America at war! (1941--) -- Part 2

Bankhead Bill opponents warn –
War bond subsidy may start U.S. in advertising field

Measure could open Treasury to successive extensions of program and pile up large bill for taxpayers
By Robert Taylor, Press Washington correspondent

A Pacific second front now!

Delay enables Japanese to dig in
By Gilbert Cant

Pegler: New York police salary

By Westbrook Pegler

Clapper: Double talk

By Raymond Clapper

Governor receives ousted reporter

Editorial: The power to subsidize–

Editorial: OPA – still a hot seat

Editorial: Stimson-Marshall statesmanship

Edson: Aerial combat inventions will aid civil flying

By Peter Edson

Ferguson: Mrs. Jimmy Doolittle

By Mrs. Walter Ferguson

Move to ‘terrify’ public is charged to coal operators

Union says mine owners are exaggerating cost of meeting UMW demands; review of ‘Little Steel’ formula hinted

CANDIDLY SPEAKING —
The myth of Paris!

By Maxine Garrison

Millett: ‘Back seat driving’ takes harmony out of marriage

By Ruth Millett

New power pools maintain output at arms plants

By Roger W. Stuart, Scripps-Howard staff writer

Elimination of corporate taxes at war’s end urged

Paper charges class at Pitt gets ‘red line’

‘Don’t stop revolutions’ advice to Army group cited

Völkischer Beobachter (October 23, 1943)

Ein weiter Weg bis Rom

Amerikanische Verluste am Volturno: 7,000 Mann

Beiderseits verstärkte Kräfte –
Japans Angriff auf Neuguinea

The Pittsburgh Press (October 23, 1943)

YANKS CRUSH GERMAN COUNTERATTACK
Clark seizes height above enemy’s line

8th Army also scores; torpedo boats rip Axis shipping off Italy
By Richard D. McMillan, United Press staff writer

Poll: Women favor own drafting for war jobs

Majority think they should be taken for non-combat tasks
By George Gallup, Director, American Institute of Public Opinion

The old saying, “it’s hard to guess what’s on a woman’s mind,” would seem to apply especially to Congressmen in Washington.

Many Congressmen and others have shied away from proposals to draft women for the WACs, WAVES and other organizations because of the fear that women would resist such a step.

Yet when the women were interviewed, it was found that they are overwhelmingly in favor of drafting members of their own sex for non-fighting jobs before drafting married men with families.

This was disclosed in a nationwide study just completed by the Institute in which men and women in every state were asked the following question:

The Army can either draft 300,000 single women ages 21-35 for the WACs for non-fighting jobs, or it can draft the same number of married men with families for the same work. Which plan do you favor?

The vote throughout the country is:

Think single women should be drafted 73%
Think married men with families should be drafted 19%
No opinion 8%

Even more interesting is the vote of the single women themselves. Here is a table showing the vote of single women, as compared to that of married men, on the issue:

Single women Married men
Think single women should be drafted 72% 70%
Think married men with families should be drafted 23% 21%
No opinion 5% 9%

The vote of all women, including that of many mothers with daughters who would be affected under such a draft, shows an even more favorable sentiment toward taking single women in the place of fathers:

Think single women should be drafted 77%
Think married men with families should be drafted 16%
No opinion 7%

The Army would like to have as many as 500,000 WACs. To date, the volunteers have totaled less than 100,000.