America at war! (1941–) – Part 3

I DARE SAY —
Hot dog!

By Florence Fisher Parry

War writers escape invasion incidents


Stoneman: Brave medics slain aiding their friends

By William H. Stoneman

Mustering out plan approved by Roosevelt

President also renews request for rest of his program


Roosevelt loses wen

Washington –
President Roosevelt disclosed today that he went under the knife at the Naval Hospital in Bethesda, Maryland, earlier this week for removal of a wen from the back of his head. He was in the hospital for about half an hour.

Four Yanks see Rome on 2-day patrol mission

‘Cat Eyes,’ ‘Bloodhound’ and ‘Strong Man’ get real Italian spaghetti
By Reynolds Packard, United Press staff writer

He died in ‘the thick of the fight’ –
Roosevelt leads nation in tribute to Clapper’s integrity and ability

Cabinet joins public and press in voicing loss
By Scripps-Howard Service

President Roosevelt and other leaders in any fields have paid tribute to Raymond Clapper, whose death in an airplane collision over the Marshall Islands was reported yesterday.

To Mrs. Clapper, Mr. Roosevelt wrote:

The tragic event which has brought such sorrow to you and the children emphasizes once more the constant peril in which correspondents do their work in this war. It was characteristic of Ray’s fidelity to the great traditions of reporting that the day’s work should find him at the scene of action for first-hand facts in the think of the fight.

I share personally the grief which has been laid so heavily on you and yours and offer this assurance of heartfelt sympathy, in which Mrs. Roosevelt joins.


Stephen T. Early, White House Secretary, said:

He died as he had lived – selflessly – impervious to personal danger, a working newspaperman, with one thought uppermost; to get his facts right where the story was hottest. Honest, upright, resourceful and industrious, he had the faith and courage of a great reporter. He was just that.


Secretary of State Hull:

I was privileged to know Mr. Clapper as a friend and held him in the highest esteem. He was one of our most eminent and distinguished journalists who earned the confidence and respect of the people.

Gen. George C. Marshall, Chief of Staff:

I have been shocked and distressed. During the past four years I had come to feel a sincere friendship for him and great respect for his integrity. He had seen much of the war on many fronts where he displayed the courage and adventurous spirit of a true soldier.

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau:

His writings had the quality of statesmanship.

Acting Secretary of War Robert P. Patterson:

His devotion to the broad welfare of his country made him one of the outstanding journalists of our time. The manner of his death indicated his willingness to accept any hazard in his search for truth.

Attorney General Francis Biddle:

…A great reporter, a fine writer and an honest critic – a newspaperman’s newspaperman.

Postmaster General Frank C. Walker:

**He fell in the line of duty well performed just as any brave soldier or sailor… He aimed solely at the truth, and his words carried the sincerity of his fine intellect…

Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox:

He was a great newspaperman and his sober, thoughtful reports will be sorely missed. We shall always remember him as a great friend of the Navy.

Secretary of the Interior Harold L. Ickes:

Raymond Clapper dealt in facts and his published opinions rested firmly on these facts as he saw them. While he might have remained at home in one of those comfortable strategic armchairs – telling us what was wrong or right with the way the war is being won, he elected to go where the lead was flying and find out first-hand. He was that kind of newspaperman.

Secretary of Commerce Jesse Jones:

He was a credit to the press.

Secretary of Labor Frances Perkins:

A great reporter who had both brains and conscience.

Lt. Gen. Carl A. Spaatz:

When he visited Africa, nothing was too difficult or too dangerous for him… He died exemplifying the motto of the great newspapers for which he write: “Give light and the people will find their own way.”

Roy W. Howard, Scripps-Howard Newspapers president:

Ray Clapper has written himself into a place in contemporary journalism to which no words of his associates can add luster. He graced a profession of which he was proud and which was proud of him. First, last and always a reporter, he valued fact about every element in the journalistic alloys which combine to make a daily newspaper. Integrity which was never challenged; strong convictions untainted by bias or prejudice; a tolerance so deep-rooted as to command respect even from those in complete disagreement, won for Ray Clapper the most enviable award within the gift of his fellow journalists, the title “newspaperman’s columnist.”

G. B. Parker, editor-in-chief of the Scripps-Howard Newspapers:

Reporting is the foundation of all good journalism – accurate, sincere reporting, interestingly written. Then there are the trimmings - interpretation

W. W. Hawkins, Chairman of the Board of Scripps-Howard:

…one of the very few truly great reporters. He actually fulfilled the dreams and ambitions of all newspapermen. He will remain a shining example.

Hugh Baillie, United Press president:

…one of the finest newspapermen of this generation… a fearless reporter in his personal contact with news figures as well as in his operations at the war fronts.

Kent Cooper, Associated Press general manager:

…a career marked by brilliance since his youth on the Kansas City Star. His earnestness and warmth of personality, his tolerance and fairmindedness won him affection and respect.

Barry Faris, International News Service general manager:

…further evidence of the terrific toll this war has taken in the ranks of the country’s foremost newspapermen. He was held in high esteem by the entire newspaper fraternity.

Lowell Mellett, executive assistant to the President and former editor of the Washington Daily News:

Ray’s death is a personal blow to millions. I know because I have seen the faces of people as they received the news. The faces not only of personal friends, of whom he had so many, but of others who knew him only as a name or a voice. He had become something important in our lives.

Peterborough, Diarist of the London Daily Telegraph:

American journalism has lost one of its ablest and most fair-minded columnists. He had a great gift for reaching conclusions that appealed to the sound common sense of the average American.

Byron Price, Office of Censorship director:

One of the great figures of journalism. Every newspaperman has lost a friend.

Elmer Davis, Office of War Information director:

A great reporter – a man of integrity. His death exemplifies the high courage of the men who are bringing the news from the fronts.

Bert Andrews, chief of the New York Herald-Tribune Washington Bureau:

The affection that his colleagues held for Ray Clapper is his best eulogy. His felloe workers not only respected him for his craftsmanship but loved him for the warmth that was in his great soul.

Charles Gridley, President of the Gridiron Club:

**For millions, he provided an invaluable sense of balance in his interpretation of national and world affairs. He was that rarest of individuals, a man without prejudices.

Arthur Krock, chief of the New York Times Washington Bureau:

His fatal errand was self-assigned. By no normal concept of duty was Ray Clapper obliged to run the risks of a war front again, risks he already had run and knew well. But his concept of duty was not normal, and he pursued it to a hero’s death, to the great loss of honest journalism and a vast audience which, knowing how honest that journalism was, respected and depended on it. Of him it can be said, as of very few of us who were his contemporaries, that he had at the end “a peace above all earthly dignities – a still and quiet conscience.”

Charles G. Ross, chief of St Louis Post-Dispatch Washington Bureau:

…One of the great reporters. People turned to his column because of its beautiful clarity and because they sensed its complete honesty and the hard and faithful work back it is. The column was a perfect expression, therefore, of the most wholesome things in what we call the American way of life.

Eugene Meyer, Washington Post publisher:

The Post is proud is have been the first to sponsor and encourage his column of comment… His honesty stuck out all over him. His application to the job at hand was unremitting. He has the strong body and sturdy mind that we associate with the best human products of our Midwest. He belongs in the hall of fame of America’s greatest newsmen.

Ernie Pyle:

Ray was a great newspaperman and a gallant human being. I am heartsick.

Walter Lippmann:

We have lost him when we are going to need him the most. He has perished in the act of preparing for the supreme work of his life, which was to make us see truly what this terrible war is, and to make us understand, while we still have the chance, how we can win it greatly. None can replace him, for the absolute honesty of his mind and his purpose had won for him the absolute confidence of all his colleagues and of the responsible public.

Lyle Wilson, chief of the United Press Washington Bureau:

Ray Clapper marched in the front ranks of his profession.

Mark Sullivan:

What made him utterly likeable as a man was the same quality that made him effective as a commentator. Among those who came in contact with him, his simple heartiness made friends and kept them; and in his writing this quality gave him persuasiveness. It enabled him to express his views with sturdy directness, but without stirring hostility on the part of those who differed with him – these not only differed with him – these not only respected him; they composed a large part of the immense circle of friends and admirers he had.

Ned Brooks, Standing Committee of Congressional Correspondents chairman:

The 600 members of the Washington Press Corps had deep admiration and respect for his ability and his devotion to the ideals of his profession. Freedom of the press had no champion more ardent.

Paul Wooton, White House Correspondents Association president:

In the exemplary work of Ray Clapper, the press has a fine legacy. He was enterprising, considerate, sincere. There was nothing reckless in his makeup, but as a matter of routine he flew across oceans and through flak so he could write more realistically. An ace of journalism has gone down.

John T. O’Rourke, Washington Daily News editor:

He has been an unfailing example of everything that is fine and decent and intelligent in newspapering. Millions will miss him, but none more keenly than his fellow newspapermen who know that his writing mirrored a warm and generous spirit, one incapable of dealing with anything but the truth.

Arthur Hays Sulzberger, New York Times:

Your loss is sustained by all newspapermen, as it is in fact by the while community.

Helen Reid, New York Herald-Tribune vice president:

I am heartsick. He was a fine craftsman and a beautiful soul.

James Wright Brown, Editor & Publisher:

He added distinction to journalism.

Herbert Bayard Swope:

Journalism has lost one of its strongest champions of all that is right and decent. He was never more needed than now.

Earl Godwin, radio commentator:

Ray Clapper spared himself nothing in his zeal for finding the truth, and he spared no one in the telling of it. We respected his ability; we revered his splendid fairness; and we loved his personality. Truly, the American people have lost a gentleman of the press.

Lowell Thomas:

The quality that distinguished Ray Clapper was his ability to remain in all circumstances and in spite of all temptations and excitements, unfailingly level-headed. Aside from being so brilliant, he was a swell fellow.

Raymond Gram Swing:

A clear-headed, practical servant of true democracy.

Fulton Lewis:

Every real reporter has the dream-ideal to be what I believe Ray Clapper was – honest, truthful, careful in the extreme not to use the power of his profession to I jure an innocent man, but equally determined without personal fear to tell the truth.

George Fielding Eliot, military expert:

He never wrote or spoke a phony word.

The Association of Radio News Analysts, in a resolution:

He raised the standard of both journalism and broadcasting.

Wendell Willkie:

He had the indescribable something that makes a reporter a great newspaperman.

H. V. Kaltenborn, radio commentator:

One of the great figures of American journalism… perhaps the most influential of Washington correspondents.

Majority Leader Barkley (D-KY), speaking in the Senate:

He died as a soldier in the cause of democracy.

Senate Minority Leader White (R-):

Mr. Clapper’s ending was a glorious one. He was on the battle line, serving the public for which he had labored for many years.

Sam Rayburn, Speaker of the House:

A great newspaperman.

House Majority Leader McCormack (D-MA):

He made a great contribution to American thought.

House Minority Leader Martin (R-MA):

Journalism has lost a great personality.

Thurman Arnold, Associate Justice of the U.S. Court of Appeals:

A fighting and courageous liberal. Those who knew him lose an unfailing source of inspiration and help.

RAdm. Land, Maritime Commission chairman:

A national loss.

Paul V. McNutt, Federal Security Administrator:

Three things marked him – honest, sincerity and ability. I am deeply moved.

Rep. George H. Bender (R-OH), addressing the House:

His ability to report objectively and without bias was typical of the best historical mind.

Rep. A. S. Mike Monroney (D-OK), a former newspaperman:

I know of no American whose judgment has been so consistently accurate.

Senator Ball (R-MN):

Even when he became a nationally-known columnist, he went out and got his news firsthand.

Senator Hatch (D-NM):

He was a brave man, a courageous man, and a man of honor and integrity.

Senator Hill (D-AL):

He was making outstanding contributions to the winning of the war and the building of a lasting peace. He gave his life for his country.

americavotes1944

New Deal foe supports Hull

Group to meet in St. Louis in April

Chicago, Illinois (UP) –
Harry H. Woodring, former Secretary of War in the Roosevelt administration, said in an address prepared for delivery today that a meeting of “anti-New Deal Democrats” would be held soon with the aim of preventing a fourth term and proposed Secretary of State Cordell Hull for President.

Mr. Woodring prepared the address for delivery before the Chicago Executives Club after he met with anti-administration Democrats from 23 states to plan a campaign to “oust New Dealers” from the party.

He praised President Roosevelt’s foreign policies and suggested that he be appointed to head the American delegation to the peace table.

Mr. Woodring, former Governor of Kansas, in an interview, declined to divulge details of the proposed anti-New Deal meeting but said it probably would be held in St. Louis before the middle of April.

Mr. Woodring said New Dealers by necessity would have to align themselves again with the Democratic Party. He added:

But if those factions fail to relinquish control of the party and continue their dictatorial tendencies, the true Democrats will take steps to prevent them from using the name Democratic Party, thus forcing the New Dealers to organize a party of their own.

Mr. Woodring said a poll conducted recently by Herbert Hoover showed that “71% of the people of the United States are tired of present governmental operations.” But, he added, they are divided between the Democrats and the Republicans.

Draft dodger Bergdoll let out of prison

Government closes books on wealthy fugitive of World War I


Appropriation bill reduced by $23 million

U.S. fliers downed in Yugoslavia rescued


British occupy Burmese town

RAF, U.S. planes attack Jap positions, river craft

americavotes1944

Senator Vandenberg supports MacArthur

Washington (UP) –
Senator Arthur H. Vandenberg (R-MI) said today that he favored Gen. Douglas MacArthur for President because he would be a “better commander-in-chief” than President Roosevelt – particularly “if by next November, we are concentrating on wiping Japan from the Pacific map.”

Explaining his support of Gen. MacArthur, Mr. Vandenberg opposed nominating a civilian on the Republican ticket on the ground that he would not be impressive against “Roosevelt’s ‘win-the-war’ appeal, and against ‘swapping horses,’ etc.”

Krupa’s ex-valet changes his story

Germans kill medic despite Red Cross sign

Yank machine-gunned as he tries to assist wounded men
By Robert Vermillion, United Press staff writer

americavotes1944

Democrats saved nation, new chairman asserts

Birmingham, Alabama (UP) –
The Democratic administration, “which has piloted us through the perils of the past decade, saved the nation and then gave it the strength and determination to defeat its enemies,” Robert E. Hannegan, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, said in a prepared address read here last night.

The speech, delivered at a Jackson Day dinner, was read by Edward W. Pauley, party treasurer, who earlier told newsmen that if President Roosevelt wants the nomination for a fourth term, “he’ll get it.”

Both Mr. Hannegan and Postmaster General Frank C. Walker, who was originally scheduled to make the address, were prevented from appearing, Mr. Hannegan because weather conditions grounded his plane in Washington and Mr. Walker because of a death in his family.

americavotes1944

Roosevelt praises ‘nerve’ of Willkie

Washington (UP) –
President Roosevelt admitted today that Wendell L. Willkie had more nerve than he had when it came to calling for higher taxes.

Asked during his news conference for comment on Mr. Willkie’s recent speech calling for higher taxation, the President said that he did not have the nerve to ask for $16 billion in new taxes, as Mr. Willkie did. With a smile, the President remarked that he had asked only for $10 billion.

He added that as far as Mr. Willkie’s statement and his own position were concerned, he thought they were thinking a little bit more about the next generation and not just this one.


Wallace on West Coast

Los Angeles, California –
Vice President Henry A. Wallace will arrive here today for a three-day tour of war industries and a series of speeches.

Sister Kenny: Requested to leave

americavotes1944

Lodge quits Senate to enter service

Washington (UP) –
Senator Henry Cabot Lodge (R-MA) today submitted his resignation from the Senate so that he may enter active military service.

Mr. Lodge is expected to become a lieutenant colonel. He has been a reserve officer and in 1942 had a tour of duty as a major with U.S. forces in the East Libyan desert – before President Roosevelt ruled that Congressmen could not serve in the armed services while still retaining their Congressional seats.

One report from Boston said Governor Leverett Saltonstall, a Republican, would resign and be succeeded by Lieutenant Governor Horace T. Cahill, a Republican, who then would appoint Mr. Saltonstall as Senator to succeed Mr. Lodge, whose term does not expire until 1949.

Mr. Saltonstall, here for an American Legion meeting, said he had known nothing about Mr. Lodge’s plan to resign and that he would consider the appointment “if and when” he resigns. Mr. Cahill described the report as “fiction and a fine fairy tale.”

Two Yanks amazed at Nazi ‘resistance’

Army commanders want more WACs

Washington (UP) –
Col. Oveta Culp Hobby, Women’s Army Corps director, says that “every commanding officer of every installation” she visited in England, North Africa, and Italy requested more WACs.

Col. Hobby and Lt. Col. Betty Bandel, senior air WAC officer, recently returned from an inspection of WAC overseas installations.

Col. Hobby predicted that WACs might follow invading armies once the lines and field headquarters are established, as they have in Italy. Of the approximately 3,000 WACs serving overseas, 350 are in Italy and about 2,000 in Africa, she said.

Even the sight of horrifying destruction in Italy failed to swerve the WACs from their duty, she said.

She said:

I didn’t see a WAC who wanted to come home.

Editorial: Ray Clapper

americavotes1944

Editorial: Two months late

It would be a fine thing if every person of voting age in the United States could vote this year at his home polling place.

It would be a fine thing if everybody could vote both in the primaries, which are straggled out from April to September, according to varying state laws, and in the November general election.

But the country is at war, and this isn’t possible.

It isn’t possible because millions of voters are fighting that war. Some of them are still in the United States, either in training or providing behind-the-gun service but they are scattered through hundreds of camps, depots, bases, stations and headquarters.

Millions of them are overseas, not only in Italy, England and New Britain, where the main fighting is going on, but at Pearl Harbor, in New Guinea, Algeria, Cairo, Iran, China, Burma, Australia, Bermuda, Panama, Brazil, Liberia, Tarawa, Alaska, Guadalcanal and hundreds of other places.

These men and women are not assigned their foreign stations, or their domestic bases, by geographical origin.

Members of the Armed Forces from Pittsburgh, as from every city, hamlet and township in the country, are distributed all over the world.

There are 48 states and 48 sets of election laws, widely different. To make it possible for each member of the Armed Forces to vote in strict compliance with the laws of his own state it would be necessary for the Army and Navy to suspend many other pressing war matters and detour an inconceivable amount of personnel and equipment to the job of distributing and collecting ballots from the thousand and one spots where American voters are stationed around the world.

Secretary of War Stimson and Secretary of the Navy Knox have said this is not possible. They have said the only way the Army and Navy can handle this problem is by making use of a “simple, uniform” ballot.

Some Congressmen and Senators dispute this. They say the whole matter can easily be handled by the Army and Navy despite the different systems, or by routine mail without any special help from the Army and Navy.

They could be right. But Mr. Knox and Mr. Stimson are in a better position to know. They have at their fingertips authoritative information from competent Army and Navy officers, at home and afield. They are familiar with the overall picture. And they have demonstrated a sincere interest in this problem.

How can we do else than accept their advice?

We have a letter from a Wilkinsburg naval officer, now overseas, who attempted to vote in the 1943 local election. Here is what he said:

My ballot for Nov. 2 election arrived Jan. 2. I didn’t even bother to fill it out. Personally, I’m quite disgusted. It was mailed Oct. 18. Whether it was the Navy’s fault or the fault of the Board of Education, I don’t know. But I do know that if ballots are held up for the presidential election, there’s going to be an awful howl raised by the men overseas. I wish something could be done about it.

Something can be done about it. Congress can do something about it. And Congress had better do it soon.

americavotes1944

Editorial: Straight thinking from Willkie

Wendell L. Willkie’s views of fiscal policy, as set forth in his New York speech, are thoroughly sound. Unless we maintain vigorous economic health, we can neither play a successful major part in world affairs after the war nor realize our hopes for social gains and higher living standards here at home.

An economic bloodstream composed largely of debt will eventually starve all the cells in the body.

It has been said before that our standard of living will have to come down during the war. Mr. Willkie proposes to force it down by tax increases that would net twice the amount asked by the Treasury, about six times the amount voted by Congress.

We wish Mr. Willkie had been more specific as to what taxes he would lay. But he was thinking straight when he advocated, in general, ruthless levies on every dollar in every income group, leaving the American people only the actual necessities of life, in order to pay the costs of war while the war is being fought, to the limit of our ability.

This, he says, is only simple justice to the men who are doing the fighting; it is the way to save our standard of living in the future.

Expressing greater faith in the people than some others have shown, he predicts they would bear the burden willingly if given a clear understanding of the issues involved, and if assured that their money would not be wasted.

He recognizes, also, that the post-war period will present an entirely different problem. Then our desired objective will be to stimulate the flow of goods and services, the taking of risks, the creation of millions of peacetime jobs. Then will come the time for minimum rather than maximum taxes. And then the fiscal policy should be, not to impose the highest possible tax rates, but to provide the highest possible income so that relatively modest rates can provide necessary revenue.