America at war! (1941– ) (Part 1)

Background of news –
New and secret weapons

By Editorial Research Reports

The United States has one or two new secret weapons of air warfare which will deal “paralyzing” blows to the enemy, Gen. Arnold, chief of the U.S. Army Air Forces, announced Sunday.

Prior to 1939 predictions were rife that any new war would be completely annihilating, and quickly. Although some of these horrendous forecasts revolved around airplane bombing, and others around disease germs, most of them were concerned with the use of gas. Yet gas seems so far to have been used little in the present war – whether or not because the defense is known to be adequate, or because the results are not expected to be very effective, or because of fear of reprisal.

So far the new weapons of war developed in World War II have been the parachute battalion and the transport plane. (Barrage balloons might be considered entirely defensive.) The enormous new airplanes and tanks, after all, had their counterparts, albeit embryonic, in 1914-18, and the same thing is true of the far-ranging submarine. Two of the new weapons of war used in the last war have largely fallen into disuse in this one – the lighter-than-air Zeppelin and poison gas.

Airplanes were used in World War I largely for reconnaissance. Such bombing of cities from the air as occurred was largely from Zeppelins.

The submarine in German hands was highly effective for some time, especially when used without restrictions.

Some historians of the First World War declare that Germany did not possess, even in 1918, enough submarines for use both as commerce destroyers and as adjuncts to the fleet – perhaps one reason for keeping the German fleet in port after the Battle of Jutland. And the convoy system, for the development of which Prime Minister Lloyd George is usually given chief credit, finally met the U-boat challenge adequately.

Poison gas was first used, by the Germans, in April 1915 against the British line in Belgium, around Ypres. It seems to have been chlorine gas. The effect was devastating, but the German army leaders had placed little faith in gas, and were not prepared to follow up the havoc which it caused.

In 1916, at Verdun, the Germans used phosgene gas, discharged from shells, but by this time the Allies had developed defenses against gas. In fact, the British themselves had used gas in September 1915 and were aided by the fact that the prevailing winds in Belgium and northern France blew toward instead of away from the German lines.

But it was the tank which was the most effective new weapon of warfare. Winston Churchill, while First Lord of the Admiralty, was largely instrumental in having the tank manufactured in quantity.

A few tanks, first called “landships” were used by the British at the Battle of the Somme, in September 1916; the results led the Allies to begin manufacturing them on a large scale. In November 1917, the British again used tanks, but were not prepared to follow up the success. By the summer of 1918, when the German force was spent, the tank was in the forefront of the spearheads which Foch drove into the German line.

Returning sailors say –
Coolidge sunk by U.S. mines

Transport goes down off South Pacific port

2 more battleships to join fleet soon

Allied troops mop up enemy on Buna front

Japs ordered by Hirohito to resist to the last man
By Brydon Taves, United Press staff writer

Defeated Senator due for price job

Millett: Teachers invite revolt by ban on girls’ slacks

Women’s war work attire is certainly nothing to arouse educators’ protest
By Ruth Millett

CANDIDLY SPEAKING —
Whoa! Vanity changes coming too fast

By Maxine Garrison

Roving Reporter

By Ernie Pyle

WITH U.S. FORCES IN ALGERIA – After two days of loading American soldiers aboard our troopship, and of hosting aboard thousands of bedrolls and barracks bags, at last we sailed.

It was a miserable English day, cold with a driving rain. Too miserable to be out on deck to watch the pier slide away. Most of us just lay in our bunks, indifferent even to the traditional last glance at land. Now it was all up to God – and the British Navy.

Our ships carried thousands of officers and men and a number of Army nurses. I felt a little kinship with our vessel, for I’d seen it tied up under peculiar circumstances in Panama two years ago. I never dreamed that someday I’d be sailing to Africa on it.

The officers and nurses were assigned to the regular cabins used by passengers in peacetime. But all the soldiers were quarters below decks, in the holds. The ship had once been a refrigerator ship, and now all the large produce-carrying compartments were cleared out, and packed with men.

Each compartment was filled with long wooden tables, with benches at each side. The men ate at these tables, and at night slept in white canvas hammocks slung from hooks just above the tables.

Water from 7 to 9, and later

It seems terribly crowded and some complained bitterly of the food, and didn’t eat for days. Yet many of the boys said it was swell compared to the way they came over from home to Britain.

Sometimes I ate below with the troops, and I’ll have to say that their food was as good as ours in the officers’ mess, and that was excellent. Some crowding is unavoidable. It’s bad, but I don’t know how else you’d get enough men anywhere fast enough.

The worst trouble was a lack of hot water. The water for washing dishes was only tepid, and there was no soap. As a result, the dishes got greasy, and some troops got a mild dysentery from it. The American Army officers, much to their credit, continued to raise so much hell about the ship that by the time we left it, things were in much better shape.

In our cabins, we had water only twice a day – 7 to 9 in the morning, and 5:30 to 6:30 in the evening. It was unheated, so we shaved in cold water. The troops took lukewarm saltwater showers, by Army order, every three days.

The enlisted men were allowed to go anywhere on deck they wished, except for a small portion of one deck set aside for officers. Theoretically, the officers weren’t permitted on the enlisted men’s deck, but that soon broke down. We correspondents could go anywhere we please, being gifted and chosen characters.

Instructions for “battle stations” in case of attack were issued. All officers had to stay in their cabins, all soldiers had to remain below. Troops in the two bottom decks, down by the waterline, were to move up to the next two decks above them.

Only we correspondents were to be allowed on deck during an attack. Being useless as well as gifted, we were honored with the divine right of getting ourselves shot if that’s what we wanted.

To Murmansk or America?

We correspondents knew where we were going. Some of the officers knew too, and the rest could guess. But an amazing number of soldiers had no idea where they were bound.

Some thought we were going to Russia over the Murmansk route. Some thought it was Norway. Some thought it was Iceland. A few sincerely believed we were returning to America. It wasn’t until the fifth day out, when the Army distributed advice booklets on how to conduct ourselves in North Africa, that everybody knew where we were going.

The first couple of days at sea, we seemed to mill around without purpose. Eventually we stopped completely, and lay at anchor for a day.

Finally, we made rendezvous with other ships and then at dusk – five days after leaving London – we steamed slowly into a prearranged formation, like floating pieces of a puzzle drifting together to form a picture. By dark, we were rolling, and the first weak ones were getting sick at their tummies.

Clapper: Adjustable peace

By Raymond Clapper

The truth about a ‘doctor shortage’

Commissioned doctors can be moved
By Peter Edson

WLB will act on boycott which hampers magazines

House report cites serious lack of steel

Materials shortage seen retarding military programs

Isn’t that a war crime? Or can you fire on retreating soldiers?

1 Like

U.S. Navy Department (December 18, 1942)

Communiqué No. 223

South Pacific.
On December 17, a force of Army “Flying Fortresses” (Boeing B-17), escorted by “Airacobra” fighters (Bell P-39) attacked the Munda area of New Georgia Island. Results were not reported.

Navy Department Communiqué No. 222 announced that 12 Japanese “Zero” fighters had been shot down in the vicinity of New Georgia Island on December 16. A correction has been received from the South Pacific stating that the number shot down was 3 instead of 12.

Communiqué No. 224

Pacific and Far East.
U.S. submarines have reported the following results of operations against the enemy in the waters of these areas:

  1. One large tanker sunk.
  2. One large cargo ship sunk.
  3. One medium-sized tanker sunk.
  4. Two medium-sized cargo ships sunk.
  5. One medium-sized transport sunk.
  6. One trawler sunk.

These sinkings have not been announced in any previous Navy Department communiqué.

The Pittsburgh Press (December 18, 1942)

SALES OF GASOLINE HALTED
OPA to allow war workers limited fuel

They will be able to cash in only one coupon at a time

British pound split army on Libyan coast

Subs blast three Axis ships; U.S. fliers strike hard in Tunisia

Bulletin

North Africa –
Air fighting became heavy over the Tunisian front today as Allied and Axis forces raced to bring up supplies for the battle for Tunis and Bizerte.

Roosevelt rankled –
Reporter gets Nazi Iron Cross

President gives medal for column he disliked

Henderson resigns –
OPA head bows to farm bloc

Congress wins final round in 4-part deal

War closes in on home front

Food, gas, business and education are deeply involved
By the United Press

House group scores OPA regulations

Small business firms facing extinction unless bureau relents