces for striking at them. Nevertheless, the number of U‑boats sunk in November has again exceeded the number of their victims.
Why does the newspaper say soviet russia instead of the soviet union?
1 Like
Russia was used as the colloquial term for the Soviet Union, despite Russia only being one part of the Union, among other countries. The Russian state had the ultimate authority over Soviet affairs.
1 Like