Capt. Topping, Sonja’s husband, flattens Flynn with one punch
Dispute is mystery; friendship professed
…
Confidentially, they stink!
Jap soldiers’ ‘B.O.’ helps Yanks to avoid ambush
Enemy’s diet of dried fish gives him an unmistakable odor, Marine says
…
Eyewitness story –
Mighty U.S. task force hits Japs
Palau Islands left a smoking inferno
By Dan McGuire, United Press staff writer
…
Tornadic storms kill 17 in South
By the United Press
Tornadic storms left at least 17 persons dead in Arkansas, Texas and Oklahoma today as a high-pressure area, attended by general storm conditions, moved eastward. Over 500 families were homeless.
At least 15 persons were known dead in Arkansas, one in Texas and one in Oklahoma, and the list was expected to grow as reports trickled in from areas where communication lines were destroyed. More than 140 were injured.
Tornadoes lashed Arkansas from north to south last night. As the storm center moved eastward, high winds were reported to have disrupted telephone service between Birmingham and Jasper, Alabama. No casualties had been reported in Alabama.
Four persons were killed and 16 injured at a Farm Security Administration project near Woodson, Arkansas, 20 miles south of Little Rock. Nine were killed in Monroe, Pulaski and Boone counties, and two at Pine Bluff.
Japan pouring fresh troops into Burma
Tokyo seeks to speed invasion of India
…
Aussie ‘releases’ in Army defensed
‘Just a paper move,’ statement says
…
Court divides on application of labor act
Rutledge sees trap for employers
…
12 companies lose Navy star because of steel union walkouts
Board interprets strikes as production losses no matter who or what starts them
By Fred W. Perkins, Pittsburgh Press staff writer
…
Foster: Aussie double talk confuses Helen
Fantastic lingo has actress on ropes – but she’s learning it
By Ernest Foster
…
Winchell files $250,000 suit
…
Owlett: New Deal seeks domination
Manufacturers’ head denounces theorists
Doylestown, Pennsylvania – (special)
G. Mason Owlett, president of the Pennsylvania Manufacturers Association, in a speech here last night, charged the New Deal with seeking “to gain complete domination of all industry, all enterprise and all initiative.”
He said:
We see this in the limitations being cunningly imposed on free enterprise by rattle-pated theorists who seek to make over our economic system without admitting that it’s being socialized.
Red tape curbs enterprise
Mr. Owlett is also Republican National Committeeman from Pennsylvania and a candidate at the April 25 primary for delegate-at-large to the Republican presidential convention.
He said:
When victory is finally ours, we don’t want an America where every detail of our private lives is run by government brass hats. A man has to have a little room to move around in if he’s going to do his part to build a better world. He can’t do much when he’s all tied up with regulations, red tape, restrictions and trick taxes that rob him of all chance to live his own life and plan his own adventures.
Personal initiative destroyed
Mr. Owlett said the Roosevelt administration “has destroyed personal initiative and undermined the pillars of all enterprise.”
He said:
The greatest contribution that government can make toward the steady increase in the American standard of living aside from war production, sound money, proper tariffs and fair courts, will be made if government avoids competition in industry and confines itself to the strictest protection of equality and corporate ventures into new fields.
Stokes: War factor may keep Ohio for Roosevelt
State may elect GOP Governor, Senator
By Thomas L. Stokes, Scripps-Howard staff writer
Cleveland, Ohio –
Ohio is going to be bitter fighting territory in November’s election.
It looks Republican in complexion today, and is likely to repeat in choosing a Republican governor and U.S. Senator.
But Democrats are hopeful that the war may swing the state in President Roosevelt’s column in November, in such a mixed result as has happened in recent years. In the presidential contest, Ohio is still labeled doubtful.
The outcome will depend upon this great industrial city, upon what size Democratic majority it can piled up to offset downstate Republicanism, increasingly powerful in the rural districts and small towns.
Carried by Roosevelt
Mr. Roosevelt carried Ohio in 1940 against Wendell Willkie by 147,000. Most of the margin came from Cleveland. He carried Cuyahoga County by 138,000.
Cleveland Democrats have a prize exhibit who may help considerably in turning the trick. This is big, broad-shouldered Mayor Frank J. Lausche, twice elected by thumping majorities. He is seeking the Democratic nomination for governor in a field of six candidates. His nomination is forecast.
He should help Mr. Roosevelt in this city, especially with the war the issue.
A second-generation American, of Slovenian parentage, he has the patriotic fervor of the second-generation American, and is an effective public speaker. Enjoys favor generally because of his admittedly fine administration as mayor.
Compared with Lincoln
He is a towering and commanding figure, with a great mop of black hair that waves about when he warms up on the platform. Sincere, serious, he rather cherishes the comparison to Abraham Lincoln.
He was in the Army in World War I, though he did not get overseas. He was a semi-pro baseball player, but he resisted the temptation to go into professional baseball; instead, studied law and began practice here in Cleveland.
Vying for the Republican gubernatorial nomination are Mayor James Garfield Stewart of Cincinnati, backed by the State Republican chairman and boss, Ed Schorr; Tom Herbert, attorney general, who has the support of Senator Harold Burton, and Paul Herbert, no relation, the Lieutenant Governor.
Stewart favored
Mayor Stewart seems to be favored.
Senator Robert A. Taft is not opposed for renomination and looks a sure winner in November. William G. Pickrel of Dayton, former Lieutenant Governor, is given the edge in a three-man contest for the Democratic senatorial nomination.
Editorial: The isolation myth
One week after the Wisconsin primary, some fourth-termers and Willkie adherents are claiming that he was defeated by isolationists, as the isolationists themselves contend.
We repeat the well-known facts, which are the opposite of that myth:
Thomas E. Dewey – who won while refusing to run – four years ago was no more and no less an isolationist than Mr. Willkie and President Roosevelt, who campaigned on the pledge of keeping this country out of war if possible. Since Pearl Harbor, Mr. Dewey has gone farther than Mr. Willkie or Mr. Roosevelt in endorsing an Anglo-American alliance, which is the opposite of isolationism – not to mention Mr. Dewey’s strong international plank in his 1942 campaign for governor, and his recent repudiation of “the Gerald L. K. Smiths.”
Mr. Willkie was not the extreme internationalist candidate in the Wisconsin primary. That was Harold E. Stassen, the advocate of a world state, which neither Mr. Willkie nor Mr. Dewey supports. Mr. Stassen ran a good second, in comparison to fourth place for Mr. Willkie.
All of which is unanswerable proof that isolationism did not defeat Mr. Willkie nor account for Mr. Dewey’s large vote.
But no such evidence is needed to disprove the charge that the Republicans of Wisconsin or of the nation are isolationist. The Republican Mackinac Declaration urged American participation in international organization rather more vigorously than any Democratic Party pronouncement. Republicans were as active as Democrats in passing the Fulbright and Connally resolutions for international; cooperation – resolutions long delayed by President Roosevelt.
The truth is that isolationism is insignificant today, as the small vote against the Connally and Fulbright resolutions demonstrated. If there were many isolationists, the name would not be used for smear purposes by politicians who court votes.
But isolationism could grow into dangerous proportions. It probably will, unless the President or his successor is more successful in curbing the European trend toward another balance-of-power system. Certainly, the American people will react bitterly if the joint Allied pledges are ignored, and if our Congressional commitment to democratic international organization is rejected by the big powers in favor of a puppet setup.
If fourth-termers would spend less time smearing their opponents with an imaginary isolationism, and more time trying to remove real causes of potential isolationism, they would serve their party and their country better.
Edson: Rush Holt tries comeback in West Virginia
By Peter Edson
Washington –
Rush D. Holt – remember? – the boy Senator of 1935 et seq., is trying to do a political comeback in his native West Virginia. He seeks the Democratic nomination for governor in the state primary May 9.
People who can’t forget young Mr. Holt’s violent pre-Pearl Harbor isolationism are trying to make out that this is the first test of how much isolationist strength and sentiment there may be remaining in this country after two and a half years of war.
To think that West Virginians would vote for or against a gubernatorial candidate just because of his America First leanings and utterances that long ago seems at first glance to be a bit farfetched.
There are lots better tests of isolationism coming up later. Most important is Senator Gerald P. Nye’s fight for renomination in North Dakota. To a lesser degree, a contest for the seat of D. Worth Clark of Idaho, and to a still lesser degree, the races of Bennett Champ Clark of Missouri and Robert A. Taft of Ohio.
When you get this far down in the scale, it isn’t so much a case of having been isolationist as of having been opposed to many of the administration policies.
Robert R. Reynolds of North Carolina has thus far stuck to his determination not to seek reelection to the Senate, though he did smile coyly when arch-isolationist Gerald L. K. Smith picked him as likely presidential timber a few months ago. Senator Burton K. Wheeler of Montana doesn’t have to seek reelection till 1946. That will be the real test.
Senate again?
In the case of Rush Holt, some of the effort to pin the isolationist skunk cabbage on him at this time stems from the fear of where he might go from there, if he should be elected to governorship this year. Under West Virginia law, a governor does not have to resign office while seeking election to federal office, and in 1946 West Virginia elects a Senator. Mr. Holt, it is feared, has his eye on coming back to Washington as a successor to Harley M. Kilgore.
Since he last graced the capital scene, Mr. Holt has (a) been married, (b) registered for the draft, (c) been elected to the West Virginia state legislature. Otherwise, blackout.
He has kept his trap shut on all the things about which he used to rant – the New Deal, the warmongers, John L. Lewis and the CIO who helped him to election in 1934 and whom he repudiated in 1935. Maybe people have forgotten. At any rate, it will be an interesting test of the old theory that the memory of the American electorate is short.
Editorial opinion
As to Mr. Holt’s chances next month, and as to the effect which Mr. Holt’s pre-Pearl Harbor isolationism may have on the primary, opinions of three West Virginia newspaper editors queried on these points are enlightening:
Mr. Holt’s pre-Pearl Harbor actions haven’t even been mentioned, according to S. G. Damron of The Charleston Daily Mail. This editorial says observers think Mr. Holt will get a big anti-administration protest vote.
Mr. Holt is an enigma to Malcolm T. Brice, editor of The Wheeling News-Register. Mr. Holt’s traditional anti-labor stand while he was in the Senate would argue against his getting any labor support in this election, says Mr. Brice, but if John L. Lewis told the state’s 120,000 miners to support an anti-administration candidate, his chances for nomination would be favorable! This editor points out, however, that all straw ballots indicate the state is going Republican in the fall anyhow, with or without Mr. Roosevelt, so Mr. Holt doesn’t matter.
From Clyde A. Wellman, editor of The Huntington Advertiser, comes the guess that Mr. Holt will be a sure winner in the primary, the basis of his strength being the fact that his opponent, Clarence Meadows, has been tagged, rightly or wrongly, the crown prince of Governor Neely and all anti-Neelyites are rallying to Mr. Holt. Mr. Holt’s isolationism is not considered a big factor.
Republicans are hoping Mr. Holt gets the nomination so they can beat him with the isolationist label.
Background of news –
What will Willkie do?
By Jay G. Hayden
Washington –
Wendell L. Willkie, by his sudden withdrawal from the race for presidential nomination, has stolen the headlines from his own funeral.
The first reactions in Republican circles to Mr. Willkie’s announcement reflected complete satisfaction. He had discovered in Wisconsin that he was licked, something they had known for a long time, the party wheelhorses said, and most of them added that nomination of Governor Thomas E. Dewey on the first convention ballot is now inevitable.
Then, all at once, the thought seemed to pop up that Mr. Willkie, absolved of the role of self-seeker, might exercise more influence both as to candidates and policies than he has heretofore. Particularly there was speculation as to just what Mr. Willkie meant when he said:
I honestly hope that the Republican Party will nominate a candidate who will represent the views I stand for.
The inference plainly was that Mr. Willkie might decide to intervene for or against somebody. There is the suggestion even that he might bolt if he decides that the candidate nominated does not represent his views.
Dewey repudiates ‘Firsters’
Governor Dewey himself may have designed to head off any attempt by isolationists to lay claim to his Wisconsin victory when, in a statement just as the first returns were coming in, he declared that “the Gerald L. K. Smiths and their ilk must not for one moment be permitted to pollute the stream of American life.” In the same statement, Mr. Dewey renewed his commitment to a policy of American collaboration in world affairs.
The Wisconsin primary result, in fact, tended to dim the notion that only isolationists were opposed to the renomination of Mr. Willkie. LtCdr. Harold E. Stassen, who has gone even further than Mr. Willkie in urging sacrifice of American sovereignty to a better world order, ran surprisingly well.
Isolationism in Wisconsin, to the extent that it affected the primary result, probably worked on behalf of Gen. MacArthur. Lansing Hoyt, who directed the MacArthur campaign, headed the America First organization in the state before Pearl Harbor. Also, Gen. MacArthur’s candidacy took on an isolationist tinge from the support given him by The Chicago Tribune.
There can be no mistaking that the immediate effect of the Wisconsin primary was to increase greatly the probability that Governor Dewey will be the Republican nominee.
Big margin over Willkie
Despite his unquestionably sincere effort to remove himself from the contest, the 15 candidates who persisted in running under the Dewey label all were elected by substantial pluralities, and so were two others who adopted an ”uninstructed” designation but announced themselves for Mr. Dewey.
Based on the vote cast for the leading candidate on each delegate-at-large slate, Mr. Dewey polled more than 41% of the votes cast in the four-man contest. Mr. Willkie’s vote, in contrast, was about 10%.
The fact that Mr. Dewey beat Mr. Willkie so soundly in the only official election contest in which they have run against each other obviously makes it difficult for Mr. Willkie to turn against Mr. Dewey now without inviti9ngf the charge of sour grapes.
If Mr. Willkie should base his support of a presidential candidate on international policies, it would seem that he should pick Mr. Stassen who, in addition to having been an ardent internationalist ever since 1939, was Mr. Willkie’s floor manager in 1940.
When Mr. Stassen let it be known, two weeks before the Wisconsin primary, that he would accept the presidential nomination, however, Mr. Willkie sharply criticized him.
Mr. Willkie is known to believe that, in view of their common international views, Mr. Stassen should have supported him, and that if this had happened, his [Mr. Willkie’s] chances both in Wisconsin and Nebraska would have been greatly improved.
Stassen watched in Nebraska
Omaha, Nebraska (UP) –
With Wendell L. Willkie out of the race for the Republican presidential nomination, LtCdr. Harold E. Stassen had an opportunity today to pick up 15 delegates to the GOP National Convention in the Nebraskan preferential primary.
Two full slates of delegates were entered on the Republican ticket, one pledged to vote for the former Governor of Minnesota on the first ballot only, and the other pledged to the favorite son, Governor Dwight Griswold.
Although Mr. Willkie was out of the race, his name was still on the ballot, which was printed before he announced his withdrawal. Because of that fact, he was expected to draw a sizable vote.
The Nebraska primary vote means nothing in delegating authority to the convention. The delegates, once elected, may vote any way they choose. When chosen by slate, however, it is understood generally that the delegates will vote for the winner of the primary on the first ballot at least.
Illinois votes on MacArthur
Chicago, Illinois (UP) –
Gen. Douglas MacArthur was the only major presidential possibility whose name appeared on the ballot today in the Illinois presidential preference primary election.
Gen. MacArthur, whose name was entered without his consent, was opposed on the Republican ticket only by Riley A. Bender of Chicago, a political unknown and former boxer. There were no contestants on the Democratic ticket.
Preferences shown by the voters in the Illinois primary are merely advisory and not binding upon the delegates to the national conventions.
The principal Republican contests are for the nominations for U.S. Senator, Representative-at-Large and Secretary of State.