The Pittsburgh Press (February 18, 1946)
Secrets of atom bomb leak out, endangering American supremacy
Lack of legal guards for confidential information cited by Army officers
WASHINGTON (UP) – Army experts today expressed grave concern at what they termed “multiple leaks” of closely-guarded atomic bomb secrets.
Maj. Gen. Leslie R. Groves, chief of the bomb project, declared that the nation has lost more security on the bomb during the past four weeks than during the entire wartime development period. But he declined to specify source of the leaks.
Other Army sources warned that hitherto top-secret information is “constantly slipping out,” and contended that the leaks endanger this nation’s supremacy in the atomic field. They said no adequate legal protection for the vital information now was available.
Canada pushes probe
These views were expressed while the Canadian government continued investigation of the disclosure of secret and confidential information to a foreign mission at Ottawa. It was denied at Ottawa that atomic information was involved in the Canadian leaks.
Columnist Drew Pearson said last night that atom bomb secrets did constitute the “confidential information” supplied Russia by a Canadian spy ring. He added that a Russian agent was permitted to sail from Seattle with a suitcase containing the data.
Parliament warned
He said in his weekly radio broadcast that the incident had brought a “showdown” in U.S.-Soviet relations and convinced many officials that “we cannot go on appeasing Russia.”
In London, L. J. Solley, Labor member of Parliament, warned that the Canadian round-up of spies endangered scientific thought and constituted “anti-Soviet propaganda.” Others speaking at a conference on science and welfare declared that a factor in the Canadian situation was failure io share scientific knowledge on a worldwide basis.
Army sources cited what they considered two chief ways in which bomb information has slipped out. These are.
In these hearings, Army sources say, witnesses cannot discuss atomic subjects or argue their own views without inadvertently releasing valuable information the witnesses, they say, have gone into technical aspects of the problem which have contributed little to congressional attempts to establishing a control policy – but which have jeopardized security.
Allegation denied
This allegation drew heated denials from committee sources. They pointed out that witnesses repeatedly have been warned not to divulge confidential information in public hearings. One source, pointing to voluminous printed testimony, declared that no atomic knowledge hitherto regarded as confidential has been made public. Committee members, he said, carefully have withheld questions that might divulge valuable technical information for private committee sessions.
Since V-J Day, Army sources say the principle of “compartmentalization” – no one person knowing all the atomic bomb secrets – has been breaking down. Provisions of the Espionage Act are inadequate to check the flow of information, they said.
Kept secret during war
Some committee members and scientists appearing before the group have urged a breakdown of “compartmentalization” as a step forward in peacetime application of atomic energy.
Authorities declined the specify other sources of leaks, explaining that such action merely would point attention to the leaks and further weaken security.
During the war, it was maintained, there was “absolutely no talking” about atomic matters. One officer said the situation now was “similar to two boys discussing an auto – they never stop.”