America at war! (1941–) – Part 3

U.S. State Department (December 8, 1943)

740.0011 EW 1939/32243: Telegram

The Ambassador in the Soviet Union to the Secretary of State

Moscow, December 8, 1943 — 9 a.m.
2144.

Supplementing my 2131, December 6, 7 p.m.

I had occasion to ask Molotov last night how it had happened that TASS had made a statement regarding the conclusion of the Tehran Conference. He explained that (one) Reuter’s [Reuters] from Lisbon had predicted the meeting and (two) Senator Connally had announced it was going on. TASS could not ignore these reports and therefore stated the truth to end further rumors which were considered to affect adversely our mutual interests. It is my personal opinion that the British and we have more to explain to the Soviet Government than they have to us. I therefore recommend that we do not pursue the matter further with the Soviets.

HARRIMAN

891.00/2072: Telegram

The Minister in Iran to the Secretary of State

Tehran, December 8, 1943 — 5 p.m.
1096.

In reply to my inquiry as to reason for premature publication of declaration regarding Iran, my 1090, December 5, Soviet Chargé told me he had heard Iranians were going to release text on morning of December 5 and that his Embassy therefore rushed publication in order not to be left behind.

In a separate conversation with an officer of this Legation and Major Henry, Hurley’s aide, Soviet Press Attaché denied all knowledge of any agreement regarding release date for publicity on Tehran conference and further intimated he had not understood declaration on Iran to form part of general release.

It is obvious that these two statements are conflicting and both seem implausible. If Soviet Chargé had heard of Iranian intention to break deadline, he could easily have intervened with the Iranian authorities, at same time notifying his American and British colleagues. Likewise, the Press Attaché’s plea of ignorance is vitiated by fact that he was present at meeting with Major Henry and British representatives on December 4 at which release arrangements were discussed. However, I have not pressed the point and shall take no further action unless instructed.

DREYFUS


U.S. Navy Department (December 8, 1943)

CINCPAC Communiqué No. 23

Our carrier task forces which attacked enemy installations on Kwajalein and Wotje Atolls on December 4, 1943, (West Longitude Date) destroyed 72 planes in the air, strafed and burned an undetermined number of medium bombers on the ground, and destroyed or damaged various ground installations on Kwajalein, Ebeye, Roi and Wotje Islands.

At Kwajalein they sank two light cruisers, one oiler and three cargo transports and damaged one troop transport and two cargo transports.

At Wotje one cargo transport was damaged.

Our forces, under command of RAdm. Charles A. Pownall, USN, successfully fought off vigorous prolonged aerial and torpedo and bombing attacks. Of one group of seven torpedo planes, six were destroyed by anti-aircraft fire.

One of our ships suffered minor damage. Our aircraft losses were light.

CINCPAC Press Release No. 188

For Immediate Release
December 8, 1943

The enemy continues nuisance air raids against our installations in the Gilberts. On the night of December 6 (West Longitude Date) a plane dropped four bombs at Makin, which landed harmlessly in the lagoon. On the night of December 5, enemy planes dropped eight bombs near Betio Island. Only one bomb landed near our installations, causing minor injuries to personnel.

President Roosevelt’s remarks at Malta
December 8, 1943

Franklin Delano Roosevelt (D-NY)

Lord Gort, officers and men, good people of Malta:

Nearly a year ago the Prime Minister and I were in Casablanca – shortly after the landings by British and American troops in North Africa – and at that time I told the Prime Minister some day we would control once more the whole of the Mediterranean and that I would go to Malta.

For many months I have wanted on behalf of the American people to pay some little tribute to this island and to all of its people – civil and military – who during these years have contributed so much to democracy, not just here but all over the civilized world. And so, at last I have been able to come. At last, I have been able to see something of your historic land. I wish I could stay but I have many things to do. May I tell you though that during these past three weeks the Prime Minister and I feel that we two have struck strong blows for the future of the human race.

And so, in this simple way, I am taking the opportunity to do what all the American people would like to join me in doing. I have here a little token – a scroll – a citation – from the President of the United States, speaking in behalf of all the people of the United States. And may I read it to you:

In the name of the people of the United States of America, I salute the Island of Malta, its people and defenders, who, in the cause of freedom and justice and decency throughout the world, have rendered valorous service far above and beyond the call of duty.

Under repeated fire from the skies, Malta stood alone, but unafraid in the center of the sea, one tiny bright flame in the darkness – a beacon of hope for the clearer days which have come.

Malta’s bright story of human fortitude and courage will be read by posterity with wonder and with gratitude through all the ages.

What was done in this Island maintains the highest traditions of gallant men and women who from the beginning of time have lived and died to preserve civilization for all mankind.

December 7, 1943
FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT

I have signed it at the bottom and I wrote on it not today but yesterday, December 7, because that was the second anniversary of the entry into the war of the American people. We will proceed until that war is won and more than that, we will stand shoulder to shoulder with the British Empire and our other allies in making it a victory worthwhile.

The Pittsburgh Press (December 8, 1943)

5th Army advancing on main road to Rome

Mountain barrier hurdled by Yanks in six-day battle in Italy
By C. R. Cunningham, United Press staff writer

TURKEY SPEEDS TOWARD WAR ON AXIS
Defense ring placed about Dardanelles

Balkans flareup nears; Ankara becomes Allied nonbelligerent
By Harrison Salisbury, United Press staff writer

turkeymap
New bases for Allies from which to raid the Balkans and Nazi-held Russia would be available should Turkey join the war against the Axis. The opening of the Dardanelles would speed shipments of arms to Russia. German troops were reported massed in southeastern Bulgaria, in the vicinity of the border of Turkey in Europe.

Cairo, Egypt –
Turkey has militarized the entire Dardanelles zone in an intensified program of warlike moves climaxed by a shift into the Allied camp as a benevolent nonbelligerent, reports presaging an explosion in the tense Balkan situation said today.

A United Press dispatch filed from Ankara last Thursday said Turkey was calling up one million more men to double the country’s armed strength this month.

Advices reaching Cairo in the wake of the Anglo-American-Turkish conference here said the Turks had laid out zones three miles wide on both sides of the Dardanelles and put them under strict military rule.

Nazis mass troops

The historic Dardanelles gateway between the Mediterranean and Black Sea lies below the border of European Turkey, near which the Germans were reported massing considerable armed strength. Among the security measures taken by the Turks in recent weeks, according to reports here, was the arrest of many persons suspected of espionage for the Nazis, described as on the upsweep recently.

Turkish police were also keeping close watch over Italians with Fascist sympathies, especially in the Istanbul area where there are about 75,000 Italians. All of them were under close surveillance and their names were on police registers.

Build war positions

Since 1937, the Turks have built a dense network of positions suitable for both defense and attack along the Dardanelles. High Turkish Army officers have repeatedly expressed their confidence that any attack would fail.

While foreign experts believe the Turkish Army is short of modern equipment, they are unanimous in agreeing that the morale of Turkish troops is high and their discipline is excellent. The Turk is traditionally a first-class warrior.

President İsmet İnönü of Turkey, a communiqué revealed, conferred with President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill here last Saturday, Sunday and Monday and joined them in expressing the “closest unity” of the three countries in their attitude toward the “world situation.”

May enter war soon

Though an immediate Turkish declaration of war against Germany was not anticipated, barring a possible German attack, such a declaration may be only weeks or months away. Turkish sources suggested that Turkey was ready to enter the way anytime that the Allies were prepared to protect her against a German attack from Bulgaria, the Aegean or the Black Sea.

The possible Anglo-American use of Turkish airfields and supply routes, as well as an Allied thrust through Turkey into Bulgaria or Greece, were believed to have been discussed at the Cairo Conference and it was assumed that the United Nations and Turkey now have fully coordinated plans for any eventuality, including the opening of the Dardanelles as a supply route for Russia.

Some sources expected Turkey’s declaration of war, if and when it comes would be announced simultaneously with military action.

Rush reinforcements

Apparently anticipating some such move, Germany was reported rushing land and air reinforcements into southeastern Bulgaria, especially in the Eastern Rumelia area facing Turkey, and along the Black Sea coast, according to unofficial reports reaching Cairo.

Large detachments of Elite Guard forces were also reported massing at Salonika and gradually embarking for the island of Lemnos, which commands the Aegean entrance to the Dardanelles.

The bulk of the German reinforcements on the Turkish frontier, most of which were motorized infantry, were said to be concentrating in the triangle formed by the Black Sea port of Burgas, the frontier town of Rakovski on the main Sofia-Istanbul railroad, and the inland town of Plovdiv.

Speed air bases

The Germans were also rushing to completion air bases in an inner triangle based on Plovdiv, Stara Zagora and Malko Tarnovo on the frontier, it was said.

The same informants also said that German uneasiness over the attitude of the great mass of Bulgarians has been mounting steadily since the death of King Boris because of that country’s traditional sympathy for Russia. An incipient liberation movement in Bulgaria was reported to have contacted the new Partisan government of Dr. Ivan Ribar in Yugoslavia.

In a further effort to disturb the Balkans, the Allies were believed circulating through neutral channels the specific terms under which they will accept Germany’s surrender.

Repercussions expected

The stiffness of these terms was expected to touch off major repercussions among the German satellites, particularly in Hungary, which was believed ready to withdraw any time the Allies can extend any kind of assurances against Nazi retaliation.

There was every indication that the terms to Germany remained unconditional surrender with the Allies reserving the right of individual judgment over German Army officers accused of war atrocities, even if the German General Staff should instigate peace negotiations behind Hitler’s back.

Avoids direct answer

Selim Sarper, secretary general of the Turkish Press Bureau, avoided a direct answer when asked by correspondents whether the Turks had acted as the medium for any peace offers from Germany.

He said, “None were made through me.”

British and American staff officers were revealed to be engaged in a series of important conferences, at which they were believed to be drafting details of the new assaults promised by the Tehran Declaration against Axis Europe “from the south” and presumably including an invasion of the Balkans.

Smuts arrives

Marshal Jan C. Smuts, Prime Minister of South Africa and one of Mr. Churchill’s closest military advisers, arrived here Monday, but did not participate immediately in any Allied staff talks. He consulted Mr. Churchill shortly after his arrival and dined with Mr. Roosevelt that night.

President İnönü and his Turkish delegation of 15, including Foreign Minister Numan Menemencioğlu and Marshal Fevzi Çakmak, Chief of the Turkish General Staff, flew here in British and U.S. planes from Turkey. However, it was stated officially that none of the Turkish military leaders had participated in staff talks with British and American commanders.

Soviet envoy present

The conference was held at the joint suggestion of the United States, Britain and Russia, the communiqué announcing the meeting said, and Sergei A. Vinogradov, Soviet Ambassador to Ankara, represented the Soviet Union.

The communiqué said that the participation of the Turkish leaders in the conference:

…bears striking testimony to the strength of the alliance which unites Great Britain and Turkey and to the firm friendship existing between the Turkish people and the United States of America and the Soviet Union.

Beside the principals, the conferees included British Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden, President Roosevelt’s special adviser Harry Hopkins and Mr. Menemencioğlu. The sessions were all held in Mena House, site of the Roosevelt-Churchill-Chiang Kai-shek meeting less than a fortnight earlier.

Parley story again told prematurely

London, England –
Information concerning the momentous Allied conferences in the Middle East was again released prematurely last night when the Berlin radio reported the Turkish news agency announced the news of the latest Cairo meeting at least two hours before the official deadline.

At 10:50 p.m. CET (5:50 p.m. ET), Berlin broadcast that the Turkish agency issued an official communiqué concerning the journey of President İsmet İnönü to Cairo to meet with President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill. Berlin then proceeded to broadcast the text of an official announcement concerning the meetings – which was not released in the United States and Britain until 7:30 p.m. ET.

Previously, the British news agency Reuters has given advance information of the Cairo Conferences in which Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek participated, and the Moscow radio broadcast the fact that the Tehran Conference had been held more than three days before the official release of information concerning that conference.

Allied leaders may see Franco

Spanish move to forsake Nazis is hinted
By Leon Kay, United Press staff writer

Cairo, Egypt –
The possibility of a Roosevelt-Churchill meeting with Generalissimo Francisco Franco was speculated upon today as interest turned to the Western Mediterranean following the epic Allied conferences involving Russia, China and Turkey.

The Western Mediterranean bristles with problems just as thorny as those ironed out at Cairo and Tehran, but it was not known whether President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill propose to include Iberian, French and Italian affairs in their already-crowded scheduled.

A meeting among the two Allied chieftains and Franco at Tangier or Casablanca would afford Spain an opportunity to extricate herself further from the Axis web. Some sources suggested, however, that any such negotiations might be carried on by underlings rather than by the principals.

Though it must be emphasized that nothing definite can be revealed about the plans of Messrs. Roosevelt and Churchill, their presence in Africa would obviously enable them to make on-the-spot inquiries into the troubled French and Italian situations as well as to meet Franco.

The French have felt left out in the cold by their exclusion from the Cairo and Tehran Conferences, but a courtesy call by Messrs. Roosevelt and Churchill on Gen. Charles de Gaulle, President of the French Committee of National Liberation, might soothe their ruffled feelings.

May inspect front

It was not believed that the two leaders would concern themselves with the still-unsettled Italian political situation, though they might take advantage of their presence in Africa to inspect the Allies’ only active European land front.

In connection with the French and Italian situations, it might be significant that Robert Murphy and Harold MacMillan, American and British representatives respectively on the Italian Advisory Commission, twice journeyed to Cairo for consultations with Messrs. Roosevelt and Churchill. Messrs. Murphy and MacMillan were formerly special ministers to North Africa and as such had close contact with the French Liberation Committee.

Series of losses admitted by Japs

Tokyo broadcast also complains that overwhelming Allied airpower has cut Nipponese supply lines ‘one after another’
By Walter L. Briggs, United Press staff writer


Tokyo admits loss of 159,000 troops

By the United Press

Allied bombers rip New Britain

Aerial drive on Rabaul picks up speed
By Brydon C. Taves, United Press staff writer

Guffey hears call to quit his vote post

Hornet’s nest is stirred by ‘unholy alliance’ allegations


Gravy train is wrecked –
House group kills proposal to pay papers for bond aids

Efforts to subsidize press in small communities thwarted by narrow vote of 11–10

‘Lay that pistol down’ –
Byrnes asks special blocs to join fight on inflation

If we don’t hold the line now, mobilization chief says, the floodgates may open

Joe E. Brown in China

Chungking, China –
Film comedian Joe E. Brown arrived at Chungking Monday, smiling his cave-like smile for all to see. For seven days, he had been entertaining U.S. soldiers at various Chinese bases.

Guffey: Butler stooge for magazine

Says Reader’s Digest is making ‘international fool’ of Senator


Roosevelt proclaims Jan. 1 day of prayer

Repatriated on Gripsholm
Pittsburgh doctor’s lips sealed on Jap atrocities

U.S. authorities fear reprisals against other internees

Soldier-vote issue fought by coalition

Southern Democrats’ lead gains support of GOP
By Thomas L. Stokes, Scripps-Howard staff writer


Hoover and Landon seek foreign unity

In Washington –
Fight on subsidies is laid to big food manufacturers

Auto union’s Reuther, farm union’s Smith back administration program; Scanlon calls consumers

Planes pound Marshalls in 2-way attack

Land and carrier-based aircraft smash at Jap-held islands
By William F. Tyree, United Press staff writer

Screenshot 2022-06-20 213810

Simms: Time at hand for entry of Turkey into the war

Any delay beyond four months to be too late, diplomats say; decision could shorten conflict, save many lives
By William Philip Simms, Scripps-Howard foreign editor

Washington –
Turkey is expected to be in the war within four months on the side of the Allies. If she isn’t, some of the best-informed diplomats here say, she will have missed the boat.

Now that Marshal Stalin, Prime Minister Churchill and President Roosevelt have fixed the time and place for the final assault against Germany, the moment for Turkey to make up her mind is conceded to have arrived.

The master plan having been made, the details must be filled in at once. If Turkey comes in, the drive from the south will take one direction; if she stays out, it will take another. In any event, Russia, Britain and the United States must be told now in order to fit her into the complicated war machine which will probably start rolling about April.

Turkey’s entry within 120 days would probably be decisive. It might shorten the war by months and save countless lives and treasure.

If her entry is delayed, the chances are that it would do neither her nor the Allies much good. Once the Russians enter Romania and reach the Danube, Turkish intervention would be like Italy’s move against France in 1940. And the same might be said if it came after an Anglo-American invasion of the Balkans via Italy and the Adriatic, or via the Aegean.

Reports that Turkey intends to postpone joining the Allies until it will be “safe” are regarded as slander. According to some, she fears she would be overrun by the Axis.

Nevertheless, she has approximately a million men under arms and her mountainous frontiers looking out on Greece and Bulgaria are comparatively strong. According to military opinion, if she could not hold her own there until help arrives, it would be folly for the British and Americans to attempt landings on the difficult and hostile shores of Yugoslavia and carve out a bridgehead there.

Turkey-in-Europe already forms a powerful bridgehead in the Balkans. Close by, in the Middle East, there are at least 500,000 British, American, Anzac, Polish, French, Indian and other soldiers there begging for a chance. And with the U-boat menace checked in the Atlantic, and the route through the Mediterranean open, the Turkish front would not lack for supplies.

Turkish bases for the Allies without entering the war, or opening up the Dardanelles to Allied shipping, are discounted as beside the mark. To give us bases for use against the Axis would be an act of war in itself. As for the Dardanelles, before we could use them, we would first have to throw the enemy out of the Aegean and, second, dominate the air over Greece as well.

Istanbul, of course, is extremely vulnerable. Turkish cities would probably be bombed. But there is no such a thing as a safe war. But, here again, such talk ignores the national character. The Turks have never wanted in courage. Their soldiers are as gallant as any. And their people have endured the ravages of war for 2,000 years.

Turkey wants a place at the peace table. She sits astride Marmora and the Dardanelles, one of the world’s strategic prizes. She is the crossroads, by land, sea and air, between Europe and Asia. There is every reason why she should have a voice when the future of that part of the world comes to be decided.

But she has obligations as well as rights. Thus, as the Big Three foreign ministers said of Austria after their meeting at Moscow:

In the final settlement, account will inevitably be taken of her contribution to victory.

Editorial: Turkey and the Western Front

Ferguson: World cooperation

By Mrs. Walter Ferguson

Background of news –
Behind the scenes at Tehran

By Gault MacGowan, North American Newspaper Alliance