America at war! (1941–) – Part 3

Leaders of the second front –
Man who beat Luftwaffe in 1940 leads fighters under Gen. ‘Ike’

Leigh-Mallory hailed as victor in Battle of Britain in England’s dark days
By Boyd Lewis, United Press staff writer

A handful of Allied leaders will lead millions of soldiers in the “second front” against the Nazis on the continent of Europe. Who are these men? Where are they like? Are they capable of the big job before them?

In this, the fourth of a series of articles, Boyd Lewis of the United Press tells the story of Marshal Leigh-Mallory, the hero of the Battle of Britain, who haws been chosen by Gen. Eisenhower to command the air fleet that will help the Allies back to France.

When the American, British and Canadian armies swarm across the English Channel in their supreme assault upon Hitler’s “Fortress Europe,” a quiet-spoken, dapper, middle-aged former lawyer will sit in a secret headquarters somewhere in England directing the greatest air armada in the world’s history.

For Air Marshal Sir Trafford L. Leigh-Mallory, Allied air commander-in-chief under Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, that will be an historic day.

As his planes hammer the enemy’s stronghold and provide an umbrella of protection without which the ground assault would not be possible, he will be reliving the Battle of Britain, when, as commander of the famed Fighter Command Group No. 11, he was one of the men chiefly responsible for saving Britain from invasion.

Prime Minister Churchill said of the RAF:

Never have so many owed so much to so few.

The Spitfires and Hurricanes exacted so punishing a price from the German Air Force for its bombing that it was compelled to call off its mass raids when a few more weeks of smashing attacks upon British industrial centers might have turned the tide of the war.

Predicted disaster

The dark-haired, trim-mustached ex-barrister had organized his forces coolly and helped produce a result which he had forecast. He had said before the outbreak of war:

Although the enemy may send over very large numbers, I believe that with the organization we have, the enemy’s efforts would not last very long.

In August 1942, he made further impression upon the Allied Command by organizing the fighter umbrella thrown across the Channel to protect the skies over the famous Dieppe Raid, an operation which dragged the wary Luftwaffe off the ground and cost it 170 planes.

To airmen, Marshal Leigh-Mallory’s appointment caused no surprise because he is famed among them as one of the most capable and methodical of air chiefs.

He is 50

The public was inclined to ask, “Who’s he?” Marshal Leigh-Mallory has always sought to avoid the spotlight, even to the extent of not disclosing his age in Who’s Who. He is 50.

Had it not been for the First World War, he might have spent his life in the wig and robe of a lawyer instead of the uniform of a commander of fighter pilots. He had a typical “upper middle class” education at Haileybury College and studied law at Cambridge.

In August 1914, he joined the army. Two years later, he joined the Royal Flying Corps, then in its infancy. He was awarded the Distinguished Service Order for service in France.

When peace came, Leigh-Mallory turned his back on the law and decided to make a career as an air officer. He was commissioned a squadron leader. For several years he commanded the School of Army Cooperation. He is married and has two children.

Progress is steady

His progress was like his methods – steady. Outbreak of this war found him a vice marshal in command of Fighter Group 11. He has stuck with the fighters across the Channel in relentless sweeps which have all but driven the German planes out of the sky during daylight.

His dogged philosophy is illustrated by recent advice to British air cadets:

When we have our “downs,” don’t get the jitters. We can take it and we mean to go on taking it until we have defeated them.

A year ago, he issued this Christmas order of the day:

Best of luck in 1943 and damnation to the Luftwaffe.

It was a prophetic order: The RAF had excellent hunting in 1943. Now it is ready to carry rout Marshal Leigh-Mallory’s further orders and bring “damnation to the Luftwaffe” so that the Allied forces may fight under friendly skies.

Maj. de Seversky: Fall of Pantelleria, Schweinfurt toll are landmarks of military aviation

By Maj. Alexander P. de Seversky

Phone records shattered by war demands

Bell Company reports new highs in installations, long-distance calls

Völkischer Beobachter (January 7, 1944)

Stalin läßt Willkie rüffeln –
Moskau lehnt jede USA-Einmischung in Osteuropa ab

Auch die schüchternste Anfrage von Neuyork durch die Prawda frech zurückgewiesen

Nur die Juden sind in Nordafrika zufrieden –
Große Erbitterung über die Besatzungstruppen

U.S. State Department (January 7, 1944)

Prime Minister Churchill to President Roosevelt

London, 7 January 1944

Secret
No. 536

Prime Minister to President Roosevelt. Personal and most secret.

Bedell Smith and Devers came through here morning of 5th. Bedell told me that he and Montgomery are convinced that it is better to put in a much heavier and broader OVERLORD than to expand ANVIL above our pre-Tehran conception and that he is putting this to Eisenhower and your Chiefs of Staff…

It also seems to me from what I heard very probable that the Y Moon (see my immediately following) will be at the earliest practicable date. I do not see why we should resist this if the Commanders feel they have a better chance then. At Tehran, however, COS recommendation was Y1 or one day earlier which you and I agreed to express more agreeably as “During May.” In conversation with UJ we never mentioned such a date as May 5 or May 8 but always spoke to him around 20th. Neither did we at any time dwell upon the exact phase of the operation which should fall on any particular day. If now the Y date is accepted as final I do not feel that we shall in any way have broken faith with him. The operation will anyhow begin in May with feints and softening bombardments and I do not think UJ is the kind of man to be unreasonable over 48 hours.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The Pittsburgh Press (January 7, 1944)

TRAIN HITS BUS; 27 SOLDIERS DIE
8 others hurt at main gate of air base

Men killed at Kingman, Arizona, as they return from gunnery practice

Yanks smash back Nazis

Breakthrough onto Rome road imminent as Axis resists bitterly
By C. R. Cunningham, United Press staff writer

U.S. bombers plaster Reich

New, secret device used by Fortresses

On New Britain –
Japs slain by hundreds as Marines push advance

Yanks gain slowly and tediously as foe puts up ‘toughest resistance’ on isle
By Don Caswell, United Press staff writer


New Yank ace now missing

Relatives confident Maj. Boyington is ‘safe’

May fly 600 miles an hour –
New superspeed plane uses jets, no propeller

U.S., Britain announce fighter already tested in several hundred flights
By Reuel S. Moore, United Press staff writer

I DARE SAY —
Writing is a funny business

By Florence Fisher Parry

Unfaithful wives blasted by chaplain

Warships wait as 17,000 strike to aid painters

CIO union wants Navy to take Cramp plant; pickets active


Rift develops within ranks of rail unions

Three unions denounce two other groups for ‘desertion’

Spread of strikes cited in argument for Richberg plan

West Virginia Congressman is impressed by comments from Armed Forces; sees labor harming itself
By Rep. Jennings Randolph (D-WV)

americavotes1944

Ex-Akron mayor may snub jury on ‘Hopkins letter’

Washington (UP) –
C. Nelson Sparks, former Mayor of Akron, Ohio, said today he may stand on his constitutional rights and refuse to surrender to a federal grand jury the original copy of a letter purportedly written by Harry Hopkins, President Roosevelt’s No. 1 adviser, predicting that Wendell L. Willkie will be chosen the 1944 Republican presidential nominee.

Mr. Sparks made his statement after the Department of Justice announced a grand jury will begin an inquiry next Wednesday into circumstances surrounding the letter, which Mr. Hopkins has branded a forgery.

Poll: Willkie faces sharp fight in Midwest

Indiana, home state of 1940 GOP candidate, favors Dewey
By George Gallup, Director, American Institute of Public Opinion

‘Aggressive defense’ against invasion believed planned by German generals

Allied armies may face rocket bombs and zones of mines
By Thomas M. Johnson, special to the Pittsburgh Press

Markley: Jap shot down by Foss fired at major in boat

By Morris Markley, North American Newspaper Alliance


Gen. Arnold: Three-fourths of Berlin razed

‘We’ll finish the job, too,’ air chief pledges

americavotes1944

Editorial: Wartime voting needs

Secretary of War Stimson and Secretary of the Navy Knox have laid down a number of minimum requirements which they believe essential to any soldier-voting plan.

The secretaries sent their recommendations to the Council of State Governments, obviously with the idea that the Council would distribute them among the states.

The requirements which Mr. Knox and Mr. Stimson say are necessary to enable the Army and Navy to carry out an election among the members of the Armed Forces are reasonable and to the point.

They say, in effect, they can’t stop the war while soldiers and sailors vote, but they also say the armed services will do everything in their power to carry out whatever laws are enacted.

But the necessary provisions which they have outlined should be sent to Congress because it is Congress which must enact the basic legislation if there is to be any uniformity in an election among the Armed Forces, or for that matter any election.

Congress resumes sessions Monday and a suitable arrangement for enabling the Armed Forces to vote should be the first order of business.

The purpose of the plan, however devised, is to give the 11 million men in the Army and Navy an opportunity to vote and any method which is so restrictive that it bars any of these men, save possibly those in actual combat at the time the vote is taken, will be satisfactory.

The only way to guarantee that all, or nearly all, of these men will be supplied with appropriate ballots is to set up a uniform system. As Mr. Knox and Mr. Stimson point out, they cannot adapt the military facilities to 48 different systems.

It would be impossible for the states to get together in the next few weeks, or even months, on a uniform voting plan. It is relatively simple for Congress to act. Congress should waste no time in being about it.